VCDQuality Forums - Stuart Little 2 *READ NFO* - TELECINE

Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Stuart Little 2 *READ NFO* - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=7431)

Posted by Jeff on 08-30-2002 12:08 AM:

good tc screener
videocd isnt my fav but this is good quality
good job

Posted by svenbob on 08-30-2002 12:17 AM:

I have to say with ever release VideoCD is gaining more and more of my respect, especially to label this by its "real" name... read the nfo.... extremely interesting... this is great... VideoCD has a bright bright future

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-

Posted by realized on 08-30-2002 12:22 AM:

VideoCD sucks

its true, bad groups can have one or two random good releases. i mean don't stupid ppl sometimes say smart things ? Yes once in a blue moon it does happen..

VideoCD doens't know how to encode, still doesn't know what a aspect ratio is, doesn't know the diffrence between a telesync and a screener and doesn't know when to stop.

Sure , if they start pre'ing good releases then i will give them the respect they deserve.. for now they are still a waste of bandwidth and hard disk space..

I think we should invite all the VideoCD, oSB and A-TEAM people and teach them how to encode.

-realized

Posted by [RaZoR] on 08-30-2002 12:29 AM:

hmm a telecine with a counter ? hmmmmm.....

__________________
no idea

Posted by TeAr-Dr0p on 08-30-2002 12:37 AM:

nope . . .

they took the UTi cam . . . dif sound source

and used that ticker they put in el diablo

Posted by svenbob on 08-30-2002 12:48 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by [RaZoR]
hmm a telecine with a counter ? hmmmmm.....

read the nfo

Posted by StonyVision on 08-30-2002 12:48 AM:

hrm.. well by the info it seems there learning allot and i think uti did a great rip but if this is a Tc screener it aught to have better sound wouldnt you think???

Posted by Wesb0b on 08-30-2002 01:02 AM:

Fucking moron you cant add a ticker like that. Id like to see you add one.

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-30-2002 01:42 AM:

Re: VideoCD sucks

quote:
Originally posted by realized
its true, bad groups can have one or two random good releases. i mean don't stupid ppl sometimes say smart things ? Yes once in a blue moon it does happen..

VideoCD doens't know how to encode, still doesn't know what a aspect ratio is, doesn't know the diffrence between a telesync and a screener and doesn't know when to stop.

Sure , if they start pre'ing good releases then i will give them the respect they deserve.. for now they are still a waste of bandwidth and hard disk space..

I think we should invite all the VideoCD, oSB and A-TEAM people and teach them how to encode.

-realized

I love people like you, who feel they know everything about the VCD scene, and continually make themselves look like morons to the rest of us, because they are completely clueless in all aspects.

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-30-2002 01:53 AM:

this group should be banned from the scene, not only are they one of the worse, but they steal other peoples work!

uti should whoop your asses!!

please never ever release anyhting again. i hope you stop for all of us

Posted by svenbob on 08-30-2002 01:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Wesb0b
Fucking moron you cant add a ticker like that. Id like to see you add one.

sorry wes, its actually kinda easy.... crop it out of a diff movie and boom, there ya go... but yeah rappa... chill with the forum comments.... we fight in groups ;-)

Posted by svenbob on 08-30-2002 01:58 AM:

also, look at this release, and the UTi release, and you notice that this release is somewhat scrunched, whereas the UTi is not, cannot be the same source

Posted by OwNaGe86 on 08-30-2002 02:04 AM:

This is stupid, you guys must be blind! UTi's cam of this was no where close to the picture quality of this release. you guys are just a bunch of cry baby bitches! If your gonna flame so bad and act like you could rls shit 10x better why dont you start a group? go ahead go get all the movies you want and start rlsing! as for me I appreciate VideoCD's rls's they are bringing watchable rls's of movies, and its pretty fast too. so if you wanna flame and say this is UTi's rls go to the eye doctor and get a check up.

