VCDQuality Forums
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- National Security - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13826)


Posted by Azzkicker on 01-18-2003 01:02 AM:

sandstorm


Posted by backoff on 01-18-2003 01:09 AM:

Hmmm ESOTERiC hasnt been doing well on their TS's lately, but who knows this may be great. I will respond when I see a sample.


Posted by Beaster on 01-18-2003 01:16 AM:

lol first guy to vote votes 1,1,1 lol kinda hard to hide that!!! moron... getting sample now will rate when its done

watched sample, i guess i am used to all the dvd scr's, but this is definitly watchable, 6\5\?


Posted by nvr on 01-18-2003 01:16 AM:

Guess were back to the TS's again. Not too bad from sample and I wanna see this movie!

7/7/?


Posted by rappa on 01-18-2003 01:21 AM:

picture is slanted, sound is pretty nice, not an amazing telesync, definetly a silver, 5/5

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by semaj8686 on 01-18-2003 01:25 AM:

Saw JPEG and decided to get the sample...Not too bad..pretty watchable. will wait for proper or maybe even longer for screener or dvd scr.


Posted by n0th1ng on 01-18-2003 01:33 AM:

watchable and thats all....dont dl if you wnat quality


Posted by THING on 01-18-2003 01:51 AM:

i've just grab the sample and this is almost as bad as the other three. eso i really like u guys a lot but come on u guys are starting to make ftf look good. where are the ts groups at? come to the rescue and realese something plz. because esoteric is not the same


Posted by likwid8 on 01-18-2003 01:51 AM:

Yes maybe a proper would be needed


Posted by blitzed on 01-18-2003 01:52 AM:

puke

i thought ftf was gone judging from the slanted crop on this thing i say esoteric is the new ftf damm what you guys would do for $$$$$$$$$$


Posted by hoozdapimp on 01-18-2003 02:06 AM:

wtf...4.5 only? i think we have all gotten a little to used to dvd scr's...get used to the TS's again, screener season is coming to a halt.


Posted by Rep- on 01-18-2003 02:22 AM:

the slant is noticable, but doesn't effect the movie THAT much. Its pretty clear and the sound is decent too. A little dark and the slant but thats all. You guys seem to think there will be a dvd screener in 2 weeks of this movie or something. Well guess what, there won't. This will most likely be about as good as they get, maybe, just MAYBE, we will get a UTi or TCF version of it, but this isn't half bad. Those screeners are spoiling you guys! After watching CD1, I must admit, the movie is stupid, with Martin Lawrence's typical slapstick homor. heh


Posted by OldSchool on 01-18-2003 02:53 AM:

Thumbs up

This is a lot less cammy than a lot of the "TS"s lately. Picture is decent, and sound is a little hollow but still very understandable. For a TS: 6/5


Posted by eminemfan898 on 01-18-2003 03:55 AM:

a new slanted ts of this movie. looks good . who knows if ill pick it up.


Posted by bmvtoys on 01-18-2003 04:17 AM:

Picture is fine on this release, but the audio is terrible...the first few minutes of the movie have audio disappearing and reappearing. You may wanna wait till the audio is fixed to d/l this movie..


Posted by gslicedivx on 01-18-2003 05:32 AM:

looks like average telesync....thanks for the release though


Posted by OzZyOz on 01-18-2003 06:14 AM:

this isn't no fucking 5/5/? u fucking people dvd scr's are gone out the fucking window shit u fucking vote on this like its a shitty TS and its a totaly fucking watchable one shit welcome back to the fucking world of TS!


Posted by brr8760 on 01-18-2003 07:11 AM:

Watched the first ten minutes. Serious audio problems, including sync and disappearing sound. Okay picture. Hope something better comes out. Props for speed.

Also, based on the first ten minutes, Martin Lawrence is a jaw-droppingly racist mo'fo'. His "crazy black man who hates whitey" schtick is in full bloom here.

Edit: CD2 starts out great -- real nice picture, not bad sound.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by a1catraz on 01-18-2003 08:43 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by backoff
Hmmm ESOTERiC hasnt been doing well on their TS's lately, but who knows this may be great. I will respond when I see a sample.


foo..

