VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Spider-Man - SCREENER - THCiSO (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4795)

Not a bad release, SVCD would have rocked I think cause if its a VHS source its very nice indeed, bit blocky from the vcd encode but still nice... props to THCiSO for it.

Looking pretty good, maybe I'll grab this one.. after all the dvd isn't going to be out for a while.. so many people have already voted on this one I doubt anyone of them has seen this yet

Sweet!!!! Awesome release!

the sample looks pretty much all time in quality. With this kind of quality i hope to see a lot more from thciso though. 8 for video. and 9 for audio. The video rating could've gone up to a 9.5 if they would've done 3 cds(which they probably shoud've done)

very nice and sweet..watch out TEG..they may give u a run for the money.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..

shitty quality on the sample....................ill stick with the Centropy SVCD.TS

quote:

---

Originally posted by philly b
shitty quality on the sample....................ill stick with the Centropy SVCD.TS

---

__________________
stumpy_006

damn nice quality

:: yadda yadda yadda

You folks r messing me up. I halted my download because of the philly/stumpy comments, then checked the sample and thought it was FINE. Gotta agree with moviebootlegger on this one.

I was surprised THCiSO left the black/white warning in their sample. Could this be...gasp...truth in advertising?!

THCiSO == this looks like a great screener (i.e. bright, sharp, not too compressed, great color, great sound). Will watch all of it tonight. THANKS TO ALL THE GROUPS WHO HAVEN'T DITCHED US LIKE CENTROPY DID. I regret every CTP dick I ever sucked. (I'm such a whore).

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.

nice, props!

screeners that switch between color and black/white are madly annoying... i dont care how great the quality is

Nice Job

This is a good VHS screener. Monochrome fade ins are annoying, but its a screener. I refuse to suck dick as you can check every other post I have made and never made a reference to centropy, but for the huge amount of time difference in ctps svcd and this screener I have to say that the ctp is just as good of a release as this. If I had to do over I would not get this release and just wait for the dvd rip whenever that may come down the road. 7/8/8

yeah i'll stick with ctp rls aswell...since the dvd is due to retail in November...i think i can manage the wait ;D

nice thc

nice to see thciso with a sweet release, there you have it, the best group around makes a sweet come back. thats right i said the best group around. never once did they have a mislabel or a shitty quality anything. ive been waitin on these guys. in my opinion CTP will always have a back seat to THC. really nice to see one of the pioneer groups back.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.

???

stick to the CTP release . .you crazy? this one is great .. and even if it was not.. the FTF release ate up the CTP one.. at least that is how us sane people see it

Well, I dunno why people are so jumping on people, sure people prefer CTP thats because they always release quality. I dont see why people should jump down their throats for it.

This isnt how the warez world once was, everyone was friendly, now its being ambushed by lil kids who think they are better than others.

Grow up some people enjoy the releases and stop persecuting peoples preferences.

heh .. not sucking CTP's dick at all .. they just happened to be the group that released the release of this flick that was IMO better than this one .. my comment had nothing to do with the group themselves ..

props to THCiSO for the RLS, but i find that this one isnt much better than the CTP rls if it is at all, and because it is released so much later, why not have just went with the CTP rls ...

__________________
stumpy_006

Yep I agree, and I wasnt pointing the blame solely at you my friend. IMHO this screener is more like a TS, not so good playback. Yep the CTP rls is far better.

Spiderman Screener

Just wondering if anyone can tell me about the monochrome fade in's in this release. Are they throughout the movie or just at certain points (begining or end ??)

Thanks, just wondering





CHris

Stick with the ctp one,even with its glare problems it still beats this one.

And the black and white thing gets annoying as does the poor encode.

Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.

quote:

---

Originally posted by drbobsevilweb
Stick with the ctp one,even with its glare problems it still beats this one.

And the black and white thing gets annoying as does the poor encode.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by drbobsevilweb

Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by drbobsevilweb
Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.

---

moviebootlegger, i dont suck centropy dick, fuck them for all i care. but there release was better, video and audio.

you can get back on THCiSO's cock now. :P

Here ill put this in terms all u lil dalnet newbies know...Its a PURE SCR, no CTP'S is not nearly as good, The black and white happens 5times throughout the movie for about wat, 5 fucking seconds. Its not no fucking telesync neither, if it was you wouldnt see advertisements..CTP RGB wasnt correct on this rls neither..a lil too much blue still and had big glare problems. Try watching samples on ur damn dvd players, then u see quality or not, not on ur pcs that have like onboard video and onboard sound cuz u wouldnt get shit out of that. This byfar beats any release and for all u dick sucking fags out there, get a life.

NUKED

This is a Centropy release. You can see a little of the boom mic at the top and was cropped for this scr release they say. Also you can see the Twin Towers on Spider Man's reflection on his mask and I'll be the final version won't show that.

RIGHT ON RAPPA!!!!!!!!!!

NUKED

it's a centropy release. you can see boom mic at the top a little and was just cropped out. also you can see the twin towers on spiderman's reflection on his mask towards the end of cd1.

quote:

---

Originally posted by DABhand
IMHO this screener is more like a TS, not so good playback. Yep the CTP rls is far better.

