VCDQuality Forums - Team America World Police *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Team America World Police *SVCD* - TELESYNC - FRA (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=47822)

Posted by villanovax on 10-18-2004 09:50 PM:

From the sample, the video seems a bit dark, and a lot like the CAM, but the audio is nice.

6/8/?

Posted by firefighter on 10-18-2004 09:58 PM:

All TS' are CAM's just with direct audio. All this is , is NOX CAM + DTS audio. It got nuked alot of places for mislabled CAM but those nukers need a slap upside the head & new speakers .

The picture on this is very dark, bit grainy but overall watchable , not the greatest. The Sound on this is DTS audio but they dont know how to use progys to crank the sound (reminds me of POT when they first started doing TS's) so the sound is very quiet and gotta crank the speakers.

Pretty much if you want a better version (direct sound) of NOX cam , pick this up.

5/8/?

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Posted by crapper on 10-18-2004 10:00 PM:

this is a sample review

k
picture nice 6 not good fuzzy so not clean and dark..

sound nice 7

movie i donno FAT ASS

i wanna see this one but not this way..

not good enough

hopefully someone will release an other one

Posted by ill3st on 10-18-2004 10:05 PM:

just got the sample now, sound is pretty damn good.. shame about the video

4.5/7.5/?

wont be downloading this version due to the low quality,, will wait for a better version.

Posted by Jonesss on 10-18-2004 10:14 PM:

the pic is dark and grainy like
firefighter said....
The movie looks to lame for me... and the quality is just to low :/
the sound is ok i my ears...
so
video gets a 5 do to the darkness and it's to grainy...
the sound is ok 7-8
And I will not coment on the movie... for the reason that it looks to lame...

Posted by Lab on 10-18-2004 10:18 PM:

5/7 .. audio is low...

I wish they would've done a VCD TS instead of SVCD so that VideoCD/maVen could've done a better TS.

Posted by Neversoft on 10-18-2004 10:35 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 DO NOT ASK HOW TO OBTAIN RELEASES You can not download from VCDQuality, this is a NEWS site.

2 WE DON'T CARE WHERE YOU DOWNLOAD FROM! Keep it to yourself, do not discuss your sources.

3 NO FLAMING OTHER USERS! Stick to rating the quality and note any problems you feel with the release.

4 NO GROUP DICK-SUCKING We do not want to hear any shit about "Ooooh. Where's Group-X?" or "I'll wait for Group-X's release" until they release it!

5 If you cant abide by the above rules. Get the fuck out, nobody wants you here!

Now, play nice folks

Posted by Khameleon808 on 10-18-2004 10:51 PM:

its allright rls i guess

6/7/9

having seen this in theaters , i thought it was pretty damn funny so if you can stomach cams , give it a looksee

Posted by bobey on 10-18-2004 11:29 PM:

Do you guys think there will be a better version then this one out soon? I want to see it badly but i dont want to watch it as a cam...

[Edit:: Go to the cinema then! Don't post in here unless you're reviewing the release, please - Neversoft]

Posted by Shlomi26 on 10-19-2004 12:42 AM:

6/6/8

Posted by Debo on 10-19-2004 01:02 AM:

i might grab this
audio is great
pic is ok
6/8

well from the sample it doesnt look so bad
but from the full release it looks like shit

__________________

Posted by XeKToReX on 10-19-2004 01:47 AM:

From sample.

pic seems a little blurry and grainy, pretty watchable seeing theres not much detail in the movie, sound is great.

6/8/?

XeKToReX

Posted by commiewhore on 10-19-2004 02:23 AM:

video = same silver as nox....5

audio = dts audio, but was kept too low when decoded....6

movie = funny as hell, made me laugh a few times 7

silvers are a dyme a dozen glad to see these grps arent pointing fingers of stolen source....so much intelligence i might kill myself

Posted by Freeder on 10-19-2004 02:23 AM:

Not too bad.... I must say puppet sex is pretty funny.. heh heh heh. Anyhoo

Video is blurry, that is the most obvious flaw to this release. Juding from the sample, which was of a 'dark' portion of the movie, it is still easily watchable, i would assume it is better in the well lit portions.

