VCDQuality Forums
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Road To Perdition *PROPER* - TELESYNC - UTi (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=4912)


Posted by RRD on 07-15-2002 09:37 PM:

Great quality!

good job UTi!


Posted by wowsa on 07-15-2002 09:42 PM:

Thumbs up Come to butt head

Ok i dont have to be a brani scientist to say that if u Uti can bring us a svcd ts that is even enar centropy class i really hope u will.. everyone that not agree must be really stupid or should have their head examned ... KEEP svcd ts coming!!


Posted by Superxero on 07-15-2002 09:55 PM:

Talking

holy shit! this looks, good reminds me of TMMVCD those were tha days!

__________________


Posted by ABlix0 on 07-15-2002 10:21 PM:

Looks a hell lot better then the other release. Looks like I'm going to have to grab this one.

(UTi - who they?)


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-15-2002 10:23 PM:

Wow damn nice job still give props to vcdistro for a nice pre-realease but this is way better! This is nice and light colors are nice you can actually see everything in the picture great job uti!


Posted by cofferscuffs on 07-15-2002 10:24 PM:

just seen the sample... very clear, brightness good but the contrast is a tad dull. the sound is just above average, just sounds a little wierd to my ears but that could be my earache

__________________
cC.


Posted by oqwarrior on 07-15-2002 10:29 PM:

Excellent release guys! Wish I could get my hands on the SVCD encode, but the VCD will do. Props to VCDistro for the early release and props to UTi for this great TS!!


Posted by 404notfound on 07-15-2002 10:46 PM:

I've said it before and i'll say it again. UTI always delivers on quality.

Now if they only did more releases the scene would be a better place


404


Posted by SSS on 07-15-2002 10:47 PM:

Uti Please encode 6 pass SVCD TS NTSC

Thanks!


Posted by AgGz on 07-15-2002 10:52 PM:

Great rls UTi

first i looked at the pic...EXCELLENT!
then i saw the sample...EVEN BETTER!

and keep em comin with the SVCDz just as long as they're not werid birates like ctp =)

thanks UTi


Posted by b0nk3r on 07-15-2002 10:57 PM:

awesome picture decent sound.

8/7.5/--

think im gonna watch this movie. props uti

__________________
..


Posted by Scorpion on 07-15-2002 11:08 PM:

UTi should definitely release in SVCD. Everytime I see a UTi release I know that the video is going to be really fucking good. I think they should do SVCDs for the public. Good job with this release, UTi!


Posted by psilocybinC on 07-15-2002 11:09 PM:

Talking

UTi = Under The Influence

good job UTi on this FINE ts .... quality is above par and i hope to see more releases from u guys in the future ;]


Posted by Joface on 07-15-2002 11:23 PM:

Thumbs up

good quality movie pic and sound are great and its 10 times better than the vcdistro copy all around 2 thumbs up


------------------------------------

On the eight day God created Beer


Posted by Starscreamer on 07-15-2002 11:24 PM:

Thank god a rls of this movie that I'll be getting, thanx UTi!


Posted by krazyfoo on 07-15-2002 11:32 PM:

UTi.. excellent job.. id definently prefer an SVCD rls.. but ill get the internal.. definently worth rls'n for all tho.

u guys have always done well w/ TS's.. ie About a Boy and Thunderpants [cam i believe bu still].. good job.

__________________
NFO Jones stole my bike


Posted by PizzaTheHut on 07-15-2002 11:38 PM:

no svcd

i signed up for this forum just to give my opinon on this release. so here we go. the pic on this is very good but the sound isen't the best i have heard definatly worth picking up though. great job UTi. now for svcd or vcd, well the truth is there isen't much difference and it would probabaly be better if TS just stayed vcd. centropy did svcd just to show off that they could get away with it when in reality if you encoded those releases down to vcd the quality was exactly the same as the svcd.


Posted by Swimj on 07-15-2002 11:41 PM:

Smile Gr8 job

UTi For as long as they have been around, have released quality to the scene... Not the Fastest, but quality...Only if they released more often, Also please dont include how u are going to 'Grab this movie' cuz honestly nobody cares.. Lets just keep that to ourselves and comment on the quality/sound... which looked good from the sample.


Posted by Assai|ant on 07-15-2002 11:44 PM:

Centropy who? thats all I have too say.


Posted by toohey on 07-15-2002 11:47 PM:

so far i've just checked the sample and the pic is very very nice and sound is just a bit low but otherwise it's great....and yes svcd-ts all the way


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-15-2002 11:51 PM:

Just read the NFO and just wanted to say UTI great job and SVCD!


Posted by Grimfull on 07-15-2002 11:54 PM:

UTI Great Job, keep it up. Im glad its not internal. These guys r doing good....they released a good Mr.Deeds and Windtalkers and now another on thats the best of them all.


Posted by barney on 07-16-2002 12:03 AM:

good qual the sound is kinnda low but not a problem and for every1 who just wants to say "nice to c the rls" who cares...

the people that usually say that are the 1s without the movie.




watch then post !!!