---

1. We know its from a VCR/DVD copy, but the encode is close to similar as a TS. And I did watch on DVD player and I still think CTP is better rls

2. Grow up, why you guys obsessed with cock sucking, cant get enough of it or something?

3. Anyone from PR gonna fix an old account I had with ya, I know a couple scour this forum where are ya guys?

This seems to be a nice release, just watched the samples.

And guess what... The aspect ratio changes from CGI scenes and normal scenes.

So to all of you who complained about CTPs release changing

Ohh, and yeah, I prefer this one over CTPs.

2 Cds, much better color

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"

Yep, I agree. This rls is much better than CTP's. The only problem I have with it is it's a little blocky. I know there's a way to clean that up, but I'm not too skilled in that department yet. I did post something about it in the new section (encoding help/questions). I'm not dogging anyone here, while CTP's rls was very good for a telesync, I've been waiting for a screener for a while, and now I have it. And thank god it's only 2 CDs!!

OK

OK people Centercopys Sucked IT was Way to bright The Bass On the Movie Was Way to loud man And IT plane Old Kicked the Bucket IT was a Ok realse At the Time KNow We See a SCreener Perfect and IT may have a LIl Black and White At times But IT beats the SHit Out OF the CTp realse All you people Posting that the CTP realse OF this Flick IS better Gotta Get OFF CTPS Cock Wtf I am SIck OF this SHit A group Does Better and You sit THEre OHH the Centercopy (TS) Was Way better Then THE {SCREENER}
Fuck Shut Up and Thank This Group For Coming Out With Somethign Better then CTp they Did IT Just Like Many groups Beat Others Out the Wall Enjoy this Film people It is A Great Scr..

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol

ok, after all those constructive and useful comments I thought I'd add one of my own. This release is a decent one, nice screener... nice vcd. The thing does look blocky when played on my standalone dvd-player, which is pretty normal when a vcd is played fullscreen. The bw-fading is not annoying me at all, the 4 times or so it happens for less then 10 seconds are not disturbing. If this one is better then the ctp release? Dunno, hard to tell... One thing to keep in mind is that this is a 2cd vcd, the ctp release is a 3cd svcd. Ofcoz the ctp has better image, as in less blockiness. The source from this one is better tho as far as I'm concerned... I wish they had made a 2/3 cd svcd from it...

Both releases have their pros and cons.

ctp: good pic/sound (for a ts anywayz) but well... a TS
thciso: good source, mediocre pic/sound (hell, it's a vcd). I think this one would be better for a small screen/watching on the puter and the ctp might be better for a full screen/standalone dvd-player. I bet that if thc-iso had made a svcd from this it would beat ctp to the bone.

Well, that was it... I wonder how many "u suck thc-cock in hell", "eat ctp arse", "lame kiddie 12 yo" replies I'll get

No im not expert at encoding but all i meant was that there are visible jagged lines around the actors when seen from a distance and it does get blocky.

I don't think CTP are that good, I think there starwars was quite unwatchable on the first CD due to the glare.

ps

I tried to delete my second post - but vcdquality wasn't having any of it.

- only admin/mods can delete posts - pHo

decent release I played it in my dvd player, kinda blocky which is kinda annoying how bad was that pdvd release from DUST ?

Look, let me say my 2 cents. This release is definatly better than the Centropy one. But for the people who continuasly bitch about Centropy lovers, understand that Centropy was a good group, much better than any other TS group out at the moment, so people liked them because they released good shit. I liked them, and If they started releasing again I'd still like them. But they're gone right now and yeah that sucks, but damn stop whining about it. They arent gonna come back because you bitch on VCDQ forums.

Now, Just because someone like's CTP's releases doesn't mean they're sucking they're dick or blah blah whatever flaming answer you want to give. Of course we're tired of hearing about it, call them out for that, but not for liking on of the best TS groups there are.

Now you heard my 2 cents.

-svenbob

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-

Well i haven't watched the Centropy release yet, so im just judging it as it is...not comparing to any other releases

Video: 8
Audio: 9

Video was good, beginning and ending had a few glitches [were only a few seconds] and i didn't really like the black and white+message parts, even though they are a mere 10 seconds or so, but still, just my opinion.

Audio was pretty good, not really much to complain on that part.

i personally dont know anything about encoding or anything like that, but all you guys that fight about who sucks the most dick from whichever rls group are fucking stupid. Just comment on the fucking release itself and dont bring all these other rls groups in it.

Well i was disappointed , i thought for a screener the quality sucked. in some places more than others blocky bad encoding oh well deleted it . Just my opinion but not a great rls for a screener.

i know centropys release was a ts and this is a screener, but ive seen way better screeners in my day. just cause the centropy release was a ts dosent mean that thciso cant totally fux0r the encode and make it look worse.

fuck you.

this release was not that good...I wish they would have encoded it better but whatever. look sbetter than that pdvd tho.....I still don't get it did they have a hard copy of the pdvd or were they recording of a screen cuz nobody could possibly make a shitty encode like that directly from a dvd unless your that dumb

Nice picture and sound, better colour than the centropys copy but when it goes black and white that put me right off it.

Judging from the sample, i ain't so keen on that whole fade-to-mono shiz. Nice enough audio/video but i think i'll hold on the extra months for a DVD copy.

Nice, but for me, not worth a download.