VCDQuality Forums - 007 Die Another Day *INTERNAL* - TELESYNC

Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- 007 Die Another Day *INTERNAL* - TELESYNC - iNTENSE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11733)

Posted by IrcOp on 12-01-2002 04:35 PM:

to many releases please next time keep it to yourself.

Posted by K0N5T1 on 12-01-2002 04:40 PM:

nice :)

Very nice quality!
UTi release is good too, but this one is even better
Good work!

Posted by syxx2001 on 12-01-2002 04:42 PM:

it looks good going by the jpg, but this is what, the 7th release? i could see if none of the releases were good, but some are.

__________________
going by the jpg, i will take a little dull video over the last release anyday.

Posted by MiNiSTRY on 12-01-2002 04:49 PM:

The word "internal" has lost its meaning since everyone are going public with them anyways. If this nonsense continues, I'm gonna be the first to start propering internals...

Posted by VCDz on 12-01-2002 05:03 PM:

Quality isn't too bad...

Annoying J letter...

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?

Posted by UnForGiveN on 12-01-2002 05:18 PM:

tired of so many but i also want a watchable one.. this one looks better so far then the others by the sample

Posted by BLOODUK on 12-01-2002 05:31 PM:

Looks nice , whats with the *j* on the sample shots?

Posted by VCDz on 12-01-2002 05:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by THASHIZNIT
ALL YOU MOTHER F**KERS THAT KEEP SAYIN , "OHH , NOT ANOTHER RELEASE" ARE MAKIN ME SICK, WHAT THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?

IF YOU REALLY HAD A FUCKIN CLUE YOU WOULD SHUT THE FUCK UP COS ALL THE OTHER RELEASES HAD THE ENDINGS FUCKED UP AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN NUKED EXCEPT 1 FROM UTI, & THAT WASNT SHIT HOT QUALITY, THATS WHY WE GOT 5, 6 OR EVEN 10 RELEASES. YOU ARE JUST FUCKIN NOOBZ AND ARE PROLLY PISSED THAT YOU CANT GET HOLD OF ANY RELEASES, SO YOU WANNA SPOILIT FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, BY SAYING, "PLEASE DONT RELEASE ANYMORE" WHEN WHAT YOU MEAN IS "I DIDNT EVEN GET THE FIRST 1 YET " YOU FUCKIN BITCHES SHOULD STFU.

ASFAR AS QUALITY GOES THIS IS THE BEST, GRABIT.

UN LESS ITS 1 TOO MANY FOR YOU, IN THAT CASE,FUCK OFF AND WATCH YOUR SHIT COPY .

GO ON, FLAME THAT , DICKHEADZ

Well put =D .

But I don't know about the endings... haven't seen all the versions...

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?

Posted by syxx2001 on 12-01-2002 05:34 PM:

uh, buddy. i have had all of the 007 released and i only kept the UTI version. next time back your statement up with facts instead of saying n00bz and shit.

__________________
going by the jpg, i will take a little dull video over the last release anyday.

Posted by Evisu on 12-01-2002 06:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by THASHIZNIT
ALL YOU MOTHER F**KERS THAT KEEP SAYIN , "OHH , NOT ANOTHER RELEASE" ARE MAKIN ME SICK, WHAT THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?

IF YOU REALLY HAD A FUCKIN CLUE YOU WOULD SHUT THE FUCK UP COS ALL THE OTHER RELEASES HAD THE ENDINGS FUCKED UP AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN NUKED EXCEPT 1 FROM UTI, & THAT WASNT SHIT HOT QUALITY, THATS WHY WE GOT 5, 6 OR EVEN 10 RELEASES. YOU ARE JUST FUCKIN NOOBZ AND ARE PROLLY PISSED THAT YOU CANT GET HOLD OF ANY RELEASES, SO YOU WANNA SPOILIT FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, BY SAYING, "PLEASE DONT RELEASE ANYMORE" WHEN WHAT YOU MEAN IS "I DIDNT EVEN GET THE FIRST 1 YET " YOU FUCKIN BITCHES SHOULD STFU.

ASFAR AS QUALITY GOES THIS IS THE BEST, GRABIT.

