VCDQuality Forums
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Charlies Angels: Full Throttle *SVCD* *GRP REQ* - TELESYNC - NOX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=22651)


Posted by tWiZtEr on 06-30-2003 08:47 AM:

:: Don't Judge on the jpg, nor make a post bout the rls as for this jpg is misleading.


Posted by vcdking on 06-30-2003 08:50 AM:

quality looks good but movie still sucks 7/8/-1000


Posted by T-H-E-W-H-O on 06-30-2003 08:52 AM:

wow

i'm speechless. Good job boys, you dishing out sum hot shit. keep up the good work. 8/7


Posted by Jc100 on 06-30-2003 08:53 AM:

Ignore the above. Lamers who jpg judge.... Um yea wow thats talent. Sound is horrible and muffled. Unclear and pic is dark and blocky... Royal POS... Enjoy the posts above LMAO. You'll see how lame they are when ya view sample.


Posted by brr8760 on 06-30-2003 09:07 AM:

Actually, Jc100 *accurately* described the sample

Yeah, the sound is so wretched that I'm not going to bother d/ling the rest. Picture quality is so-so, at best, and I'm being generous, as usual. This is one of those occasional times when jpegs are REALLY misleading.


Posted by SharkE- on 06-30-2003 09:14 AM:

EXCELLENT RLS. I got the sample and video is quite clear bbetter than any other rls group, sound is above average i'd igive it a 9/9/*NA* CTP Got some competition?


Posted by Semtex on 06-30-2003 09:22 AM:

Yep, pic is fairly nice, sound is completely w@nk however.

Still waiting for a better release of this.....


Posted by tWiZtEr on 06-30-2003 09:29 AM:

ok your right, its a LITTLE dark, hardly noticable, but the sound is horrible and the quality isnt very good, the JPG is VERY misleading


Posted by Ragnar on 06-30-2003 09:40 AM:

yes..the picture is OK, but the sound is so f.... i can't understand what sort of ears some of you guys have, saying this is GOOD and a worthy competition for ctp.. get real!


Posted by Butch on 06-30-2003 09:50 AM:

*from sample*

The point of posting on here is after you have seen the sample.Anyone who has seen it will tell you its a mislabelled cam.Yes the picture is very nice and w/s at that.Sound is not from a direct source so is a cam.

7/4/2

__________________


Posted by ACiDCrasH on 06-30-2003 10:00 AM:

Definately not a TS. And come on guys close to a DVDRIP LOL. Dream On. Only seen the sample and not too happy on it. Guess i'll just wait over fro a release from CTP.


Posted by RUiNU on 06-30-2003 10:09 AM:

This is defiantly mislabeled a ts. It’s a cam, sound is beyond horrible. 7/3/? aint going to d/l this sound would drive me to drink (more).


Posted by your name here on 06-30-2003 10:34 AM:

NOX your rls's alwasy have a very watchable pic with very bad sound
which is what this has,Pic is dark like most of there other rls's, but very watchable ,sound is pretty bad. . .


7/4/9

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by BadAndy on 06-30-2003 10:34 AM:

Sound sucks. Movie was extremely corny, but so funny. And I think there is a very very brief moment where you see Cameron Diaz's pussy, check it out.


Posted by brr8760 on 06-30-2003 10:57 AM:

Out of curiosity, I got CD1. It's even worse than the sample! Wide-screen ??!! Ah, no, it's not. The original full screen source (see last release) has been artificially CROPPED with black bars on top & bottom. There's even less actual picture than before. Remember the early subtitle where Drew says "I'm no angel" ?? It's been cropped out! Not here, folks. I only know about the line cuz of the earlier release. NOX, you guys are starting to make me long for the sweet smell of FTF.


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 06-30-2003 11:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
Out of curiosity, I got CD1. It's even worse than the sample! Wide-screen ??!! Ah, no, it's not. The original full screen source (see last release) has been artificially CROPPED with black bars on top & bottom.



Umm, TS/CAM are NEVER in WS/FS. How can they be? They have no standard AR. It's just cropped or stretched to look that way.

Anywho, sample is bleh. Picture looks like someone threw up on the screen and the sound has all the clarity of listening to MrPHO talk about lo-cost toilet paper.

It's that same old adage, thanks NOX, but no thanks.

5/3/X


Posted by Phreaky on 06-30-2003 11:17 AM:

Much better than logistics release, might be worth watching now 6/6/na


Posted by huggy on 06-30-2003 12:03 PM:

How can you say "move over ctp"? The only thing good about this rls is that it has no angle. The rest isn't as good as ctp telesyncs but good enough to dwld.


quote:
Originally posted by Hitman47
w.o.w... move over ctp

__________________
your never alone with Schizophrenia


Posted by DiSRUPToR on 06-30-2003 12:41 PM:

wtf? n00bz are tearing this forum apart 5/3/X

__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.


Posted by Butch on 06-30-2003 01:33 PM:

*from CD1*

Same Video as the previous release.Goes out of focus in exactly place when drew is sitting at the table.Looks like this has been re-encoded maybe they tried filtering it but it seems though they encoded it pretty poorly.The MPEG on my PC was pretty glitchy , meaning the video would keep pausing for a split second just like when you encode from NTSC to PAL or vice versa.I am now burning this to CD to see if this happens on my standalone.This release is PAL and wasn't the previous ?.
BRB with review from standalone.
*Glitching dissapears on standalone and yes this is the same video.Cleaned up a site more than the previous release but there's already another release of this*

__________________


Posted by Wheely on 06-30-2003 01:43 PM:

Thumbs down

What can I say LOL, the jpg is so so misleading. !!

