VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Inside Man *SVCD* - CAM - WUF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=69327)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Good for a cam based on sample scored as cam v8/s7/m8

not bad at all for first release

v7

a 6

m 9

thanks wuf for this release

From sample:

V: 10 - for a cam (and first release) this is excellent
A: 8 - bit of background hiss and a bit hollow but more than good enough
M: ?

Excellent release!

Have you people watched this release? its fucking horrible.

Video - 4 - Crap, way blue and way pixelated.

Audio - 3 - VERY harsh, overbass, etc, almost inaudible at times

Movie - ? - looks g ood, waiting for a better copy.

nice for first and pretty quick release!

v - 7
a - 5
m - ?

This is from the sample.

V: 5(not bad but very white, cropped on top,to much brightness and grainy but watchable)

S:3 (On the sample there was a hiss all the time and its very hollow, the hiss is just anoying)

F:? looks gd, waiting for better copy.

downlaoded first rar.....:

v: 3 zoomed in to fuck, half the screen missing ewither side
a: 4 way dodgy
v: will wait for decent copy

POS

__________________
SeeDee MKII

v/6 a LITTLE croped
a/5 a little hard to hear durning loud scenes and does have a hollow sound
m/?

over all not bad at all for first release especially so quickly.

i think most of you are a litte screwed it is not as bad as some of you post but then again options are like assholes we all have one,but i think this release is def watchable..and as far as based on sample goes i dont know where you got your samples but i see it as nuked for no sample.....but still decent nothing less

__________________
DoMiNaToR RuLeS

quote:

---

Originally posted by paradise_island
v/6 a LITTLE croped
a/5 a little hard to hear durning loud scenes and does have a hollow sound
m/?

over all not bad at all for first release especially so quickly.

i think most of you are a litte screwed it is not as bad as some of you post but then again options are like assholes we all have one,but i think this release is def watchable..and as far as based on sample goes i dont know where you got your samples but i see it as nuked for no sample.....but still decent nothing less

---

WHATS THE PROBLEM

I dont quite understand why people get so indignit when it comes to rating these movies. Has anyone ever thought that all tv's and home theatre systems are not created equal. and neither are the cables that you hook them up with. This is why you get such a variation in sound and audio quality. There is a reason why a 30 in regular tv cost a hell of alot less than a 30 in plasma/lcd/ hdtv. So stop complaining and debating on who is right and who is wrong on movie quality, you all are. For those who find the quality is aliitle worse on there tv verses the quality on someone elses system, well upgrade sometimes something as little as a s-cable can make all the difference in the world. And for those of you who have tv's so old that you need a converter box just to hook your dvd player up, well you are just shit out of luck, and will always get a lesser quality picture and sound. just a little knowledge from someone who knows

the sample....

does not look that bad..........it clear, and I can hear everything.....so from the sample, its pretty decent.....

Re: WHATS THE PROBLEM

quote:

---

Originally posted by wwwldw2
I dont quite understand why people get so indignit when it comes to rating these movies. Has anyone ever thought that all tv's and home theatre systems are not created equal. and neither are the cables that you hook them up with. This is why you get such a variation in sound and audio quality. There is a reason why a 30 in regular tv cost a hell of alot less than a 30 in plasma/lcd/ hdtv. So stop complaining and debating on who is right and who is wrong on movie quality, you all are. For those who find the quality is aliitle worse on there tv verses the quality on someone elses system, well upgrade sometimes something as little as a s-cable can make all the difference in the world. And for those of you who have tv's so old that you need a converter box just to hook your dvd player up, well you are just shit out of luck, and will always get a lesser quality picture and sound. just a little knowledge from someone who knows

---

Pic croped but it ok for for a cam

RATES FOT A CAM

5,5,

__________________
^^
This post was made in the sole intention to advertise my shitty webhosting service

fast release !!! as a cam video 7 audio 5 . looks like a ctp cam with that blue tint...lol

very crappy release. My eyes and head still hurt of watching this.

v: 3
a: 2
m:7

wtf

wwwldw2 is right i have a a couple of tvs and the quality shown on 1 of them on this movie inside man is totally crap yet veiwing it on the other its good so
BoxyBrown i suggest you get you fact right before slagging other members off also there a supervisors job waiting for you at Best Buy.