Posted by Hitman47 on 07-16-2002 12:30 AM:

nice little treat for Hitman... about a Hitman.... intresting.. ANYWAY... looks sweet, UTi 0wnz j00 and m3!


Posted by WeeMan on 07-16-2002 12:37 AM:

Definately SVCD

I think as long as you can keep it to 2 CD's (Not because Im too cheap for 3 CD's, because I think 3CD movies dont fit well in my book, heh) then go with SVCD. The smallest bit of extra quality is worth the extra size. Well, maybe the people who have to get shit from DALnet might not agree, but I say SVCD.....


Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-16-2002 01:07 AM:

nice release UTi..... FUCK SVCD.. SVCD TS is completely retarded and the only reason it was done by centropy is to show everyone that they can do whatever the fuck they want and people will still chocke on their balls.. KEEP TS VCD PLEASE

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by PizzaTheHut on 07-16-2002 01:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz
nice release UTi..... FUCK SVCD.. SVCD TS is completely retarded and the only reason it was done by centropy is to show everyone that they can do whatever the fuck they want and people will still chocke on their balls.. KEEP TS VCD PLEASE


your exatly right. Its like these people are brain washed into thinking they are actualy getting better quality. truth is it got ctp more credits when they spread the release and they knew that they could do it cause no matter what they did like you said people where on thier cocks.


on another note i love how people have some special insight as to how certain people get thier releases. last time i checked no one was in my computer room with me looking over my shoulder. so untill you people know me or know the people you talk shit on please keep your coments to your self. some of these "shit talkers" are the ones that ruin the scene and the public boards.


Posted by brr8760 on 07-16-2002 01:36 AM:

W-O-W. I've never seen such a positive thread in all the months I've been coming here. Nary a flame.

MY VOTE:

2 CD ---> svcd, definitely
3 CD ---> vcd

Most of CTP's complaints were based on the fact their releases had 3 CD's (Unfaithful, etc.) when they could have fit it on 2 CD's. But if the release can stay at 2 CD's, I'd much prefer SVCD.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by wowsa on 07-16-2002 01:45 AM:

Hahaha legion u are funny .. but i have to agree on this one.. this oppertunity that Uti has given us shouldnt be wasted ...
BRING US SVCD :-)


Posted by y2flyy on 07-16-2002 01:48 AM:

uti great rls
pic quality is top notch for a ts
sound is also pretty good
if you guys are trying to decide between staying strictly vcd and svcd
ill would rather see svcds
quality imo is much much better than vcd
forget all the complaints just do your thing and do your best
and if we not satisfied fuck us all to hell!!!!
but i would like to recommend you guys try something landmarking
cvcd
if you guys encode to cvcd instead of svcd now that would be amazing
in my brief experimenting with cvcd the quality is much better than svcd and some how its much more easier to encode
goto vcdhelp.com for more info
i have fell in love with cvcd over vcd and svcd
just try it once and see the great feedback you guys get
props for the rls and given us the op to make a difference now i feel more than just a lame leecher
y2flyy


Posted by DarkBeatz on 07-16-2002 02:00 AM:

this is actually a telecine version from asia, you can tell me its not but it is!

Don't believe? Compare the screenshots from the pirate dvd with the ones on vcdquality here

http://nozone.8k.com/scrn_road_to_perdition.htm


Posted by ebeats on 07-16-2002 02:44 AM:

If it fits on 2cd's, why the hell not. i got an apex1200 player for $69 that plays ALL svcd's i have thrown at it (no xsvcd tho), and who doesn't have at least a 1.5mbps line now? I mean even if it increases the picture by only 5% , it's still worth it. Theres no reason to keep to old formats Why not bump it up?

I managed to get SVCD copy and it looks alright, I will have to compare the 2 releases and report back on my non-biased opinion if it is any better at all

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net


Posted by ensain on 07-16-2002 02:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz
this is actually a telecine version from asia, you can tell me its not but it is!



OK - Its not.

Believe me, TC production in Asia has ground to a halt, and everyone who sells the Pirate DVDs is mislabelling them still. If you think this is a TC then you really ought to check the sample. Im sorry, it would be nice, but its just not true.

What is true is, that this is a great little release. Audio isn't perfect, but Telesync sound can vary so much, at least its clear enough when pumped through a decent sound system, so im not complaining.

SVCD tomorrow, I'm interested myself to see what the people decide for. Altho I know one small fact people aren't going to like about it (apart from the fact its internal) ...


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 07-16-2002 05:42 AM:

Thumbs down

Guess no one bothered to mention the about 20 fucking audio glitches in first 4 minutes of film?

Do you all judge by sample? GEEZE!!!!


Posted by KnoxRose on 07-16-2002 06:32 AM:

So UTI's are as good as CTP's?

I have not seen a Centropy SVCD release in weeks and I am really getting ticked off at the ftf and such, sound is choppy and they have been cutting scenes in some of the propers and internals I mean why bother, even if they are free? What I am wondering I have not downloaded a UTI release yet, are they as good as the CTP's? Are they all VCD format? I viewed the VCD of Road and the sound was chopped up so bad in the openning where he said what year it was I was left clueless.

