VCDQuality Forums
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- No Country For Old Men *READNFO* *XViD* - DVD SCR - BaLD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=79756)


Posted by X69 on 01-02-2008 08:31 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED



*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by oblodo on 01-02-2008 09:29 PM:

v:9
A:9
M:9

Very well encoded, and a fantastic copy.


Posted by AndrewM on 01-02-2008 10:20 PM:

v:9 - AR aside, the video is top notch.
a:9 - also solid
m:8.5. Brilliant ending, which you are either going to love or hate. Anyway, good take on a 'modern' western.

Kudos to BaLD for a great rip!


Posted by whooka on 01-02-2008 11:00 PM:

Welllll, I found this on <snip> a day before 'BaLD' put out their release and the one I found was 1/1.4GB file with no group name or nfo or anything included. Looks like BaLD took this anon source and, prob fixed it for stand-alone players, and released it. However this one does look sick on my average 26" LCD (TV). improved A/R makes the desert shots so much nicer and with no blurred counters and great color and clarity, def the one to grab for anyone who was still waiting for a slightly better video.

V: 9/9 (my eyes are getting used to all this bluray and hi-def shit)

A: 8/10

Movie: 9 imho


Posted by duckfan on 01-03-2008 12:10 AM:

Put me in the "hate the ending" group. The artsy fartsy types may think it was brilliant but it was not a satisfactory ending for the rest of us.
V: 8
A:8
M:3 (it would have been an 8.5 with a decent ending)


Posted by OSH on 01-03-2008 12:30 AM:

Major improvement over the last release. Not that anything was really wrong with the previous release, but this one is better quality. I don't see anything wrong with the AR. The video quality is outstanding, this is a fantastic release. Thank you once again, BaLD.

V-9
A-9.5
M-?


Posted by wiggo on 01-03-2008 12:37 AM:

AWESOME

for a pre-release

10
10
10 = My fave film of the year.

Javier Bardem is easily, I hope, gonna win an oscar this year. That is if there is any justice. What a role, played by a wonderful actor.

Wiggo


Posted by wiggo on 01-03-2008 01:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by duckfan
Put me in the "hate the ending" group. The artsy fartsy types may think it was brilliant but it was not a satisfactory ending for the rest of us.
V: 8
A:8
M:3 (it would have been an 8.5 with a decent ending)



"The Rest of us" = Run of the mill ending. This film goes against the grain, and if you bothered to follow what had gone on previously, you would of understood the ending.

Please be kind when giving a film a score. This film will be considered a classic in years to come.

Wiggo

Get onto the scene at the garage with the attendant,(Coin flip). Check out the fan belts (Time to hang?) and the Smiley faces (Time to live?).

What a fucking film!!!


Posted by LesStrater on 01-03-2008 02:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by wiggo
"The Rest of us" = Run of the mill ending. This film goes against the grain, and if you bothered to follow what had gone on previously, you would of understood the ending.

"Run of the mill ending" = You don't feel like you wasted 2 hours of your life when the movie ends. I understood the ending--and it STILL sucked.

My guess is the Coen brothers didn't want a duplicate of their most successful movie "Fargo" by having another back-woods law officer outsmart the bad guys.

I'm going to grab a copy of this new release and replace the ending with the the final 2 minutes from "The Fugitive", where Tommy Lee Jones puts Harrison Ford in the police car. It will probably make more sense that way...and couldn't possibly be any worse. LOL


Posted by Saywhut on 01-03-2008 02:29 AM:

looks good to me... better late than never

v 9
a 8
m ?

this film was shot in Super 35 format, i reckon that is what is accounting for the disparity in aspect ratio (or screen size shown) between this release and the previous Done release...


Posted by qwik3r on 01-03-2008 02:30 AM:

Is this even needed? I don't understand the purpose of this proper, other then the credits..
No.Country.For.Old.Men.DIRFIX.PROPER.READNFO.DVDScr.XViD-BaLD

from sample:
v9
a9
m?


Posted by wiggo on 01-03-2008 02:31 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by LesStrater
"Run of the mill ending" = You don't feel like you wasted 2 hours of your life when the movie ends. I understood the ending--and it STILL sucked.

My guess is the Coen brothers didn't want a duplicate of their most successful movie "Fargo" by having another back-woods law officer outsmart the bad guys.

I'm going to grab a copy of this new release and replace the ending with the the final 2 minutes from "The Fugitive", where Tommy Lee Jones puts Harrison Ford in the police car. It will probably make more sense that way...and couldn't possibly be any worse. LOL



Not at all, no!

