![]() |
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- King Kong *XViD* - DVDRIP - GOD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=68556)
IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ
1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)
2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES
3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE
4 NO FLAMING
5 NO "SPOILERS"
6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)
7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!
8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM
9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE
* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes
*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***
yeah!
nuke wars, they say its from the dvdscr source which is bullshit, cuz theirs not scrolling text or nofin. not retail tho.
Iv seen it and didnt see a damn thing wrong with it.
9/9/...............
allrighty kids, heres the first image so far of this release... only first rar from cd2:
code:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6766/kkrip3ja.jpg
This are screenshots from dvdscr and this release. Can someone check the quality from the dvd. The picture hasn't been cut, the colors look better, so for now I belivie this is a real dvdrip.
dvdscr: http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr258061.jpg
dvdrip: http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdrip258062.jpg
[ NUKE ] [ King Kong DVDRiP XViD GOD ] [ oversized(2cd.max.per.runtime.rules) ]
let's all hope for a repack
Well, you've got me. I thought this'd be an auto-nuke as it's 3 CD's for a 187 minutes movie. Isn't 210 minutes minimum for a movie this long if it's gonna be a scene 3CD non-internal release? Like I said, you've got me
Rules been changed or something???
Anyways two more pic's:
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/446/0011ny.png
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6862/0026pn.png
Haven't compared it with the other releases yet.
Guys, any idea of where to grab the torrent?? I know i shouldn't be asking but its seem to be un-findable!! Also the overall size does sound a little strange...
Cheers, Rob
::EDIT:: Whoops... I took a shit on your forum account. Read the rules, cunt - NS::
it's suspicious when a dvdrip comes right after a dvdscr.
this had 'fake' stamped all over it.
the sample isn't that great either. you see fuzz and pixellation around the edges of the characters' faces.
I think 3 cd's is fine. 640 pixel width would be better.
quality would be crap on 2 cd's.
then the question is... how did they get rid of the 'property of...' messages? or were there 2 dvdscr's, one that was ment to be internal and one to be sent out? this group managed to grab an internal?
this is truely a fake.. they cropped the scrolling text out of it.. i just watched it side by side with the dvd screener.. and its a lot narrower then the dvd screener..
quote:
Guys, any idea of where to grab the torrent?? I know i shouldn't be asking but its seem to be un-findable!! Also the overall size does sound a little strange...
) definitely worth the re download
)__________________
Sargent Shiltz - IKnow Nothing! Nothing!!!
Doesnt look croped fron the sampels ,
any proof ?
quote:
Originally posted by sirmonkey
this is truely a fake.. they cropped the scrolling text out of it.. i just watched it side by side with the dvd screener.. and its a lot narrower then the dvd screener..
comparison screenshots to show overcropping please anyone?
edit:
guess noone else but me is interested in this so meh, anyway, grabbed first rar from both films, have done one comparison and found NO overcropping on the 'dvdrip'... going to try a few other spots, and will post images... so unless someone can post an image showing the dvdrip is overcropped, i just cant understand the nuke... perhaps people are just too doubting and have no real proof? anyway, images to come.
edit 2: ok here are the comparisons. as far as i can tell, if anything, the dvdscr is overcropped on the sides.
the ONLY way the dvdrip could be from the same dvdscr source, is if the group went super-tricky, and actually overcropped ONLY the segments with the property-of labels, and then spliced them back in. if thats what they did, i applaud their creativity for removing an annoyance, without causing any collateral damage to the rest of the film... (though i then frown on their 'dvdrip' bs!), because from the samples ive looked at, there doesn't seem to be any overcropping in the dvdrip... heres the 2 samples taken from cd1, first rar.
code:
http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/4459/comp16ub.jpg
code:
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/14/comp29xo.jpg
this is an ok release, stop nuking guys.
I already did look few posts up. The picture is NOT cropped.
Good job Chiv, I really dont care whether or not its a dvdscr or dvdrip because its going straight on to a dvd9 so quality will be awesome.
vidio - 9
audio - 9
movie - 10
Ill accept it as a dvdrip for now until someone shows some proof its a fake.
quote:
Originally posted by dontgiveafuck
I think 3 cd's is fine.
It's definetly not cropped or zoomed in I just did a side by side comparison and it shows the same exact full frame as the dvdscreener. So it's a very special dvd screener/ somehow digi ripped from a digital theater print/ or an actual dvd rip. So it should only be nuked for being oversized.
Anyway the video quality is great I just hope sometime soon we will have a high def ripping scene for these movies.5.1 audio is nice and i am not really a big fan of the movie so I really wont grade that.
Here are the shots. Judge by yourself but I belive this is a DVDRIP release.
dvdscr1:
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr1259257.jpg
dvdrip1:
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdrip1259255.jpg
dvdscr2:
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr2259258.jpg
dvdrip2:
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdrip2259256.jpg
All the shots are sinchronized, if you dont belive in the first comparison look at the poles and in the second case look at the hand and the position of the fingers. There is NO cropping. Now as I said before I want a DVD of this release.
