VCDQuality Forums
Show all 46 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- V For Vendetta (2006) - CAM - Saga (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=69229)


Posted by X69 on 03-18-2006 05:13 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by darknez on 03-18-2006 05:18 PM:

hmmm

very dark and grainy ,props for fast release ,audio ok for a cam

think ill wait


5/6/dont no watched 15 mins turned of =(


Posted by Horton on 03-18-2006 05:21 PM:

Grainy, Bad AR, Angle, but thankfully doesnt look to brutally cropped.


5/4/8 - go see it in theaters, or wait till a TRUE HQ release.


Posted by Jules_Tavernier on 03-18-2006 05:32 PM:

2/4/?

Quality looks like it was filmed on a mobile phone. the is nothing good to say about this release.


Posted by p77 on 03-18-2006 05:38 PM:

Yeah this is ok if u need to watch it.... but if u don't its deff recommended u wait


Posted by Striped on 03-18-2006 05:42 PM:

I'd say it's shit but it's not even that good, audio aint bad though

3
7
?


Posted by blitzman on 03-18-2006 05:53 PM:

this movie

you guys are really giving it the shitcan, i believe for cams having better audio is way better than having muffled bs audio and great video, this is definitly watchable, of course when a better release is given dl that to but for as quick as this has been released. with 24 hours my hat is off. i give it a 5/7/10.


Posted by lozman on 03-18-2006 06:07 PM:

not a good piture at all ,sound is not 2 bad for a cam ,hopefully a decent release very soon as im looking forward to seeing this film

3/6/?


Posted by thelaughingman on 03-18-2006 06:39 PM:

3/6/9

wait for a better release, i saw this in theaters last night and it is def worth waiting for a better version.


Posted by isinginthebanned on 03-18-2006 06:46 PM:

2/6/9

Wait for a better release. Shouldn't be long for a movie this sweet.


Posted by movie-king on 03-18-2006 06:48 PM:

I think it poor true look like somethink i did from my phone lol
3,3

__________________
^^
This post was made in the sole intention to advertise my shitty webhosting service


Posted by roy8846 on 03-18-2006 07:03 PM:

sound is good for a cam
as said before its dark , grainy , slanted but watchable if you cant wait.

video 5.5
audio 7.5
movie ? will wait for a better release

__________________
hardcore will never die!!!!!!!!


Posted by djdilemma on 03-18-2006 07:18 PM:

beginners at it again

is it just me but i saw the whole theater people the movie is bul???will i downlaod it yeah just did will i watch it hell no i either wait or go to the show


Posted by desertboy on 03-18-2006 07:41 PM:

Shit with a capital S

3/5/? Couldn't watch it all but it'll probably be crap anyway.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by me-self on 03-18-2006 07:43 PM:

Jono ross gave it a bad review on film 2006 and to me it don't look fab, this copy is a bad copy but its a first and fast release.

V:3
S:5
F:? (ainit to bothered, give it a miss)


Posted by thebra1n on 03-18-2006 08:13 PM:

sound isnt bad for a cam, thats as good as it gets, has to be up there with the worst pictures of any cam ive seen dark, blurry and unwatchable

avoid at all costs

v= 1 unwatchable tripe
a= 7 usual quality for a cam
m= cant watch this yet


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 03-18-2006 08:14 PM:

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/484/vlcsnap40977447vu.png

sample screenshot.
it's watchable i suppose


Posted by JKozzy on 03-18-2006 09:27 PM:

3.5/6/10

Saw this in Imax last night and it was fantastic. Definately want to see it again on my own time, but not this release, judging from the sample. Quick release though.

__________________
This is my sig.


Posted by T-H-E-W-H-O on 03-18-2006 09:51 PM:

oh my, terrible quality. Audio is alright though. I waited 1 hour in line at the cinema last night, but the damn thing was sold out for the next 3 showings. This is deff one you want to see in theaters, all the reviews ive read say good things.

