VCDQuality Forums
Show all 51 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Hulk *SVCD* - TELESYNC - loGisTic (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=22212)


Posted by Vovka on 06-24-2003 07:33 AM:

The release is pretty good. It is a bit unstable in a few parts (according to sample). Audio seems nice. Too bad it was 3 cds :/.

My rating: 7/8/7

__________________
Drinking Vodka with Vovka!


Posted by UltrA1 on 06-24-2003 07:39 AM:

Hulk............
Well a true Telesync
sound x7
video x8
Movie x8
loGisTic should try a NTSC format for a change


Posted by lax01 on 06-24-2003 07:42 AM:

3 CDs? How come? Do they not know how to encode a mpeg-2 file onto 2 CDs?

__________________


Posted by dank bref on 06-24-2003 07:48 AM:

picture 6 audio 7.5 movie x not bad ...slightly blurry audio seems nice great job logistic!


-dank

__________________
what does THAT button do?


Posted by jby on 06-24-2003 07:55 AM:

not bad... 7/8/X


Posted by reznor on 06-24-2003 07:58 AM:

7/7/4

Video is descent. Full screen.
Audio isn't bad either.
Movie wasn't that good.


Posted by TheBeyonder on 06-24-2003 08:01 AM:

yeah nice audio .....its a good rls ....

quote:
lax01 - 3 CDs? How come? Do they not know how to encode a mpeg-2 file onto 2 CDs?

3 cds are normal for a 137min movie !


Posted by lame hack on 06-24-2003 08:10 AM:

way better than the workprint, fullscreen eh :/, 6/6/x, Ill wait for a nother release, good job none the less


Posted by desertboy on 06-24-2003 08:26 AM:

NTSC for a TS, some people know nothing!

5/5/1

Avoid the film because it's shit, this release is pretty average


quote:
Originally posted by UltrA1
Hulk............
Well a true Telesync
sound x7
video x8
Movie x8
loGisTic should try a NTSC format for a change

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by lostaznguy on 06-24-2003 08:44 AM:

Hulk Telesync...Blurry nothing special...But good job loGisTic


Posted by your name here on 06-24-2003 08:49 AM:

ehh ok rls
sound is bad for a ts
video is kinda like theyre 2f2f rls



6/5/6

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by XeroFightsAlone on 06-24-2003 09:30 AM:

keepin his workprint,

5/6/8

__________________
soda box


Posted by Mr_Grinch on 06-24-2003 09:53 AM:

judging by sample it's average quality. Not as good as the new wave of ts's we've seen of late but perfectly acceptable and better than the workprint. Seems to be a fair bit chopped off the sides though. Anyone who's watched it all through see any differences between this and the workprint?

Oh and the film was brilliant, far superior to spiderman and daredevil. Except the last fight, that seemed a bit.... random and rushed. The rest was great.

6/7/8


Posted by Rezneck on 06-24-2003 09:58 AM:

I have to agree, average quality on this one going by sample. 3 disks doesnt make this one worthwhile in my book.

7/7/8


Posted by hippyhater on 06-24-2003 10:42 AM:

meh, above average ts

8/8/0

movie was horrible tho

3 cds is fine for this movie
pal is also fine...


Posted by DX-WWE on 06-24-2003 10:42 AM:

Nice Job

/me dont care abour ntsc or pal all good all good

but it is good that the whole groups dont just think about the americans

6/6/3

Crap movie tho

__________________
Flamers No Point Its All FREE Just Stick 2 What Yur Good At Sweet FA

Those Who Flame Will Be Flamed By Others (HehE)


Posted by brr8760 on 06-24-2003 10:53 AM:


As for the rip, this is NOT at the level of loGisTic's Hollywood Homicide or Italian Job: it's FS (worse than pan & scan), the colors are weak, and there is occasional movement weirdness. On a positive note, the sound is excellent. (6/8/4). THANKS GUYS-- KEEP 'EM COMING!

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by Tweezer on 06-24-2003 11:11 AM:

not worth the download....crappy movie

6/6/2


Posted by kindrid on 06-24-2003 11:19 AM:

ive just had a look at some above and read pic is awful and sound is terrible
wtf?
sound is awesome pic is a bit grainy
very nice release keep up the good work
7/8/4


Posted by revolution-x on 06-24-2003 11:59 AM:

keep the pal standars logistic your doing great!

6/6/4


Posted by vcdking on 06-24-2003 12:42 PM:

ok but old 1 still owns this wout 30 days before in theaters wow keep this copy im sticking with fast guys 5/6/4


Posted by BlackJackJoey on 06-24-2003 01:46 PM:

4/3/4


With all the new TS out there this group needs to take some lessons on Quality not speed


Posted by desertboy on 06-24-2003 03:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by revolution-x


excellent point put forth, keep the pal standars logistic your doing great!

