VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- 2 Fast 2 Furious *SVCD* *NUKED* - TELESYNC - loGisTic (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=21064)

judging from samle..
the vidoe is kinda dark, sound is okey, but I don't see why they made it to svcd, the quality ain't that good..

5/7/?

quality isnt that good and whats that 2 black bars at the sides?

another damn SVCD TS release for no reason.

to all the releasing groups

NOT EVERY TS HAS TO BE A SVCD

thanks

argh
no need for ANY other release of that piece of shit !

all "actors" should be banned and live in shame for that....

video ok (5), but sound is really bad(4)...

SVCD because of scenes that could look really blocky in vcd2 when theres loads of movement does look better in SVCD, thats the only reason I would go for SVCD! whats every one else think! ?

think ill wait a bit longer for this. saw a review on TV yesterday they said it was utter shit and the actors that looked good actors where only good cos of there natural charisma and were pretty crappy anyway and it said apart from fast car chases there wasnt much too the film

Sound is much better than the last release, video is decent but there certainly is no need for this to be svcd... Don't plan on watching the whole movie but if I did I would wait for a better release. 5/6/?

better rls and still the same crappy movie though.

6 / 6 / 1

Come on guys. Theres no need for this svcd. It has to be at least be better quality both sound/picture before you can call svcd. unfortunatley this rls doesn't fall into that catagory.

Better luck next time

__________________
your never alone with Schizophrenia

True, it may not be worth being SVCD but it's still the best rls about right now.
Havent seen the whole movie but all i've heard is it's shit, think i'll have to see for myself though

better faster

nice audio nice video

the second one the better

Going from the sample this release has good audio. The video is good for a SVCD TS could have been sharper and clearer maybe, but props for a fast good quality release ;-) play with the contrast or brightness since its a tad dark. This release is very watchable on my TV and it is not cropped to much to be noticed and it does not have a bad angle either, just could have been a little better with the sharpness and detail. Love the fact they had a some old classic muscle in this movie, only reason I watched it.

Rating this TS...
Video = 6 - 7
Audio = 8
Overall = 8 because it has a Hemi Challenger in it for some scenes otherwise a 6


Thanks for the 2fast release guys


Update: Just watched the whole movie and the left side is cropped some... not enough to ruin anything, but its there.
And the audio cuts out once or twice in the middle of the movie for a couple of seconds. There is a mild angle like its cocked to the right making the right bottom corner go down and the top left corner go up. Besides this the movie was very watchable and pretty good for a fast SVCD release

Not sure if this makes it a Cam but twice during the movie you can see peoples heads. Once when some stretches are something and later when a woman sits back down...

*from sample*

one word - CAM.
video - 8 (as t/s's go , better than the previous release)
audio - 5 (cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam)
film 1
CTP show them how its done please!.

quote:

---

Its not a Cam
Its a WORKPRINT from a VHS source and was Videocaptured from that if you ask me.

---

__________________

Re: *from sample*

quote:

---

Originally posted by Butch
one word - CAM.
video - 8 (as t/s's go , better than the previous release)
audio - 5 (cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam)
film 1
CTP show them how its done please!.

---

i was kinda impressed with loGisTic's last release, for a new group not bad.

this 2 fast 2 furious release is very watchable compared to esoterics.

6/6/?

From the Sample - Dark , Dark , Dark, Colors are faded , and has that blurry tint to it like Finding Nemo FTF. The Sound Alright but has an echo to it. Watchable though. Compairing the two releases I'd take this one.

/me debates ... to pick up or not too

5/5/?

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

well..

I like it when a TS is in SVCD. I'm not too interested in seeing this movie though, This seems like a cam to me. Kinda shitty audio and dark and muddy but watchable video. Meh.

