VCDQuality Forums
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Wars: Episode 2 - Attack Of The Clones *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - HafVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=2797)


Posted by Brisk on 05-10-2002 11:45 PM:

Ho Hum. Wonder what this could be then


Posted by M_J on 05-10-2002 11:50 PM:

damn thats fast


Posted by PhAnToMs on 05-10-2002 11:51 PM:

wonder

i wonder if this is any better then the ftf release might be never know

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by Squeaky on 05-11-2002 12:37 AM:

i have a mental image of release group people all standing in the same line with their cameras


Posted by brr8760 on 05-11-2002 12:42 AM:

Stop wondering about the quality -- this is obviously a re-pack of FTF's version. I watched the FTF sample... it has the same odd-shaped rectangle screen that shows in these jpegs (but not in FTF's jpegs).

I checked them out-- the only other "release" from "HafVCD" this year was a NUKED "screener" of HOW HIGH (rated about 3/4/~).


Posted by Scorpion on 05-11-2002 01:07 AM:

Re: HafVCD are major losers-- with a FAKE RELEASE

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
Stop wondering about the quality -- this is obviously a re-pack of FTF's version. I watched the FTF sample... it has the same odd-shaped rectangle screen that shows in these jpegs (but not in FTF's jpegs).



Are you blind? The video on this release is way better then FTF's, and is better then some CTP releases. It's a shame the audio only comes from the left channel.


Posted by Moonglows on 05-11-2002 01:33 AM:

brr8760 how can u say it's a repack? i watched both samples, wtf u talkin about the odd shaped rectangle screen? if u really watched it, you would have seen a little black line on the right of one, and the hafvcd is a trapezoid shape, im not saying either is 'good', although in the hafvcd one, you could obviously see a quality difference in faces. I can't assume u looked only at the jpegs, but damn it sounds like it.

The facial expressions i was referring to, was the ftf's sample w/ the white corridor and the kid walking(very fuzzy) and the war-room in hafvcd's(clearer, but still quite fuzzy).


Posted by MAXIMUS on 05-11-2002 01:40 AM:

i disagree...this is kind of crisper then the ftf because u cant really read the subs in the ftf...in this one u can.

Also, the audio only comes out of one speaker, but if u MUX (take the sound from the ftf and lace over this one) it should be better

IMO


Posted by stuckx on 05-11-2002 01:53 AM:

Talking look cool

Look better than FTF.. but i cant give comments with only the JPG


Posted by apache-vampir on 05-11-2002 02:02 AM:

*INTERNAL*
what the heck that mean anyway- ok i uess that sounds well nooobie etc -
dont wanta a shitty answer just a *proper* 1 please
all you smark-fookers can abstain-
thx
-=apache=-


Posted by PenisXX on 05-11-2002 02:06 AM:

same source as FTFs, same audio errors at the same spots. had this version 2 days ago, as TuCVcD (but there was just the sample floating around, havent seen the full rls). bad quality, way too blurry.


Posted by duhmantis on 05-11-2002 02:49 AM:

Star.Wars.Episode.2.TS.iNTERNAL-HafVCD

Getting this now, i hate to waste cdz.... dunno which if any i should watch........


Posted by tooner on 05-11-2002 02:59 AM:

Some ppl on this board are thick as shit. Let me explain one or two things. This is not a repack of FTF release nor is it from same source (if you even suggested this then pls go point at yourself in a mirror and laugh.) The reason it's an internal is because the group did not believe the quality was good enough for a proper release. Picture quality looks better than FTF release as is sound but unfortunately its only mono thru the left speaker.

Still a decent rls imo and I know ill be watching it.
tooner

PS everyones expecting a centropy release soon and it might be worth waiting for if the quality is anything like spiderman.


Posted by phpdood on 05-11-2002 02:59 AM:

Re: wonder

quote:
Originally posted by PhAnToMs
i wonder if this is any better then the ftf release might be never know


it's worse the the ftf release.. the sound is even more hollowerd... fast though...


Posted by Motivations on 05-11-2002 03:25 AM:

Star Wars: Episode 2

Maybe you can just download it, and stop argueing about quality etc. It's pretty amazing that somebody took the effort in shooting at in a cinema at all....

You have to have a pretty good Newsgroup program, such as Newspro. Because this theater-rip is being posted in the
alt.binaries.vcd newsgroup you may want to apply a filter first for the following keyword:

ftf-swep

success....


Posted by Mango on 05-11-2002 04:37 AM:

Thumbs up LOL

re : Squeaky
>" i have a mental image of release group people all standing in the same line with their cameras "


Posted by The5Venomz on 05-11-2002 04:40 AM:

How is the Movie????

Enough about the quality of these 2 releases....How is the actual movie????


Posted by Pent on 05-11-2002 06:25 AM:

excellent release, better than ftf
watched cd1 so far


Posted by adzest on 05-11-2002 07:46 AM:

Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes


Posted by theBlaze74 on 05-11-2002 07:50 AM:

Does not look like a re-pack.