Like the saying "Don't judge a book by its cover", well don't judge a flick by the jpg. Look and listen yourself, looks are very deceiving..

The sample is basically horrible and talk about audio, what audio.
It's terrible.

All the ppl here saying CTP look out.. I think they don't know the true difference. Yes, no angle, but still not even close to CTP's standards.

5/5/5


Posted by GeeMann on 06-30-2003 02:45 PM:

Nice try NoX maybe one day u will get it right.

Vid is fair at best sound is HoRrIbLe

4/4/reserved


Posted by mutilati0n on 06-30-2003 03:43 PM:

7/5/?

Picture is slightly blurred but still easily watchable full screen.

Sound is distorted, like they didn't plug the fuckin headphones in all the way -- but still easily watchable.



Posted by Mouth_Full21 on 06-30-2003 04:05 PM:

ya.. this is crap. Don't matter really, but w/e... The video is quite nice but the sound, O-man. Not gonna bother downloading this gonna wait for CTP... but keep it up NOX u guys are getting good. CTP didn't start out with the wonderful rlses they have today, they started out with shit ones just like everyone else but u guys already ahve something on em', just starting and u guys are GOOD.. some more work and u guys can rule the *TS* Svcd

::CTP also started out as VCD and with good SOUND.


Posted by djkoolaide on 06-30-2003 07:11 PM:

wtf is up with some of you people and sucking ctp's cock "i'll wait for ctp" thats all i fucking see anymore

ctp doesnt release every movie, get used to it. ctp IS indeed a very good TS grp, but still, i hate that saying "i'll wait for ctp"

its like saying DVL is gonna realease every XviD that you want.. which doesnt happen


Posted by Tweezer on 06-30-2003 07:17 PM:

Re: wow

watched the sample enough for me to NOT want this release

5/4/7


Posted by Chewsmoka on 06-30-2003 08:27 PM:

From Sample

Video is blurry and not clear at all. Audio sounds muffled and hollow. Don't know how well the standalone will help this release :|

6/6/?

__________________
Ignorance Is Bliss. An Example -

quote:
Originally posted by platinum_bomb
Dude, It wasn't there and still isn't... I was waiting to see what the pic looked like cuz the release was up, but there was no pic and i didn't find the sample, mo fo. Don't make me come and tie ur arms to ur chair and beat u silly with your own keyboard

lol

Will edit this after i get it.


Posted by desertboy on 06-30-2003 09:24 PM:

You all deserve to die!!!

quote:
Originally posted by DiSRUPToR
wtf? n00bz are tearing this forum apart 5/3/X



They did that a along time ago


4/5/? samples shit but I suspect the movie will be shitter


__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by brr8760 on 06-30-2003 09:56 PM:

Is this a NUKE *GRP REQ* ? If so, good move, guys.

quote:
Umm, TS/CAM are NEVER in WS/FS. How can they be? They have no standard AR. It's just cropped or stretched to look that way.
Huh? If the camera films the entire screen, it's WS. If they sit too close, or zoom in too far, it's FS. In this case, NOX got ahold of the same "FS" source (of the previous release) and added black bars to the top & bottom to give the illusion of a WS release.


Posted by bmvtoys on 07-01-2003 12:05 AM:

It was nuked because cd1 extracts strait to mpeg, not bin/cue. That was why the group requested the nuke, not for any other reason.

Release is decent. Audio needs to be adjusted, but the pic aint too bad.

Still better than the last one


Posted by params on 07-01-2003 08:58 AM:

The picture is ok :/ - all I can say just ok.
The sound is hollow and distorted REALLY bad makes it unwatchable IMO

6/3/?


Posted by JcM AkA ViPER on 07-01-2003 01:26 PM:

eeewwww, what up with that sound man , pretty good pic though.... 7/3/??


Posted by BoOsTzex on 07-02-2003 05:47 AM:

I hate being a negative critic but the picture sux, audio is crap. Compleately unbareable, jpeg looked great so I downloaded it, Waste of bandwidth, wait for a better release...


Posted by Giz on 07-02-2003 03:29 PM:

Picture Quality Really Good Like The jpeg, But The Sound Reallllllllly Not That Good, Think Bfore You Download This; You May Want One With Bearable Sound Quality ...Just A msg Not Rating It Cause I Have Not Yet Watched It


Posted by unique on 07-08-2003 09:56 PM:

5.5/4/?

you can clearly see an angle...was cropped too.
video doesnt look thaaat bad if u watch it on tv...stil not good enough.
I have no idea why this is a telesync cuz the sound sux ass!
and i spent 1.5 gigs on downloading this .

pic is waaay misleading...should have posted earlier

__________________
---


Posted by kakarot12300 on 07-10-2003 09:28 PM:

well i watched the thing yesterday, and the sound was crap, the the video quality was exceptional. Youre all being way to hard. Myself, having just recently weened myself off the tmd trash from p2p progs, restrain a certain level of respect for all these groups who can bring to me these amazing quality movies.

To this movie, i give 8.5/6/7 (well, maybe i have a cameron diaz fetish.. )


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 PM.
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.