VCDQuality Forums
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Red Dragon *SVCD* - TELESYNC - ECO (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=9175)


Posted by ABlix0 on 10-03-2002 02:43 AM:

*me hopes!!


Posted by Wesb0b on 10-03-2002 02:47 AM:

Awsome movie. cant wait to see qual. this just hit my sites

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel


Posted by Shortman on 10-03-2002 02:51 AM:

Shortman Posted Already!

[8:48pm] <dinde> lol wh ovoted already
[8:48pm] <dinde> lamers
[8:48pm] <dinde> lol


Posted by PhreakerX on 10-03-2002 02:54 AM:

mmm, cool name we'll see about quality in time

__________________
"I love the Power Glove. Its so bad."


Posted by SneakySix on 10-03-2002 02:54 AM:

Its good qual, ceen it a few hrs ago


Posted by rappa on 10-03-2002 03:01 AM:

ok umm this is to post about the release not about wow svcd or blablabla...5/7/x..pic is blurry and not to nice, sound is direct

Edit: I added the jpeg's for it but they dont seem to be working..hmm idk the problemo

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by Redemption on 10-03-2002 03:01 AM:

I said this was on its way, ive been told its better by a mate but how much he wouldn't tell me.


Posted by gh0st_man on 10-03-2002 03:09 AM:

Blurred *NUKED*

. Kinda sucks wanted this one...


Posted by rappa on 10-03-2002 03:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by RaPpA
ok umm this is to post about the release not about wow svcd or blablabla...5/7/x..pic is blurry and not to nice, sound is direct

Edit: I added the jpeg's for it but they dont seem to be working..hmm idk the problemo



Edit2: They r now working.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by Trenton_1 on 10-03-2002 03:34 AM:

I never thought I would say this but FTF's is still the best. Picture looks blury from the sample and I watched FTF's and was very very impressed.


Posted by IsoFAST on 10-03-2002 04:12 AM:

4/3/8

The ftf version was much better then this one and a-teams.
I can't believe I said FTF and MUCH better in one sentence, maybe they are finally learning.


Posted by reefer420 on 10-03-2002 04:49 AM:

; /

this is eco first release soo dont judge us too harshly yet. ill admit this isnt the best quality for a svcd but o well shit happends any comments email us at [email protected]


Posted by Swimj on 10-03-2002 05:09 AM:

NUKE NUKE

THIS WAS SUCH SHIT AFTER WATCHING THE SAMPLE, stupid n00b re-encoders.... and they did a shitty ass job too, get your own source good movie though
4/3/8


Posted by MrBoogedy on 10-03-2002 05:46 AM:

Comment on quality on detail?

Well, obviously the last few people to rate gave this movie a quality of 1/1/X because it went from 7/7/X with 6 votes to 5/5/X with 9 votes.

So, apparently this release is absolute shite, but can anyone say why? The FTF release had poor color and less than crappy sound. While I don't think a TS should ever warrant a 3CD SVCD, with that beef aside, I'd like to know exactly what makes this release worse/better than FTF in any way (except for the 3CD SVCD TS part).

And if you're going to respond and enlighten me, make sure you've actually seen this release, I don't want to hear any comments on the jpegs, even the sample isn't always an accurate representation.


Posted by raides on 10-03-2002 06:09 AM:

um now if we can only get the ftf video and this one's sound then we be dancing like nakees


Posted by someth1ng on 10-03-2002 06:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by PhreakerX
mmm, cool name we'll see about quality in time

does anyone post reviews here on quality in here anymore? damn you got me...


Funny you asked that cuz you just posted two posts that had nothing to do with the quality. hehe

Lame rls, just reencoded. Don't waste your bw on such shit. GET YOUR OWN SOURCE!!!!


Posted by mrnoregard on 10-03-2002 08:41 AM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by someth1ng
[B]

Funny you asked that cuz you just posted two posts that had nothing to do with the quality. hehe


LMAO......

__________________
If yo daytons got a lil' mo shine than the ones i got, ama get my nine and yo shit is mine.......


Posted by desertboy on 10-03-2002 09:50 AM:

Talking

4/4/8

piss poor inferior quality reencode of FTF's put onto 3 cd's saw the sample thats enough to convince me not to bother this time. Nevermind Gay name for a group isn't it a dolphin or something


PS I've just noticed that on the voting screen you can click to see who else voted and how they voted, just thought anyone else who missed it might enjoy seeing which are the guys who consistent vote 10/10/10, you know who I mean Westside-Homie, reefer420 and some others. Stop being so lame and actually download films before review (Or at least the sample)


Stop being such stupid dicks is the moral of the story.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by THE_DREAM on 10-03-2002 10:03 AM:

im not going to judge u guys yet i'll give u some time to develope first ok??


Posted by frak on 10-03-2002 10:38 AM:

crap


Posted by sevve on 10-03-2002 11:05 AM:

thanx alot man


Posted by PhreakerX on 10-03-2002 12:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by someth1ng
Funny you asked that cuz you just posted two posts that had nothing to do with the quality. hehe

no one understands sarcasm these days...

