VCDQuality Forums
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Day After Tomorrow *PROPER* *SVCD* - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=42184)


Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 08:34 PM:

VideoCD,

please dont waste anymore time than was already wasted with this shit movie. focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2


Posted by simonl85 on 06-23-2004 09:03 PM:

pjfan281, please don't waste any more time on this board unless you have something constructive to add to the posts about this release.

Rate the quality of the release ALONG with the quality of the movie if you feel it is necessary. Needless bashing of the movie without helping anyone to make a decision on whether to download the release is fucking pointless and will just make people want to set fire to you whilst shouting I AM THE WALRUS.

Kthx.

__________________


Posted by joeydownload on 06-23-2004 09:12 PM:

Well said simonl85,you only post on quality of print not arseholes moning ,he must be new !


Posted by wykidnk on 06-23-2004 09:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pjfan281
focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
[Second...]
NO REQUESTING FILMS,
3. Breaking the NO REQUESTING rule . INSTANT BAN.



As for this release, its pretty nice..

8/8/6

__________________
Click!


Posted by serj on 06-23-2004 09:29 PM:

been a while since i lasted posted, nows a better time then any before i get banned for inactivity lol

well i'm just as guilty here but I find this really funny...

simonl85 and joeydownload post a comment telling pjfan281, to not post unless it's about the release..well um look what you 2 just did...you think it makes you any better? no it makes you equal and i am right there with all 3 of you for doing this...


wow another release? but wait this one isnt nuked?
at this point i'll just wait for a dvd release or a nice looking screener, thanks for your time though videocd.


Posted by VCDz on 06-23-2004 09:34 PM:

I wish VideoCD released a DVDR version of their Telecine's with DD 5.1 surround like Replica does.

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?


Posted by Darkness on 06-23-2004 09:55 PM:

simonl85: please dont waste time & space replying to other people pointless & idiotic posts..


Anyway,,

8/7/6


Posted by Bakkoda on 06-23-2004 10:00 PM:

8/8/2 - Better than average quaity for VideoCD in my opinion, sound is great and video is a touch blurry but not very pixelated.

Ill jump on the bandwagon. Gj Simon, a whole post about wasting posts and nothin said about the movie itself.

EDIT: kthx
Second EDIT: Everyone has an opinion on the quality but yet I'm the only one to actually rate it on the poll?


Posted by BiggD23 on 06-23-2004 10:02 PM:

At least they didn't flat out lie in the NFO about where they cut the ending this time...bonus points for that.

8/8/doesn't deserve a score


Posted by neatz on 06-23-2004 10:03 PM:

VideoCD,

please dont waste anymore time than was already wasted with this shit movie. focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2



i agree tuns looks good on dvdr lets see the terminal :P :P

__________________
why bitch about the cost just switch to dvd-r "dam-it"


Posted by XXXBoX on 06-23-2004 10:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by VCDz
I wish VideoCD released a DVDR version of their Telecine's with DD 5.1 surround like Replica does.


Didnt they do that with Kill Bill Vol.2? Im sure the TC DVD-R was by VideoDVD! There should be no reason why this shouldn't be the same!

XXX


Posted by tr1pp1n on 06-23-2004 10:41 PM:

saw the movie in theaters... thought it was mediocre dont think ill be wasting my bandwidth on this..... anyways good job judgin from the sample.......
8/8/5.5


I h4x0r3d t3h g1bs0n

Edit: just on a side note, remember when centropy released spiderman ts in svcd, that is when everyone started this nonsense of save up your energy for a more worthy movie... I think that it should be shut up and be grateful, dont beg a group they will release what the see necessary and what the can get their hands on and lets leave it at that...
xilf is ugly....

__________________

The wise man does not play leap frog with unicorns...


Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 10:50 PM:

ok, for all the women who got their panties in a bunch for me not commenting on quality, here you go..

videocd release better than tun release? perhaps
videocd release better enough to warrant proper? no
videocd best release? for the bandwidth, yes, otherwise no get dvdr release


Posted by henriklarson on 06-23-2004 11:20 PM:

well said tr1pp1n they will release what they can and if peeps dont like it, dont download it.

videocd are on a roll now so why should they not improve the quality of there releases if they have the chance to.

goodjob videocd keep it up.


Posted by crackerjax on 06-23-2004 11:24 PM:

yes yes, run right out and waste some bandwidth on the DVDr that is out-of-sync.