Ive watched it again since then and I still stand bv what I said. The whole tone of the film suggests that it shouldnt end all Gung-Ho. Sometimes cops win, sometimes criminal win. In this case, it felt right that no one should win (Except the Mexicans).

My whole point about the previous comment by 'Duckfan' was, how could he give it a high rating 1 second before the film finished, and then suddenly drop it right down. You either like the whole thing for what it is, or you dont. Simple as that really.

Wiggo


Posted by Budman69 on 01-03-2008 03:03 AM:

Still waiting for a decent DVD-R
8
8
9
Spoke too soon, BaLD came thru with the source!


Posted by duckfan on 01-03-2008 03:19 AM:

:: No Spoilers! :: ~L


Posted by Drachma on 01-03-2008 03:34 AM:

v:9
a:9
m:9.5

very good , it kept my attention !! nuff said..

Thanks Bald, I appreciate your work and sharing nature !!

__________________
peace ,pot & micr0dots


Posted by Marco5 on 01-03-2008 09:15 AM:

According to IMDB the movie was shot in the 2.35:1 aspect ratio. This release is cropped to 16:9. It means that almost 25% of the screen is missing...


Posted by SultrySalesman on 01-03-2008 11:08 AM:

.


Posted by trasixes on 01-03-2008 11:14 AM:

A - 8
V - 8
M - 9

Nice release.


Posted by SeeDee_MKII on 01-03-2008 02:10 PM:

v = 9.5 would of been 10 if i believed in perfection

v = 9

m = 9 cant beat a film tht goes against the rules.

BaLD for me are the best group to arrive on the scene for a long time imho. they confrmed that for me with that proper.dirfix.readnfo they did. Diplomatic towards Done and took effort of explining the reason. Top dollar group.


All hail bald.

__________________
SeeDee MKII


Posted by iLLmATiK on 01-03-2008 06:52 PM:

keep it short and simple:

V-9
A-9
M-10 - One of the best films of the year. Its either this film or American Gangster for the top 2 films of 2007 hands down....


Posted by dan solo on 01-03-2008 07:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Marco5
According to IMDB the movie was shot in the 2.35:1 aspect ratio. This release is cropped to 16:9. It means that almost 25% of the screen is missing...

screens for comparison:
http://i12.tinypic.com/821kxmw.jpg
http://i19.tinypic.com/7w788hx.jpg

v: 9

a: 9

m: 10 (i loved this film)


Posted by vanzans on 01-03-2008 09:37 PM:

Looks lovely... V:9 A:9 M: ?

Please stop talking about the ending....some of us haven't watched the film yet.

__________________
"Now we can do this easy, or we can do this REAL easy": Denton Van Zan, Reign of Fire.


Posted by corniche on 01-03-2008 11:40 PM:

I'm surprised that so many of you dismiss the AR issue. I have seen the full 2.35 movie and there is no question in my mind that this 16:9 "full screen" rip seriously degrades the visual compositions of the theatrical release.

The release is certainly of exceptional high quality. It's just that the high quality is applied to only three fourths of the movie.

This AR thing, it seems, will NEVER go away. So many people...so little comprehension. I wonder how many of them have praised "The Good The Bad and ... the Missing."?


Posted by bratt31999 on 01-04-2008 01:11 AM:

Wow, this is a keeper. Great job by BaLD, keep up the good work. I wasn’t going to dl this because I already had a scr. but I kept seeing all the high ratings and just couldn’t resist (Who cares) anyway.

A/9 V/9 M/7 (IMO ending sucked balls)


Posted by modistru on 01-04-2008 02:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by corniche
I'm surprised that so many of you dismiss the AR issue. I have seen the full 2.35 movie and there is no question in my mind that this 16:9 "full screen" rip seriously degrades the visual compositions of the theatrical release.

The release is certainly of exceptional high quality. It's just that the high quality is applied to only three fourths of the movie.

This AR thing, it seems, will NEVER go away. So many people...so little comprehension. I wonder how many of them have praised "The Good The Bad and ... the Missing."?



... whining should be against the rules. Just enjoy the better release for the next 12 weeks before you go and purchase the 'correct' aspect ratio (which will be the same). Super 35... look it up.

v - 9
a - 9
m - 9.5

'sall good.