__________________
"I love the Power Glove. Its so bad."


Posted by devilbeast on 10-03-2002 01:44 PM:

quality isnt good but like some sauid before the sound is good, maybe someone can hook the sound up from this one and the video from ftf's and we'd be set on a decent rls but hopin we get a screener from the awards.


Posted by j0h2n on 10-03-2002 03:20 PM:

Thats one fucked up nfo .


Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 06:44 PM:

hmmm *sucksdick* now that is how a release should be rated. This made my day. I'm surprised Mystic didnt catch that yet.

I give the release a 0/3/- Didn't like the movie enough to rate the flick itself.

b


Posted by desertboy on 10-03-2002 07:03 PM:

Talking

Votes for Red Dragon *SVCD* *SUCKSDICK* DONT CHANGE by ECO
These were the votes as of 18:00 (UK time) 3/10/2002 just in case anyone was intrested and before anyone else has a chance to edit theirs.


moviedan713 10/9/8
nightmare_1 1/1/1
h0gw1ld 1/1/10
monots 1/1/1
westside-homie 10/10/10
SneakySix 7/8/8
dc_man 1/6/10
crob 1/1/10
tko248 1/1/9
Trenton_1 4/8/9
M3RICK 1/2/2
PetahHFX 1/1/1
AgGz 10/10/10
Movieguy 1/5/10
desertboy 4/4/8
reefer420 10/10/10
Swimj 1/1/n/a
ownlos 10/10/10

maybe 3 or 4 real ratings at top out of 18 votes now maybe the madness can stop, I'll post a list of offenders from now on for the cause, real ratings.

PS I just noticed westside homie voted 10/10/10 for most of the ateams releases, maybe a member!

Just added the new votes, seperated the newbies from the real voters, still a lot of you newbies, hey ace1, doggy & westb0b for example. Killfxp you liked this film a lot didn't you.

Neversoft 5/4/7
Velocity 2/5/8
ghEtto^ghOst 7/5/10
Cory 5/4/9
IsoFAST 4/3/8
crayon 4/6/n/a
Dr. Poo PhD 5/7/10
PhAnToMs 7/9/5

ace1 1/1/1
DoGGy 1/1/6
Wesb0b 1/1/10
Rival 1/1/1
killfxp 10/10/10
SirhcMan 1/1/n/a
pyarhua 10/n/a/10

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 07:11 PM:

that's why I only posted on the board. I felt as if I posted my horrible rating it would make things worse (than what I said of course).

Ib


Posted by Stampers on 10-03-2002 07:55 PM:

I never realised that, been looking through some old posts to see who doesn't know how to vote! Nice post desertboy


Posted by IsoFAST on 10-03-2002 08:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by desertboy
Votes for Red Dragon *SVCD* *SUCKSDICK* DONT CHANGE by ECO
These were the votes as of 18:00 (UK time) 3/10/2002 just in case anyone was intrested and before anyone else has a chance to edit theirs.


moviedan713 10/9/8
nightmare_1 1/1/1
h0gw1ld 1/1/10
monots 1/1/1
westside-homie 10/10/10
SneakySix 7/8/8
dc_man 1/6/10
crob 1/1/10
tko248 1/1/9
Trenton_1 4/8/9
M3RICK 1/2/2
PetahHFX 1/1/1
AgGz 10/10/10
Movieguy 1/5/10
desertboy 4/4/8
reefer420 10/10/10
Swimj 1/1/n/a
ownlos 10/10/10

maybe 3 or 4 real ratings at top out of 18 votes now maybe the madness can stop, I'll post a list of offenders from now on for the cause, real ratings.




i added my vote to the list, a decent one.

what are these 1/1/1 and 10/10/10 these people on dope?


Posted by Bud-man on 10-03-2002 09:54 PM:

My opinion if it isnt a DVD source why make it SVCD?..even a quality made VCD ripped from DVD looks as good as a SVCD..waste of hard drive and discs


Posted by Redemption on 10-03-2002 11:06 PM:

Pretty poor and a waste of 3CD's, but hey ive saw worse.

quote:
My opinion if it isnt a DVD source why make it SVCD?..even a quality made VCD ripped from DVD looks as good as a SVCD..waste of hard drive and discs

Huh, thats pure bullshit and you know it, a SVCD TS can look good, and saying a VCD looks as good as a SVCD is laughable.

True original VCD's can look really good, but SVCD is far better.

This just under 2 hours, they should have made it 2 CD's and just ran it through an extra couple of passes.


Posted by AgGz on 10-03-2002 11:40 PM:

FAGGITS

i'm really starting to get pissed off with this forum....all you stupid retards flamin this new group....its a new group give them a chance woww this isn't a rencode if u take the time to look at it and not just the jpg u can figure that out...it could have been the same source as ftf but whos noes its no rencode...as for the svcd issue i think svcd is better...read the nfo "we decided to do svcd becuz its a kickass movie and it deserves it" and you no wat they are totally right..i dun't understand u ppl the ftfs version color was all faded and the sound dun't even get me started on that...if the name on this rls read C*T*P* u would all be shooting a load in ur pants and all screamin...this is 20x better than ftfs...and take it cuz its for free and its 4 days b4 the movie is in theathers so u all should STFU!!!


