VCDQuality Forums - The Transporter *SVCD* *Internal* - DVD SCR

Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Transporter *SVCD* *Internal* - DVD SCR - ASZEON (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=14949)

Posted by Khameleon808 on 02-10-2003 05:00 PM:

UHHHH ok

I ll leave it up to you guys, i think the one before was just fine. Unless I missed something?

Posted by VCD_MAD on 02-10-2003 05:02 PM:

WOW !!

that should be NUKED!!!

why,
well it looks like its not incoded proper
BAD A.R

check the sample out and you'll see

2/6/7

Posted by VCD_MAD on 02-10-2003 05:08 PM:

check out the NFO lol

this release should also be NUKED
why release CRAP !! like this ?

DAMN another screener FUCKED UP !!!

i dont know how GROUPS fuck screeners up , i just dont know .

:: maybe the same reason you think an iNT can be NUKED ? :/

Posted by mathbob6 on 02-10-2003 05:14 PM:

worst jpegs ever

Posted by daNnY^4LiFe on 02-10-2003 05:32 PM:

Tell me your kidding right?

Posted by Khameleon808 on 02-10-2003 05:33 PM:

You not bullshittin there

One of the cardinal rules of rating movie , dont just go by the Jpeg. buT GODDAMNNNNNNNN!

true i dont rip the movies or bring as much to the table as these guys , but i could make better jpegs blindfolded on a laptop with a low battery in the middle of northern territory of the andes while midgets in tight leather speghetti strapped bikini's with sharpened sticks poking me in the ribs with high pitched cackleing laughter spilling from their partially infected crack pipe blistered cumtrap mouths.

whoa..... sorry , i kinda went off in another corner of my distorted semi rusted and alkaloided mind

bottom line , LOOK AT YOU JPEGS BEFORE YOU POST THEM.