Posted by corniche on 01-04-2008 06:48 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by modistru
... whining should be against the rules. Just enjoy the better release for the next 12 weeks before you go and purchase the 'correct' aspect ratio (which will be the same). Super 35... look it up.

v - 9
a - 9
m - 9.5

'sall good.



Wasn't whining, and not looking for a fight. I could have been clearer and said, "you either lose a quarter of the picture or see too much of it, which ruins the intended frame composition." I understand matting, hard and soft, as well as film types.

Comparing my 2.35 copy with this one, I grant that the differences are mostly due to absence of matting rather than side cropped pan-scan. I still prefer the director-cinematographer to make the decision. NCFOM looks BETTER to me in 2.35. Especially the awesome initial landscapes.

Aspect ratios matter...Would you cut the sides off your favorite painting OR use a frame that included large parts of the wall, top and bottom?

All that aside, the current rip is certainly very fine indeed...as I said before.

Cheers


Posted by J Fresh on 01-04-2008 08:09 PM:

you guys do realize that this 16x9 copy is UNCROPPED

It shows MORE than the 2.35:1

Now I'm all for correct AR but this could be even better

besides, I'm sure most media players and DVD players can change it to the correct AR on the fly

__________________


Posted by corniche on 01-04-2008 08:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by J Fresh
you guys do realize that this 16x9 copy is UNCROPPED

It shows MORE than the 2.35:1

Now I'm all for correct AR but this could be even better

besides, I'm sure most media players and DVD players can change it to the correct AR on the fly



Unmatted, more accurately. Shown in a theater, a mask would be placed over the lens to produce the proper 2.35. I wonder, now that some multiplexes are using dlp digital projectors, if this could be an actual copy of the theatrical release supplied to those exhibitors.

PS...I still think MORE is LESS. Let the director decide.


Posted by [-BiG_W-] on 01-04-2008 09:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by corniche
Unmatted, more accurately. Shown in a theater, a mask would be placed over the lens to produce the proper 2.35. I wonder, now that some multiplexes are using dlp digital projectors, if this could be an actual copy of the theatrical release supplied to those exhibitors.

PS...I still think MORE is LESS. Let the director decide.



If this was the retail then I 100% agree with your criticism. But this is a pre-retail dvd screener, and as such it's a blinding release. I'm happy with this copy until the retail comes out. Hell, it's not even out in the theaters in my country and this beats a cam/ts/tc/r5 any day of the week, correctly matted or not


Posted by corniche on 01-04-2008 09:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by [-BiG_W-]
If this was the retail then I 100% agree with your criticism. But this is a pre-retail dvd screener, and as such it's a blinding release. I'm happy with this copy until the retail comes out. Hell, it's not even out in the theaters in my country and this beats a cam/ts/tc/r5 any day of the week, correctly matted or not


We've no disagreement, then. I always remind people about AR issues because I believe too many people accept s**t from their tv providers, eg, that has been "modified to fit your screen"....and others complain about those awful black bars that broke their TV set.

It just seems that an awful lot of people don't understand the problem at all.

And, I confess, I'm sort of a fanatic about it. I take every opportunity I can find to get on the AR soapbox.


Posted by OSH on 01-04-2008 09:35 PM:

When it comes to the crop/AR nothing is missing that isn't supposed to be missing.


Posted by Rotor1999 on 01-04-2008 11:46 PM:

http://www.modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~leopold/AV/FilmToVideo/


read the bit on Super-35


Posted by denmat on 01-06-2008 05:41 PM:

too many people worrying about very little IMO, the ar looks fine, its 16:9 and if there is any thing lost at the side it's not much. Als on a quick run through this looks clean from watermaks and scrollers (which everyone else seems to have overlooked) which makes this all the more excellent. One of the best movies of all time. The ending, well I for one am sick of the old cliched hollywood ending where the goodguy always comes out on top. So enough on the ending. Think on those who have not watched yet.

V=9.5
A=8 (excellent, pity its not ac3)
M=11/10 (yeah its that good, and its the Coen Brothers back to their old selfs.


Posted by FF-73 on 01-16-2008 10:17 PM:

V:10
A:10
M:10 - Brilliant movie.


Posted by CARR73 on 01-19-2008 09:20 PM:

V : 9
A : 9
M : ?

"Don't Fuck With The Baldies" Great release.


Posted by Jassll on 01-29-2008 04:30 AM:

Video - 9/10 - basically perfect
Audio - 9/10
Movie - 7/10 - I will need to read up on this


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 AM.
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.