VCDQuality Forums
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Blade 2 - SCREENER - TEG-VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=3293)


Posted by gnosis on 05-30-2002 07:45 PM:

teg is doing good on the screeners, but they suck with all those messages scrolling around everywhere

keep em coming teg


Posted by MaSTaBLaSTa on 05-30-2002 07:46 PM:

damn 3 serials (or anything other they gotta hide) on 1 tape
but other than that quality is pretty sweet


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 08:29 PM:

there are no teg-serial-blocks, they blurred them away this time. nice!


Posted by gangsta on 05-30-2002 09:27 PM:

yo

sup with the 3 blurred spots in it? it's nice if not for them.


Posted by Ren on 05-30-2002 10:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PenisXX
there are no teg-serial-blocks, they blurred them away this time. nice!


NICE?? it looks bloody awefull


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 10:33 PM:

eh...? no, it doesnt.


Posted by Nick on 05-30-2002 10:38 PM:

SERIAL?

can i ask what is a SERIAL?...


Posted by Ren on 05-30-2002 10:56 PM:

eh, what?? damn you need your eyes testing


Posted by NeRo on 05-30-2002 11:05 PM:

lol

i agree with Ren. That blurred shit makes this release a piece of shit, and anyone in their right mind would say the same thing. i mean, wtf? lol DUH


Posted by krazyfoo on 05-30-2002 11:12 PM:

i prefer blurs over blocks.. but whatever :P
least its not Teg 0wnz J00


Posted by Cerial on 05-30-2002 11:20 PM:

it any better than the svcd pdvd?


Posted by Generation X on 05-30-2002 11:23 PM:

how come there isn't any jpg samples for this or death to smoochy both appearing today on vcdquality. did they stop now or did they not get the samples or something? and i also preffer the blurring over the blocks.


Posted by PenisXX on 05-30-2002 11:27 PM:

you guys are all so incredible lame, it's really amazing. what do you exspect? dvd quality? do you know what screener tapes are? they get tagged with serials for a reason. the quality of this vcd is pretty nice, video is great and sound as well. do you think grps would stop blocking serials just to please you morons? damn, get a life. if you dont likle the screener, don't get it. the serial-blur is mentionerd in nfo and you can see it in sample so just shut the fuck up and be happy someone rlses anything to you loosers.


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 05-30-2002 11:51 PM:

Teg Should really make this a SVCD the Quality will go Right To Top good movie but need release it on SVCD

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by Ren on 05-31-2002 12:12 AM:

lmao, go back to dalnet


Posted by Gurpinder on 05-31-2002 12:17 AM:

this screener looks horrid. looks washed and nasty and blurry. i like tegs idea of blurring rather than blocking out the watermarks tho. i dont really think it made much difference for this fift generation tape (or whatever they used) but its a good idea. Teg is definetly an excellent group, but this and spiderman wasnt up to their usual standards.

if this sounds ungreatful, dont get me wrong. i appreciate their releases ALOT. but this one was shit.


Posted by PenisXX on 05-31-2002 12:27 AM:

hahaha, Ren, you're so leet. quick, shortbus is waiting.


Posted by NeRo on 05-31-2002 02:59 AM:

PenisXX...

dude i don't think anyone was bashing TEG for releasing this. lol - the only thing lame is how sometimes people feel the incredible need to appear superior. I don't know about you, but my dick is a good size lol. know what i mean? we are supposed to give our opinions on the release so long as we don't try and flame a group, and I think that was exactly what was being done. basically, i'm just saying that you should calm your little ass down a bit, buddy lol. Just relax, this isn't that serious to be calling people losers and lame and shit cause they don't like big ass blurs in a release.


-=NeRo=-


Posted by Generation X on 05-31-2002 03:08 AM:

this is more terrible than the first release by some group i forget who was. it was a ts too that first release which is weird cuz screeners are usually better (correct me if i am wrong). well bad quality, but the blurring is a good idea. should have gotten the sample instead of the first part. oh well nothin's perfect at least it's watchable at that small 100% size.


Posted by gnosis on 05-31-2002 03:12 AM:

bah!


Posted by PenisXX on 05-31-2002 03:12 AM:

i dont care if people bash TEG or or not, i dont like the attitude of people exspecting something dvdlike when a tagged screener is rlsed. movie companies tend to tag more and more because of the growing piracy, so guys have to live with it. if they dont like serails-blurs they should wait for dvdrip, but exspecting a tag free tape when there is none is plain idiotic.


Posted by gnosis on 05-31-2002 03:20 AM:

right!
well usually tagged movies can be taken out because its usually put on the bottom of the screen, so tmpgenc comes along and you can easily remove it with the frames, now these screeners teg got scrolls all the way up like movie credits with alot of stupid gibberish like contacting the mpaa and the # and all......
maybe a different screener will come out somewhere else i dont know, maybe its the same everywhere else...i dont know

to me its no big deal because, i plan on going striaght to the source with the movies that are screeners right now, and thats when the dvd comes out, i have patience i guess


Posted by ensain on 05-31-2002 04:27 AM:

HAHA

Glad to see PenisXX is still doing the rounds, he always used to crack me up when i read before. Your bias is truly incredible, i dont think i've read you say a nice word about any one other than TEG ever!