__________________

PAY ATTENTION

BOXY BROWN,

I DID NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT TRYING TO VIEW A SVCD ON A 50 OR 60 INCH SCREEN. WHAT I SAID WAS IN ESSENCE THAT YOU WILL GET A BETTER PICTURE AND SOUND ON A NEWER BETTER QUALITY TV. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT BECAUSE I HAVE 5 TV'S IN MY HOUSE AND MY OLDER TV'S PLAY THIS MOVIE LIKE CRAP, BOTH SOUND AND VIDEO, WHERE AS MY NEWER HDTV IS VERY WATCHABLE. I'M NOT HERE TO DEBATE, JUST TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS. AND BY THE WAY, I AM A ENGINEER FOR PANASONIC

Am in process of getting this release right now, but just watched the sample and was very impressed. This is one of the more watchable cams I've seen in a long time. Sure it is a little too blue, but it hasn't been labelled as a ts or tc. In fact, the audio is the only thing that separates it quality wise from a lot of ts releases.

v-9
a-6
m-lookin good so far

From sample:

V: 7
A: 6
M: Still DL

Video is clear, despite a little washed out. Audio is a bit too low, but pretty decent and understandable. A little hollow, but it's usual in a cam. I would even give a 8/8, comparing to some Prevail's cams, like emily rose. Just don't know why a 3 cds svcd , it would make no big difference a 2 cd vcd.

__________________
You're not a complete idiot, some parts are missing

Shit cam too blue

6/4/? looks good will g to cinema

__________________

Re: WHATS THE PROBLEM

quote:

---

Originally posted by wwwldw2
I dont quite understand why people get so indignit when it comes to rating these movies. Has anyone ever thought that all tv's and home theatre systems are not created equal. and neither are the cables that you hook them up with. This is why you get such a variation in sound and audio quality. There is a reason why a 30 in regular tv cost a hell of alot less than a 30 in plasma/lcd/ hdtv. So stop complaining and debating on who is right and who is wrong on movie quality, you all are. For those who find the quality is aliitle worse on there tv verses the quality on someone elses system, well upgrade sometimes something as little as a s-cable can make all the difference in the world. And for those of you who have tv's so old that you need a converter box just to hook your dvd player up, well you are just shit out of luck, and will always get a lesser quality picture and sound. just a little knowledge from someone who knows

---

hrmmm wayyyy to zoomed in, audio is standard cam shittery. Props on being the first group, but other than that.... nothing too special here.

5/6/?

inside man

bad croppin audio sux videa aint much better but for 1st post it better than the rest rofl

CHILL OUT

WHY IN THE HELL IS EVERYONE PUTTING WORDS INTO MY MOUTH. I NEVER ONCE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT A MORE EXPENSIVE TV. I SAID QUALITY. JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING COST MORE DOESNT NECESSARILY MEAN IT IS BETTER QUALITY. WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT YOU PAID MORE FOR THE BRAND NAME. NOW I ALSO DIDNT SAY TO COMPARE A 19 IN. PICTURE TUBE TV WITH A 60 IN. PLASMA. WHAT I SAID IS I HAVE 5 TV'S RANGING IN SIZE FROM 20 IN TO 42 INCHES. 2 OLDER AND 3 NEWER. I GET MUCH BETTER PICTURE AND SOUND PLAYING SVCD, DVIX, MPEG AVI FORMATTED FILMS ON MY 3 NEWER TV'S WHICH HAVE ALL THE APPROPRIATE AUDIO AND VIDEO CABLE HOOK-UPS INCORPORATED INTO THE TV'S THAN I GET ON MY OLDER TV'S WHICH NEED CONVERTER BOXES IN ORDER TO EVEN CONNECT A DVD OR THEATER SYSTEM. THAT WAS ALL I SAID. WHICH GAVE REASON TO WHY SO MANY PEOPLE HAD DIFFERENT OPINONS ON THE QUALITY OF THIS PARTICULAR MOVIE. I AM NOT TRYING TO ARGUE WITH ANY ONE

the video is only zoomed in for the first 3 minutes.

for the audio, you need to play with the equalizer to mute out the rumbling noises.


oh, and the movie sucked ass. 5/10

It's only the first 6:45 that's zoomed and cropped.