3/6/Waiting to buy a damn ticket. :/


Posted by andrews on 03-18-2006 10:26 PM:

props for speed, but quality of the video is not good, sound on the sample is ok, but i've heard someone is coughing all through the main movie. for sample 3/7/?


Posted by 0jdr0 on 03-18-2006 10:54 PM:

watched last nite at local theatre amazing movie as for this release just not much quality here

4/6/10


Posted by muppet2006 on 03-19-2006 01:31 AM:

very dark and grainy
sound very bad
thats looking at the sample
v4
s4
v (havent seen the movie yet)

quick release

__________________
shaun


Posted by Mercenary13 on 03-19-2006 01:57 AM:

Awesome movie!
?/?/9

V for VCDQuality


Posted by meltingsmoke on 03-19-2006 02:41 AM:

Quality is very low, clearly a rush to be first without thought to doing it right, seems to be another typical release from Saga, I don't recall ever seeing a quality release from them.

Congrats on being first, but the quality sucks too much to watch the release, so in the end what was acomplished with this Saga release?

Being the first one to provide crap, might mean you are fast but it still stinks

V:4
A:5
M:9 (I went to theatres instead)


Posted by djarum on 03-19-2006 04:38 AM:

I grabbed the sample it for a cam it is poor.

Video - 4 (Poor Res and Blurry as hell.)
Audio - 4 (Sounds like it was recorded under the theater.)
Movie - 9

Forget this release and grab the 720p Telecine that is starting to float around. It is absolutely breathtaking.


Posted by Enter on 03-19-2006 09:24 AM:

v:3 a:5 m: 8
all i can say is it should be nuked for bad AR.... props on speedy release, but pull ur heads out of ur ass and spend sometime encoding!

__________________
-
word


Posted by yukichigai on 03-19-2006 12:07 PM:

Wait... there's video?

Wow. Just... wow. I mean it's great and all that you guys got a release out so damn quick, but that's... erm... not really what I'd call watchable.

Video - 3: You can see things when people hold still, but that's about the only time you can see anything. It's dark, which is not surprising for a cam; however, the encoding of the source video was, well, odd, leaving these weird pixel blocks of darker and lighter regions of the screen, which change about randomly. Mix the already dark video and you have something that's just plain impossible to watch during motion, even without the blurry picture and questionable framerate. At this point I can't really tell if it was recorded on something with a low framerate like a cameraphone or low-budget digicam, or if it was just recorded on an NTSC camera (23.976 fps) and the jerkiness is simply due to a crappy 23.976fps -> 25fps framerate conversion job. (e.g. by using TMPGEnc's built in conversion method, which does nothing more than duplicate frames) The bottom line is that for a movie like this where the action is important this release doesn't even do an adequate job of giving us something watchable. Wait for someone else to release it.

Audio - 7: Standard cam audio, not much better or worse than other cams out there. No annoying hums, pops, clicks or other weird noises you hear on some other releases. Conversations are understandable, but still somewhat distorted. Audio isn't too hollow or anything. Probably the best one can reasonably expect from a cam.

Movie - ?: I literally couldn't understand what the hell was going on because the video was so hard to interpret. I stopped it about 30 seconds into the first fight sequence.


Bottom line: Wait for a better release. Don't even try to watch this one, unless you're blind and only really need to hear movies.


Posted by gee1556 on 03-19-2006 03:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dontgiveafuck
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/484/vlcsnap40977447vu.png


Nice spoiler.

Fortunately, I've read the graphic novel.

3/4/?


Posted by lDrunk on 03-19-2006 03:54 PM:

hi all im new to this forum can someone please tell me where do u guys find those movies from vcdquality.com ? because i search on dc++ and i cant find the movies thx

lDrunk

__________________
lDrunkie


Posted by x23 on 03-19-2006 05:41 PM:

Eh.... Dark, grainy, i'd wait for something better to come out so this ones quality doesnt spoil the flick for you. 3/7.5/?