UN LESS ITS 1 TOO MANY FOR YOU, IN THAT CASE,FUCK OFF AND WATCH YOUR SHIT COPY .

GO ON, FLAME THAT , DICKHEADZ

hahaha i like it

Posted by Nitrous on 12-01-2002 06:30 PM:

The more the merrier. Good job.

Posted by Welsh_Dragon_UK on 12-01-2002 06:36 PM:

The more releases there are the better.

We have had many releases yes but what u got to think of is there is always someone that thinks the last one was better this is why Groups release not to get a benefit out of it they like to please people with choices.

Most of the time u all say man this is crap will wait for a better copy but when theres no better copy out till the divx u all bitch.

The end of the day grab it if you want.Keep comments to yourselves unless they are of benefit to other people who are thinking of getting the film themselves.

To argue over who,what,when,why something is released is pointless.

Posted by symmo on 12-01-2002 06:58 PM:

Has this ver been nuked or not?
is the whole film there or does it cut off 5 mins from the end?

:: its internal, of course its not been nuked.

Posted by DJD4566 on 12-01-2002 07:18 PM:

does this have the full ending ???????? ALL OTHE RELEASES HAVE NO FULL ENDING this movie ends with halle and pierce in this cabin messing with the diamonds the a team release had a little bit of it but those fuckers cutted it out too if this has the full ending please let me know

Posted by wunautica on 12-01-2002 07:39 PM:

peeps!!!! i saw this movie in the theatre, the movie ends right after the halle and pierce made out w/ the diamonds, trust me it didn't show much. Thats it, then fades out to credits. So your not missing much other then a few more secs, like 3 secs of the love scene. Think a lot of peeps are complaining bout the many releases not cause they can't get a hold of it, but more like, if groups gonna bring other one out, least thing they could bring out would be a lot better then the others that are already out. So peeps excepting a dvdrip rite now, which is almost impossible. Its free ya, better to have a movie w/ lots of releases then to have 1 or 2. anywayz...late -wU

Posted by Jc100 on 12-01-2002 07:39 PM:

Um i havent seen this yet, but i want to comment on movie itself. I saw this in the cinema and the movie ended at the spot where they were in the cabin. All that was after were the end credits and at the VERY end JAMES BOND WILL RETURN. I am not sure what people are whining about as that is the movie. Very few scene releases ever retain the credits.

Posted by The Booker Man on 12-01-2002 08:40 PM:

I too saw this in the theatres(a lil long for my tastes, with previews and everything, 2 and a half hours :-\)

I'll give the movie a 7.5, as there was a long stretch in the middle that was BOOOOOOOOOring, quality of this release is a 6.9/7

Kinda on the dark side if you ask me, I say everyone wait for a svcd dvd rip, or buy the dvd, or see it in a theatre, this is too much of an action movie to be enjoyed by a TS

__________________

Posted by reelnewbie on 12-01-2002 09:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by IrcOp
to many releases please next time keep it to yourself.

wtf do u think * INTERNAL * means?

Posted by syxx2001 on 12-01-2002 09:54 PM:

if its internal it shouldn't be posted publicly. and if you are supposed to rate the movie by the sample, and the movie is internal, how will you rate the movie here at VCDQ?

__________________
going by the jpg, i will take a little dull video over the last release anyday.

Posted by Lfew on 12-01-2002 11:04 PM:

too many rls?

Man i dont know what has happened to this site over the years but its getting stupider and stupider. To the people that think there are too many rls I can only wonder what their motive is. Do you work for another group and just got out done by this one?
Are u married to one of the groups, lol. There can never be too many releases, as long as they are better. Even if they are not better it only shows commitment to what was once a fine collection of people that are giving it all they have to contribute to this scene. I dont care if there are 9999etc releases as long as they are each better. I am not married to any of them and their is no such thing as brand loyality - that only exists for the stupids - which many of you are. I would like to see how many of the losers that post on this site actually have a job. Also, if u could do a better job than the people that are staying up late at night for free that are turning these releases out - if you would do the same for free? What a bunch of stupids, and they say that the US just is not what it used to be - judging from many of the posts here they may just be right. I just hope that many are not from this country but... I know that they are. lame lame lame, if u lamers are any indication of the intellegence level of the average americans, we are in deep shit. YOU LAMERS COULD NOT BE WINNERS IF IT WERE HANDED TO U ON A SILVER PLATTER.