and if you did, and those met your approval , we should all chip in and get these dragqueens some glasses or contact corrective lenses

~~~~~~~~~~~~K~~~~~~~~~~~

" your mom tasted better this time, what have you been doing?"

Posted by Khameleon808 on 02-10-2003 05:38 PM:

I forgot

You guys should give up , we dont hear from you since june and you are still bringing shit to the table, if you want send your equipment to me.

or sell it and move out of you mom's

Posted by Wolter on 02-10-2003 05:45 PM:

why is there another release?

Posted by Phantasmical on 02-10-2003 05:45 PM:

Last one had sync problems

Posted by Kane2k on 02-10-2003 05:46 PM:

The jpeg shows an improperly deinterlaced frame.. its not really a big deal, could just be a fluke. If the entire movie isnt deinterlaced properly though that would suck. I am by the way just commenting on the jpegs, I already have a DVDScr of this one so I'm not gonna bother.

Posted by phoR20 on 02-10-2003 05:52 PM:

junk

Posted by Davy on 02-10-2003 06:12 PM:

Re: You not bullshittin there

quote:
Originally posted by Khameleon808
bottom line , LOOK AT YOU JPEGS BEFORE YOU POST THEM.

and if you did, and those met your approval , we should all chip in and get these dragqueens some glasses or contact corrective lenses

I'm 99% sure its VCDQ Staff which produce the Jpeg's, rather than the release groups (Out of the sample).

Posted by HoldDaSalad on 02-10-2003 06:13 PM:

shit

I don't judge by the jpeg but from what i can see on the jpeg in this situation the quality isn't that good, To honestly judge it i would have to see a sample. Who cares its an internal so its not meant for us. I never heard of nuking an internal, can it be possible?

Posted by Faceman on 02-10-2003 06:23 PM:

JPEGs do tell all in this case, bad IVTC. No deinterlacing should happen.

Posted by Pra3t0 on 02-10-2003 06:27 PM:

Why are you retards judging a release by a JPG? And why are you assuming the WHOLE movie is okay based on a tiny clip? Oh... I forgot. You don't give a shit. Am I the only one who's actually downloading these movies and watching them all the way through? JEEZUS!! Teenage punks.

Posted by Faceman on 02-10-2003 06:39 PM:

You aren't showing any more intelligence by that post. The JPEGs show it. It's a messed up release. No one is offending you.

Posted by backoff on 02-10-2003 07:48 PM:

NUKED

NUKED for bad AR and interlaced... Better luck next time ASZEON.

*Parasiticgannon: I think they just tagged on INTERNAL just so they wont put up proper, becuase the other needed no proper.

Posted by hippyhater on 02-10-2003 08:04 PM:

the other did need a proper. out of sync audip.

i guess were gonna have to wait for the dvdrip

we should just merge the video fo the other one to the audio of this one

Posted by SBlack on 02-10-2003 08:22 PM:

deja-vu

This is turing out like fucking Minority Report where they just didnt seem to get it right but imo they were all watchable.

Posted by TaKeAbYtE on 02-10-2003 09:02 PM:

This should be nuked...

Posted by knweedo on 02-10-2003 09:07 PM:

I haven't seen this yet, dling now, but the first rule is, don't go by the damn jpg. The jpg is to see if you wana download it, not rate it's quality.

Posted by Tweezer on 02-10-2003 09:09 PM:

Re: UHHHH ok

quote:
Originally posted by Khameleon808
I ll leave it up to you guys, i think the one before was just fine. Unless I missed something?

the one before was a divx rencode and it was horribly out of sync

Posted by petrocs on 02-10-2003 09:24 PM:

The Transporter (2002) *PROPER* *DVD SCREENER* - ASZEON

Essh! There was a high request to make
this an proper instead of internal, so
here's the directory fix to race internal
enjoy! Sorry for the previous release.

VideoCD & VCDCentral releases was nuked
for numorous reasons (desync, bad audio,
video glitches etc) Here we bring you the
PROPER from our internal release.

Whatever that means Still nuked

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005

Posted by laxdguy12 on 02-10-2003 09:31 PM:

You guys piss and mone right now about how this sucks..."get out of the scene" i read and shit but once there is a repack you'll be "thank you so much aszeon". So wait for the repack, 2 days or so probley...u guys will live.

--EDIT--

Everyone makes mistakes...remeber the first 8 mile dvd scr by boozers? If not i'll remind u CCE LOGO.

Posted by Faceman on 02-10-2003 10:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by knweedo
I haven't seen this yet, dling now, but the first rule is, don't go by the damn jpg. The jpg is to see if you wana download it, not rate it's quality.

JPG shows no one should download it. You can see the mess up in encoding.

Posted by commiewhore on 02-10-2003 11:31 PM:

wow

deinterlace much ? going by the pic and sample, i dont member the original ever being nuked, and then i see this and i cry.

Posted by CraZY8 on 02-11-2003 12:18 AM:

Re: You not bullshittin there

quote:
Originally posted by Khameleon808
One of the cardinal rules of rating movie , dont just go by the Jpeg. buT GODDAMNNNNNNNN!

true i dont rip the movies or bring as much to the table as these guys , but i could make better jpegs blindfolded on a laptop with a low battery in the middle of northern territory of the andes while midgets in tight leather speghetti strapped bikini's with sharpened sticks poking me in the ribs with high pitched cackleing laughter spilling from their partially infected crack pipe blistered cumtrap mouths.

whoa..... sorry , i kinda went off in another corner of my distorted semi rusted and alkaloided mind

bottom line , LOOK AT YOU JPEGS BEFORE YOU POST THEM.

and if you did, and those met your approval , we should all chip in and get these dragqueens some glasses or contact corrective lenses

~~~~~~~~~~~~K~~~~~~~~~~~

" your mom tasted better this time, what have you been doing?"

HAHAHAHAH
this guy is hilarious
jokes man pure jokes keep up the good work

Posted by Jimmni on 02-11-2003 12:24 AM:

If everyone is going bitch that it's not deinterlaced properly, why don't you just download a nice DivX instead? If you're watching it on your computer, why are you even bothering with SVCDs? If you *aren't* watching it on your computer, but are sticking it in a standalone DVD player and watching it on a TV, it won't matter if they didn't deinterlace it properly, so stop bitching.

Posted by daz..griff on 02-11-2003 12:35 AM:

got got this last time,and it was a lot better quality..just a waist of time if u ask me

Posted by kid_rusher on 02-11-2003 03:17 AM:

Why dont groups just use dvd2svcd? It's really simple and every rip seems to be top notch quality. But then again everyone flames groups for using dvd2svcd. Well, I guess every group gets flamed regardless, and that is the sad thing.

Posted by Snowbording4138 on 02-11-2003 03:32 AM:

ok u need to DE interlace lol

Posted by oddy on 02-11-2003 04:22 AM:

buch of assholes rating jpg's as usual........

8/8/8

Posted by SirGriper on 02-11-2003 05:48 AM:

So the question is...

Has anyone actually downloaded and watched this, and if so, how is it? Interlaced like the pic, or is it all kosh? Lates...