Posted by kindrid on 08-30-2002 02:17 AM:

if u havent seen the sample dont comment!

so many eeediots in this forum
if u had watched samples from uti and this release u wouldnt have the gaul to claim they are from the same source

everyone seems to have a theory on what the source is who stole what from who ,how bad someones encoding is

screener or telecine dont really matter if u post here claiming this is a camera set up in a cinema copy with or without direct sound then please leave now ,u know nothing about vcds.

all u eeediots who claim this is a telesync or cam (both are cameras set up in a cinema to record the big white screen at the front) go learn something about vcds i noticed alot of posts in the XXX screener forum about how that was a telesync and will probibly get some posts about it in here infact i think i read some above how it was uti's cam just go away and come back when u learn somethign about vcds ,was funny to read at first but now u are just gettign anoying claiming to know everything but u know very little

read up on cams and telesyncs (or do like everyone else does ,watch some vcds and watch the sample ,not look at the jpg)
jpgs are good for 1 thign only to see if the vcd has any anoying watermarks on the screen and if so how big (i.e avenging angelo 1st version) not to see if its a telesync or see the quality of a movie
the source of this dont matter if its screener or telecine one thing for sure is all the ppl who been in the vcd scene for a long time know right away that this isnt a telesync or a cam

u really have entertaind us with your lame posts but telling us the same joke over and over it just aint funy no more leave this forum before other newbies get infected with your pathetic views on vcds thus spreding to other newbies which by the way is what i think happend to all u eeediots

Posted by CraZY8 on 08-30-2002 02:20 AM:

LOL UR A JOKE

okkk if your SO SMART tell me what aspect ratio they used
and what should HAVE been used
lets see what u kno
and tell me why, cuz ur just some kid shouting wolf

Posted by vorbis on 08-30-2002 03:21 AM:

this release is obviously of a better standard than Utis given the different sources. Also can we stop with the absurd notion that a group would actually ADD a counter to a movie. Does anybody realise how stupid this sounds. It would be like saying some groups add mandarin subs to their movies.

Posted by mag22 on 08-30-2002 04:31 AM:

I've watched the entire UTi release with my kids... the sound was hollow but the visuals were very nice. I also remember reading UTi's .nfo about their honest labeling of a "cam" although it exceeded most TS's quality. No direct audio is simply no direct audio. Honestly I'm getting tired of all this mystery bullshit about what kind of release it is. I could care less what name it is given, only how close to DVD quality it is. I think the board standard needs to be in comparison to DVD quality, not other TS's, Screeners, and Cams. Do you really care what the groups call it? A good looking sample is just that. This isn't a job where jabbering technical jargon that is equally useless will keep you employed. Hey boss, it works or it doesn't.

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-30-2002 08:00 AM:

yti's release was perfect, unless the complainers complaining about hollow sound is playing there stuff on an apex, then you get what you pay for!!

uti release was perfect!

this release is useless and wasted everyones time!!

kill this group!

p.s. this is not complaining. this is called a voiced opinion

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-30-2002 08:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by gallonFREAK
this group should be banned from the scene, not only are they one of the worse, but they steal other peoples work!

uti should whoop your asses!!

please never ever release anyhting again. i hope you stop for all of us

Could you really be more stupid? UTI releases CAMs, I don't understand the logic of being on some groups dick who rlses cams. This is in no way close to the same source as UTI's.

Posted by AlterEgo on 08-30-2002 03:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by gallonFREAK
yti's release was perfect, unless the complainers complaining about hollow sound is playing there stuff on an apex, then you get what you pay for!!

uti release was perfect!

this release is useless and wasted everyones time!!

kill this group!

p.s. this is not complaining. this is called a voiced opinion

Do you know how stupid you sound? You think that it only has hollow sound on an Apex? A cam is a cam and that's the way it is. If you don't know the difference between a cam, ts and TC then go to vcdhelp. They have the definitions there. Until you understand the difference, you will always sound like a moron. Apex has nothing to do with UTi's cam sounding hollow. As for this rls, good job. NIce pic and sound. Props deserved for it.