I have only gotten as far as downloading the mpg samples, but they look totally different. One is even taken at a different angle.


Posted by Cerial on 05-11-2002 08:25 AM:

yeah, good thing this is internal, i dont care how good u guys think the video is, its TILTED, i'd take somewhat blurry over tilted any day


Posted by Hollywood on 05-11-2002 08:34 AM:

Suggestion...

I am so tired of reading posts about how lame X group is or how much of a retard X poster is. For those who never took the time, there is an ENTIRE forum for debating such topics so could we please keep the threads about the movies limited only to the quality of the release? This site used to be my favorite one but lately it resembles ISONEWS with all this flaming. If you've seen the sample MPEG, give an opinion. If you just saw the JPEGs, refrain from cluttering the specific thread for X movie with your opinions since they serve little purpose for the site's overall goal... VCDQUALITY.

Many thanks to all the groups for the hard work, and lets try to be respectful gentlemen from now on so we don't have to read 78 posts on one movie when only a third are relevant. This is going to be a great summer for movies...

Hollywood


Posted by mymusic on 05-11-2002 08:46 AM:

Re: Star Wars: Episode 2

quote:
You have to have a pretty good Newsgroup program [/B]


newsgroups.....r i g h t


Posted by theBlaze74 on 05-11-2002 09:25 AM:

Swep2 DVD Screener .jpg s

Has anyone seen the jpgs of the apparent swep2 DVD Screener on usenet? I have seen these, and what looks like a flatbed scan of the case as well. Is this for real? Does someone have their hands on the screener, or is this just someones Photoshop project?


Posted by brr8760 on 05-11-2002 09:49 AM:

Unhappy NEW INFO ON CENTROPY

Question: If this is an *internal* release, how come all these NEWBIES (joined May 2002, 1 post) have got a copy???

Wake up, people, this is a FAKE -- and this "group" consists of a bunch of L-A-M-E-R-S. (although I reserve the right to be corrected by a veteran).

REGARDING CENTROPY: Centropy will NOT be releasing a STAR WARS 2. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad newz. They said they won't be doing AOTC in the nfo of their release of THE NEW GUY (SVCD). Guess they don't want Lucas on their ass.

That said, a great movie like UNFAITHFUL is opening up this weekend.... and Centropy releases THE NEW GUY??!!

UGH. That's like spraying perfume on a hog.


Posted by Pent on 05-11-2002 10:04 AM:

heh, no fake


Posted by Octane on 05-11-2002 11:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by adzest
Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes


fucking newbie


Posted by XCheMiCal on 05-11-2002 12:05 PM:

I'm sick off all this people talking about the quality and they haven't even seen it all they seen are the pics (DAMN NEWBIES)I seen both the ftf and this version.this don't look like a repack at all this quality is much better then the ftf. you can even read the subs in this one. the ftf was a bit dark in some sceens I couldn't see what was going on. This version is pretty good the only thing thats pissing me off is that its too blocky on my computer it looks okay but when I watch it on my dvd I see alot of blocks for those of you that seen it you know what Im talking about. but anyway this copy is much better.


Posted by priss on 05-11-2002 02:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by adzest
Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes





*yawn* you sad fucker.


Posted by priss on 05-11-2002 02:17 PM:

Re: Swep2 DVD Screener .jpg s

quote:
Originally posted by theBlaze74
Has anyone seen the jpgs of the apparent swep2 DVD Screener on usenet? I have seen these, and what looks like a flatbed scan of the case as well. Is this for real? Does someone have their hands on the screener, or is this just someones Photoshop project?


*yawn*


Posted by ppp on 05-11-2002 02:28 PM:

better a newbie than a total wanker. For fucks sake what a pointless flame. bit like this one probably, but nm.



re

quote:
Originally posted by adzest
Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





*yawn* you sad fucker.






quote:
Originally posted by adzest
Release gets 2.5/10 from me, FTF one gets 2/10.

Bring on the 3CD SVCD From Centropy.

/me whishes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


fucking newbie


Posted by K-FurY on 05-11-2002 04:08 PM:

Re: NEW INFO ON CENTROPY

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
Question: If this is an *internal* release, how come all these NEWBIES (joined May 2002, 1 post) have got a copy???

Wake up, people, this is a FAKE -- and this "group" consists of a bunch of [edited by gandalf]. (although I reserve the right to be corrected by a veteran).

REGARDING CENTROPY: Centropy will NOT be releasing a STAR WARS 2. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad newz. They said they won't be doing AOTC in the nfo of their release of THE NEW GUY (SVCD). Guess they don't want Lucas on their ass.

That said, a great movie like UNFAITHFUL is opening up this weekend.... and Centropy releases THE NEW GUY??!!

UGH. That's like spraying perfume on a hog.



Um, this is no fake.