5/5/1

for all the people saying this movie sucks your not thinking. this movie isnt supposed to be a drama or whatever. people complained that in the first movie there wasnt enough car scenes so in this one there are more. i liked this movie. im into cars and this movie was about cars. you cant say the car chases werent good

7/5/7

2 releases of the same movie with bad audio...

video is better than eso although I don't think it warranted SVCD, audio, well, still sucks

im into cars too, but not ugly riceburner trying to be fast, when their really not.

i say the movie sucks shit, (not as much as the first one cause vin desiel isint in it)

there are only 2 decent cars in this movie, the viper and the dodge challenger.

last one only had 2 decent cars too, the black ferrari 355 spyder and the dodge charger

this would have been a decent release if it had good audio. The video was pretty nice, somewhat dark (couldnt really tell, samp was from a light scene) colors were a bit washed out, vid remined me of TMM's old releases. Sound however was obvously not direct really hollow and echoey and this was during just dailogue scenes, during racing it would probably be very shitty. This release is watchable tho, so if you're desperate to see this movie pick it up. And ya, this should have been vcd, quality is nowhere near the need to use svcd.

6.5/5/?

faYth: how could you defend this movie? how could you give this money a 7!!!!!!!!! do you have no shame?

yes, it wasn't supposed to be a drama...its an action (comedy) movie that was made into complete shit. F&F was alright (like maybe a 4 on the movie scale) and it held you attention. I bet when I download this movie, I will loose intrest in it because they went completely off the wall with the cars...there is this little thing called realism...as in cars with bodykits do not automatically gain the status of being a 10-second car...which man young (ignorant) viewers will now think after watching this movie...as for the commericals I have seen, the introduction of using CG is probably their biggest mistake. It makes the directors look uncreative because they can't use real drivers to perfom good stunts (see BMW Films.com or Ronin or fucking any other movie but these two). Finally, in this long rant that I bet nobody reads, I don't know if they put as much emphasis on NOS as they did in the first one but if they did...shame on them, there were some major flaws with the first movie (as in Nitrous does NOT exploded) and no Eclipse I have ever seen has 7 gears....

I feel personally offended by this movie...and I personally don't think any quality release group should waste their time releasing this film...

__________________

Seems to me that the audio on this one is going to be difficult to capture. The car chase scenes (engine reving, etc) have noises that will probably be a bit much for a camera's microphone to snag. I think we'll all just have to wait for a screener rip. However, after being one of the unfortunate few who paid to see this, for god sake, the movie is one of the worst ever.

-QS

video is decent..Sound is crapped out..

6/6/?

*from cd1*

quote:

---

*from sample*
one word - CAM.
video - 8 (as t/s's go , better than the previous release)
audio - 5 (cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam cam)
film 1
CTP show them how its done please!.

---

__________________

got to say, im no sheep, so...i liked the first film, i watch films cos they are an escape from the real world. i am looking forward to seeing this, would have preferred vin diesel in it though. even if it was just a quick scene to show how he`s going nowadays.

from sample: video is watchable, could be ok during fast scenes - hardly any blockiness right at end as cars drive. sound isnt the best, but u can still here wot is being said.

as for encoding to svcd-wots the problem? is it the extra 150mb to download?
a vcd has a smaller resolution - so wen that is stretched to fit a tv any glitches or pixilization are gonna show up and it`ll be blocky during fast action scenes.so if its captured for a svcd in mind, and is tweaked like it looks it was, then it`ll play fine on standalones and tv`s.

face it svcd is the way forward, the more groups get into it now (still talking ts at the mo) the better, cos they can iron out any probs, hopefully after a few more releases logistic should be ready to do a decent bad boys svcd, as they seem to be releasing quicker then ctp.

(soz if its a bit long, but everyone seems to moan about the same thing in each thread)

This movie if you can call it that should have been nuked for bad movie. Worst movie of this year so far.

Sound isn't that good. video is ok, but sound not.

The only good thing about this movie was the chicks, they looked good. all I can say about this is movie is "Teenie Bopper"

Yeah Vin Diesel is such a GREAT actor....he should be in every movie....

just look at xXx and F&F, his great acting skills really make those movies shine....