Posted by ensain on 08-30-2002 03:36 PM:

Haha, its funny how VideoCD confess to not knowing the source. "At least UTi label their films correctly" thats because UTi actually know what the source is , because they were the ones that pressed "Record" in the theater. The closest VideoCD and the rest of their lamer groups have got to that feeling is when they hand their cash over to the man at the market every sunday morning. You try sneaking your (lack of) cameras into the theater, then I'll give you props. Until then, why give a shit about any release thats just taken from a pressed disc they obviously have no idea about, not even the source. Its funny seeing the words "SCREENER" etc tagged to the side of these releases, as if they had the actual VHS. VCDQuality should add a little logo for whenever a group uses an asian source. It'd probably be the most overused image on the site!

As for the release, who gives a fuck. If I wanted it I'd have got it from their sources, and not have to pay for the 2 CDRs.

The day the VCD scene gets any respect is the day that the 10mbits drops these pointless groups. Their sources cost less than a dollar to buy, and you get pressed discs and colour artwork. And if you don't know where to get these, then thats a shame. Maybe A-Team/VideoCD/MD etc should just release onto xdcc chans, as anyone higher up has no need for crappy asian rips.

RE:The whole adding a ticker/screener messages : no problems.

Props to TCF, UTi, TEG, and all the DVDRiP crews (both prerelease and classic) for actually making this scene an actual scene, not just a place where kids can race eachother for the same releases that OTHER people have made. I believe tNb do their own stuff (Ive not seen their releases) ? Well no matter what the quality, at least those guys gave it a shot, which is more than this group and the rest of the lamers will ever do.

Posted by whitehat on 08-30-2002 04:12 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ensain
as anyone higher up has no need for crappy asian rips.

you mean there's a better quality rip out on "the scene" now?

then >>shame on you, VideoCD, for releasing something into the scene that theres already a better quality rip of out to "the people who matter" <<

if not, then yes, there is a place even for "crappy asian rips", atleast for the people who apreaciate(sp?) them

__________________
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.

Posted by K-FleX on 08-30-2002 06:02 PM:

ViDiEO CD ROX U FUCKEN MOFOS GET A FUCKEN LIFE IF U DUN LIKE THE QUALITY DONT DOWNLOAD BUH DONT TRASH THA GRP....THESE SCENE GRPS BRING U ALL THESE NICE MOVIES IN THE FIRST PLACE IF U THINK U CAN DO BETTER TRY BITCHES AND U WONT LAST A MOFO DAY

....EZZZ

VIDEO CD FOREVER

Posted by K-FleX on 08-30-2002 06:03 PM:

FuCK UTi They RLS shit after its not wanted ....FUCKEN CAMs

Posted by pHo on 08-30-2002 06:08 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by K-FleX
FuCK UTi They RLS shit after its not wanted ....FUCKEN CAMs

quote:
Originally posted by K-FleX
WTF this is the best cam i have ever seen .....UTi Rox when it comes to cams heh too bad tehy take a while for rlsing shit heh

otherwise amazing grp eZZZ

/me puts on his trollspotting vision

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by Dr. Poo PhD on 08-30-2002 06:11 PM:

I hadn't downloaded any other version of this movie, but wanted to wait so that my friend of the girl persuasion could catch a decent one and this one soundly sufficed for that. I'd say it's a 8/7/"don't really give a crap".

Thanks VideoCD. You made my life easier. If there were only bad versions of this movie to watch after promising to get her a good one, there would have been some indefinite sleeping in the doghouse. =(

Thanks for letting me sleep in my bed guys (and/or gals). =)

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-30-2002 06:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ensain
Haha, its funny how VideoCD confess to not knowing the source. "At least UTi label their films correctly" thats because UTi actually know what the source is , because they were the ones that pressed "Record" in the theater. The closest VideoCD and the rest of their lamer groups have got to that feeling is when they hand their cash over to the man at the market every sunday morning. You try sneaking your (lack of) cameras into the theater, then I'll give you props. Until then, why give a shit about any release thats just taken from a pressed disc they obviously have no idea about, not even the source. Its funny seeing the words "SCREENER" etc tagged to the side of these releases, as if they had the actual VHS. VCDQuality should add a little logo for whenever a group uses an asian source. It'd probably be the most overused image on the site!