Audio is very good.

Overall, I think it's worth the download.

My unbiased rating: 5.5/7/?

Enjoy!
-Uncle Freeder

Posted by Miller on 10-19-2004 02:33 AM:

well not the Best TS. but its good to see FRA releasing some Ts, now for the flick, video is very dark as firifighter said it is just like NOX's release but adding the DTS .sound is a little low but still great. movie looks funny - i think i'll watch it later tonight

6/8/?

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by vip3r on 10-19-2004 02:44 AM:

I'm gonna have to pass on this release. It is the same thing as the cam, except with a shitty cropping job and encoding job ( seems to be a bit darker than NOX's CAM ). Audio is pretty nice though, but i wasn't too impressed with the movie.

5/7/4

Posted by Roger on 10-19-2004 04:47 AM:

Another lame group that should keep to VCD instead of wasting SVCD ... avoid

Posted by jmur on 10-19-2004 05:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lab
5/7 .. audio is low...

I wish they would've done a VCD TS instead of SVCD so that VideoCD/maVen could've done a better TS.

youre acting like theres no such thing as a proper. if maven or videocd or any other group for that matter feel they have a better version to contribute you better believe they will release it. dont think that just cause a not-so-good svcd ts is already out that its gonna be the only release. kthxbye.

Posted by ^Om3n on 10-19-2004 05:38 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Lab
5/7 .. audio is low...

I wish they would've done a VCD TS instead of SVCD so that VideoCD/maVen could've done a better TS.

Well they still have a chance, multiple sources tell me this is nuked for being a mislabled cam

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?

Posted by firefighter on 10-19-2004 06:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by jmur
youre acting like theres no such thing as a proper. if maven or videocd or any other group for that matter feel they have a better version to contribute you better believe they will release it. dont think that just cause a not-so-good svcd ts is already out that its gonna be the only release. kthxbye.

Well considering there wasnt Video Problems with FRA's release other then being a silver , dark , grainy and overall crap picture , the sound was DTS. Gay scene rules state that you "cant" proper on quality alone. You need interlace , video missing , audio problems, etc , etc ... you get the picture.

PROPERS:

- No previous releases may be propered based on audio or video bitrate.
- Propers will be allowed in the case of technical problems, bad aspect ratio, sync problems, skipping/freezing, interlaced, bad ivtc, etc

In this case FRA just overall was far from pretty but nothing wrong with the video/sound in general which makes it harder for any other release group to valid PROPER without getting nuked.

Sure if VideoCD , maVen , Centropy ... whoever get a nice TS they release anyway and dont give two shits. Take it or leave it. Times have changed and this whole movie scene is full of kiddie nukers now who would love more then anything to say they nuked VideoCD/maVen.

Time for a TDX Rule change !

Also to all the Silver grps who read VCDQ's forum (which i know ya do) ...
Silver + DTS Audio = VCD (mpeg1) TELESYNC ... at best.

Helpful hint of the day: Silvers are all MPEG1 (VCD) as vobs to get the movie small and onto that disk easier, by encoding to mpeg2 (SVCD) , it doesnt make the picture any better as it was already screwed when the cammer quickly threw the CAM > Silver as time is money. So by encoding SVCD , it doesnt improve the quality any but just rather pisses of hundreds of leechers as it possibly can screw a better copy from being released in the furture.

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Posted by DCunderground on 10-19-2004 07:38 AM:

This release was a step forward for audio at least, so props to FRA for that, I hope sombody else at least internals a ts with a better quality vid,

5.5/6.5/?? Gonna watch it tomorrow at the theatre...

Posted by BLUE-NEO on 10-19-2004 09:44 AM:

6/8/8 good film decent release

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...