Heyhey!
Look inside the NFO:
Release Date: 02/05/06
Where are these guys from??? Asia or what?
Greetings GPhil
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/...screener6js.jpg
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/...screener4bz.jpg
Better video and sound than the DVL version, and looks to be a different source than the Screener, so nukers got it wrong again, but whether this is retail or not, no idea, guess we wont know till a DVDR appears.
9/10/?
The idiocy of some people is unbelievable, it's almost shocking the level of intelligence some people are in possession of.
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr1259257.jpg
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdrip1259255.jpg
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr2259258.jpg
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdrip2259256.jpg
If you can't see the difference here I really suggest you all book an appointment at the local opticians.
1. Maybe this is a different Screener source, a completely clean one and are trying to pass it off as a retail.
2. Maybe this is retail, even though the release date isn't for a while.
Whatever it is, whoever is in charge of Nuking releases needs to pull their thumb out fo their ass and do some real work.
Video - 9
Audio - 8
Film - 8
__________________
J i n g l e s.
nice one, thanx for that, bout time someone posted those so that we could shut up all those whiners... glad i made the right choice in going with this one... better video, SUPREME AUDIO! cant wait to watch it tomorrow night.
It was def not DVL source, anyone who bothered to get the release could tell.
Well done Chiv and Redemption for proving this.
Video 9
Audio 10
Movie 10
Video: 7
Sound: 9
Movie: 8
Video is a bit soft and the compression is not that great considering its on 3CDs, but its not bad either. It's not cropped or zoomed in as some people say.
Sound is great as its 5.1.
Movie was pretty good, length could have been edited a bit, but its enjoyable.
they would have saved a lot of hassle if they just released the friggin DVDR
this as a dvdrip
9/9/?
__________________
WHY THE INTERNET IS LIKE A V*GINA-If you don't apply the appropriate protective measures, it can spread viruses.The more people use it the bigger it gets.Some people think they know how to move around in it, but they really can't interface.It has no conscience and no memory.The part you see is actually just the front end of a very complicated system.Some people believe in security and avoiding penetration but others believe it should be open to all comers.Those who have it think that those who don't have it are somehow inferior.
I'm normally one for following the rules, but i do think AC3 is under-rated or something.
I have HDTV and 6 Channel Audio setup. I do prefer movies in Higher resolution and i simply love AC3 and DTS. Using mp3 simply does not compare, i believe the scene should allow for rippers that focus on ac3.
Hell, if i find DTS, and Hi-def sources, i usually go with those instead, upto 4 CDs is ok for me (Saving private ryan DTS), quality before anything else.
Rating
7/10/8
Video could be sharper/cleaner,
AC3 is as perfect as usual,
Movie is very good by any standard.
If its a dvdrip, i wished they would of released it as dvd9, or two dvd5's. Otherwise converting the xvid's to dvd format is some what lengthy.
__________________
My Burnt Dvd's are my sig.
removed to keep people from getting me banned... and to stop the repeditive bashing of my comment..
quote:
Originally posted by sirmonkey
if they arnt chopped then why have all the pictures ive seen posted.. the dvdrip picture looks narrower then the dvd screener..
even on the first dvd screener image.. the text is cut.. if you take poth pictures put them side by side.. the dvdrip picture is cut just above where that text would be.. unless some one can learn how to freakin take pictures that are the same size.. your waste your time.. i still say this is from the dvd screener..
Sirmonkey, I'm sorry, but your'e argument is plainly flawed. You arent taking into account the fact that the DVDrip is in fact encoded at a slightly lower resolution - 608x256.
The DVDscr is encoded at 624x272, which as im sure you can see is 16 pixels taller a picture, which accounts for the DVDrip screenshots being smaller.
When looking to see if the picture has been cropped, dont look at the size of the picture, look at the details in the picture. When you do that, you will see that there is no cropping at all, in fact, the DVDrip shows a bit more picture to the right and left.
In regards to this rip, quality looks pretty good, i may have no idea where they got this from, but it most certainly is a clean dvd source.
9/9/9ish
I doubt this is retail (how could it be, there's not even a set date for the retail release of this major blockbuster), probably just a cleaned up russian tc/bootleg, hehehe.
Best animation for a big gorilla ever btw
. Mighty Joe Young is the next, but that's hilariously bad in comparison :P . Notch up another award for the sfx people.
quote:
Originally posted by sirmonkey
if they arnt chopped then why have all the pictures ive seen posted.. the dvdrip picture looks narrower then the dvd screener..
even on the first dvd screener image.. the text is cut.. if you take poth pictures put them side by side.. the dvdrip picture is cut just above where that text would be.. unless some one can learn how to freakin take pictures that are the same size.. your waste your time.. i still say this is from the dvd screener..