Posted by coathanger on 02-11-2003 06:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by kid_rusher
Why dont groups just use dvd2svcd? It's really simple and every rip seems to be top notch quality. But then again everyone flames groups for using dvd2svcd. Well, I guess every group gets flamed regardless, and that is the sad thing.

I have used dvd2svcd and not all movies come out top notch. Try to rip The Hunt For Red October and you will see what I mean. I dl that movie twice and then ripped it myself, all 3 with the same result. Finally just ripped and encoded it without dvd2svcd and it came out perfect.

Posted by kid_rusher on 02-11-2003 07:07 AM:

coathanger,
Besides Red October, Have there been any other rips that have not come out to your satisfactory? I'm just trying to get a feel for dvd2svcd because every movie that i have used it for has been successful. I have not yet tried Red October but if this is just one of the handful of movies that do not work with dvd2svcd then I believe using the prog is very efficient. The time saved using the program and ease, and quality definitely outweigh the remote possibility of a bad rip happening.
Otherwise, what if a group renamed the cue sheet and the bin. Would anyone ever know if dvd2svcd was used?

Posted by flipp0r on 02-11-2003 08:10 AM:

Re: I forgot

quote:
Originally posted by Khameleon808
You guys should give up , we dont hear from you since june and you are still bringing shit to the table, if you want send your equipment to me.

or sell it and move out of you mom's

02/09/2003 DVDRIP DVDR 24 Hour Party People *LiMiTED* ASZEON

go home. kthx.

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."

Posted by lo.pro on 02-11-2003 08:18 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jimmni
If everyone is going bitch that it's not deinterlaced properly, why don't you just download a nice DivX instead? If you're watching it on your computer, why are you even bothering with SVCDs? If you *aren't* watching it on your computer, but are sticking it in a standalone DVD player and watching it on a TV, it won't matter if they didn't deinterlace it properly, so stop bitching.

plenty of ppl these days have an HDTV, foolio.

and anyway, interlace artifacting can be seen even on a regular tv. it's not like a properly interlaced broadcast.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."

____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________

.

Posted by homerjay on 02-11-2003 11:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Kane2k
I already have a DVDScr of this one so I'm not gonna bother.

care to share which version you have and what the quality is as so far none have been watchable - have they ??

Posted by Faceman on 02-11-2003 02:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by oddy
buch of assholes rating jpg's as usual........

8/8/8

Oddly enough one of the assholes here is you.

Deinterlace really isn't the major issue here, ITVCing. The DVD probably wasn't 29.976, it was probably 23.976 with pulldown. Who knows what they did, you can see ghosting, deinterlacing isn't going to help that.

Also they encoded CKY4 as 16:9....not a group who checks their work.

Watching this on a TV isn't going to help. It's a bad release, stop posting about judging JPEGs only, b.c the JPEGs tell you what is wrong here.

If I seen the sample or the original DVD I could tell more, but I would say deinterlacing wouldn't be the major problem (merry well could be).

Posted by rencodeit? on 02-11-2003 05:45 PM:

maybe just not set for pc

hey guys not defending the quality but i do alot of capturing with a ads instant dvd it captures mpg2 in real time but dont deinterlace results it looks like shit on pc when i catch an image of it but looks great on tv as tv is more forgiving may not be the case here just my 2 cents

Posted by coathanger on 02-11-2003 08:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by kid_rusher
coathanger,
Besides Red October, Have there been any other rips that have not come out to your satisfactory? I'm just trying to get a feel for dvd2svcd because every movie that i have used it for has been successful. I have not yet tried Red October but if this is just one of the handful of movies that do not work with dvd2svcd then I believe using the prog is very efficient. The time saved using the program and ease, and quality definitely outweigh the remote possibility of a bad rip happening.
Otherwise, what if a group renamed the cue sheet and the bin. Would anyone ever know if dvd2svcd was used?

It has only been a couple for me. My suggestion is to run dvd2svcd but do not delete the extracted_audio.mp2 and enconded_video.m2v file until you watch it to see the results. If the results are not up to par you can use tmpgenc to mux and re-encode the movie.

If you have any other questions, we should probably move this to another thead. Kinda getting off topic. oops

Posted by ushutdafukup on 02-12-2003 04:52 AM:

i thought dvd screeners were suppose to look good..........this looks like total crap on a stick.
1/2/4......lol

__________________
Bow Down!

Posted by lipster on 02-12-2003 03:00 PM:

Im happy that i didnt waste my time dl this movie and im even happier that it was nuke even befere it hit sites...What i dont get is the pic sucks and ppl still ask for it

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM.

Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page