VCDQuality Forums
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Transporter *SuBBeD* - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=8784)


Posted by stumpy_006 on 09-23-2002 05:02 AM:

sample looks good ... subs are abit big but its OK ... downloading the movie itself now and gonna watch it tomorrow ... nice work ESOTERiC .. getting better all the time 7/8/NA

BTW in the sample dood is counting down 54,53,52,51 ... but in subs it says 44,43,42,41 ... i just thought i'd point that out cause i thought it was funny

__________________
stumpy_006


Posted by CerealKid on 09-23-2002 05:48 AM:

Nice, I saw most of the 1st cd.. Good quality sons.. And yes.. the subs are weird.... hehe.. Great job guys..!!!!!!

__________________
Kill the FUCKIN RHINO.


Posted by CharlyTuna on 09-23-2002 05:52 AM:

had this about an hour ago burned. watched cd1, now going for a beer/food run. be back to watch cd2.

tgif is calling me.

deffintly a 7/7/8 great action!


p.s. this is an opinion


Posted by DrSeussFreak on 09-23-2002 07:16 AM:

OK

Well, nothing special, movie was good, subs suck


Posted by XTASY-Jones on 09-23-2002 07:56 AM:

Every since I saw the preview for this I've been wanting to see
this flick. This is to good and ahead of time, Sooo Kool.


Posted by aTTicA on 09-23-2002 11:46 AM:

ok.. this is differnt.. i actually got something b4 ppl posted.. so i figure ill throw in my 2 cents.. the picture on this is really good.. audio is decent as well.. umm somethin aint quite right tho.. the motion isnt smooth. maybe those of ya who saw the eso dog soldiers know what im taklin bout.. my guess is its a case of a really good source and a really bad encode.. still quite watchable.. id give it a 6.5.. but if eso could fix their motion problems itd be a 7.5..


Posted by nicci on 09-23-2002 01:20 PM:

nice release

7/7/8


Posted by kasper on 09-23-2002 01:55 PM:

yes thanks been waiting for this...subs get to me a little but ill just work around them.


Posted by ^Om3n on 09-23-2002 03:04 PM:

aTTicA, dropping frames?

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by Asterisk on 09-23-2002 07:06 PM:

Yeah Omen, it's similar to the Minority Report TC, like it's 15fps, but it's decent quality.

Worth a d/l if you don't mind subs. 6/6/?


Posted by Rep- on 09-23-2002 09:02 PM:

FTF is good at 1 week pre's, but ESOTERiC kicks ass at these 1 month pre's.


Posted by nefariousi on 09-23-2002 09:18 PM:

Just finished, Good Movie......

The Subs were indeed a little annoying but what the hell, I can put up with that. Enjoy every second of it. Thanks again for the P.H.A.T release guys.

7.5/7.5/8

Thanks


Posted by reverend on 09-23-2002 09:30 PM:

Qi Shu is sooo hot

Qi Shu is easily the hottest babe acting now, before, or in the future.

See 'Millenium Mambo' and tell me I'm not wrong


Posted by Stabbe on 09-23-2002 09:43 PM:

How can u stand the low framerate ?!, its not watchable.


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 09-23-2002 10:18 PM:

Great Movie, can't complain. don't care about subbs i got use to it now if you know how to remove it *evil smile* it looks better but still it looks awsome, it deserv a 8/8/8 cuase two parts it had a sound problem.

--- Good Work ESOTERiC keep it up and bring more Pre month stuff

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by KevN2002 on 09-23-2002 10:58 PM:

Thanks, just removed myself from the queue.


Posted by WiggoMan on 09-23-2002 11:18 PM:

8/7/?
good job esoteric!

but it is little anoying with the sub


Posted by Axion on 09-23-2002 11:42 PM:

just finished watching, movie was good.. subs were a little annoying and so were the sound glitches on the second cd, other than that great pre, thanks ESOTERiC!

7/7/8


Posted by misfits138 on 09-24-2002 01:01 AM:

whats up with the frame rate? hope the frame rate looks better when i play it on my dvd player.


