VCDQuality Forums - Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets *PROPER* - TELESYNC

Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets *PROPER* - TELESYNC - iNTENSE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11321)

Posted by DX-WWE on 11-21-2002 06:33 PM:

Ummm 1/1/1 WTF

Silly Little Tw*ts It Looks Good A Bit Dark But is the Best i have Seen So Far Dunno What U Peeps think

I Give It 7/7/8

I Hate Flamers No Point In it, Its All FREE Dont Be a Biatch

DX-WWE Loves THe WWE

Posted by Ferret44 on 11-21-2002 06:38 PM:

great thats all we need another recode group, shame u guys forgot to remove the bit where some bloke stands up in the theatre on the first disc.... oh did i forget to mention that it was exactly the same place as the UTI cam aswell that it happens.

obvious recode with slightly better colour dont waste your time.

Posted by Klownicle on 11-21-2002 06:43 PM:

I plan to get this if I come across it but im not going to go out of my way. I would like to watch a nice looking version of this. Just a tad bit better video wise, don't know audio thoe. If its a reencode im guessing id be the same.

:: how the hell can u compare video if u can't see it moving ? lol -pHo

Posted by [dj-mike] on 11-21-2002 06:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Ferret44
great thats all we need another recode group, shame u guys forgot to remove the bit where some bloke stands up in the theatre on the first disc.... oh did i forget to mention that it was exactly the same place as the UTI cam aswell that it happens.

obvious recode with slightly better colour dont waste your time.

recode LMAO this is nothing like the UTi cam this is the best version out up too now easly

7/8/7

Posted by j0h2n on 11-21-2002 06:48 PM:

Hmmm...

Posted by siri_uk on 11-21-2002 06:51 PM:

3 cd's for a TS seems a bit OTT

Posted by petrocs on 11-21-2002 06:57 PM:

er..nothing in the nfo to say why or how its a proper
I wont profess to have seen this yet cause I havent and I dont think jpg's should be the reason for voting since this is vcdquality and not jpgquality so I will hold judgement until I see it
but as everyone knows a reason for the PROPER should always be included in the NFO.

Posted by reelnewbie on 11-21-2002 06:58 PM:

uti and ftf versions were fine. no need for anything else until scr (preferably dvd)

Posted by Astaroth on 11-21-2002 06:58 PM:

Finally a version worth watching The other two were pure garbage. Im getting this now 7/7/8

Posted by kap0n3 on 11-21-2002 07:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth
Finally a version worth watching The other two were pure garbage. Im getting this now 7/7/8

that was a joke right ?

__________________
"As far back as I can remember, I've always wanted to be a gangster." -- Henry Hill, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1955.

Posted by Xiphi on 11-21-2002 07:21 PM:

hmm 3cds... i think ill wait for the svcd release.. gues that will be next year but who cares..

i saw the cam and it was very watchable.

Posted by Astaroth on 11-21-2002 08:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by kap0n3

that was a joke right ?

No the joke was on us when you got the uti and ftf versions both a waste of time

Posted by PlasticSpoon on 11-21-2002 08:29 PM:

I saw the sample. its just a dark scene...the rls isn't darka nd is better than the others.

8/8/?

Posted by Swimj on 11-21-2002 08:42 PM:

ummmm, it was nuked for a reincode like on four of my sites, dont bother

Posted by nicothepimp on 11-21-2002 08:49 PM:

astaroth doesn't know what the hell he's talking about... i haven't seen this version... but there was nothing wrong with the uti version (except the 30 seconds of silence at the end of the first cd).... the quality and the sound was great!

Posted by brr8760 on 11-21-2002 10:09 PM:

quote:
Finally a version worth watching The other two were pure garbage. Im getting this now 7/7/8

You're either a) a member of this new reencode group, or b) a complete imbecile. The other versions were fine, particularly the UTi version, this reencode is not needed, and no reason for the *proper* is given in the nfo.

I think the answer is clear---> c) all of the above.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.

Posted by Astaroth on 11-21-2002 10:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
You're either a) a member of this new reencode group, or b) a complete imbecile. The other versions were fine, particularly the UTi version, this reencode is not needed, and no reason for the *proper* is given in the nfo.

I think the answer is clear---> c) all of the above.

LOL well moron you just keep getting you lame cams of kazaa ok. How can you suck on utis dick like that you all know the sound on utis is pure garbage. FTF is better but not by much atleast this is a real TS and not mislabled. I hate these p2p lamers and newsgroup whores who think they know shit about releases and groups. brr8760 why dont you and that shadyrapper2 or whatever get together and have a circle jerk while watching UTIs shitty version.

Posted by Xiphi on 11-21-2002 10:58 PM:

Why are people always bitching around here.. just have some respect for each other. Be glad this stuff is around and its for free.!
just give your opinion and leave it at that.

