VCDQuality Forums
Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Open Water *SVCD* - DVD SCR - NOX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=47374)


Posted by wazzers on 09-28-2004 11:57 PM:

Nice quality dvd cscr usual b+w intervals and protery of blah blah

8/8/4-sucked badly


Posted by Scorch on 09-29-2004 12:15 AM:

What a quick release.. though this looks like it might be a mislabeled TC?

EDIT: Nevermind, must just be a bad sample jpeg.. the divx release looks great


Posted by diekund on 09-29-2004 12:16 AM:

jeeesus this video looks terrible, not NOX's or DvP's fault, but the fault of the film makers. the audio sounds like its taken from a cam source at a cinema. they only had $120,000 spent on this movie hence its shitness, but jeesus thats bad. props to you NOX
rip is perfect tho, just the source sucks


Posted by jmur on 09-29-2004 12:31 AM:

about time this was put on vcdq, lol. anywho. vid isnt that great. it looks like its out of focus or something, still completely watchable. as far as rhe sound goes, its perfect. there are b&w scenes, and property of lions gate watermarks. im not gonna bother with this, but its a good release if u havent seen it yet,

7/9/5


Posted by Redemption1980 on 09-29-2004 12:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Scorch
What a quick release.. though this looks like it might be a mislabeled TC?

EDIT: Nevermind, must just be a bad sample jpeg.. the divx release looks great



Why are you rating the jpegs, jpegs tell you very little, if they did then people would all get the DIVX version, when this one looks a bit better.

I like the release and i like the film, low budget and all.

8/9/8


Posted by vip3r on 09-29-2004 01:00 AM:

not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think. Movie wasn't bad, i'll wait till retail though. Good job on this super quick release guys. Seems like it's " DVD-SCR Season "

7/8.5/7


Posted by liteflihi on 09-29-2004 03:06 AM:

Is it me or is the divx version choppy? Looks like about 18 FPS. Sound was fine.


Posted by Rico on 09-29-2004 03:14 AM:

Great job from NOX... I don't think that anyone could ask for anything more. Copy looked great to me on the bigscreen, crisp sound, low-budget movie but fun to watch.

9/9/5


Posted by HcC on 09-29-2004 05:19 AM:

CRAP

"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it

__________________
--==HcC==--


Posted by sloth1234 on 09-29-2004 05:33 AM:

Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by HcC
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it



you sir are a F*cking moron, ok the film was low budget and could have been more interesting to some people..but honestly shut the hell up, you don't go and tell the outcome of a movie in a public forum for people who might actually want to watch it. I myself have heard mixed reviews about the movie but still might watch it that doesn't mean I wanna know what happens in it asshole...damn..
some people should just keep their opinions to themselves..
anyways..9.5 for video... - .5 for watermarks because they are kind of annoying and 10 for audio..


Posted by aWe on 09-29-2004 05:53 AM:

SORRY... Posting on the release only... not other peoples flaming posts:

release: everything about it was FINE. watchable and no problems, couldnt have expected more from a low budget film.

8.7/8-9/5.3 - bleh watermarks dont matter -- this movie is mostly water anyways = Þ

just another low budget film that made its way to the box office.

__________________

IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/VCDQUALITY
IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/prolifeabortionists
"@Dwaggy · pirates are hella kinky
Avenue_1 · how do u know this?
@Dwaggy · i'm a pirate"


Posted by MTV on 09-29-2004 07:38 AM:

I hate to say xvid - but if you want this film get the xvid. its loads better quality than this rip.dont know wot the hell they did to it but the dvp rip is 99% perfect.i got both samples before d,loading the dvp copy & glad i did.

7 / 9 / 6


Posted by MaKEshiFT on 09-29-2004 07:47 AM:

Originally posted by HcC
CRAP
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. Not only that, its about ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

I FULLY AGREE WITH SLOTH1234!!!
MAN WTF IS YOUR DAMN PROBLEM!! On half of EVERY one that WAS Actually planning on watching this.. YOU are a complete ASSHOLE for telling the Ending on a PUBLIC Forum!! I mean we are so thankfull for idiots as your self ..and blessed by your complete lack of respect for others by doing so, and yet utterly amazed by your complete idiocy at the same time!
Yes this may not be the best movie. but it is just that..
"A MOVIE!!" ,, so the next time you attempt to GRACE US with your supreme intelect.. realize one thing.. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY! Ruining the movie for anyone//.. as you did me and i imagine a few others, is a Complete idiot thing to do..
8.7/ 9 / 8 (if you take the movie for what it is.. a LOW Budget movie)

[EDIT:: Nice flame, but I removed the spoilers and you bastards keep re-posting em!! - Neversoft]


Posted by t8yman on 09-29-2004 08:26 AM:

Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by HcC
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it




CUNT

I have yet to watch this, my mife really wants to watch it, and now I know the ending, and therefore dont want to watch it now.. Why don't you fuck off and die, I'm surprised they let you into the theatre to see this, isn't it a 15 certificate or something?