"I never narced on nobody...." <---I think that line and acting summed up his entire carrer.

As for Paul Walker, I think they could have used pop-sickle sticks with smiles on them and nobody would have known the difference...Paul Walker=as the acting skills of a brick...

__________________

Strong opinions here in the ole forum. I for one liked the first movie, and will see this one in theatres. No, its not going to get any awards for best picture, or best actor, but its something lots of people are into, and therefore it will make money. I can bet half of you complaining about it havent even seen the movie. Because the only reason you would go see it is if you were into cars, and judging from the comments, most of you aren't. It will probably suck as a movie, but at least we get to see some cool race scenes, and some hot chicks!! Thats always a good combination.

This release isn't bad for loGisTic's second try. If its going to take up two discs anyway, I would much rather it be in SVCD. Much better framerate, and less pixilation. I have just viewed the sample, and its looking like the audio is muffled, and the video is a little dark, but most definitely watchable. VERY similiar to The Italian Job video quality. The Italian Job was nice. Didn't need 3 discs, but i'm not complaining. Hoping a better release will come along.

CATBOX

Oh yeah, and riceburners dominate Muscle cars anyday!!

WTF

wtf is wrong with you peeps.

the quality on this is good, way bettert than eso's and spund is okay.

7/7/X

__________________

Quality isn't so bad movie is practically same as the first but worse.

6.5/6/4

Why don't you people like SVCD's I wish eveything was released on SVCD cams,ts,screeners all of it except of course silvers.It would be a step up for the community

__________________
Don't Fear The Reaper

i just saw the sample. waiting for the next release

I just saw the sample.

Video
A little bit cut off on the sides, but good colors, tad bit too dark.

Audio
I didnt find the audio too bad. I thought it was watchable, I think the nukers are getting used to all the Centropy releases.

Overall, id download this release, but Centropy, show them how this is done.

dont know why it was nuked audio isnt very good but its not pure shit video quality is watchable worth the dl but do hope a better release comes along 7/5/?

A clear example of what I was talking about in the Finding Nemo TS TCF thread, most posters are like sheep nukers.. they follow the crowd and probably hasn't even touched the sample or release itself, don't know why they posts besides having nothing to do.. think it's the cool thing to do.. or a member of another group dissing for kicks. Well, from the sample I'd give this 6/4/?, Video is ok but their Italian Job was better, they still have a problem with pixelation on motion scenes (car chases, etc), sound has that similar echo thingy like TCF's nemo probably some sound filter or somethin.. Nice job LoG, not the best work but at least you're still tryin`

this movie is pure shit

video = 6 not too bad
sound = well just not good
moive= -100 piece of poo

Seems to me that logistic are having a hard time, fair enough they deserved a nuke on their first release b/c they'd screwed the audio but then they repacked it with fine audio. Sounded good to me but it still got a nuke for being oversized. Although I dont see it nuked on any sites, just here.
Now this one gets it for bad audio. ok, the audio's not perfect at all but it's definately not worth a nuke.

logistic, keep it up guys, maybe a bit of improvement on the audio but you're getting them out good and early

quote:

---

Originally posted by CATBOX
Strong opinions here in the ole forum. I for one liked the first movie, and will see this one in theatres. No, its not going to get any awards for best picture, or best actor, but its something lots of people are into, and therefore it will make money. I can bet half of you complaining about it havent even seen the movie. Because the only reason you would go see it is if you were into cars, and judging from the comments, most of you aren't. It will probably suck as a movie, but at least we get to see some cool race scenes, and some hot chicks!! Thats always a good combination.

---

follow the leader

Ever since centropy started bringing more QUALITY release the the scene in SVCD everybody feels there pieces of shit deserve to be SVCD's ... thats so lame.