Posted by Skippy_2002ca on 09-24-2002 01:20 AM:

nice

seen the sapmle and enjoyed this movie so i give it a 6/6/9

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol


Posted by korax on 09-24-2002 01:40 AM:

Good Job However

Look pretty nice but why didn't you crop those subtitles off i dont think to many people would have minded a half centimeter cut off from the bottom.

__________________
korax owns joo


Posted by Scorpion on 09-24-2002 01:49 AM:

It looks like it has a motion blur when played on the TV...weird framerate shit.

It's watchable, though, especially for a pre.


Posted by MacMall88 on 09-24-2002 02:23 AM:

does ne1 out there know how to fix that framerate shit?? i really wanna watch this one but i can't stand this. please post if u know how.
5(because of FR, prob like a 7.5 otherwise)/7/?


Posted by Cele-CT on 09-24-2002 02:59 AM:

overall good movie , Was hopeing to see it this month , but they delayed it. Now Oct 10th. Good movie, The fps was a bit of a problem.


Posted by misfits138 on 09-24-2002 03:01 AM:

this would be the best ts i've seen in a loooooooong time if it weren't for the framerate.

reencode it ESOTERiC...perrrrty pleaze!


Posted by ^Om3n on 09-24-2002 03:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by misfits138
reencode it ESOTERiC...perrrrty pleaze!


It would be really pointless and stupid to recode this to just about double the frame rate, trust me... it'd look worse.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by misfits138 on 09-24-2002 04:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ^Om3n


It would be really pointless and stupid to recode this to just about double the frame rate, trust me... it'd look worse.



ummm not if they used the original source.


Posted by a1catraz on 09-24-2002 05:10 AM:

Re: nice

quote:
Originally posted by Skippy_2002ca
seen the sapmle and enjoyed this movie so i give it a 6/6/9


how can u see the sample, and tell that the movie was good, just wondering................. makes people doubt u actually got a copy of the movie..


Posted by cmm on 09-24-2002 06:45 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by misfits138
this would be the best ts i've seen in a loooooooong time if it weren't for the framerate.

reencode it ESOTERiC...perrrrty pleaze!



i hear ya. i thought that i had downloaded someone's divx reencode instead of the actual vcd release. at least its not just me. still looks pretty damn good though.


Posted by bmvtoys on 09-24-2002 08:00 PM:

Good audio...the fix the video framerate you have to change it up to about 54 or 54.999. Not sure on how to fix the audio, that's another story all together.


b


Posted by Jc100 on 09-24-2002 11:29 PM:

Correction: 59.94 FPS and it does work well. I just tried kids tip on like a few mins and the motion doesnt look blocky and blurry now. I just hope if i do this my dvd player can spport it. Anyway, need to watch before i rate it and do conversion fully.


Posted by MacMall88 on 09-25-2002 12:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bmvtoys
Good audio...the fix the video framerate you have to change it up to about 54 or 54.999. Not sure on how to fix the audio, that's another story all together.


b



Whats a good player to change the fps


Posted by bmvtoys on 09-25-2002 12:39 AM:

you'll actually have to re-encode the video, but the audio can't be fixed I think. The silver for this release has the same issue, so maybe the original source was bad.

b


Posted by DarkEsperX on 09-25-2002 03:30 AM:

The video quality is very good. The sound is good, the movie is good. Props to ESO all around.

8/7/7


Posted by DrEEmDaZE on 09-25-2002 09:48 AM:

Good movie, enjoyed it till the end. Audio was fine, The picture quality was great for a movie released this early, but the frame rate was really fucked up. Gets a little jumpy in the action scenes and you dont see it very smoothly, not to good for an action movie. Oh well, still is nice to see it 3 weeks before the theatrical debut, deff worth the dl and great werk on eso's side!


Posted by Sy12uP on 09-25-2002 10:11 AM:

I liked the movie Subs got in the way once in a while, sound got alittle messed up, but the movie made up for it. 7/7/8

Good rls.