Oh, and idrunk, if you dont know, i wouldn't suggest asking here


Posted by Jules_Tavernier on 03-19-2006 07:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by lDrunk
hi all im new to this forum can someone please tell me where do u guys find those movies from vcdquality.com ? because i search on dc++ and i cant find the movies thx

lDrunk




the site your looking for is HERE


Posted by UrbanSmurf on 03-19-2006 07:49 PM:

quote:
hi all im new to this forum can someone please tell me where do u guys find those movies from vcdquality.com ? because i search on dc++ and i cant find the movies thx


sum things you just dont ask m8 if you need to ask u should not be on the forum

v 3 (gave me a HEADACHE)
A 6 (standard cam audio)
m ? (too bad to watch)


Posted by lickmebitches on 03-19-2006 08:28 PM:

thanks Jules. You saved me the trouble. Good link too. hehe. As for this release, whoa.

Video: 1 (Unwatchable)

Audio: 6

Movie: 9 (Went on opening night, fucking GREAT!)


Posted by ol_perfesser on 03-19-2006 10:43 PM:

Thanks for all the warnings.
I looked at only the 3 random rars I downloaded. 2 were so dark all I could see was V's mask amd whatever other face was in the screen (I think Natalie P)
the other was in a white hallway that wavered and shimmered like through smoke and water..

Sound was typical cam - hollow mono, but a little louder, so it was listenable. But not being blind, this wasn't viable. Not going to waste my bandwidth, will wait for better.

1/6/?

__________________
Op


Posted by Enter on 03-19-2006 11:32 PM:

btw i love hearing the cammers cough and talk very professional

__________________
-
word


Posted by the tired one zzzzz on 03-19-2006 11:52 PM:

v for vendetta

downloaded all of this watched about 3 mins extremely dark sound was not very good
10/10 for speed of release
video 2 very very dark
sound 4 bit muffled
movie 9 official trailer looked good
think i will wait for a better copy


Posted by savman on 03-20-2006 01:08 AM:

well all i can say is thanks for the flick saga

just encoded through adobe and looks miles better now

i think peeps should try and learn how to clean the movies

as a crap source can b recoded fine and its the guys like these

groups that keep us all happy so ....respect where its due!

and at the end of the day if u dont like anybodys release

go out and do it ya self lol....or just shut up and go watch at the

flicks...


Posted by yukichigai on 03-20-2006 03:38 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by savman
well all i can say is thanks for the flick saga

just encoded through adobe and looks miles better now

i think peeps should try and learn how to clean the movies

as a crap source can b recoded fine and its the guys like these

The rating system here is meant to rate the quality of the video that has been released, not what it might theoretically be made into with a lot of postwork. Groups are supposed to handle any postwork on their own, rather than leaving it up to the viewer.

Give someone enough time they'll find a way to turn lead into gold. It doesn't mean they should be paying gold prices to get the lead.


Posted by Freeder on 03-20-2006 04:16 AM:

Release sucks, don't waste time- I won't repeat what others have already said otherwise.

HOWEVER- saw it in theaers, REALLY good movie! go spend the 8 bucks, its worth it

-Freeder


Posted by GigaBit on 03-20-2006 11:18 AM:

3/6/?

wait for prevail rls.


Posted by onehand on 03-20-2006 08:20 PM:

the previal release is out, anyone have any comments on the quality??

im leaching it now


Posted by bern2707 on 03-21-2006 12:38 AM:

load of crap

waste of time, Unwatchable


Posted by bodie on 03-21-2006 01:14 AM:

Aaaaarggghh!
Watched the sample and this looks terrible! Video is very fuzzy and looks like cam is cocked at an angle. Sound is pretty good though.

V-3
A-6
M-?


Posted by teebee7pm on 03-21-2006 05:33 AM:

Thumbs down

4/5/? keep trying!!!! thanx butt no thanx ! aww what the heck thanx!!


Posted by wiggy67 on 03-21-2006 11:15 PM:

Lightbulb

not a bad release ive seen a hell of a lot worse but on the whole its ok


Posted by Major007 on 03-21-2006 11:38 PM:

Very ginny and dark indeed.
5/6/9
Get the Prevail version


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.
Show all 46 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.