1st of all..why u postin if u havnt seen the sample in da first place?
2ndly of all.. wesb0b was most likly fukin around
3rdly of all.. for slant 5.5/6/5

pz


Posted by 100%nUkE! on 01-18-2003 08:56 AM:

hey-the pic and sound is like the usual silver-esoteric releases - watchable but not better than 6/5/?.......(while 6 is max )


Posted by tearz on 01-18-2003 09:15 AM:

Great rls

and even greater, FTF isn't newhere to be found on the VCDQuality main page! woohoo, finally they may have stopped releasing for publicity, or all together RELEASING


Posted by bhagangstaz on 01-18-2003 11:16 AM:

yay silvers! i just luuuuuv them ;P


Posted by CinapS on 01-18-2003 02:11 PM:

Heh : Not bad Release besides the lil flicked angle and the fucked audio . But i guess some people dont feel the want for quality.

6.4.7


Posted by djkoolaide on 01-18-2003 04:11 PM:

hmm i guess not bad for a silver...


Posted by djkoolaide on 01-18-2003 04:11 PM:

hmm i guess not bad for a silver...


Posted by xBeeFeRzx on 01-18-2003 05:49 PM:

...

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
this isn't no fucking 5/5/? u fucking people dvd scr's are gone out the fucking window shit u fucking vote on this like its a shitty TS and its a totaly fucking watchable one shit welcome back to the fucking world of TS!


I totally agree with you there ozz. Everyone got so spoiled by all the dvd scr's that they forgot bout tellesyncs and now everyone thinks that its not watchable because its not a dvd scr. I haven't seen sample yet but ill pick it up soon.


Posted by your name her on 01-18-2003 09:07 PM:

good rls cept for the annoiying ass J watermark and the slant of the cam i still think this is a good rls jus my 2 cents

6/6/?

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by DownTheSun on 01-19-2003 01:34 AM:

quality is ok
sound is out of sync


Posted by brr8760 on 01-19-2003 02:17 AM:

WARNING: Both disks end before they should, disk one apparently 3 minutes (it says eject on the frozen screen), and disk two before the credits, maybe during the last scene when Lawrence is talking.

Just helping y'all out.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by Stabbe on 01-19-2003 04:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by 100%nUkE!
hey-the pic and sound is like the usual silver-esoteric releases - watchable but not better than 6/5/?.......(while 6 is max )


6 Max for what?? for a TS? a TS can be 10 if it´s done right, we have different formats , DVDRIP , Telesync , TeleCine ,Screener , Cam . We have to judge on the format, not all together.

__________________
"i think i am getting hacked. my modem lights are flashing..."


Posted by VW-Russia on 01-19-2003 06:47 PM:

My first post here.....
Just burned it and watched.. Did not have access to a sample..
I would honestly give this movie 8.0/5.0/9.0 for Video/Audio/Movie
respectedly


Posted by Klonin on 01-19-2003 08:22 PM:

CDs are full

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
WARNING: Both disks end before they should, disk one apparently 3 minutes (it says eject on the frozen screen), and disk two before the credits, maybe during the last scene when Lawrence is talking.

Just helping y'all out.




If you edit the 3 minutes of the eject menu at end of each disc it will fit on one CD. Movie is complete. Sound is screwed at start of CD1 but movie is all there.

6 - Video
6 - Audio
7 - Movie


Posted by xcdr on 01-21-2003 01:22 PM:

they shouldve released this as a CAM. poor quality. sound is missing , out of sync. in the begining of the movie in the corner something is moving. the sound when it coems back is good though. ill probably pick up the other ts .


Posted by ReLoC on 01-22-2003 11:27 AM:

yep yep another "just ok" ts-eso release ........but cant expect too much......didnt look like they were workin with a whole lot





®Ë|öÇ
öñË


Posted by joekker on 01-22-2003 06:18 PM:

Is it me or is the left side of the picture askew?!? Nonetheless so-so movie at best. 4/5/4


Posted by nitemare on 01-23-2003 08:30 AM:

6/5/6

pic was ok. very watcheable. no complaints

sound - this is where is suffered. lots of voices out of sync with sound with annoyed me the most. and in the beginning there was NO sound!. but the rest was fine..so it made up for it.

movie - better than expected. martin was martin. i like him. what the problem is? what your name is? is should start talking like that and see the reaction! this movie was much better than "the hours" which i saw last night. def. watch this one for some laughs!


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 AM.
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.