Posted by Lfew on 12-01-2002 11:30 PM:

is it better?

If this release is better - i want it. It should be on every site if its better. I spent big $ on the latest and greatest puters and tvs. I want quality - i dont care if its the 99th ts release.

Posted by Natural on 12-01-2002 11:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by syxx2001
if its internal it shouldn't be posted publicly. and if you are supposed to rate the movie by the sample, and the movie is internal, how will you rate the movie here at VCDQ?

just because it's internal, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. people who can get it can talk about it, and people who can't get it will still talk about it, pretending they do have it. that's life

Posted by crapper on 12-02-2002 12:22 AM:

no rating from me.. DO IT YUR SELF

Posted by reelnewbie on 12-02-2002 01:52 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by syxx2001
if its internal it shouldn't be posted publicly. and if you are supposed to rate the movie by the sample, and the movie is internal, how will you rate the movie here at VCDQ?

well, since groups pre their shit (yes, even internals are pred) on affils, i can only assume that those with access to certain affils are the ones with the access to the sample, etc. and in this day and age of requests, it's very easy to see how this shit gets moved around even with the .internal. tag.

Posted by ToughMan on 12-02-2002 02:35 AM:

Thank you Intense. The best copy so far. I give this released a 7/6. Keep up the good work guys!

Posted by djkoolaide on 12-02-2002 04:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiNiSTRY
The word "internal" has lost its meaning since everyone are going public with them anyways. If this nonsense continues, I'm gonna be the first to start propering internals...

exactly what i was going to fucking say...

Posted by m-drew on 12-02-2002 06:45 AM:

Quality looks decent.

I think I will download this copy.

Posted by neoparadox on 12-02-2002 06:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiNiSTRY
The word "internal" has lost its meaning since everyone are going public with them anyways.

quote:
Originally posted by syxx2001
if its internal it shouldn't be posted publicly.

Stupid fuckin' noobs. The difference between internal and non-internal is that site-ops must request an internal in order to get it, it doesn’t mean that no one is supposed to know about it....

Oh yeah, nice work iNTENSE, keep it up.

Posted by MiNiSTRY on 12-02-2002 08:25 AM:

neoparadox >> DUH, REALLY? Thanks for the valuable information, and that 1337 word "noob".

Posted by Truman on 12-02-2002 10:51 AM:

Ok, The FACTS of this release is its the same source as the subbed 1 , which also means its missing a few minutes in the MIDDLE of the film about 5 mins .
This is where the subbed jumped from going down the stairs to getting the car on other releses this was in but was full of mpeg errors and broke up quite bad HOWEVER ateams rls was complete and without errors , only the quality on ateams was not the same pic was washed out .
So if you really want to watch this movie without missing any of the film i suggest you either wait or (dare i say it) go watch it at the movies.

Posted by desertboy on 12-02-2002 11:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Truman
Ok, The FACTS of this release is its the same source as the subbed 1 , which also means its missing a few minutes in the MIDDLE of the film about 5 mins .
This is where the subbed jumped from going down the stairs to getting the car on other releses this was in but was full of mpeg errors and broke up quite bad HOWEVER ateams rls was complete and without errors , only the quality on ateams was not the same pic was washed out .
So if you really want to watch this movie without missing any of the film i suggest you either wait or (dare i say it) go watch it at the movies.

Go watch it at the movies, ha ha. Want an odd idea, the movies. Good quality great sound won't find many people here who actually go. I hardly ever go movies are to shit these days.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Posted by Bananaram on 12-02-2002 11:19 AM:

i saw at theatres and seen almost all the release of this,still best one i find for being the whole movie and quilty of the rip is the uti cam,will stick with that till dvd out

Posted by Swimj on 12-02-2002 01:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by IrcOp
to many releases please next time keep it to yourself.

stupid its internal cant you read?