Is it possible for you to be any more stupid? If you read that nfo properly, you'd clearly see that VideoCD said they didn't know what to label it because of the way the scene works. They said numerous times it was a TC, but also a pre-retail TC screener. Also, if you think this was an asian source, go look at Minority Report TC from TCF, that one has been out in asia for over a week. Do some fucking research before you spout off pointless stupid crap.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 08-30-2002 07:32 PM:

I don't know what I have to think about these releases anymore, it is very well possible this is from a genuine screener tape from the same source as xXx because both movies are from columbia pictures.. Secondly it is very easy to add a timer to a movie by yourself if you have the skills and the soft. But now start labelling screeners as telecines.. I don't think this is a improvement, when someone labels something as a screener you can expect a counter/mpaa warnings/blurred serials/.. but when someone labels something a telecine you except a genuine telecine (full screen) no serials/counters/warnings and all that shit just like the new telecine from minority report! Respect to TCF for superb releases and 99% of right labelling! when it comes from a real screener it stays a screener even if the video distributor got it from a telecine machine! Anyway respect to videocd for the great releases I do enjoy them and hope they keep the work up!

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-31-2002 12:51 AM:

no need for 900 stuart littles!

its a fucking movie of a damn rodant, get a life

if you cant watch uti's with any problems, you must need to get a life, its a damn mouse...

nothing wrong with the sound or vid. on uti's

unless you people got walleye vision and waxed ears!

get a life, we dont need 900 versions of a mouse movie

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-31-2002 11:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz
I don't know what I have to think about these releases anymore, it is very well possible this is from a genuine screener tape from the same source as xXx because both movies are from columbia pictures.. Secondly it is very easy to add a timer to a movie by yourself if you have the skills and the soft. But now start labelling screeners as telecines.. I don't think this is a improvement, when someone labels something as a screener you can expect a counter/mpaa warnings/blurred serials/.. but when someone labels something a telecine you except a genuine telecine (full screen) no serials/counters/warnings and all that shit just like the new telecine from minority report! Respect to TCF for superb releases and 99% of right labelling! when it comes from a real screener it stays a screener even if the video distributor got it from a telecine machine! Anyway respect to videocd for the great releases I do enjoy them and hope they keep the work up!

well first of all, I'm surprised your able to type with uti's dick so far down your throat, but on to another note. UTI's was a cam, granted there is no need for another cam or ts of this movie, but a TC screener? I definitely think it was a good rls to do, hell if you want to talk like that there was no need for a Minority Report TC or a Star wars Ep2 dvd..stfu gallon.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 08-31-2002 04:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Azrael626

well first of all, I'm surprised your able to type with uti's dick so far down your throat, but on to another note. UTI's was a cam, granted there is no need for another cam or ts of this movie, but a TC screener? I definitely think it was a good rls to do, hell if you want to talk like that there was no need for a Minority Report TC or a Star wars Ep2 dvd..stfu gallon.

Hey dickhead, I wasn't even talking about UTi, haven't mentioned their name at all, and I didn't say this release wasn't needed neither, I was just saying it should be called SCR and not TC..

Learn to read before you start to reply!!!!

Posted by Azrael626 on 09-01-2002 01:48 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz

Hey dickhead, I wasn't even talking about UTi, haven't mentioned their name at all, and I didn't say this release wasn't needed neither, I was just saying it should be called SCR and not TC..

Learn to read before you start to reply!!!!

Your actually completely right Dark, I apologize, I was intending to quote Gallonfreak and I must have hit your post instead. My apologies.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 09-01-2002 03:18 PM:

By the way sorry for the dickhead, was just in a little wade of anger Wasn't ment really

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 PM.

Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page