Watchable first release, good enough if you HAVE TO see it right now.

6/4/?

All of you guys complaining about it being too blue? If you'd actually already seen the film, you'd realize it was made in kind of a bluish tint. Dunno why, but it was.

When you guys quote your ratings do you realise you are quoting a cam? Have any of you ever given a CAM 10 for video or audio? Whats the highest rating you have ever given? A 7 maybe? If thats the case then the 7 in relation to top scores is a 10 and everything below that drops a grade. I see a lot of you writing 5 out of 10 for a cam etc but this is wayyyyyyyy better than most cams that come onto VCDquality. The audio also aint bad at all. Now accross the board this movie would probably get a 5/10 for video and 4/10 for audio but for a cam its good for at least an 8/10 for vid and 7/10 for audio.

If your going to use ratings (and moan a lot about them) at least have half a clue about what you are actually doing.

Scotster

Re: CHILL OUT

quote:

---

Originally posted by wwwldw2
WHY IN THE HELL IS EVERYONE PUTTING WORDS INTO MY MOUTH. I NEVER ONCE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT A MORE EXPENSIVE TV. I SAID QUALITY. JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING COST MORE DOESNT NECESSARILY MEAN IT IS BETTER QUALITY. WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT YOU PAID MORE FOR THE BRAND NAME. NOW I ALSO DIDNT SAY TO COMPARE A 19 IN. PICTURE TUBE TV WITH A 60 IN. PLASMA. WHAT I SAID IS I HAVE 5 TV'S RANGING IN SIZE FROM 20 IN TO 42 INCHES. 2 OLDER AND 3 NEWER. I GET MUCH BETTER PICTURE AND SOUND PLAYING SVCD, DVIX, MPEG AVI FORMATTED FILMS ON MY 3 NEWER TV'S WHICH HAVE ALL THE APPROPRIATE AUDIO AND VIDEO CABLE HOOK-UPS INCORPORATED INTO THE TV'S THAN I GET ON MY OLDER TV'S WHICH NEED CONVERTER BOXES IN ORDER TO EVEN CONNECT A DVD OR THEATER SYSTEM. THAT WAS ALL I SAID. WHICH GAVE REASON TO WHY SO MANY PEOPLE HAD DIFFERENT OPINONS ON THE QUALITY OF THIS PARTICULAR MOVIE. I AM NOT TRYING TO ARGUE WITH ANY ONE

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scotster
When you guys quote your ratings do you realise you are quoting a cam? Have any of you ever given a CAM 10 for video or audio? Whats the highest rating you have ever given? A 7 maybe? If thats the case then the 7 in relation to top scores is a 10 and everything below that drops a grade. I see a lot of you writing 5 out of 10 for a cam etc but this is wayyyyyyyy better than most cams that come onto VCDquality. The audio also aint bad at all. Now accross the board this movie would probably get a 5/10 for video and 4/10 for audio but for a cam its good for at least an 8/10 for vid and 7/10 for audio.

If your going to use ratings (and moan a lot about them) at least have half a clue about what you are actually doing.

Scotster

---

v: 6
a: 6
m: 8

not a bad release not sure why they bothered with a svcd tho.

quote:

---

Originally posted by funeralfoguk
not a bad release not sure why they bothered with a svcd tho.

---

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.

---

video = 6 its a cam..what do u expect

audio = 4 also typical crappy cam audio


this thread = 9 for the humour of such kids pissing up each others backs.

movie = 8

its jodie

Aint seen the copy but just been to pics o see it.
Awesome film! Really enjoyed it.

Gotta love people with an opinion and like to argue it on the internet. Noone cares what anyone else thinks on internet forums. This site is for rating movies, not pushing your opinions on people. Just rate the f'ing movie and keep your opinions to yourself. Flame me if you will but don't expect a response.

7/7/? - Decent CAM, very watchable if your not a picky jackass.

Back to rating the movie - what do you expect from a cam?
Watchable, but not perfect. Cropped at first, not a good angle. Hand over camera twice during early part, then a head covering lower left for a couple of minutes...
Sound leaves a lot to be desired. Music drowns out dialog often, have to keep adjusting sound to hear Denzel...
Good movie, I'll have to see it again when the DVD comes out.

5/4/8

__________________
Op