VCDQuality Forums
Show all 54 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- xXx *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=5957)


Posted by Nuclear5 on 08-05-2002 12:55 AM:

Anyone know if this release is decent or not?


Posted by Hitman47 on 08-05-2002 01:05 AM:

LOL! how is there a movie rating, its been out for like 30 mins, only like 2 ppl have seen it ! (ripper and encoder!) god.. you ppl crack me up....


Posted by Rep- on 08-05-2002 01:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Superxero
waht! waht! nigga nigga boo yah nigga boo ya nigga booo ya! finally a pre rls nigga nigga boo yah nigga boo ya nigga booo ya! !!!!


Dude. cut down on the pot and drugs...

Anyways: too bad this release is crap, even fora pre.


Posted by mathbob6 on 08-05-2002 01:39 AM:

quality isnt there, its quite shitty


Posted by Groovie Mann on 08-05-2002 01:39 AM:

I really hope that this is not as bad as the jpegs make it look. It looks like you're watching through a thick film of urine.


Posted by DaGamler on 08-05-2002 01:42 AM:

just watched sample, a little dark, sound ok,cropped, looks watchable


Posted by DaGamler on 08-05-2002 01:50 AM:

Just watched sample,video a littledark,sound-ok,cropped. looks watchable. your avg. videocd ts.


Posted by RRD on 08-05-2002 01:53 AM:

Props for the pre-release, thumbs down for the quality.


4/10


Posted by zangmann on 08-05-2002 02:00 AM:

visual quality is good, but can hear the audience laughing and shit in the background reminds me of an old school cam. Poor audio.


Posted by Hitman47 on 08-05-2002 02:09 AM:

too bad there is no sex... the XXX is just a gimmick so sick pervs will see it.. they will goto the theatre and see there is a XXX movie and pay the 15 dollars to watch a action movie.... middle fingers up for quality, down for pre-release....... those perverts will be happy to watch and find out what it is about before going to pay for it... thanx VideoCD!


Posted by Ferret44 on 08-05-2002 02:44 AM:

If the were gonna release it INTERNAL anyway , at least they could have labelled it correctly......

last time i cheched i didnt think u would be able to hear people coughing & laughing on a Telesync.

Anyway quality sucks but props for the pre release CAM.....



Posted by ^Om3n on 08-05-2002 03:06 AM:

The film title is pronounced 'Triple X' dispite the spelling that is used, so dont confuse it with porn because of the name.
IMO this release should have been nuked from public, for simple fact that they KNOW it's crappy even for a pre. They labled it iNTERNAL solely so it didn't get nuked for bad quality, i hate whem groups do that, either let the damn thing get nuked, do a better job with your encoding tweaks, or if you must mark as iNTERNAL, make sure it is just that. Groups are abusing the point of a release marked as iNTERNAL and this is part of the reason why actuall iNTERNALs are always being leaked coz the siteops are probably finding it a little hard to tell the difference when group pull stunts like this.

Good job with the speed on this, no idea about the quality, the above was an assumption due to the fact that it was marked iNTERNAL.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by brr8760 on 08-05-2002 03:23 AM:

quote:
If the were gonna release it INTERNAL anyway , at least they could have labelled it correctly...... last time i cheched i didnt think u would be able to hear people coughing & laughing on a Telesync..... Anyway quality sucks but props for the pre release CAM.....
Thanks for the straight poop, Ferret. I can hear the echoes of VideoCD's disappointment when they said: "We got XXX! We got XXX ahead of everybody. Put it in, put it in.

Cough, cough. Laugh, laugh.

We're fucked. Let's make it internal. Shit, can't even make the jpegs look good. 'You like, you like,' my ass.

Or something like that.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by Snowbording4138 on 08-05-2002 03:31 AM:

good thing its internal the qual sucks... i gotta give u props for releasen it tho


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 08-05-2002 03:44 AM:

Props for pre

A pre-release of XxX is what all you people who prefer quantity over quality will like. Me on the otherhand would prefer a quality release of it. Nice pre-release so-called TS Video-Cd, we didn't expect any better . At least you could label it a CAM and not try to fool us. The word *nuke* comes to mind.... Kazaa kiddies are hungry, better go feed them.

As for the actual quality:

Video: Blurry and Dark. 5/10

Audio: Reminds me of a Yankee's game 4/10

Movie: Didn't watch it all and I don't intend to for this release.

__________________
[--Quality over Quantity always--]


Posted by tw1st on 08-05-2002 04:58 AM:

Its not for you dumbasses to like or not like. Its Internal, therefore your siteops requested/approved it, so blame them. Anyone who moved it should have dome so on request only anyway. You'll are some ungrateful lamers, be happy you got anything, and wqhen you say you want quality over quantity, understand this. Noone Gives A Fuck What You Want.


Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-05-2002 06:56 AM:

internal?


VIDEOCD should of internaly stuck it up there assholes!!


even drunk its unwatchable..


retire

someone could of did a better job with a FISHER PRICE CAMERA


Posted by Stinger_DS on 08-05-2002 08:24 AM:

great early rls but internal?


3/4/6


Posted by a2jward on 08-05-2002 09:59 AM:

Is anybody else missing what looks like a couple of minutes of the beginnig? Mine starts with the Dreamworks intro than I got some fake looking title just a flashing XXX with effects so bad it looks like they came from an atari......and then I get jump ahead a few minutes in the movie.

I wonder if this is going to be like Reign of Fire? Where we wont see the beginning of the movie untill the screener.

I downloaded this movie cuase I want to be cool at school tomorrow but if peerpressure hadnt overwhelmed my common sense I would have waited for a different release.


Posted by DoGGy on 08-05-2002 10:52 AM:

Talking What the hell !ยก

i think i'll wait for a better release


Posted by Bud-man on 08-05-2002 01:38 PM:

Cmon guys did we expect any better?, We all waited for 6 months for this......lets see how many releases will be by friday


Posted by Storm180 on 08-05-2002 02:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by I_Drink_24_7
internal?


VIDEOCD should of internaly stuck it up there assholes!!


even drunk its unwatchable..


retire

someone could of did a better job with a FISHER PRICE CAMERA



Well then I look forward to your release from you soon using your fisher price camera..I would really like to see it before the opening date if you wouldnt mind so you better get to work. Also maybe trying watching the movie sober, maybe being drunk 24/7 is your problem, obvious among others but deal with them one at a time.

Storm180


Posted by Philyteach on 08-05-2002 03:13 PM:

Ewwww! Even for the 20 cents worth of disks this wasn't worth it. I guess I should start viewing the mpeg 1st for these pre's.


Posted by lo.pro on 08-05-2002 03:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by a2jward

I downloaded this movie cuase I want to be cool at school tomorrow but if peerpressure hadnt overwhelmed my common sense I would have waited for a different release.

lol nice to see an honest post

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by bmvtoys on 08-05-2002 06:08 PM:

Ok, I have a video bootleg of this movie, and it starts with the XXX logo, and there is a scene where an agent is being chased into a dance club, which is the way the book starts...if this release does not start like that, then it would be missing minutes. Can anyone that has (really) downloaded this tell us if that is the way this starts?


b


Posted by RayTraCeR on 08-05-2002 08:21 PM:

I have this release, and I have skimmed through it ..

The quality isn't great , sound is a little worse , but I think its watchable .. I mean if you are dieing to see it yes I think this will give you your fix ...

I find more then anything its a little too blurry which really ruins the picture, a little dark ... But if you really wanna see it , its watchable.. And it is a pre-release also , I find too many people have expectations so high that you might as well just start going to the theatres... People have more fun beating the hell out of the releases here then they do giving an honest opinion on the quality...

This will give you your fix , AND ofcourse obviously there will be better versions coming .............

Video 5.5
Audio 4.5


Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-05-2002 10:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Storm180


Well then I look forward to your release from you soon using your fisher price camera..I would really like to see it before the opening date if you wouldnt mind so you better get to work. Also maybe trying watching the movie sober, maybe being drunk 24/7 is your problem, obvious among others but deal with them one at a time.

Storm180




drinking makes vcd's look better, this one need CRACK OR HEROIN

i dont do drugs, so im on the job with my new fisher price camera, ill keep u updated, hope i win the race


Posted by Sig-Bro on 08-06-2002 12:49 AM:

Someone said that this had a Dreamworks opening then some shit-tacular crap cheap effects..well it is possible that the beginning is a rip off, because it's not even relased by Dreamworks, it's Columbia/Revoluton. Unless the person got their companies screwed up by accident. I can't judge this or anything cuz i havent downloaded it yet, but i think I will save my time and wait for a better release. This is one of those big bonered movies that will be released 5 billion times over, but hey, gotta give em all props, better than my cheap ass could do.

Sigh *How I Wish I Hadn't Of Sold My Fisher Price Camera For Opium* Sigh


Posted by renegade on 08-06-2002 01:08 AM:

I skimmed through this release early this morning. It's somewhat watchable. As someone said the pic is real blurry. The audio is typical for a cam. Unless your dying to see this flick, wait for something else.


Posted by Storm180 on 08-06-2002 02:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by I_Drink_24_7



drinking makes vcd's look better, this one need CRACK OR HEROIN

i dont do drugs, so im on the job with my new fisher price camera, ill keep u updated, hope i win the race



Drinking makes vcd's look better?? I think you need to talk to a medical doctor, because drinking has an adverse affect on eye sight and reaction time. Sound like you need a few AA meetings if you think this way.

