VCDQuality Forums
Show all 38 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Peter Jacksons King Kong CD2 CD3 *REPACK* *READNFO* - CAM - HYdRO (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67738)


Posted by X69 on 12-15-2005 06:48 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by vurtX on 12-15-2005 06:51 PM:

video = 2 ... cant see a fucking thing
audio = 2 -- absolute shite
movie = ?? ... yeh like im gonna spoil an epic by watchin this

ok so i read the NFO blurb about this is 4:3 blah blah, why even bother? its total shit .. you'd get more respect by releasing anything watchable , rather than rushing out the first turd that drops outta your arse.


Posted by White Rabbit on 12-15-2005 07:21 PM:

i didnt think it was THAT bad for a cam. sure, its not great but ive seen worse

FROM SAMPLE:

v 5 (its a bit blurry and grainy, and kinda dark but seemed watchable, nothing more)

a 3.5 (is this a cam? i think its just really really bad direct audio coz audio from a microphone doesnt usually have a hiss to it. it just sounds like bad direct audio from a drive in but someones filtered it the wrong way. on the other hand, im prolly wrong)

m ? (it looks decent but i will prolly go and see it, if i dont have time coz of the time of year then ill wait for a better copy)

thanks hydro but this isnt your best work

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.


Posted by Air1 on 12-15-2005 07:40 PM:

already nuked for bad AR still - can't verify though cause i won't grab it, i don't care to see this movie


Posted by Flommy on 12-15-2005 08:00 PM:

this is awfull but hey the first one out wount be long for a good ts or a nice tc is here i think

V-4
A-2
M-10 this is by far the best movie of the year


Posted by Integrity on 12-15-2005 08:04 PM:

Some of you MOFOS crack me up last review for this crap as release was 3.4/3.1/7.9 and this time it was repacked and now all the sudden its a 7.0/7.0/9.5 dam someone jipped the ratings on this or was quick to score it. withought looking at it.


Posted by Clessy on 12-15-2005 08:15 PM:

Technicolly should something be nuked for being in 4:3 even if the movie is 16:9. I mean thats like saying all Fullscreen DVD releases should be nuked.


Posted by jaxxboss on 12-15-2005 08:39 PM:

I farted 4/4/6


Posted by me-self on 12-15-2005 08:45 PM:

V:3 (Blur-o-vision)
S:3 (Just plan bad)
F:? Heard its gd and watch the cinema viewing.


Posted by Goturenumba on 12-15-2005 09:52 PM:

Video = 3.5 (generous)
Audio = 3.5
Movie = 10 Fantastic


Posted by Konichiwa on 12-15-2005 10:01 PM:

still looks like pure shit.... ohh I know hydro why not go out and cam yourselves insted of grabbing a xvid source off p2ps...
pure shit
0/0/7


Posted by Iammyself on 12-15-2005 10:09 PM:

if this was a shitty movie it would have okay rates for a CAM... oh well its a good 1st rls... 6/5/5...too long... good action, though it doesn't make it a good movie


Posted by DBXfirefly on 12-15-2005 10:47 PM:

video = -1 cant see shit

audio = ouch my ears


movie = awsome but dont waste ur eyes nor time on this totaly shite rls..they should be shot, then hung, then shot some more for this embarresment!!!


Posted by Konichiwa on 12-15-2005 11:37 PM:

the worst cam iv seen since the fast and the furious, which the camera guy put vasaline all over his lense.
give it up hydro... just quit..

pure garbage, looks like Kong took a big ole pooper on the cam..


Posted by SuperDong on 12-16-2005 12:22 AM:

Question

How is that we got a Screener (or something almost as good as a Screener) the day Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith came out but it hasn't happened for King Kong? How does that work?


Posted by nykid on 12-16-2005 12:27 AM:

more like RECRAP..

NOT EVEN GONNA RATE THIS.


Posted by Longveiw on 12-16-2005 04:31 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by SuperDong
How is that we got a Screener (or something almost as good as a Screener) the day Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith came out but it hasn't happened for King Kong? How does that work?


that was a workprint...