6/6/4 methinx heh



Nothing to do with PAL standards, TS should always be PAL frame rate, frame rate, frame rate.

Ever seen an NTSC TS they're dreadful quite popular in the early days (Pre digital)

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by upur0 on 06-24-2003 03:19 PM:

From the sample, not the jpeg:
6/8/3


Posted by Mouth_Full21 on 06-24-2003 04:22 PM:

i like this rls very much., This sound is suprisingly good and crisp and clear and the video well.. It is very nice and bright not so0o clear a little bit of a gray haze kinda thing on it but all in all a nice rls.. 7.5/8/5


Posted by Jurai on 06-24-2003 04:32 PM:

they use pal for a reason not cuz of where they live

6/6/1


Posted by Rep- on 06-24-2003 04:36 PM:

I find that people that don't fully understand the film hate the film. If you have a brain that works, go see this film. It's great! If you are like most people on the board, don't! 6/6/9


Posted by flipp0r on 06-24-2003 04:43 PM:

dull colors
great sound
lame movie.

and stop whining about NTSC vs PAL. If you want to do something about it, dontate a fucking NTSC camera, or STFU.

6/8/3

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."


Posted by crazyjapking on 06-24-2003 04:44 PM:

My favorite thing about the Hulk is that everyone hates it! It just goes to show people like crap movies rehashed. Obviously everyone doesn't remember the Hulk very well. He was never really a superhero, Its mostly a drama about a man living with the pain of being somthing he does not wish to be.

More or less, I compare it to Batman. Tim Burton wanted to do what Ang Lee did, but he gave way for the action crowd. So you have a uncompleted drama about the complex mind of Batman and you have a film with great directing and action scenes. But thankfully it was still a great movie. Ang Lee did somthing rare and took out the popcorn from a summer flick and turned the Hulk into a directing masterpiece that you come to expect from Lee and gives us what the Hulk is really like.

My honest opinion is people dont like it because they were led to believe something and can't except the fact the movie doesn't go the route of 2 Fast 2 Furious or somthing.

4/4/8.5


Posted by Butch on 06-24-2003 05:22 PM:

*from film*

Props to LoGistiC,and i feel sorry for you that you had to sit through 137 minutes of this crap.
7/7/1
NTSC or PAL i couldn't care less.

__________________


Posted by someth1ng on 06-24-2003 06:46 PM:

In any event, ok for a TS, but I've seen better from logistic and other grps. Keep them coming though! 5/8/8


Posted by Muzak on 06-24-2003 07:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crazyjapking
My favorite thing about the Hulk is that everyone hates it! It just goes to show people like crap movies rehashed. Obviously everyone doesn't remember the Hulk very well. He was never really a superhero, Its mostly a drama about a man living with the pain of being somthing he does not wish to be.

More or less, I compare it to Batman. Tim Burton wanted to do what Ang Lee did, but he gave way for the action crowd. So you have a uncompleted drama about the complex mind of Batman and you have a film with great directing and action scenes. But thankfully it was still a great movie. Ang Lee did somthing rare and took out the popcorn from a summer flick and turned the Hulk into a directing masterpiece that you come to expect from Lee and gives us what the Hulk is really like.

My honest opinion is people dont like it because they were led to believe something and can't except the fact the movie doesn't go the route of 2 Fast 2 Furious or somthing.

4/4/8.5

exactly. good to see some other people dont have their head way up their arseholes. this is a good movie, whether you think it or not, lol. i dont like how they changed the way he becomes the hulk, but im not goin to pine over it. when i got the workprint, i had 15 people over watching it. and everyone had pretty much the same opinion as me, the first half was a bit slow, coulda been tightened up, but overall the movie kicked ass. 11 of us were at the theater opening night. as ive stated before, you want the hulk doing nothing but smashing shit up? GET THE FUCKING GAME. that will satisfy you nicely.

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.


Posted by kalvaitis007 on 06-24-2003 07:33 PM:

Listen up, knuckleheads!

I've cleaned up this train wreck of a thread to reflect, get this, COMMENTS ABOUT THE RELEASE! What a concept! People will actually read it and see comments about how THIS RELEASE looks and sounds.

Here's a list of things they won't see (now): The old CTP v. the World Debate, The old Americans aren't worthy of PAL debate, the old Don't waste your time on a bad movie lecture, and (my favorite) the don't complain cause its FREEEEE whine.

Like the man said, "Don't make me come back here...."

-K


Posted by Carpe Diem18 on 06-24-2003 08:22 PM:

Exclamation

3 CD´s? Its no great thing use the DVD2SVCD 1.0.9 Bundl and the Chinema Craft Encoder 2.50SP you Encode easy 90min+ on one CD!