Posted by crapper on 11-21-2002 11:11 PM:

picture ... dark.. grind.. 7 more 6.5

sound.. it doesnt sound hollow like the uti but i cant tell from the sample if the source is an edited source or the same.. sounds nice 7

nice one..

maybe the best.. i dont know if this one is complete but 3cd's is a bit much..

im gonna stick to the uti cam..

Posted by Faceman on 11-21-2002 11:12 PM:

Maturity level around here has to raise.

Mislabeled Proper.

Posted by DrOmango on 11-21-2002 11:33 PM:

MAN WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU@?@?@? rencode or not, whatcha gonna do about it? Well you cant do crap!!!! so might as well stop whining, post good feedback and what lacks (actually how about no caus that part will lead for some lame rencode excuse)
and best of all, leech this movie, best release yet!!! 7/5/10

Posted by [dj-mike] on 11-22-2002 12:20 AM:

this is no way a reencode if watch the sample you will see UTi's release was very nice, the ftf was a little better and this on is a littler better then the ft one, sounds is fine video is not bad (still the best out)

nice 1st release for a new group

Posted by KaMa on 11-22-2002 01:00 AM:

jeesus is everyone from this damn group posting here ... i mean jeezus this Movie quality sucks UTI is fucking fine ..

Posted by PlasticSpoon on 11-22-2002 02:03 AM:

they are damn good reencoders. I need help from this group...where's the button in tmepg to restore audio not found on the UTi release...and the not fucked up beginning

Posted by d0l3m1t3 on 11-22-2002 02:33 AM:

the only thing worse than a reencode is a reencode group that doesn't even give a reason for the proper, then gets all their members to come in here saying we're "sucking UTi's d!ck". do your own g0ddamn work, morons. it's obvious who they are.

the UTi release was perfectly fine for an prescreener release. UTi's been making decent ORIGINAL contributions to the scene, you guys are just llamas

Posted by shadyrapper2 on 11-22-2002 04:17 AM:

nice quality for a new group.

hope this wont be a group that doesn 1 release and quits from VCD and only does DVD.

Posted by Astaroth on 11-22-2002 05:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by shadyrapper2
nice quality for a new group.

hope this wont be a group that doesn 1 release and quits from VCD and only does DVD.

LOL!! this isnt a new group cmon you been showing your newbness all over the forum lol

Posted by Bakkoda on 11-22-2002 06:43 AM:

Well I think callin UTis rls garbage is a bit much. Like callin madona a virgin but back to the point. STFU and talk about the movie on which your posting. This isn't about UTis rls or any others.

5 on the pic cuz its a little dark but its still clear. 6 on audio. No reason for this rls but thanks anyway.

Posted by DarkFireX on 11-22-2002 08:04 AM:

Put simply...

This release is watchable so deserves credit. But on the other side of things there wasnt a need for a proper a screener should have been next IMHO. uTi's release was better in quality and thus to call this a proper should have been nuked. But thats just my 2 cents...as I said good release guys just didnt need a proper.

5/6/9

Posted by PhAnToMs on 11-23-2002 02:18 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by siri_uk
3 cd's for a TS seems a bit OTT

how is that odd for a ts it can happen depending how long the movie is u shoulda said 3 cds for a 2cd vcd movie is a bit odd but u didnt so...

8/7/9 the uti was fine for me till the dvd scr or rip

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message

Posted by baseballplyr7 on 11-23-2002 02:21 AM:

thats gay! 3 cds for harry potter when other teams have 2 cd and fit the whole movie. its not like its an SVCD TELESYNC. its just a plain ts.

definetly a newbie group

Posted by baseballplyr7 on 11-23-2002 03:48 AM:

why 3 cds? its not like its a SVCD TS thats a long ass movie. cmon now

Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-26-2002 11:32 PM:

RE: Re-encode.

The noobs here are funny, posting stuff like "how can it be a re-encode if the audio is better?"

You know, it's MUCH easier to get a good audio sample and pair it with a filtered video footage after the fact than it is to get both done together the first time.

Anyone with any experience with video editing can tell you noobs that audio can be paired up with video very easily. Chances are, this group sat with plugs and recorded the better audio, and just tied it all together.

I can't tell you HOW many times I've had to fix audio matching for a movie I've downloaded... used to happen all the time. Now, you sure the hell don't see ME releasing every movie I fix, do ya?

If you MUST be on this group's jock, why not at least reserve your drool buckets for their next release? See if they can uphold their "standards".

Posted by RisTar on 11-27-2002 07:56 PM:

Best i ever seen for now

well its a bit dark but its better then purple like in the XV release
And even better then A-Team , A-Team Releases to colorfull so
I think this is the best releases for harry potter and the chamber of secret , Get it !!! 8/7/9

Posted by RisTar on 11-29-2002 12:37 AM:

next msg

well ppls i got all the harry potter 2 releases and let me tell u something iNTENSE is the best release i saw it on my dvd player and the video quality is just like VHS quality the sound is better then the other releases but not perfect like the video , the sample is a little dark because this is a dark part the rest of the movie is perfect ! get this release
10/8/10

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page