Anyways I got the sample of this, I thought it was better then the ftf rls but not a major improvement. One question for u guys is it worth dling if u already have the ftf rls or should i just wait for a better copy?


Posted by conlia-98 on 05-11-2002 04:31 PM:

Exclamation Come On

They got it early i would give em 7 for effort .

Could someone give me a straight answer on which is better .

I know Centropy have said in there nfo that they wont do it but they have just done it to spark more attention . Thats why gorups release isnt it to get attention

If Centropy dont release it there will probally be a Telecine soon


ConLia98


Posted by plonk420 on 05-11-2002 09:53 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Cerial
yeah, good thing this is internal, i dont care how good u guys think the video is, its TILTED, i'd take somewhat blurry over tilted any day


TILTED???

oh gawd <rolls eyes>

it's shot from the side of a theater.


Posted by plonk420 on 05-11-2002 09:58 PM:

Re: NEW INFO ON CENTROPY

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
REGARDING CENTROPY: Centropy will NOT be releasing a STAR WARS 2. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad newz. They said they won't be doing AOTC in the nfo of their release of THE NEW GUY (SVCD). Guess they don't want Lucas on their ass.


pity.

ahhh well. they'll live to TS another day, i guess.

hopefully this'll give other groups to do a DECENT and not FAST release of this. here's to that... <raises cream soda-filled beer stein>


Posted by brr8760 on 05-11-2002 10:18 PM:

Well, if this IS a legit release-- and it hasn't been nuked yet-- then I was off-base and OOL. It had all the earmarks of a fake: but I guess that's why I never made it to Detective.

BWAAAHHHAAAA

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to perform an unnatural act on a cream soda-filled beer stein.


Posted by moviebootlegger on 05-11-2002 10:28 PM:

to all u stupid ass newbies sayin this is a fake or this rls is tilted or bullshit SHUT THE FUCK UP. i dloaded the sample and the quality is wayyy better than ftf but still blurry a lil. ima wait till a better rls to watch this anticipated film. heh if ctp dont rls dont cry i dont really giva shit. its their choice. u cant expect them to come out with 3 rls's a week and perfect everytime. giv em a break they did alot of good shit so far let someone else get the spotlite for star wars. IM HOPING TEG WILL RLS ANOTHER MASTERPIECE LIKE SPIDEY. that was a CAM and better quality than ftf and hafvcd. the sound was bettter than both and they didnt have direct audio source. HAHA. that shows TEG knows how to do em. i hope TEG gets a direct sound for this rls and same cam pic would b perfect for me. TEG is the 2nd best group they jus gotta rls more like before. I HAVE FAITH IN U TEG!


Posted by cawknballs on 05-12-2002 12:26 AM:

I'm going to my buddies place to watch it now on the big screen... if it blows i'll be back later to flame all you dorks.


Posted by Faceman on 05-12-2002 01:28 AM:

People get it through your skulls.........


IT IS THE SAME AS FTF

Same, not different, same. Same source, same aspect ratio.


Posted by Jasper0 on 05-12-2002 04:12 AM:

Your seriously fuked up if you can watch this shit. Save your pennies and go see it in a theatre or wait for a better rls.


Posted by Skynet on 05-12-2002 06:19 AM:

Exclamation

Okay here is the deal. The HaFVCD is the better of the two but only by 10-15%, IMHO. The sound is about the same, maybe slighter easier to hear the dialog. Neither version is great, in fact they both pretty much suck. It may be possible to re-encode this version with some video clean up and enhanced and filtered sound.


Posted by theBlaze74 on 05-12-2002 10:18 AM:

quote:
fucking newbie http://octane.theidiots.org - DO NOT FUCKING CONTACT ME FOR MOVIES, IM NOT A VENDING MACHINE, AND I WILL PROBABLY NOT LIKE YOU


grow up


Posted by **TheWhiz**02 on 05-13-2002 05:12 AM:

Red face

better than ftf but wait for a better group


Posted by Vamp|re on 05-13-2002 02:44 PM:

This is the sort of the same as the FtF release in the beginning the audio skips in the same parts. Maybe HAFVcd just did a better job of editing the video


Posted by erob64 on 05-15-2002 04:10 AM:

yes wait for another


Posted by zlinman on 05-17-2002 10:09 AM:

Hi, sorry for this very newbi q.: How can I play this VCD? Extracted from *.bin there I can only see very brocken video (more than half the screen is green and so one...) and crackly audio (using PowerDVD and VideoCDPlayer of WinOnCD...) Am I missing some other codec? Tnxx for help - have fun!


Posted by zlinman on 05-17-2002 10:44 AM:

Hi,
sorry for this verry newbi q: How can I play this release? Extracted files from *.bin playing with PowerDVD or Videoplayer of WinOnCd giving me only broken video (half of screen only green color and so one) and crappy sound. Am I missing some codecs or so? Tnx for help and have fun!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:01 AM.
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.