The Picture is in sometimes to Dark. 4/6/8 is my Vote.

gR33Tz FRoM G3RMaNY

CaRpe Di3M 18


Posted by desertboy on 06-24-2003 10:59 PM:

I really didn't like this film, I'm an Ang Lee fan but this was not for me. To call people stupid for not liking a film only shows you're own lack of tolerance.

To say I liked 2 fast 2 furious because I don't like this is ridiculous.

This film tried so very very hard but it failed to deliver. I'll stick to crouching tiger for now.

TS need to be Pal it's simple,

check every CTP TS release it will be pal

film runs at 24.something frames a sec pal is 25, ntsc 30 thus ntsc TS flicker like hell where as pal isn't as bad.

Simple
no arguements they make you look stupid

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by ACiDCrasH on 06-24-2003 11:24 PM:

Talking

Pretty ok release. Cheers to logistics. Prefer this to the workprint although the colors could be better. But let's face it, full screen is better than a crop movie


Posted by btz on 06-24-2003 11:36 PM:

rls aint good enough for 3cd's


Posted by RUiNU on 06-25-2003 01:13 AM:

I liked the movie and the sample looks pretty good (still d/l the rest) by the sample I give this a 7/7/9. Like I said I liked this movie so there is my vote


Posted by Rep- on 06-25-2003 01:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by btz
rls aint good enough for 3cd's


I just want to wait and see how many people complain about the 3CD's when Centropy, or another group releases this. I'm guessing about.... 0? Just because it isn't the best quality film, doesn't mean it shouldn't be 3CD's. It's the length that counts, and if they tried to fit this into 2 CD's, it'd be nuked for terrible quality. A movie like this needs to be 3CD's. One due to it's length, and two due to the kind of movie it is.


Posted by britinwinnipeg on 06-25-2003 02:20 AM:

Wink

For a first release its very-good

pic is ok sound is ok

what do you wont man a dvd rip????

score 6/6/7


well i watched it all and its still good pic full screen i like that /good sound

but the guys head at the end of cd 2 and begining of cd3 makes me have to give lower points

score 5/6/8 i liked the movie


Posted by knweedo on 06-25-2003 02:23 AM:

Not great, not bad. I'm sticking with the workprint. This movie ain't worth burning many copies of. Not the best TS. Definetly not as good as other loGisTic TS's. 6/8/4 Keep at it loGisTic... you guys rock.


Posted by Zain on 06-25-2003 04:05 AM:

Such low quality and it took a whole three cd's, lol.

5/7/3

__________________


Posted by Card on 06-25-2003 05:20 AM:

Pretty decent release...

7.5/8/8


Posted by flatland on 06-25-2003 07:01 AM:

good job,

7/7/?

__________________
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
blazin.


Posted by elevated on 06-25-2003 09:12 AM:

6/7/ehhh

good rls, only copped sample, can any one fully comment on diff btwn workprint and final?

__________________
All these hoes...they entertain me...wifey now that bitch captivates me...


Posted by Beaver35 on 06-25-2003 04:59 PM:

I have to Agree

Not bad quality for picture..sound is not worth 7...and 3 cds not worth the download credits for this notso good movie...thanks for the try....


Posted by ferryboat on 06-27-2003 11:07 AM:

The release is ok. 3 cds is too big!

7/7/7


Posted by dikki on 06-27-2003 01:35 PM:

Hmmm.....

After actually watching all 3 cd's, I dont know what the early voters were actually voting on!

Pic: Fullscreen, a bit washed out but watchable (chame about the guy's head/elbow on cd 2-3) 6/10

Sound: Lovely... just what you expect from a telesync! 8/10

Film: argh! 3/10


Posted by |nZer0 on 06-28-2003 06:05 AM:

hmulk

6-6-9.99999

good movie really, quality on this is pretty good too...that 80$ Walmart dvd player is the shit.


Posted by bloopetybloop on 06-28-2003 07:25 AM:

THIS IS JUST AN EDITED DUPE OF THE WORKPRINT!!!

After watching this, I thought that something was off, so I ran the workprint VCD of the Hulk right next to the "SVCD telecine" and saw that all Logistic did was cut off the right part of the screen and clean it up a little, but it's the same copy!!!

If by some twist of fate I wound up with an edited renamed workprint then my apologies to Logistic. Maybe somebody else out there can check it out.

-Life is like a box of shit made to look like chocolate...


Posted by sammy1212 on 06-28-2003 07:29 AM:

Umm.......

Kids: The Hulk is what happens when you take steriods, so lay off the juice

CD3 or 3 CD's ruins this release. Down in front to guy at the start of CD3 Also, me dvd player couldn't make it through all the bad frames in CD3. It was bearly watchable.

5/7/6


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM.
Show all 51 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.