Connections between drinking Alcohol and health

3. The pharmaceutical functions and results of modern research

A. The influence on the central nerve system (CNS)

Ethanol caused "stimulation" is absolutely not a real excitement, it is only a slackening of the brains controlling functions. Big amounts of alcohol taken habitually make their imbiber forgetting his good behavior, modesty and self-control. Furthermore it decreases his sense if distinction, memory, concentration and reasoning. The eyesight (focusing) also often worsens.





Storm180


Posted by Stampers on 08-06-2002 02:52 AM:

Dude...i really think u need to get drunk.


Posted by RUiN on 08-06-2002 04:00 AM:

Video is realy good . Sound is good (laughin is very bad). For those that said it is dark . You must be smokin some kind . I say d/l it and dont pay 7 bux at the theater

Dont coment on the quality untill you have d/l'd it . I am sick of all you lammers tryin to sound important . Get a life and a clue


Posted by Wizard1 on 08-06-2002 04:11 AM:

Meh...its decent quality for a pre-release.....


Posted by Wizard1 on 08-06-2002 04:13 AM:

Decent release for a pre-release =p


Posted by vcdmanone on 08-06-2002 05:28 AM:

Angry What do you expect??

Hey if you dont like the quality then pay to see it, otherwise will all the whinners please SHUT THE HEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
UP!!!


Posted by Static on 08-06-2002 05:32 AM:

This release isnt that bad.
5/5

Everything cant look like a screener. Props for speed.

quote:
Hey, little girl, pull my finger


Posted by Zipomatic on 08-06-2002 06:05 AM:

Okay...

I can't believe that this release has had so many negative comments.

Yes the picture is a little blurry and it is a little dark, it is NOT perfect, but it seems fine to me on my TV.

The first couple of minutes have been chopped and replaced with the crappy xXx titles (as was mentioned earlier) and although the sound is very clear and loud, this is a CAM not a TS. You can clearly hear the audience laugh in more than one place.

But, geez, I expected this movie to be a terrible copy from what I saw from the Jpgs, but it is NOT that bad. It is more than watchable in my opinion.

Really.


Posted by kaliecious on 08-06-2002 06:54 AM:

I rencoded

You know I rencoded this and add a little more brightness to this and it look fuck good. But I will not put it out cause yall bitch about people who reencode movies. all this movie needed was a litt more bit rate to it and hell that would have made 100% differnce in it right there even w/o the brightening up of the movie.. peace


Posted by kaliecious on 08-06-2002 06:59 AM:

reencoded

You know i reencoded this movie and added alitght of brighness to it and it looked GREAT... but I won't release cause yall gripe about reencodes to much.. all it needed was more bit rate and some toning.. and to the release GROUP videocd.. Bravo, I have not seen yall put out many movies but what yall have put out yall are moving up.. you a little more bit rate and make stuff crisper yall will not get as much slack.


Posted by kaliecious on 08-06-2002 07:00 AM:

..

.. how come my replies are not coming up I am not typing this a 4th time


Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-06-2002 07:58 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Storm180


Drinking makes vcd's look better?? I think you need to talk to a medical doctor, because drinking has an adverse affect on eye sight and reaction time. Sound like you need a few AA meetings if you think this way.

Connections between drinking Alcohol and health

3. The pharmaceutical functions and results of modern research

A. The influence on the central nerve system (CNS)

Ethanol caused "stimulation" is absolutely not a real excitement, it is only a slackening of the brains controlling functions. Big amounts of alcohol taken habitually make their imbiber forgetting his good behavior, modesty and self-control. Furthermore it decreases his sense if distinction, memory, concentration and reasoning. The eyesight (focusing) also often worsens.



blu blu blu, shad up

hahaha




Storm180


Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-06-2002 08:01 AM:

also what good is speed if quality sux?


i can run fast as hell, but whats good running fast if im taking a shit?

lol


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 08-06-2002 08:21 AM:

The Movie is Not bad, but i can't wait for a better release cause some seens you can't really figure out what's happening cuase of the cut from top and bottom. enough said beside this Thanx for releasing the movie soo Quick and still better then FTF *EVIL SMILE* but you know i love you all

keep up the good work

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by TazgodX on 08-06-2002 10:08 AM:

ITS NOT THAT BAD!!! The quality is about a 5.5 to 6 for video not the worst but totally watchable audio gets a 2 cause i hate hearing peole talk and laught and clap during movies!


Posted by tonikgin on 08-06-2002 10:45 AM:

Red face rammstein

this release is crap.. i will legit pay the $7, go see the first 5min ONLY to see rammstein in the opening scene, then will walk out of the theatre. vin deisel sucks.