KnoxRose


Posted by killfxp on 07-16-2002 06:38 AM:

PaulAAtreides:
You're on crack bro


Posted by toohey on 07-16-2002 07:28 AM:

this version is same source as the VCDistro since all the sound problem were on exact same location but the picture has been majorly cleaned up...much nicer pics but too bad for the first 5 min of audio...only 5 min so who cares


Posted by killfxp on 07-16-2002 07:56 AM:

What do you poeple smoke???? You seem to be on crack too.


Posted by Natural on 07-16-2002 08:07 AM:

Thumbs up

very nice. hope we see more of em


Posted by VCDguy on 07-16-2002 08:09 AM:

T HIS MOVIE WAS THE BEST

I LOVED THIS MOVIE IN THE THEATERS OFMG watch this if your into drama tom hanks was great!


Posted by IamJackBlack on 07-16-2002 01:44 PM:

do i smoke too much crack, or did UTi used to be an MP3 group?


Posted by cofferscuffs on 07-16-2002 02:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by IamJackBlack
do i smoke too much crack, or did UTi used to be an MP3 group?


crack prolly...

__________________
cC.


Posted by ABlix0 on 07-16-2002 07:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PaulAAtreides
Guess no one bothered to mention the about 20 fucking audio glitches in first 4 minutes of film?

Do you all judge by sample? GEEZE!!!!



First 4 minutes. Big deal.

Small price to pay for a great release.


Posted by killfxp on 07-16-2002 08:52 PM:

these people need to stop smoking crack!


Posted by VcdGahds on 07-17-2002 04:59 PM:

This is an excellent re-encode. The quality of the picture is head and shoulders above the previous release. I would give it a 7 for video and a 6 for sound, because even though it is only the first 4 minutes, you do miss a couple of important things...like the year the show was in since it cut out right as the kid was saying what year it was But seriously, the sound is fine. This one is definitely worth watching...and the movie was outstanding...a 9.

As far as SVCD vs. VCD...if you guys want to do an SVCD encode then go ahead. If you decide to do ONLY SVCD like the other guys did, then people may start to have a problem. Me, I don't give a rat's ass. My Pioneer will play almost anything I put in it


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2002 02:39 AM:

Fuckin' ay! Nice, tidy lil rls.


Posted by Starscreamer on 07-18-2002 07:13 AM:

OK, well, I'm getting the VCD version right now, can someone tell me if this version is as good as the SVCD version but one disc less, or should I stop right now and go for the SVCD? Please let me know, I hate when there's 2 rls's of movies at the same time. From the same group....makes it more difficult to decide.


Posted by jedi420 on 07-19-2002 11:52 AM:

man i cant find a sample of this anywhere. what s the difference in the internal and proper? just mpg1 and mpeg2? has anyone seen both the releases yet that can comment on the differences quality wise?


Posted by Mitzelplick on 07-21-2002 07:40 AM:

The audio does have fuckups in the first few minutes of the film, But it clears up and is a nice release, if you really have a problem with it..get a fucking job and buy a ticket..Props uti


Posted by TheDiggler on 07-21-2002 08:04 AM:

Just finished watching....

Spent the whole damn day watching ALL of the new shit and finally got a chance to watch this one. First off, big thanks to UTI for this and all other releases.

Well worth the d/l time if your not to anal about quality, in addition to being an excellent flick. Good points; the whole movie is intact with no logos, not cropped to high hell, does not contain a shit load of macro blocks, synced audio and did not notice any video glitches. It does have the audio drops in the first few minutes and does give a few audio cracks here and there throughout the film. The only other dislike was the brightness, especially at the end where you find it difficult to see what is happening, but like the audio issues it is brief.

Just a side not related to this release:
1. Could we please stop comparing the groups? ANYBODY who takes the time to release deserves some form of appreciation, even if you think the release sucked. Offering praise to a release in fear of a group halting releases just goes against the point in even posting a review. Or worse, flaming others for giving a proper review!

2. I just wish that people would STOP posting messages that have not even taken the time to d/l and watch a movie in it’s entirety. If you want to bitch about someone’s comments then post a review then gripe and try to be civil. We have people giving there opinion on what? A jpeg or some 2 min. clip? Get it, burn-it, watch it and then post. Or worse yet, the individual who just gives you a movie review! Worse then that, the movie review with spoilers!! Without any mention of the quality of the release. Take the time and read through the posts, how many are actual reviews? I wish that every release had a double thread, 1 for actual reviews and the other for anything else.

If you actually read this whole thing thanks for reading! If you want to flame me for MY opinions could you do so with a proper review of this release?

Thanks!


Posted by renegade on 07-29-2002 07:22 AM:

No better than the first release. Props for the effort.


Posted by jonywinf on 08-12-2002 11:35 PM:

still looking for this version...if the jpeg's are any indication then it is sweet.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33 AM.
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.