I plainly refuse to download TEG as a moral issue. Im not going to bash them if i then watch and enjoy the film later on, im not a hypocrite. I guess this is TEGs one month of the year where they actually release semi decent stuff? Altho admittedly half of the releases are heading DVDwards soon anyway, I'd personally rather wait.

Keep replying PenisXX you keep me in stitches. The funny thing would be if you weren't a member, and were actually just a group whore. I really hope thats not true, cos thats really lame.


Posted by sincere116 on 05-31-2002 06:21 AM:

my opinion

yea the blur spot tend to be annoying but hey it's free


Posted by Zipomatic on 05-31-2002 08:04 AM:

Well....

I've been reading the opinions posted here, so I thought I would give my unbiased view. This screener is average, yes the blurred tags are noticable, but not as bad as the usual black boxes, and personally after watching for a couple of minutes, I don't notice them (the same goes for subs on a movie)

To all of the people who are labeling this movie "shit" I'm really not sure where you are coming from. The quality is average for a screener, not great, not poor. It has blurs, but as other people have said, it says so on the NFO and you can clearly see them in the sample.

Maybe I am out of line in saying this, but it pisses me off when people complain about every little thing wrong with a release. Some people seem incapable of overlooking things and enjoying the movie, or the fact that it has been released at all for free. This movies is a tagged screener. There WILL be tags showing in some form. All you people want is perfect quality on every release, well I hate to be the one to break it to you, but if that were the case then there would be very little released at all.

Like the old cliche goes "It's free, stop bitching. If you don't like it, don't download it"


Posted by Ren on 05-31-2002 09:27 AM:

I was going 2 say something, but I cant be assed, apperantly im l33t and slagging TEG off, realy shows the mentality of some 1 dosent it.....

**EDIT**

BTW, stop saying its free, I think by now we all know this, hell all I said is that the 3 blur blocks made it unwatchable to me


Posted by moviebootlegger on 05-31-2002 11:45 PM:

y da hell yall flamin on teg. this rls is good its a screener. sorry to say for u centropy lovers but their rls of this sucked. it was blurry as hell. teg is awesome. i dont care about serialz i think next time they should jus leave em in. its prolyl less hassel on them to leave them anyways. well teg ownz all with screeners so those who r bitchin jus wait for centropy to rls the quality teg does. (which is never) ;-)


Posted by KaiKo on 06-01-2002 01:40 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
i dont care about serialz i think next time they should jus leave em in. its prolyl less hassel on them to leave them anyways.


there's a reason they take them out you know... maybe you should think about it....

or do you want me to enlighten you?


Posted by MystLurker on 06-01-2002 04:14 AM:

Four words for MovieBootLegger: Sources and Law Enforcement. Think about it.

Haven't finished my d/l of this yet, but what the big deal with everyone bashing TEG. Hell they have had 10x releases of any other group in the last month and most are of fairly decent quality. If you don't like the blured serials then don't download the flippen movie. You can say you dislike them and that it lowers the quality of the movie, but other than telling how it affects the quality don't flame a group because you don't like how they operate especially when that is how they HAVE to operate. Sometimes I wonder how old some of you are. As of lately I would assume some of you to be no older than 10.


Posted by bbrain on 06-01-2002 06:32 AM:

it was awite

i thought this rls was cool.. the movie was a lot more clear than previous ones, sound was good too. the only thing someone can complain about is the serial boxes.. which is not TEG's fault.. so yea.. good release.
and my opinion on the free thing.. they are not 'free' in the sense that bandwidth is money right?
one


Posted by Odaiba2 on 06-01-2002 01:27 PM:

No screener tags

I dont know but I think I have a better version that all of you.
One thing, I see no screener tags. The quality is blur like you say but I still see NO tags.

I guess I got mine from a different release group because I think the one I have is better.

Anyway, one good DAM movie!!!!!
-Odaiba


Posted by rodney on 06-03-2002 02:30 AM:

are the serials through the whole movie? i got the sample and they are all the way through the samples


Posted by DGR on 06-04-2002 10:45 PM:

Hmmm, is it me or is the movie kinda... shocky.

It isn't smooth, not on my dvd-player nor on the puter. Quality is ok, blurring the serials is a nice way to get rid of em... but the movie just doesn't play smooth. Anyone else with the same prob?


Posted by Odaiba2 on 06-05-2002 02:47 AM:

Blur Serials

Can someone explain what you mean by blur serials?
I dont see any serials on my copy. Is it because the serials are blurred?

-Odaiba


Posted by DGR on 06-05-2002 11:41 AM:

There are 3 blurry blocks in the release... top right, top left and on the bottom. Those HAD serials (or something) and they are blurred away hence the blurry/blurred serials


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20 AM.
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.