__________________
J i n g l e s.
quote:
Originally posted by sirmonkey
if they arnt chopped then why have all the pictures ive seen posted.. the dvdrip picture looks narrower then the dvd screener..
even on the first dvd screener image.. the text is cut.. if you take poth pictures put them side by side.. the dvdrip picture is cut just above where that text would be.. unless some one can learn how to freakin take pictures that are the same size.. your waste your time.. i still say this is from the dvd screener..
this was nuked for being oversized, not for lying about its source. so why all the tripping about it being nuked?
it does break the oversized rule, and rules are rules, so its rightfully nuked.
v: 9
a: 9
f: 10
Does that version possess those sentences in the image?
http://www.shrani.si/pics/dvdscr2259258.jpg

NOT CROPPED
For all who think the picture is cropped beacuase of the text... Well, IT IS NOT. The screening text depending on the movie is at the bottom of the screen or between screen and black bars. Original MPEG2 ready for encoding is in most cases in 4:3 format. From that field the actuall screen field is cut and then encoded. If there is screening text is it automatically cropped but THE TEXT ONLY. Movie window is untouched.
People who do encoding know what I mean.
quote:
Originally posted by FrightfoO
[B]I doubt this is retail (how could it be, there's not even a set date for the retail release of this major blockbuster), probably just a cleaned up russian tc/bootleg, hehehe.
i couldnt give a wank about oversizing, if you burn/convert xvid movies to dvd like me then the more oversizing the better.
v 10 (retail or not, why the fuck am i gonna bother upgrading an unmarked screener to the real retail rip? answer: im not. this is a perfect xvid imo and nothing less)
a 10 (5.1, whats wrong with that)
m 9.5 (it dragged a bit at parts but what 3 hour film doesnt? this is an excellent flick)
thanks GOD for this clean rip, and the best yet. and the 'more to come' comment in your NFO sounds very interesting!
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:
compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.
encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.
quote:
Originally posted by sendcrap1
[ NUKE ] [ King Kong DVDRiP XViD GOD ] [ oversized(2cd.max.per.runtime.rules) ]
let's all hope for a repack
quote:
Originally posted by White Rabbit
i couldnt give a wank about oversizing, if you burn/convert xvid movies to dvd like me then the more oversizing the better.
v 10 (retail or not, why the fuck am i gonna bother upgrading an unmarked screener to the real retail rip? answer: im not. this is a perfect xvid imo and nothing less)
a 10 (5.1, whats wrong with that)
m 9.5 (it dragged a bit at parts but what 3 hour film doesnt? this is an excellent flick)
thanks GOD for this clean rip, and the best yet. and the 'more to come' comment in your NFO sounds very interesting!
__________________
my wifes a sex object..when i say sex she objects
YEs to say thx to the group.It loos sweet and is sweet as a movie.Been waiting for this for a long time now.
Movie9
Vid9
Audio9
Scoot
__________________
||| Amd 64 3500+ ||| Dfi Ultra SLi Mobo ||| 7800GTX ||| 2x80gigs WD ||| 1gig ocz 4200 |||
Well, its a compressed file in xvid format anyway. So who really cares if its not retail, cause it wont be any better if this is not it
scene rules should be revised to allow for 3 disc rips of movies this length - 2 discs with this sound, and it'd be macroblock city.
9/9/8
this is a keeper
Wow, it's taking an age for that retail DVDR.
quote:
Originally posted by chiv
its an unmarked dvdscr...
great rip... It took me a minute to watch this, as i really dont like the movie, although having this copy over a week, i didnt want to waste 2 1/2 hrs again...
I finally took a look and Its damn decent, If not a retail, its more like Shrek 2 DVDrip that got an early rls, like a WP of a DVD or sumthing...
The video is a bit, umm... i guess pixelated is right, but its not quite what I see, there is something wrong with it being a DVD rip, its just not as clear, maybe a dvdscr unmarked (to the naked eye) either way its the best out and def not a cropped dvdscr, some guy posted some pics earlier in the thread, and you could see scr msg over the tv, but this didnt have it even though slightly smaller than dvdscr pic... oversized is no problem although I think a 2cd rls woulda did good, and woulda had no nuke (or sheepish ones)... The sound is great...
now to the bad parts.. this just wasnt my taste of a movie, it starts slow, speeds up, and then lasts too long, and ends, well, too long of what it should, given that its not much diff than the original, this woulda been a decent flick with 30 mins shaved from it...
oh well i got an opinion which really doesnt like oscar flicks that are drawn out too long... so for this flick (the CGI isnt that great really, but its the movie i care about) i rate it 8/8.5/6
Its a DVDScr unmarked...
If you were to put this on 2disc it would be crap... 3disc makes this one very good.
BUT... You could get the SoT release instead.
The image below is GoD at the top and SoT at the bottom... I played these at the same time side by side and frame matched for the screen grab.
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4548/kong20052up.jpg
As you can see GoD release is faded compared to SoT release... Both are 3disc.
I can vouch for the King.Kong.2005.iNTERNAL.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.SoT 3CD release as well. Very nice!
how does this compare to the NUKEE release?
quote:SoT's is definitely the best by far.
Originally posted by rahzel
how does this compare to the NUKEE release?
quote:
Originally posted by tycho55
SoT's is definitely the best by far.
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 AM. | Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.