VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Signs *REAL* - SCREENER - ESOTERiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=9023)

It didnt take them long...

"10.0 (1) 10.0 (1) 1.0 (1)"

My view, 6.5/8/?

quote:

---

It didnt take them long...

---

quote:

---

"10.0 (1) 10.0 (1) 1.0 (1)"

---

quote:

---

My view, 5.5/8/?

---

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message

Looks pretty good. Alittle hazy but watchable. The sound is good as well.

7/7/7

quote:

---

Originally posted by PhAnToMs

i see what u mean didnt take u long to be a asshole



yes this is what i am rating it to its a vcd and this is the best damn quality u can get from a VCD thats why its the VCD page not the fuckin svcd

your view is up ur ass man this is perfect quality best possible for a VCD in my opinion


10/10/9 here

---

finally been waitinf for a good rls of this.

props to ya!!

7/7/9

Although I didn't see this release of I think I can get a pretty good idea on how it'll look like. The JPEG looks aboulutley marvelous, and since I've seen posts on here saying that the audio is good then I guess it doesn't lie. Although audio and video are good I didn't enjoy this movie as much as I would have liked to, especially since it's from the director who made two of my favorite movies of all time (Unbreakable & The Sixth Sense) I just thought the story was sorta bland and just plain stupid.

quote:

---

He's an asshole cause he didnt give it a 10??? Its not a 10, so looks like your the asshole!!!!!! Last time I checked 10 ment perfect....its not perfect!!!! ya its a vcd and it looks good but its not a 10 so looks like youve labled the wrong person an asshole!!!!

---

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message

VERY nice. Excellent pic and brilliant crystal clear stereo sound (near perfect).

8/9/8.

i wonder how this would of been as an svcd

wicked nice good job eso

top notch from the sample, will watcht he whole thing and give another but from sample 8/9/7
Good screener It woulda been good svcd but wouldnt have changed it that much so good they left it vcd. And you faggots stop arguing It is an oppinion thats why they are all different you fucking idiots enough w/ the acting like 6 yr olds.

quote:

---

Originally posted by PhAnToMs


then name a 10 id like to see u name a 10 when this is great

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by MacMall88

one that comes to mind is the Spiderman SVCD SCR by TEG

---

really nice rls .. sound is great, i find when people were moving the vid. got a tiny bit blocky so i dont know how it'll look during high-action scenes ... but otherwise 8/8/NA

__________________
stumpy_006

how bout tcfs release of stuart little 2 eh eh?

__________________
"I love the Power Glove. Its so bad."

signs.2002.Screener.SVCD-EM was great quality why this release is even necessary is beyond me but its a good movie so whatever

9/9/wont tell you what i think of this movie, cause flaming will accure, since people think everyone has to have the same tatse.

great work eso

9/9/9 GJ Esoteric

__________________
My sig worked, It's back.

Lol charlie tuna didn't even reply here and already by the 2nd post the flaming starts, lol @ what has happened to this board

__________________

"EWS's release was a re-encode of EM's SVCD (something which should be frowned upon in the scene) and it really didn't improve the quality." Esoteric You Can Take Your Lil Signs Vhs Tape And Shove It Right Up Your Ass READ THE GD FUCKIN NFO BEFORE YOU SAY ITS A RECODE YOU BITCHES!

"EWS's release was a re-encode of EM's SVCD (something which should be frowned upon in the scene) and it reallydidn't improve the quality." ESOTERIC You Can Take Your Lil Vhs Screener Tape And Shove It Up Your Ass. Read The Fuckin Nfo! It Was From The Same Soure You Fuckin Morons!

GREAT RELEASE

Finally a watchable release of this movie, no more ts's or that EM crap release, or the renecode of it !!!!

GOOD JOB ESOTERiC !!!!!!

i have wanted this movie for a while and don't settle on crap, you have come through again !!

you are one of the groups i can now just download, and not worry about the quality, cause all you release is good quality

good job, keep it comming, and as far as EM and the re-encoding groups go (a-team , oSB , and so on) get a life

quote:

---

Originally posted by CharlyTuna
9/9/wont tell you what i think of this movie, cause flaming will accure, since people think everyone has to have the same tatse.

great work eso

---

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

The EM one wasn' t that bad, but this is better.

7/8/?

Ive saw the movie but i agree that movie reviews should be left out, as they are totally opinionated and cause arguing.

I rated 6, i made a typo, i gave it this comparing with others id seen.