9/9/ who fuckin cares now anyway.

YOU FUCKING WANKER


Posted by Debo on 09-29-2004 08:55 AM:

ill grab this
7/8/1


omfg i coudnt beleive this movie
pure shit

__________________


Posted by VonRashniek on 09-29-2004 09:04 AM:

Re: Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by sloth1234
you sir are a F*cking moron, ok the film was low budget and could have been more interesting to some people..but honestly shut the hell up, you don't go and tell the outcome of a movie in a public forum for people who might actually want to watch it. I myself have heard mixed reviews about the movie but still might watch it that doesn't mean I wanna know what happens in it asshole...damn..
some people should just keep their opinions to themselves..
anyways..9.5 for video... - .5 for watermarks because they are kind of annoying and 10 for audio..



Agreed, heh I waited for a good release to watch this, now why bother, I know how it ends, what a jacka$$.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.


Posted by ephid0r on 09-29-2004 12:00 PM:

8/8/0

was worse than the release I watched a few weeks back, for some sick reason I wanted to see if the sea wasnt pixelated to fuck this time


Posted by nozafc on 09-29-2004 02:12 PM:

from sample :

8/10/??

not seen movie yet, have heard mixed reviews


Posted by 404notfound on 09-29-2004 02:54 PM:

The next person to slag off another user i will punch them in THE FUCKING THROAT!

You all can't be that STUPID to have forgotten the rules i posted over and OVER and OVER a while back? What am i saying. Of course you all are!

If somebody does something you don't like REPORT THEM TO A FUCKING MOD AND IT WILL BE DEALT WITH! Turn the forum into a flame war and you are out. I don't care if you have 1 post or 1000.

404

__________________


Posted by iNz0 on 09-29-2004 04:29 PM:

I just saw the xvid version last night, which was in my opinion a perfect rip , as for the movie, it is truly a great movie.most ppl are just to narrow minded to see that.

PS : i am never going near the ocean again


Posted by bcool2k on 09-29-2004 05:21 PM:

Wow, this release finally made it to vcdqHEHE..Anyways, its definitely the best version out there.. Pic is widescreen and looks fine to me except it was filmed with a low rate camera and relatively low budget locales..Anyways No fault of NOx..Except for the occasional b&w scenes this film is short and mostly dull..NOt bad, but not great. Will def do till the retail DVDR..


7.5/8/6.5


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 09-29-2004 05:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jmur
about time this was put on vcdq, lol.



Shut up.


Posted by Nealo on 09-29-2004 06:13 PM:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

Mystic you crack me up

__________________


Posted by Neversoft on 09-29-2004 09:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by 404notfound
The next person to slag off another user i will punch them in THE FUCKING THROAT!

You all can't be that STUPID to have forgotten the rules i posted over and OVER and OVER a while back? What am i saying. Of course you all are!

If somebody does something you don't like REPORT THEM TO A FUCKING MOD AND IT WILL BE DEALT WITH! Turn the forum into a flame war and you are out. I don't care if you have 1 post or 1000.

404

I'm telling ya, it does my head in... Thanks you people who had the intelligence to keep quoting the guy who posted the spoilers - I had heaps of fun editing your posts, thanks!

(This movie does smell of palsied cunt though)

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.


Posted by dvdhouse111 on 09-29-2004 10:19 PM:

judging by the sample

video = 8

audio = 8

movie = havent watched yet

heard this low budgeter is along the same sort of camara work as blair witch and I liked that so will appeal to me i think

Music of mass destruction rocks dudes


Posted by Snoop on 09-30-2004 01:12 AM:

I don't remember reading this in the rules but a no-brainer should be if you post a spoiler and report the ending. Instant nuke. Ban em' for life. Yes sir mr. HcC c-ya later dumb-ass.

V - 7
A - 7
M - 6

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you work for UPS? I thougt I saw you checking out my package.


Posted by mogweezer on 09-30-2004 11:35 AM:

no way man. dont make sense - if u are reading a post 'about' open water, chances are there might be some plot description etc. if u 'really' have some sense, dont read the thread until after u have seen the film. u can see the quality votes over on the main page anyway. there's no need to read specific posts.

not everyone in the world has heard of 'spoilers' = i just wish ppl would use common sense. mores the point, the 'offending' post ppl are mentioning here doesn't actually reveal ANYTHING about the movies plot, at best he noted the chronology of scenes - and for a film set ENTIRELY in water, lets be honest; can a jpeg really say that much?

i rarely post here. and the above is one reason why. ppl exercising 'power' purely for the sake of it. Go sue Hollywood for making trailers that contain all of the best bits of a film, if it 'really' bothers u.

quality.