Good job mate, you managed to make an ass outta yourself 2x in one thread, that seriously takes some talent. ... this is enought to warrent a proper, just to get rid of that nasty sidebar for those of us who are lazy asses and don't want to fix it ourselves, and have the bandwidth to waste. (not trying to offend, just stating and opinion) Besides the other was pixalated all to hell, and you could see more video blocks than in a vhs screener, it was pretty much not a TC, and if it was, then someone needs to re-read "how to encode 101."

Nice release VideoCD, scanning through CD2 now .... looks great, sounds nice ... bring on the TC.DVDR .... Go VideoDVD

/end rant


Posted by 00b1ar on 06-23-2004 11:26 PM:

aws0m3 ill dl it asap 9/9/9
u guys dont appreciate the quality of a flix
Movie Rocked

__________________
n1ce 00b1ar


Posted by pjfan281 on 06-23-2004 11:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crackerjax
yes yes, run right out and waste some bandwidth on the DVDr that is out-of-sync.
/end rant



still mixed reviews there. some same it's only sample, one person says its in the movie too. hasnt been nuked yet, so too early to tell. i wont waste time downloading it either way for such a lame movie. and for the record, slight imrpovements in video quality are not cause for a proper. any group can take an extra week and make the video look "less blocky". i saw the tun release and it was fine. this should have been an internal release and thats about it. later.


Posted by vip3r on 06-23-2004 11:35 PM:

Yeah good proper VideoCD..took awhile, but ya got it out..

9/9/6 - i'll have to think about downloading this one..


Posted by scousethief on 06-23-2004 11:45 PM:

in my opinion not a good reason for a proper shouldve been nuked. The tun version was a good enough version that played excellently on my standalone with very little pixelisation

i am going to base my score on the sample

8,9,6


Posted by Debo on 06-23-2004 11:59 PM:

another release of this shitty movie
8/8/5

__________________


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 06-24-2004 12:10 AM:

Ok this is much better no matter what anyone says its worth a download only if you like the movie. Otherwise don't bother. F..k the sample. Most samples are misleading. I thought alot of us would have caught on by now.
From CD1 The 20th Century Intro is cut and goes straight into the movie.
CD2 is Just Fine.
CD 3 Full and All The Credits.
No doubt the quality is great from the beginning on. Looks like from a Asian source even has a Asian Word of The Day After Tomorrow come up at the beginning.

I really wish people would stop bashing the movie if you don't like it fine. Don't discourage others from giving it a look.

I thought the movie was good only problem with it, was the terrible and incomplete ending. Which they could have told more about the after effects of the world but left it dry with nothing more but a satelitte zoom and some credits. But the movie was good none the less. And the special effects were very nice.

9/9/7 Rating from actually having the release. Not the sample.
This is much better than any other release on quality.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by the hitman--uk on 06-24-2004 01:14 AM:

nice release ,but if you ask me why bother the movie was shit ...but thats just me,8/8/3

__________________
heaven has a hitman--


Posted by 00b1ar on 06-24-2004 02:14 AM:

YUP D0NT KNOCK IT TILL I GOT IT

__________________
n1ce 00b1ar


Posted by a r e s ! on 06-24-2004 02:27 AM:

if the videocd source is the same like the german dubbed russian pdvd (tc) version released by iND (splitted on three discs too), the quality looks like this and I stay with the blurry but contrast richer and more colorful telesync

telesync versus telecine
screen by screen 01
screen by screen 02
screen by screen 03
screen by screen 04
screen by screen 05

(TC) The.Day.After.Tomorrow.PROPER.TC.Line.Dubbed.German.SVCD-iND
(TS) The.Day.After.Tomorrow.PROPER.SVCD.TELESYNC-VideoCD


Posted by directv on 06-24-2004 03:09 AM:

i'm notr trying to flame against ne1, but if you're gonna bitch about a movie/quality of a movie, then there are 2 things you can do: wait for the dvdrip to be released/rent and burn the dvd yourself, or not waste your time bitching about the movie. it's that simple and i think that most if not evry1 in the scene would agree


Posted by masterle on 06-24-2004 03:36 AM:

vcd released this a long time ago. same time as other releases. don't know why it took so long for vcdquality to get it. well i rate is 8/8/8. i thought movie was good for a one time watch.