The elitemedia release is all i need wont be getting this one.

YEP EM'S release was just fine for me, u sure we all watched the same release? looked find on my TV

like usual

3sot3ric puts out another good release from one of the few left reliable groups!

quote:

---

Originally posted by NeWcS


He's an asshole cause he didnt give it a 10??? Its not a 10, so looks like your the asshole!!!!!! Last time I checked 10 ment perfect....its not perfect!!!! ya its a vcd and it looks good but its not a 10 so looks like youve labled the wrong person an asshole!!!!

asshole!

But what do you expect coming from someone who has a Feminem quote for his sig!!!!

MCL!

---

I hate to burst the popularity bubble here.....but


Didnt anyone beside me notice how the video kept getting brighter then dark , and so on

Yes I tried it on 2 different players and only watched part of disc1
but it kept doin that.

I dont really care what source this comes from....but if the video can't remain stable I wouldnt give this more then a 5

Sound was good, give that a 8

i watched the "workprint" when it first came out. loved the movie and thought the workprint was great. didnt see any problems besides annoying text shit and black bars. Seems like this movie got too many releases. How many damn releases can one movie have? the work print was fine until a dvd rip came out. Though this screener looks ok.

?/?/9

__________________

that's right DigitiziD, think they forgot to take the macrovision off

quote:

---

Originally posted by Redemption
The EM one wasn' t that bad, but this is better.

7/8/?

Ive saw the movie but i agree that movie reviews should be left out, as they are totally opinionated and cause arguing.

---

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

about time there is a watchable signs

closest thing to dvdrip

8/7/5

ya the video going bright then dark every 20 seconds is very annoying

if it weasnt for that id give 8/8/9

but... since its doing that bright to dark thing i give it a 5/8/9

annoying brightness

I think it'd funny that it took so long into this thread for anyone to even comment on the fact that the brightness was constantly changing so much. Does anybody think that's because the first 20 votes and 15 posts on the thread or so were just based on jpegs and the odd one on the sample.

This webpage has a good idea behind it, but the people here kind of defeat that.

I agree with the rating that this would be about a 8/8/9, but because of the brightness messup it's about a 4/8/9. That definitely gets on my nerves and ruins this rip.

Thanks DigitiziD!

Gee...somebody who actually watched it! Now do people understand why you burn & play before you post? Probably not. Yes the fading brightness is a bit annoying simply because of the frequency, like 30 seconds apart. The video is a bit blurred.

I have a copy of every version of this movie and in my oppinion this one is the best. They kept the opening credits and a portion of the ending, if that matters to you. The sound was excellent and if they did not have the fade problem I would have easily given this an 8 or 9. The blur is only slight.

Re: annoying brightness

quote:

---

Originally posted by MrBoogedy
I think it'd funny that it took so long into this thread for anyone to even comment on the fact that the brightness was constantly changing so much. Does anybody think that's because the first 20 votes and 15 posts on the thread or so were just based on jpegs and the odd one on the sample.

This webpage has a good idea behind it, but the people here kind of defeat that.

I agree with the rating that this would be about a 8/8/9, but because of the brightness messup it's about a 4/8/9. That definitely gets on my nerves and ruins this rip.

---

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

nice job u guys are doing real good

Hmm lazy encoding? no its just CBR 1150 crap. If i ever do a VCD i do multi passes and max bit rate, just like an SVCD. The quality is top notch, well best for a low res vcd.

brite and dark

hey, when i poped it into my dvd player, i DID go brite then dark! but after a while it didnt bother me

man what a mess on signs

well, i hate to tell u guys but this is not as good as the earlier svcd screener. its darker, the sound is ok but the video quality is not anywhere as good as the svcd. if u cant see the difference, i suggest u buy a new tv. there are many new dvd players that support svcd - namely apex and jvc. the difference is huge if u got a hd widescreen tube tv. in fact, this rls is a waste of time get the earlier screener in svcd format. i wasted my time to dl this. i dont even know why mess with the vcd bitrate if the file is hq. this could have probably been better than the earlier rls if it had been in svcd bitrate. i mean its only common sense 1150 vs 2550 bitrate. DUH wtf if u got a high quality source, put it in svcd format. whatever the other signs svcd screener is rated at should be a whole point higher than this one.

the going dark, and then bright sucks, its similar to macrovision,
but not as severe, it doesnt ruin the movie, but its annoying,
its worse than subtitles