VCDQuality Forums - Catwoman *INTERNAL* - CAM

Show all 60 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Catwoman *INTERNAL* - CAM - NOX (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=44843)

Posted by firefighter on 07-23-2004 05:55 AM:

Catwoman *INTERNAL* - CAM - NOX

From Sample and odd rar pretty damn good for a pre theater CAM. Colors are good, no dark flickering, (dark in general) seems a bit zoomed in, Sounds ok besides it having an echoish sound (sounds like it was cammed 10 ft away from speakers). Overall very watchable first copy .... everyone who seen this at dry runs already said the movie sux ... no rush to see this movie. Very nice for pre theater NOX.

As a CAM:
8/6/?

Notes:
INTERNAL because the scene used to be once civilized. Releasing a CAM was shameful and we still believe it is, but as demand rises for speed, we will INTERNAL CAM's for
who just can't wait.

= NOX has a silver supplier and just doesnt want to get kicked off sites ? I wouldnt be ashamed of releasing pre theater CAM's that look like this. Gj NOX! How much more do you expect from a CAM ...

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Posted by pHizZ on 07-23-2004 06:37 AM:

6/6/x

Sample is a freaking minute and a half long. All my cam reviews are in comparison to UTi, which, in my opinion, was the best cam group in the scene.

The video is cropped to about fullscreen, and the colors are pretty vibrant. However, the brightness is kind of flickery, and a little annoying. I would have rated a 7 or 8, but I deducted points for cropping, and flicker.

The audio is hollow; a little tinny. Standard for cam, but I've definitely heard better sound on UTi's cams.

This movie looks like total garbage, and I won't be downloading it. It's not related to the comic book at all, and I think it's a disgrace that it has been made.

Posted by vip3r on 07-23-2004 06:41 AM:

Wow! This is a nice CAM. Can't expect much better than this from NOX. You guys just made my evening . Movie doesn't look promising, but this is a one day pre theater, which we haven't seen lately. Almost does look like a UTi cam. Clear picture, wasn't that fuzzy looking from the sample, and the audio sounds a bit camish, not too echoy though. Mad props on this release. Hopefully the movie will be enjoyable, getting now & watching - will update later!

7/7/4 - ::edit:: just finished watching this, and it was MUCH better than i expected. had some bad acting though

Posted by jmur on 07-23-2004 07:03 AM:

purty nice cam. colors are very good. audio is good (as far as cams go). i may watch this, i may not. movie looks like shit, so i wont be seeing it in theatres. but if you really want to see this, this is watchable. not the greatest, but hey its early, and its free, so you cant complain.

6.5/7/?

Posted by Debo on 07-23-2004 07:03 AM:

picture looks good
sound is shitty but what u expect
7/6

__________________

Posted by Miller on 07-23-2004 07:26 AM:

nice cam/pre - well sound is good, not really hollow, but it is odd. video is nice does flicker a little bit but nothing to complain about and is dark. but hey its a cam
7/7/? for a cam rating
diden't watch all the flick yet

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by eighty5 on 07-23-2004 07:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHizZ
This movie looks like total garbage, and I won't be downloading it. It's not related to the comic book at all, and I think it's a disgrace that it has been made.

Its a typical hollywood movie, lets buy rights to the name, and we will overpay some popular actor and pay some guy to write a shit story, and it will be a box office HIT!!!

Great PRE theater CAM. We cant ask for much, when its a PRE.

From sample, colors look good, little dark, and very zoomed in, and the sound is very very echoish, but im not complaining.

Good job NOX.

6/6/?

Posted by Debo on 07-23-2004 07:52 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked who gives a f..k.

thats probably the only reason ima watch it

__________________

Posted by -Jenix- on 07-23-2004 08:26 AM:

Pretty Good Cam Release, no arguements here from me, those who can wait, go ahead...im watching this its a good first.

6.5/7/?

Posted by mikeyrana on 07-23-2004 08:28 AM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

Posted by Debo on 07-23-2004 08:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

what the fuck

__________________

Posted by diggiedog on 07-23-2004 08:40 AM:

Not bad

Very nice release from them was actually suprised...too bad the movie itself looks horrible....

8/5/ ?

Posted by UltrA1 on 07-23-2004 08:44 AM:

Judging from Sample_Only

Sound is not direct...but decent if you can't wait..
Slight echo...
6.0
Video is pretty clear for a cam..............
7.8

Hope VideoCD or Centropy does this one soon,
Later

Posted by Hurr on 07-23-2004 08:49 AM:

Not going to get this movie since it looks like crap and everything I heard about it says crap

Excellent job on the early release boys.

From the sample,

7.5(nice vid nox!)/6.5(clear but echoish)/If someone rips all the trash and leaves just a sampler of the sexy parts and I turn off the volume I'll watch this movie. If not, meh..

Posted by qbs on 07-23-2004 08:51 AM:

not bad nox 7/6/?

Posted by chifus on 07-23-2004 09:13 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

Umm... that shit is just disturbing. Guess i won't be downloading this movie anytime soon...

__________________
Bah.....

Posted by vip3r on 07-23-2004 09:45 AM:

Halle Berry was naked in swordfish, ya saw her big 'ol titties..just watch that to see her ..