Posted by djkoolaide on 10-03-2002 11:45 PM:

RECODE!!


Posted by PopSicko on 10-04-2002 12:39 AM:

Looks like all the A-Team and FTF dick-smokers are sure showing there asses now...that's TOO funny. Same people who vote for themselves for employee of the month as well I bet.

This remake is way better than the original 1986 Michael Mann cock-up. 5/5/8...


Posted by MrBoogedy on 10-04-2002 02:08 AM:

Actual Quality

So does this release have better sound than the FTF one? From the posts it seems it does, but from the rating board, the sound is rated waaaaaay lower.

Also, the jpegs certainly look like they've got better color than the FTF, so is the video on this actually worse than FTF? Or does it have such a shitty low quality rating simply because it's a 3CD SVCD TS (which is unecessary)?

Can somebody actually compare the two releases for me, regardless of format or size, just compare the quality if I were to sit down and watch both of them side by side, which one is better?


Posted by IsoFAST on 10-04-2002 06:21 AM:

nuked everywhere

visit

http://www.nforce.nl/nfos/index.php

nforce shows nuked, that means every topsite nuked it.


Posted by crob on 10-04-2002 10:25 AM:

What the freak is a topsite?! Everyone keeps on going on about them!!!


Posted by sevve on 10-04-2002 10:38 AM:

thanx


Posted by ShifTeR on 10-04-2002 11:40 AM:

Re: nuked everywhere

quote:
Originally posted by IsoFAST


nforce shows nuked, that means every topsite nuked it.



lol, no that just means one person who updates nforce nuked it. course i can't find it on any respectable site, which must say something ...


Posted by desertboy on 10-04-2002 12:22 PM:

Talking Re: FAGGITS

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz
i'm really starting to get pissed off with this forum....all you stupid retards flamin this new group....its a new group give them a chance woww this isn't a rencode if u take the time to look at it and not just the jpg u can figure that out...it could have been the same source as ftf but whos noes its no rencode...as for the svcd issue i think svcd is better...read the nfo "we decided to do svcd becuz its a kickass movie and it deserves it" and you no wat they are totally right..i dun't understand u ppl the ftfs version color was all faded and the sound dun't even get me started on that...if the name on this rls read C*T*P* u would all be shooting a load in ur pants and all screamin...this is 20x better than ftfs...and take it cuz its for free and its 4 days b4 the movie is in theathers so u all should STFU!!!


Wait a minute didn't you vote 10/10/10 for this movie, who's really the lame ass fuck, you for your lame asss ratings I mean 10/10/10 I only saw the sample but this aint no 10 not by a long long shot. Stop being so lame, you're surely either a group member which is pretty lame (Quality speaks for itself) or a stupid newbie.


FOOOOOOOOL

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by Stampers on 10-04-2002 02:49 PM:

Re: FAGGITS

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz
i'm really starting to get pissed off with this forum....all you stupid retards flamin this new group....its a new group give them a chance woww this isn't a rencode if u take the time to look at it and not just the jpg u can figure that out...it could have been the same source as ftf but whos noes its no rencode...as for the svcd issue i think svcd is better...read the nfo "we decided to do svcd becuz its a kickass movie and it deserves it" and you no wat they are totally right..i dun't understand u ppl the ftfs version color was all faded and the sound dun't even get me started on that...if the name on this rls read C*T*P* u would all be shooting a load in ur pants and all screamin...this is 20x better than ftfs...and take it cuz its for free and its 4 days b4 the movie is in theathers so u all should STFU!!!


You heard of the full stop and the comma?


Posted by Jetster33 on 10-04-2002 04:45 PM:

wtf scvd

by the look of the jpg it looks terrible and i would not waste the time d/l since we all d/l ftfs version which was really good . As for svcd hmmm let me think its stinks so vcd of ftf is better!


Posted by BumCheese on 10-04-2002 06:12 PM:

Talking Just another note

That lamer reeper420 is probably a group member too. His name is in the ECO logo next to the C in the nfo.

5/7/9 for the movie


Posted by DrSVCD on 10-04-2002 10:45 PM:

Thumbs down BAD!!!

Not to good a release


Posted by anticrom on 10-06-2002 04:04 AM:

Show some damn respect for new grps, everyone starts off small....At least theyre doing something While u bitches leech...

__________________
lalala


Posted by ItlHorrorFan on 10-09-2002 04:17 PM:

atleast there is direct sound and a little more color than FTFs this is a good release


Posted by impossible on 10-10-2002 05:45 AM:

Alright, heres the deal with this release:
Video- 4 (congratulations, svcd of a vcd-worthy release!!11)
Audio- 5(atleast I hear something...)
Movie- ?

The video was truly deserving of VCD, and not this stunt trying to prove you are one to look for with SVCD. Colors were dim, like after you wash nice shiny, colorful clothes with bleach. I wish I could give a review of the movie, the trailers are intriguing, but obviously I will need to see something more watchable than this before that ever happens....


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 AM.
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.