Posted by Carlitosbaby on 10-19-2004 10:20 AM:

since when does videocd give a shit lol. Look at shark tale there were like 5 versions out before they pred. If they do it great hope they do. you should be commenting on fra quality not on if they screwed it up for videocd. Have you read a videocd nfo recently. Kinda tell everyone fuck you.

Posted by nouse on 10-19-2004 01:24 PM:

sounds quite good, but to be straight on video, its shit... well, not too shit to watch but took part of the joy away

Posted by evilsailor on 10-19-2004 04:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter

In this case FRA just overall was far from pretty but nothing wrong with the video/sound in general which makes it harder for any other release group to valid PROPER without getting nuked.

I don't know what other sites have done, but this was nuked for bad quality alone on a couple that I've seen. Thank god there's still some people with some logical reasoning left in the scene.

The sound on this release was fine, perfect, I mean it's DTS, what do you expect? But the video, I didn't expect it to be so bad. It's probably pretty bright throughout the whole movie and it's puppets for christ's sake, what could you do to fuck it up? Well, believe me, the video is barely watchable. This might've been tolerable if they had it out a week ago, but after theatrical release, no way.

(I saw the actual movie at the theatre though, and it gets a ten out of ten for sure).

Posted by Miller on 10-19-2004 11:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
Well considering there wasnt Video Problems with FRA's release other then being a silver , dark , grainy and overall crap picture , the sound was DTS. Gay scene rules state that you "cant" proper on quality alone. You need interlace , video missing , audio problems, etc , etc ... you get the picture.

PROPERS:

- No previous releases may be propered based on audio or video bitrate.
- Propers will be allowed in the case of technical problems, bad aspect ratio, sync problems, skipping/freezing, interlaced, bad ivtc, etc

In this case FRA just overall was far from pretty but nothing wrong with the video/sound in general which makes it harder for any other release group to valid PROPER without getting nuked.

Sure if VideoCD , maVen , Centropy ... whoever get a nice TS they release anyway and dont give two shits. Take it or leave it. Times have changed and this whole movie scene is full of kiddie nukers now who would love more then anything to say they nuked VideoCD/maVen.

Time for a TDX Rule change !

Also to all the Silver grps who read VCDQ's forum (which i know ya do) ...
Silver + DTS Audio = VCD (mpeg1) TELESYNC ... at best.

Helpful hint of the day: Silvers are all MPEG1 (VCD) as vobs to get the movie small and onto that disk easier, by encoding to mpeg2 (SVCD) , it doesnt make the picture any better as it was already screwed when the cammer quickly threw the CAM > Silver as time is money. So by encoding SVCD , it doesnt improve the quality any but just rather pisses of hundreds of leechers as it possibly can screw a better copy from being released in the furture.

/me claps

best post i ever read in the comments section

firefighter , ya i don't see why they svcd encode silver cams , guess they do it just to piss the leeches off lol

then again, if you release your TS as a SVCD, it can effectivly make your release the only TS release of that movie, since i don't think a group will release a VCD of it if their is a SVCD of it , since it would then be a dupe , but hey im a moron and im usually worng

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by Miller on 10-20-2004 01:09 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by evilsailor
I don't know what other sites have done, but this was nuked for bad quality alone on a couple that I've seen. Thank god there's still some people with some logical reasoning left in the scene.

well if its nuked for quality its a sheep nuke, not a proper nuke, guess your on some pickey sites.

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by bcool2k on 10-20-2004 08:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
Well considering there wasnt Video Problems with FRA's release other then being a silver , dark , grainy and overall crap picture , the sound was DTS. Gay scene rules state that you "cant" proper on quality alone. You need interlace , video missing , audio problems, etc , etc ... you get the picture.

PROPERS:

- No previous releases may be propered based on audio or video bitrate.
- Propers will be allowed in the case of technical problems, bad aspect ratio, sync problems, skipping/freezing, interlaced, bad ivtc, etc

In this case FRA just overall was far from pretty but nothing wrong with the video/sound in general which makes it harder for any other release group to valid PROPER without getting nuked.