Posted by MrFreeze on 08-06-2002 06:18 PM:

this rls will hurt your eyes.


there is a dreamworks logo/intro then some cheap paint looking xxx flashes and u see some dead agent. im guessing u miss about 5min. 99% of the english subs are coverd u can only see the tips of the letters totaly unreadable. The audio is nasty the video will make u go blind. and at the end you get to enjoy the RESIDENT EVIL credits i guess its a extra bounus. i watched the 28k trailer after just to compare and my eyes had a hard time adjusting to the amazing quality of lowband video. the 28k trialer was 100x better, and it probly shows u the whole freaking story.


Posted by blacks on 08-06-2002 07:58 PM:

Video is pretty alright. Grainy though imo.
Audio sucks though. its a straight out cam. It has that cam echo about it.

Videocd ought to label right instead of internalling it.

I for one, am pretty irritated by the tons of similar quality "Telesyncs" coming up.

Vigilante, Videocd, Vcdistro, FTF, tNB, UTi, etcetc.

Proper, Real, Uncropped, internal, SVCD, and a million and one reasons to dupe some crap.

If the proper is worth it, then by all means. But all i see is crap after crap after crap.

Where is TFE when u need em?


Posted by ErBzZ on 08-06-2002 09:13 PM:

i dont see why people clap in the theater they act like they never seen a stunt in thier lives .. haha damn some people are crazy .. i wouldnt b clappin n shiet i b lyke awwww damnnnnn but i dunno i guess its diff in states..


Posted by VcdGahds on 08-06-2002 09:38 PM:

Audio is pretty hollow, and considering they labelled it a TS, there sure is alot of audience participation in it...leading me to think it is a mislabelled CAM, but who am I to accuse. Video is not great, a little green throughout, but definitely watchable if you don't really care much about seeing this in the theatres, which I don't. A show like this will not be ruined if I watch a shitty copy then a good copy. Star Wars and Spiderman, yes. But this...nah.

About the beginning credits, I think(this is my own personal opinion, nothing I know or have first-hand knowledge of) they cut out the beginning credits because they were probably so far off the screen they didnt want to give away the fact that so much is cut out from the right and left. Instead of doing what the bozo who taped the first "Sum of All Fears" did, these guys decided to just simply cut out most of the beginning credits. Funny, too, how they used a "Dreamworks" logo when I don't think Dreamworks has anything to do with this release. And if you notice the music with the "Dreamworks" logo, it sounds alot like that from "The Time Machine" music...but again, I could be wrong there, but it was pecularly similar to me. Maybe that is just the Dreamworks music now, but I don't remember hearing it before on any other Dreamworks movies.

FYI, for those of you who do not remember what the first "Sum of All Fears" was like, that was where the person who was running the camera kept moving the camera left and right to get in the credits...and during some of the subtitles later on, he/she kept moving the camera left and right again.


Posted by THE_DREAM on 08-07-2002 02:23 AM:

thx for making me look like an asshole video cam cd. i invited some guys and girls over to brag about having a movie a week b4 it hit the theathers i went and got some drinks and shit after we tapped the bottle i pop the vcd in the dvd player at this time we was cooked. when they seen it they said they rather go to a ru paul concert then to look at the worst bootleg in history.

they had jokes for days. i think all the groups should get 2gether and sign a pertiton to get rid of these mislable guys i could waited for a ftf rls thx god tnb rls it i told that my cd was messed up i showed the tnb version and now im bragging again thx tnb yall saved me and for video cam cd tell the camara guy he not suppose to smoke dust while filming or stop buying those $5.00 bootleg tapes and trying to psat them for ts with people screaming and talking and had the nearve to rls that shit with five minutes missing

cya thx
tnb


Posted by Klonin on 08-07-2002 05:59 AM:

Unhappy

Wonder how many peops actually downloaded it. Noone is mentioning the wrong intro (DreamWorks) and the Resident Evil credits at the end......HMMM, intro was mention a couple of time but noone really mentions the lame ass clapping and cheering the homos do on this CAM....

Quality = 5
Sound = 3
Movie = 7

Movie was actually ok

Recommend waiting for another release......


Posted by kipy on 08-08-2002 05:25 AM:

AHAHAHAH!! i love ErBzZ's comment with the clapping at the stunts, those are ppl some farmer people who have never seen a movie before.

Thanks


Posted by djkoolaide on 08-13-2002 06:21 AM:

okay i just wasted 2 cds on this rls


this is a CAM, not a TS


4/2/3



the video makes u go blind (literally, i was squinting through the whole movie)

u can hear ppl laugh


dont dl this

im waiting for UTi or a screener for the next time i burn this


Posted by ThEgAmE on 08-13-2002 12:04 PM:

I dont mind about the video quality and audio, i just want it to be watchable and it was but i am relly p****d of cause this is nuked and they dont even say it, but i see the part that was missing from another release and it was only a little while.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.
Show all 54 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.