Whats up with the nuke on here? It didn't seem like it was that bad, seen a lot worse that didnt get nukes? The Video actually keeps up in the high movement scenes probably due to the higer bitrate of SVCD i dont see why everyone flips out? it would of been 2 CDs if it was VCD anyways, and if your DVD Player cant play SVCDs go out and spend some money on a new one anyways! I don't see why people are getting upset? As for the movie, ughh if your DYING to see it just stick to the Trailer or the Sample or something because you'll basically be throwing your bandwith down the toilet where this movie belongs!


One minor problem with sound, around 46 min into CD1 the sound does get static y for about 30 seconds but you can still hear their voices in the background real light but enough to make out the words, but then it goes away... thats the only reason for a nuke? seems a bit much to nuke it, it's not that bad and it dosnt seem to be the encoding job.

audio is better than the last release, still pretty crappy
video is crappy too. no need for SVCD on this one, even for action scenes
guess its been nuked anyway
dont waste your time.
5/5/x

__________________

Saw in theater, was about like the first. Entertaining but VERY poor acting. I'm waiting for one with better sound. 6/4/5

quote:

---

Originally posted by master-drew
another damn SVCD TS release for no reason.

to all the releasing groups

NOT EVERY TS HAS TO BE A SVCD

thanks

---

__________________
Argueing over the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win, you're still a retard.

This release is bearable, but I think I'll wait for another one.

7/5.5/?

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by ezkamo


lmao tru
anyhoo, movie rocced ass i saw it a day before it was out i was gonna take my camera to the theater but it was universal an all they wouldnt let me in with that shiz lol

---

pretty good movie i would recomend going 2 theaters first sound cuts out on some good parts but other then that its a good movie and fair quality quit complaning u butheads these are4 cams what do you expect

this looks like the same exact source as the esoteric ts,
same camera movement at the beggining of the film, same shitty sound,video has that same darkness to it

for a svcd this deserves 4/4/7

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

DEFINITE improvement over the other version. loGisTic deserves major props on both picture and (acceptable) audio. Like others here, I don't understand the nuke for "bad audio." I haven't seen it nuked anywhere else, frankly.

And for all those bandwidth-download limit challenged people out there, SVCD is a MUCH BETTER format than VCD, even with a so-so original. The audio improvement alone is worth it.

well, i just saw it in theatres :GASP: and the problem is that the sounds is fucked throughout the entire movie, it goes in and out, high and low, theres one part where u can barely hear the effects, i couldnt talked to anyone at the theatre i went to a lte showing, im wondering if a lot of other theatres of running into this, thus horrible audio on the TS, if so, it might be awhile before we have a release with good audio, just thought id throw in my 2 cents!

best rls out so far 5/5/? going pass thouon this rls .

These Svcds ARE a waste of time!!!

Most of them are NOT standard compliant.
They have the bitrate lowered to fit more on the CDs.
This makes it useless for anyone whose DVD player only plays compliant SVCD.
Every SVCD release I have to convert to VCD just to get it to play on my DVD player!!

So all you people out there when u burn these files and wonder why u get that slight stutter in playback, there's your answer.

Fozzee

Just Watched It And...

It seemed fine to me. Picture was decent (not brilliant, but watchable) and I had no problems hearing what was said (apart from one 10 second burst near the end of disk 1 that buzzed)

Heck, I thought the movie was not that bad!!! (and I know bugger all about cars) it was what it was, a decent popcorn flick.

Pic 7
Audio 7
Movie 7

Geez, some people bitch way too much about things, Nothing wrong with this release.

Best release yet video 7 sound 6 movie 5

No need for a svcd with this "quality".

5/4/5

Some cool cars though. That 'Cuda Hemi was a beauty. They need a few more musclecars in there besides the 10 trillion rice mobiles.

I think the reason some ppl don't like the audio is cuz they play it on their computers!! I tested it on the computer and audio was... weird. Then I put it on my standalone and the audio was fine!! IMHO everyone should invest in a good standalone and stfu

7/6/6

Video 6
Audio 6