Sure if VideoCD , maVen , Centropy ... whoever get a nice TS they release anyway and dont give two shits. Take it or leave it. Times have changed and this whole movie scene is full of kiddie nukers now who would love more then anything to say they nuked VideoCD/maVen.

Time for a TDX Rule change !

Also to all the Silver grps who read VCDQ's forum (which i know ya do) ...
Silver + DTS Audio = VCD (mpeg1) TELESYNC ... at best.

Helpful hint of the day: Silvers are all MPEG1 (VCD) as vobs to get the movie small and onto that disk easier, by encoding to mpeg2 (SVCD) , it doesnt make the picture any better as it was already screwed when the cammer quickly threw the CAM > Silver as time is money. So by encoding SVCD , it doesnt improve the quality any but just rather pisses of hundreds of leechers as it possibly can screw a better copy from being released in the furture.

I agree with you a change is do. However, VideoCD managed to sidestep a NUKE when they PROPERED the Terminal.SVCD.TS. Back in the day

Anyhow, this is the best release so far. Best thing it has going for it is the DTS sound. The pic is dark and cropped as stated,but easily watchable on a bigger tv burned to disk. I enjoyed the film, but its definitely NOT for everyone.

5/7.5/8

Posted by ThePredator on 10-22-2004 08:58 AM:

Its ok but i hope for a good TS 5/7/?

Posted by Hero_of_the_Day on 10-22-2004 02:57 PM:

7/7/? - watch this weekend
Definately not a bad release, bit grainy but watchable, sound really good.

__________________
Suck it up princess !!

Posted by Enzomatrx on 10-23-2004 05:49 AM:

finally caved and watched this release, since nothing else was recently released.

actually glad I did. Via XBox on TV it was watchable through and through, especially with the sound being spot-on.

Yeah, it a little dark, and blurry/grainy.
However, it's fully watchable, and just as warped as you'd expect from Parker and Stone

7/9/10

Posted by puppet on 10-23-2004 08:52 AM:

Sorry, I'm not understanding how to burn this to be able to play in a DVD. I know this is only a place for review, but i figure since i have a questions about this specific release, it'd be better here than the Newbie forum. I'm wrong, I'm sorry...

When i try to burn using the VideoCD option in Nero, im presented with about 5 or 6 different folders. CD-R's are only 700mb, while each bin/cue file is 800mb.

How do i burn this to be able to play on a DVD player? if thats not even possible.. how do i get this to play on a computer, i guess?

[Edit:: Use Nero's "Burn Image" function (in the file menu) or use CDRWin or Alcohol120% - Nerversoft]

Posted by puppet on 10-23-2004 07:06 PM:

^^ (in response to the mod edit)

When i try to use the Burn Image function in Nero, it worked, and played on my DVD player.. however, it had a big green bar across the top, and played so choppily it was almost like it was in slow motion. Is this my DVD player, or did i burn it wrong?

Posted by Miller on 10-23-2004 08:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by puppet
^^ (in response to the mod edit)

When i try to use the Burn Image function in Nero, it worked, and played on my DVD player.. however, it had a big green bar across the top, and played so choppily it was almost like it was in slow motion. Is this my DVD player, or did i burn it wrong?

2 things - post this in the newbies section

second id say its due to it being burned to fast, try lowering the speed if not it could be the media or the dvd burner, try not to use doller store media and make sure your dvd burner is complient with svcd/vcd

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by puppet on 10-23-2004 08:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Miller
2 things - post this in the newbies section

Okay. I found a similar thread in the newbie section, and i replied here:

http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=47457

if you could hop on over to there and help me, it'd be much appreciated. sorry for fagging up this Team America thread.

Posted by KnowTheToe on 10-26-2004 12:37 AM:

Video - 4 (2nd disc was pixilated)
Audio - 8
Movie - 7 (laffed my ass off)

__________________
Do you know the toe?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page