Posted by EclipseGSX on 06-24-2004 04:24 AM:

On my PC, this one does look a bit better than the TUN version. Playing it on my TV -- you'd be hard pressed to tell them apart (video wise). The VideoCD is a bit sharper and ever so slightly less saturated. As for audio, this version isn't as LOUD...

Judging as a TC
Video: 8
Audio: 9.5
Movie: 4


Posted by Schmiggy JK23 on 06-24-2004 04:47 AM:

8/8/?

yet to watch the movie, maybe ill finnaly check it out.

sample was decent, not their best work, but best release so far.

__________________
"much to learn you still have..."


Posted by ghosty on 06-24-2004 05:24 AM:

8/9/7

good quality, pretty good movie, i'm a lil tired of "earth as we know it will be no more" type of movies, but I still enjoyed watching this


Posted by djkoolaide on 06-24-2004 05:32 AM:

This is nice, but IMO it's just like the TS's they have been rlsing lately. Still a good rip!

8/8/?


Posted by VCDz on 06-24-2004 07:11 AM:

Im waiting for the DVDR w/ DD 5.1 from VideoDVD .

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?


Posted by Justin_Case on 06-24-2004 07:20 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by pjfan281
VideoCD,

please dont waste anymore time than was already wasted with this shit movie. focus your attention on more important things...perhaps a good version of Terminal? if not save the energy for spiderman 2



Dude yer a douche bag

<-- but that's just my 420 cents

V:8.5
A:8.0
M:7.5

__________________
SUCK IT SLOW


Posted by Pickles on 06-24-2004 07:46 AM:

Thumbs up

Excellent job VideoCD. Audio and video are really nice on this one. This is by far the best release in my opinion. I watched the whole thing not a sample judge. I liked the movie, worth the download. This is what i like to see. Keep up the good work. Major props to VideoCD.

Audio 9
Video 9
Movie 8 ..I like special effects

My review, my opinion, my rantings :-)


Posted by scousethief on 06-24-2004 09:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
Ok this is much better no matter what anyone says its worth a download only if you like the movie. Otherwise don't bother. F..k the sample. Most samples are misleading. I thought alot of us would have caught on by now.
From CD1 and CD2 stilling vcdgearing cd3 now.
The quality is great from the beginning on. I really wish people would stop bashing the movie if you don't like it fine. Don't discourage others from giving it a look.

I thought the movie was good only problem with it, was the terrible and incomplete ending. Which they could have told more about the after effects of the world but left it dry with nothing more but a satelitte zoom and some credits. But the movie was good none the less. And the special effects were very nice.

9/9/7 Rating from actually having the release. Not the sample.



id b a thick cunt to say its not worth a proper then download the fuckin thing hence my rating on the sample. If u dont like that tough i really dont give a f**k go kiss videocds ass im not waisting my bandwidth on what looks exactly the same as a previous version


Posted by MikiMeyers on 06-24-2004 01:15 PM:

mm seems to be the same quality. the tun rls was fine..


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 06-24-2004 08:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by scousethief
id b a thick cunt to say its not worth a proper then download the fuckin thing hence my rating on the sample. If u dont like that tough i really dont give a f**k go kiss videocds ass im not waisting my bandwidth on what looks exactly the same as a previous version


Really shows how small your mind is, and how childish you are. Because even the sample has high enough quality to show you how much better it is. But even so, like I said I'm not your daddy or your boss its your business if you don't want to download it. Oh! well! But the ones that have downloaded the actual release will tell you. This is 10 times better than the tun release and is damn near dvd-quality. But obviously you don't care. So why even comment. I can give a fuck who released it. If it was videocd, matine or chakra. The fact of the matter is, this copy is better waaaaaaaay better.
Doesn't make you a cunt for not getting, thats just your choice.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Wolter on 06-24-2004 08:05 PM:

@ares: i don't think you can compare the Telecine with the Telesync just by pictures. You have to see some moving scenes to judge.
I don't think any Telesync can be better than this Telecine


Posted by Technician on 06-25-2004 12:57 AM:

Thumbs up

Hey guys i watched this movie last night and i thought it was great the quality was good and i give it a big thumbs UP!!

Keep up the good work

__________________


Posted by dvdhouse111 on 06-25-2004 12:58 AM:

I will be sticking to the videocd telesync as judging by sample i dont think the 3cd tc is worth the xtra dl. but hey that is my opinion and what does that count for in here?.....nothing cause everyone will formulate there own choice

ps - England on their way home - roll on Germany 2006!