Posted by ShinBone on 09-25-2002 07:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by aTTicA
ok.. this is differnt.. i actually got something b4 ppl posted.. so i figure ill throw in my 2 cents.. the picture on this is really good.. audio is decent as well.. umm somethin aint quite right tho.. the motion isnt smooth. maybe those of ya who saw the eso dog soldiers know what im taklin bout.. my guess is its a case of a really good source and a really bad encode.. still quite watchable.. id give it a 6.5.. but if eso could fix their motion problems itd be a 7.5..


Yes I've seen thier dog soldiers and the motion blur is quite horrible. What encode settings, filters, w/e could they use to fix this.


Posted by SumBastard on 09-25-2002 07:43 PM:

:(

Picture isn't as smooth as current releases, it seems to lag, and the sub ARE annoying endeed. but overall it's a speed PRE.


Posted by Jc100 on 09-26-2002 01:07 AM:

I retract what i said earlier, i tried the encode and then watched the some of it, didnt help really and at the 54.05 fps, my dvd wouldnt support it. This could indeed be the best release we have seen since LOTR if a repack was done to fix this. Picture quality is very veyr good and the lagging makes this film a very low rating as it is quite annoying. My 2 cents, but seeing blurry motion isnt the way to watch a movie.


Posted by mag22 on 09-26-2002 03:29 AM:

I'm agreeing with the masses here... the jerky feeling detracts a lot from the action sequences. They appear to be Jackie Chan type choreographed masterpieces, but you could never tell. I liken this to watching people in a strobe light. The audio was good minus the last bit of CD2 where a few hisses were heard intermittently. A smoother playback would've made this a killer Pre, but as it is I rated it a 6/6/6.


Posted by Whrswoldo on 09-26-2002 06:34 AM:

been looking foreward to this one! still getting cd2 will give opinion on movie after seeing whole thing

picture is very watchable except for annoying subs, the framerate is not that much of a problem for me... audio's great for pre,

6 / 7 / ?

btw did anyone else know "45" was chinese for 5"fifty five"


Posted by dvdmatty on 09-27-2002 12:50 PM:

Great film.... Reminded me of Ronin with the car chases The subs are not too annoying, i dont have a problem with the frame rate.


I will definatly update this film wen a better rls comes out.. but Very good for a 1 month pre-rls.


Jason Statham has come along way since the likes of 'Turkish'. His best role yet.


Posted by nitemare on 09-28-2002 07:09 AM:

6/5/5

picture ok. somewhat watcheable. very difficult to see what was going on during the fighting scenes.sound was sometimes hard to hear..noticiable buzzing sound at times too. movie itself average at best. good start, but then ended up being another van damn/jackie chan kung fu movie which always ends up boring to me. there are much better flics out there. quality is ok..movie just average..


Posted by kalvaitis007 on 09-29-2002 06:51 PM:

THIS is why I don't get Telesyncs....

Usually I stay away from TS rls, but I wanted to see this one and I didn't think I'd convince the wife to go to a theatre and see it with me.

I see a ton of comments saying this is a great rls except for the framerate. Maybe it's just me, but that's kinda like saying, "if the whole thing was different it would be great!" The frame rate killed this release for me. The audio had a pop and a crackle for awhile in CD2 (early on). The movie turned out to be a little better than I expected, but towards the end you could tell they ran out of story.

In relation to other ts rls, I rate: 4/4/6

-K


Posted by Lrd_Mince on 09-29-2002 09:12 PM:

I dont know wether the release had missing parts in it or not, but this movie sucks ass. Picture was alright, but a bit blurry during action scenes. But the main disappointment was the horrid dialog and lack of cohesion. Especially at the end. I'm not going to give it away, but it seemed as if everybody was coming out of nowhere.


Posted by explicit on 10-07-2002 04:39 PM:

wow i like the subs !
and the quality was produced resulted fine.
Good Work!!


Posted by VincentVegaFFF on 10-13-2002 08:20 PM:

6/5.5/?

I did watch the whole release but stuff's missing in it. Important plot points are gone. Its not fair to rate an incomplete movie. What was there was pretty good though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 AM.
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.