This is sooooo freaking terrible.
Very very very poor release.

1/1/?


Posted by 0nslaught on 12-16-2005 05:04 AM:

V: 2
A: 2
M: ?

Pure crap.


Posted by goman on 12-16-2005 08:16 AM:

not worth the download:

5, 2, not watched yet


Posted by bernashmat on 12-16-2005 09:43 AM:

Definatly a bit darkish, But watchable


Posted by charliechan10 on 12-16-2005 10:21 AM:

Good first release,abrupt ending.
Others act on previous posts and write shite,If this had been a maVen release all your ratings would have been higher.
V/5
A/6
M/8
No one asks you to d/l it,but it certainly helps when making comments about it if you do.


Posted by DBXfirefly on 12-16-2005 10:54 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by charliechan100
Good first release,
V/5
A/6
M/8



out.of.sync, out.of.sync, out.of.sync its a Cam and shit for a cam and there normaly bad!

u voted 5 for video and 6 for audio. hate to think what qualifys as bad in ur book, if u wanna watch shit rls and think there good then thats ur opinion but i wouldnt waste good bandwith on this shit when a ts with be here in a few days. wait for a better rls or goto the movies.!


Posted by Striped on 12-16-2005 01:40 PM:

an average cam overall , sync is fine with repack and i enjoyed this release with some alterations to the pic and sound. and like fuck i'm gonna sit in a seat at the movies for 3 fuckin hours, so thanks for the chance to see this so early

5/5/8


Posted by mally on 12-16-2005 04:30 PM:

Peter Jacksons King Kong CD2 CD3 *REPACK* *READNFO* - CAM - HYdRO

having read some of the early comments on this release i was rather hessitant about wasting the time and bw but as there wasnt much else bein released lately i decided to have a look after all the first few posters rarely look at anything but the sample,to try and make it look a little better i ran it thru main concept encoded it to svcd and then to dvdr then watched the whole thing on standalone,and it really isnt that bad certainly not as bad as the first few posters made it out to be.i dont think its a cam tho i think its a ts the audio sounds direct to me it dosnt have that distant hollow sound that cams have and the slight hiss/buzz in it is something u get from direct sound probly a faulty jack or sumthin.the vid is a bit dull and theres like a shadow around the edges but its certainly watchable.i dont fancy goin 3 hrs without a smoke so itl do till sumthin better comes up been a while since we had a 4cd svcd so could be a while.
cant really give Hydro too much props for this cause all they done was dled the avi.ts from p2p and converted to mpg,maybe if theyd cleaned it up a bit.anyway rating as a ts which is what i think it is and compared to ther ts's
vid 5 watchable but coulda been filtered to look better and still a bit squished.
audio 6 direct but slight buzz/hiss repack is now in sync
movie 7 bit long takes a while for action to start


Posted by SuperDong on 12-16-2005 05:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Longveiw
that was a workprint...

This is sooooo freaking terrible.
Very very very poor release.

1/1/?



Oh no, I know this is a cam, I don't download sh*tty cams. I only download Telesyncs, workprints or of course screeners. I'm just asking how were they able to get a workprint of Revenge of the Sith as soon as it was released but they couldn't do it with King Kong. Is it just that they failed to secure who they handed out copies of Revenge of the Sith, or how does that work? Who are the people who steal these copies?


Posted by kidkrate001 on 12-16-2005 07:22 PM:

Nice early release,and a quick repack.
6/6/6
Movie is good,but waayyy drawn out.
Fuck peter jackson,and fuck the lord of the rings too.Tighten this shit up,we know the story.
Cams rock,hydro gave you something, thanks


Posted by neysa59 on 12-16-2005 07:29 PM:

Hmmm Well I havent actually watched this but i did take a look at it in various parts on all three cd's. I have yet to see what is so bad about this at all. I hear no hiss the audio actually sounds pretty good. Yes there is dark parts but its like that in the theatres. Camming dark scenes aint the easiest thing to do to begin with.
This is free. We ought to be just thankful that someone is out there that takes the chances and brings these to us. At least it is watchable for the people out there who want to watch the cam instead of waiting for dvdrips.