Posted by Raven on 06-25-2004 12:25 PM:

does this sound slightly out of sync to anyone?

especially on 3rd cd?


Posted by scousethief on 06-25-2004 03:50 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
Really shows how small your mind is, and how childish you are. Because even the sample has high enough quality to show you how much better it is. But even so, like I said I'm not your daddy or your boss its your business if you don't want to download it. Oh! well! But the ones that have downloaded the actual release will tell you. This is 10 times better than the tun release and is damn near dvd-quality. But obviously you don't care. So why even comment. I can give a fuck who released it. If it was videocd, matine or chakra. The fact of the matter is, this copy is better waaaaaaaay better.
Doesn't make you a cunt for not getting, thats just your choice.
[/QUOT



your entitled to your opinion and so am i unfortunately im right in this one there is little to argue about and things look different on different dvdplayers /tvs personally this is the first time ive judged by the sample and it was my opinion that there is no real reason to proper it as ive said before . If you took that personally i dont care this is a forum and my votes count alongside yours and are as valid its just a shame there are so many gay sheep followers out there

also i dont care who releases stuff out as long as it gets released videocd are verygood but the also fuck up sometimes i pesonally dont care if 3 gay midget aboriginal polo players on crack with s&m tendencies release movies as long as there is a good reason for it but this wasnt one of those


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-01-2004 11:41 PM:

[/B][/QUOT



your entitled to your opinion and so am i unfortunately im right in this one there is little to argue about and things look different on different dvdplayers /tvs personally this is the first time ive judged by the sample and it was my opinion that there is no real reason to proper it as ive said before . If you took that personally i dont care this is a forum and my votes count alongside yours and are as valid its just a shame there are so many gay sheep followers out there

also i dont care who releases stuff out as long as it gets released videocd are verygood but the also fuck up sometimes i pesonally dont care if 3 gay midget aboriginal polo players on crack with s&m tendencies release movies as long as there is a good reason for it but this wasnt one of those [/B][/QUOTE]

For once we agree..opinions are opinions..didn't take it personal...release is nice. Even though I do like tuns. Better just for having complete intro. Overall you right..to some its not worth it. But overall a little better in ways and in others..tuns version is...I see a tie...lol...

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Bryzian on 07-02-2004 03:53 AM:

I dont know why i only saw 1 person mention this, but i notice it's desynced by at least 3/4 of a second starting the end of cd 1, and goes through cd2. i didn't watch cd3 cause i got tired of it. Can Anyone confirm this?


Posted by HipB on 07-06-2004 05:38 AM:

ok this is a sweet rls, not tops at all but sweet, umm let see, first off sync not that bad on my 3 dvd players, but still off as others mentioned, the picture is great, and i might try to desynch and fix it, but as i watched i noticed the wicked crop, there was a lil more shown on the vertical aspect on the TS, with that said, i will ask again that would these groups stop cropping telecines, i mean ok some ppl dont like to see foreign subs, but some ppl dont like ppls chins and heads cropped either, but it seems we only have the earlier aspect now a days, either way, as with videocd they want to keep a nice widescreed ratio, fine u are the bomb right now, no complaint really but even without the ratio u could sho more making diff sizes, thats how tun tried to rip u off is the crop...

7/7/8


Posted by Puzzlepants on 07-11-2004 08:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bryzian
I dont know why i only saw 1 person mention this, but i notice it's desynced by at least 3/4 of a second starting the end of cd 1, and goes through cd2. i didn't watch cd3 cause i got tired of it. Can Anyone confirm this?


If it's out of sync, I didn't notice it at all. I just watched the last 20 minutes of cd3 and I couldn't see anything wrong at all.


Posted by leadbunny on 07-11-2004 03:36 PM:

movie is boooooring


Posted by donfrabrizio on 07-29-2004 05:00 AM:

downed the full last night , sound is good (had worse) , picture looks fine to me (no dark spots although the colors seem a bit of ) and the only thing that bothered me is that the packiging was totally wrong.fault on 2nd cd and with the first cd, the picture stops after 20 min and the sound goes on.

therefore 8/7/? and a new section packaging 4


Posted by Tinkerbell on 07-30-2004 10:23 AM:

Question ITS GOOD

Dont you think the movie is slighty out of syinc not in all of the movie but in bit's overall good movie nice sound and picture but shame about it been out of syinc


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 AM.
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.