8/8/5 b/w flickers etc. as noted.


Posted by Hero_of_the_Day on 09-30-2004 01:37 PM:

It was supposed to look cheap, that was the feel and look the producers were going for. If that bothers some ppl, then they did a good job. As was stated earlier, like the Blair Witch Project.
Anyway, 9,8,7 - luckily I watched the last release, before all was given out.
Peace

__________________
Suck it up princess !!


Posted by mafioso on 09-30-2004 06:02 PM:

Thanks Neversoft

quote:
Originally posted by Neversoft
I'm telling ya, it does my head in... Thanks you people who had the intelligence to keep quoting the guy who posted the spoilers - I had heaps of fun editing your posts, thanks!

(This movie does smell of palsied cunt though)



NeverSoft, I appreciate your work editing out the spoilers. Would of sucked to know the ending before actually watching this shite. Oh well, at least it was free.

Maybe posting the ending should be an instant ban.

Video: 9
Audio: 8
Movie: Absolute vomit (but hey, that's just my opinion)

Nice work NOX!!

__________________
I cut the pockets out of all my pants


Posted by theinitialj on 09-30-2004 09:56 PM:

In my opinion this is a good copy. Video 9, Audio 9, haven't watched the whole movie yet but skimmed through it all. Seems almost perfect and a hell of a lot better then the previous cams.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 09-30-2004 10:30 PM:

decent dvdscr...could have been better, but overall its ok! the watermarks do leave a desire to just delete and not burn though.

movie sucked bad....poor decision making, but if its based off a true story then it couldn't have ended differently. but should have never been made into a movie, should have stayed in the newspaper, maybe a newspaper clipping would have been more interesting than this crap.

8/8/1 movie was zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz's. oh! yeah! I'm awake now..movie was shit.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by soeazy2004 on 10-01-2004 12:47 AM:

8/8/0

Quality great!
movies cant get any worse than this one


Posted by HcC on 10-01-2004 05:04 AM:

hahahaha. I can't believe you guys. You really made my day. Yes get angry, hahaha, watch the movie lol. It's really fun baiting you guys into flaming. Since all flames are being edited out, please feel free to spam my email adress [email protected]. I will enjoy reading them at work.


HcC - 1

Angry bit torrent kiddies - 0

btw pho or mystic-sex msg me assholes!

__________________
--==HcC==--


Posted by live_through_it on 10-01-2004 02:57 PM:

some of you people bitch too much about these releases
NOX you did perfect-
the movie rocks!
9/10/10


Posted by sneegle on 10-01-2004 07:58 PM:

HcC post

I gotta admit you are all going a bit far slagging off HcC

I was looking forward to watching this when i seen it advertised and like so many others went to cinema and watched it , what a waste of time this has to be the worst movie ever made in the history of filmaking, total crap , ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** , christ i could have made this film in 3 mins flat utter crap and i gotta admit i wish someone would have told me the friggin ending and how crap this was as they would've saved me a few quid, be thankful you didnt waste your money as for this realease

video 7
audio 8
Film itself (big fat friggin zero i was suicidal watchin it and am again thinkin of it "please shoot me i'll supply the gun"


Posted by HcC on 10-02-2004 06:40 AM:

THANK YOU SNEEGLE.

My point entirely summed up. I don't spoil movies. I spoil home videos.I don't go telling you what happened in the end of napolean dynamite(he eats tater tots from his pocket).

VOTE PEDRO

__________________
--==HcC==--


Posted by Dodgy Del on 10-03-2004 02:20 PM:

the property of lions gate films and the usual b/w scenes are enrolled into this shite film. apart from that its pretty good quality all round. grab this if you cant wait till dvd rip

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).


Posted by hilfiger2k on 10-04-2004 08:45 AM:

Excellent picture.
Excellent Sound.
Shit film.


Posted by bomb2k on 10-04-2004 10:40 AM:

This is the worst movie I have seen all year. Not because it's a low budget movie, but because it's just a horrible movie. The only thing I honestly liked about the movie was it's length. At least you don't suffer for too long watching the horrible thing. bah.


Posted by The Golfer on 10-05-2004 01:12 PM:

Liked the release. Liked the movie.

It was tense.

7/7/7

7 all round.


Posted by coat on 10-10-2004 02:17 AM:

This video encode was less than great for a dvd screener . 6
The audio sounds like it was shot with a home viseo camera like you would expect from a cam, weird. otherwise 9

The movie sux. what a waste of time


Posted by HcC on 10-12-2004 05:30 PM:

wheres my emails guys ;/

__________________
--==HcC==--


Posted by manofice on 10-22-2004 03:43 AM:

WORST MOVIE EVER!!! The ending sux

8/9/-4


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 AM.
Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.