Posted by Konichiwa on 12-16-2005 07:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by kidkrate001
Nice early release,and a quick repack.
6/6/6
Movie is good,but waayyy drawn out.
Fuck peter jackson,and fuck the lord of the rings too.Tighten this shit up,we know the story.
Cams rock,hydro gave you something, thanks


HYdRO didnt give us shit.. stolen source + shitty audio.
stolen video from p2p.


Posted by SwooP-CrawL on 12-16-2005 08:40 PM:

PoT+HYdRO= NYC China Town silvers...


Give em a break they just release this shit, they dont make it...none of you helped anybody here pay for this... just rate it and move on...

Thank you HYdRO for making it so i dont have to buy this in some shop in china town!!!

__________________


:::FOR RENT:::


Posted by fakeout on 12-16-2005 10:44 PM:

I agree, give hydro a break, the release isn't that bad. I just watched the sample and yes the faces are squashed but if you scale to 16:9 TV it comes out fine. There is a slight hiss on the audio, that's all. Other than that you can hear everything fine. It reminds me of releases you can pick up on the streets of Asia where they've zoomed in too far to the screen. But it's not as bad as shit like hookah's derailed release. This release looks watchable if you really can't wait for something better.

Having said all that I'll be waiting for maven's TS I'm not in too much of a hurry to watch a 3 hour movie.


Posted by GGODD2 on 12-16-2005 10:58 PM:

first off the the movie was sweet and a must see on the big screen. as far as the cam it made me sick to see it so badly presented im glade you want to be a first to relese but damn on a movie like this do it right .

vid :2
aud:1
movie:10+


Posted by alluro on 12-17-2005 01:33 AM:

Well, I watched the sample and I have to say that it is not that bad.

V:5
A:7 (My copy has spanish audio dubbed:-)
M:Haven't watched it

MALCOLM


Posted by garyhopkin on 12-17-2005 01:49 AM:

i dont know what all you lot were on when you watched it,even if you did watch it that is.

just put it to dvd and watching on a w/s tv,and ive seen a lot worse cams.

why dont you wankers get off your arses and have a go yourself if all you can do is bitch and moan about nearly everything that comes out.

First post here,and probaly my last after i get warned for flaming or something

v-6/a-5/m-6(for a cam)



::EDIT:: Fuck off Poindexter, I Cam movies in my sleep! - NS::


Posted by jrkey2 on 12-17-2005 02:46 AM:

don''t know anymore, converted to dvd. 16:9 and it runs pretty good really dark in the night scene when Kong snatches the chick but othere wise decent for a cam and quick rls thanks hydro. A-6 V-7 M-9 rocks. After all it is labeled a cam


Posted by WarlockWeary on 12-17-2005 06:14 PM:

Man You Guys Are Mean ...

I watched this on my tv and ive seen a lot worse cams.

At Least This Guy Who Did This One ..
Knows How To Turn OFF The AUTO FOCUS!!!

Seems all you guys do is bitch and moan about nearly everything that comes out ;(

Thanks For The Rel !

rate: v=6
a=6
m=8


Posted by chrispeters on 12-17-2005 06:24 PM:

Camera Phone ?
3
3
9

__________________
Same shit....Different Day........


Posted by madmatt30 on 12-17-2005 06:51 PM:

methinks theres a few too many maven fanboys on here, No disrepect to maven ,they do set the standard on quality at the mo but really this isnt that bad& should be rated on its own merits as a *CAM* & not on what youre all expecting in the next couple of days.

id rate 6/6/9

the video is dark yes,but on lighter scenes its actually not too bad quality at all with a little tinkering.the sound is very hissy but at least its clear,if anything its lacking bass but at least you can hear the dialogue clearly.

compared to the swine release id rate the video on this one slightly better,the audio is worse without a doubt though.
if you must see it id go for this one over the swine release as its a cd less.
Film is excellent,the mrs had tears in her eyes at the end


Posted by sphere on 01-14-2006 01:50 AM:

7/10 for me,digitally converted it took more of the hash out of it.still good.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 PM.
Show all 38 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.