Posted by neoparadox on 12-02-2002 04:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MiNiSTRY
neoparadox >> DUH, REALLY? Thanks for the valuable information

No problem, dumbass.

Posted by j0h2n on 12-02-2002 04:45 PM:

Kewl.

Posted by BIGGUMSHOT on 12-02-2002 07:09 PM:

how many copies of 1 movie really need to be released. 1 word, retarded. minority report was the same way. QUALITY not speed.

Posted by fluffykiwi on 12-03-2002 06:03 AM:

The image is quite blurry I was getting bars appearing in the fast motion scenes, and the colours were very washed out.
It looked to me to be filmed off centre with a bit of the left screen missing, the image appeared a bit squinted as well with an angle visable across the top. The start had a person's shadow over the whole right side for a few seconds also showing up the cam video, the sound seemed fine, hence the telesync
It seems to straigten out after the first five minutes or so but that to me means more image must be missing, the stripes appearing during motion is very offputting.
The video quality is worse than I personally would like to watch maybe a 5 to me with the sound slightly higher, maybe 7.
I havent seen the other versions so have no idea if this is better, but if it is I'm very glad I didnt grab those.
I'd wait for a better release and hope, another version does come out as this isnt of a good enough quality to stop people from bettering it.
I dont care if 1000 versions come out but please make them better than this, or please dont bother.
I dont think I'd like to watch the whole movie in this quality so wont even try to rate the film itself.

Posted by mist_trie on 12-04-2002 12:18 AM:

I'm glad this one was internal. Who's gunna do a proper of this now? Movie was quality bond as always...

5.5/6/8

Posted by jusdel30 on 12-04-2002 12:52 AM:

mmnmm-blurry picture on motion scenes-sound not too bad-such a shame about the picture this could of been the best release yet-anyways props for releasing and to everyone else out there-im sticking with uti at the mo-complete film and clear
cheers guys
j

Posted by Mak Man on 12-04-2002 01:21 AM:

Good release

I just finished watching this release, and I think it's much better then the PROPER that was released a few days ago. I can't compare it to the CAM release since I haven't seen that one yet. This one is definately worth checkin' out, but the movie is in mpg format, not bin/cue.

Posted by Lfew on 12-05-2002 02:52 AM:

the real deal

This rls has better color and a sharper image when there is no motion. When there is motion - its not as good. It is missing 5 min in the middle - a somewhat entertaining part at that. If these guys could up the bitrate or speed the cam up to take care of the bad motion parts and learn to change the tapes faster - 5 minutes is entirely too long, they might have something. iNTENSE 5.9/7/9 - UTI 6.5/6.5/9

Posted by DarkBeatz on 12-05-2002 12:19 PM:

Re: the real deal

quote:
Originally posted by Lfew
This rls has better color and a sharper image when there is no motion. When there is motion - its not as good. It is missing 5 min in the middle - a somewhat entertaining part at that. If these guys could up the bitrate or speed the cam up to take care of the bad motion parts and learn to change the tapes faster - 5 minutes is entirely too long, they might have something. iNTENSE 5.9/7/9 - UTI 6.5/6.5/9

They cannot up bitrate or anything, this is just from a malaysian silver, it has major subs which they cutted off, most of the subs appeared in the black bars tho and a little bit in the real movie

edit: It is a cam to btw, you see people standing up in the beginning of the movie, and the picture is very badly positioned, a large part of the left is lost in this release!! Bah

Posted by stroppy on 12-05-2002 10:52 PM:

just wanna say thanks for this release.

i know there have been a few, but this does seem to be sweet in my opinion

Posted by rvwinkle on 12-07-2002 06:51 AM:

Re: Re: the real deal

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz
It is a cam to btw, you see people standing up in the beginning of the movie.

A telesync is a cam with direct sound. Just because some TS manage to avoid distractions doesnt make this not a TS.

The sound is good on this one, if your can hear the crowd is one sure way of distinguishing a cam from a cam with a seperate sound source.

Posted by nicoladsl on 12-11-2002 07:40 PM:

yes

yes it's a very good release, this film is a bomb, lol
bye
NICO

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page