::edit:: here's some links ya porno freaks ;P

http://www.celebsdb.com/pic/Halle_Berry/b1.html

&

http://www.celebsmovies-online.com/Halle-Berry/

..haha enjoy

Posted by bigd25x on 07-23-2004 10:32 AM:

not bad for a pre-cam

video-6

audio-6

movie-? "worth watching just to see her lol"

Posted by Mogwai on 07-23-2004 11:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by UltrA1

Sound is not direct...but decent if you can't wait..
Slight echo...

:Edit: ...

7/6/juddging on the sample

Posted by mania2004 on 07-23-2004 11:36 AM:

not bad pic
but its like watching a tv comedy with the canned laughter

Posted by SplinterBone on 07-23-2004 11:46 AM:

this movie will be terrible ill watch it just to see whats up but im thinking terrible in the comics catwomen was white and in batman returns she was white and we saw her hollywood origin so this movie makes no sense at all they are gonna fuck this up like they fucked up batman the first to batmans were great the last 2 were utter garbage

Posted by RoMeRz on 07-23-2004 12:14 PM:

7/6/ dunno yet

dont care what the fuck the movies about, any movie with Halle Berry to me is good.

I dont normally bother with cams, but this was a special occasion - <3 Halle

__________________

Posted by Bassboy on 07-23-2004 12:17 PM:

Not bad at all for a cam.
Based on the sample clip 7/5/?
Will probaly be getting this one as its got very good colors, decent sound and isnt very grainy atleast compared to thunderbirds

Posted by weedmonsta on 07-23-2004 01:13 PM:

Video is at a slight angle/tilted and zoomed in/croped

audio is hollow (as someone alse has said to much audiance noise)

5.5.?

ps. Nice afro for the first 5 mins + some woman with a big voice wont shut up :P

__________________
Ding Dong

Posted by barney on 07-23-2004 02:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

for some reason ive gone all limp *pukes in his beer can**

Posted by Hairyhamster on 07-23-2004 03:48 PM:

Very good for a cam......
audio-6 lets this down a little
video-7 as i said...very good for a cam, what did you expect.
movie- havenet watched it yet and if it wasnt for Halle Berry i probly wouldnt bother, but will give it a go when ive finished washing me hair.

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.

Posted by dc_man on 07-23-2004 04:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

Man WTF!

That dude's mad homo.

__________________
My sig worked, It's back.

Posted by Mezt^Up on 07-23-2004 05:27 PM:

haha i dont think im getting this rls, HER STUNT DOUBLE IS A MAN!, i think that the only thing ppl will see this movie for is to see halle berry, but now that i know she's a man atleast 30% of the time, i wont be getting it, anyways i got the sample,

V: 7.5 (keep those colors comin', nox )
A: 6 (your average cam audio)
M: no comment

__________________

Posted by MYYZTIK on 07-23-2004 05:27 PM:

Funny

OK Ill comment first on the flick. Video great as everyone has said but for me the audio was crap! But for a cam this is a great release good job!

Now about this not folowing the comic book. Your comment shows that you have no clue about the Cat Woman story line.

Even in the comics is has be told there has been more then one Cat woman.

Personally I think this is a great take on it and saw in the theatre theatre. The action was great the woman were hot..What more do you want?

Peace!

Posted by Miller on 07-23-2004 06:36 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by UltrA1
[B]Judging from Sample_Only

Sound is not direct...but decent if you can't wait..
Slight echo...

sound is not direct because it is a cam if sound was direct it would be a TS

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-23-2004 06:55 PM:

no doubt this movie is a piece of crap, the video is very nice even though full screen. The audio isn't that bad. But there is alot of audience noise and laughter even when she first appears in the suit alot whistling and guys screaming YEAH!!!! Totally fucked up the good pic. I really just can't watch a movie as a dvd or vcd with audience interference. Otherwise I would just go to the theaters. But I watched the full release and man the movie sucked, I guess after finding out the stunt double was a dude. Kind of ruined the whole ideal of watching her half naked. So I think I'll pass on watching again. Just disgused me to see her or was it him. (Puking Alot Now!!)(BLAH)

7/5/3 stunt double is a dude and the storyline sucked two fur balls.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...

Posted by Redemption198 on 07-23-2004 07:45 PM:

I wish the Video CD and Centropy TS's has colour as good as this does, i quite like the pic on this, bit too flickery and is quite cropped.

Sound ruins it for me, Dont think a TS, feels like your actually watching a Camera filmed copy if the sound is good,(spiderman 2, I Robot), but this just reminds me of the True Lies cam i bought as a Kid.

Movie wasn't bad, kinda dissapointed though, and who cares about the stunt double thing, this aint supposed to be porn and if u want a quick shuffle over Halle, go for Monsters Ball.

7/5/6

Posted by qubit on 07-23-2004 10:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

Too Funny !!!

__________________

Posted by punzada on 07-24-2004 01:43 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mikeyrana
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
[B]But hey you get to see Halle Berry Half Naked

before you start jerking off over her make sure its during the parts that are actually her body

http://www.ananova.com/entertainmen...ews.celebrities

some times you just get a feeling in the pit of your stomach ... "there's going to be a real good reason why I won't like this movie," i thought it was going to be because this movie was going to flat out suck...but now I see it's not just that, haha.

Posted by EViL-EWoK on 07-24-2004 01:46 AM:

7/6/who cares

Nice cam, Nice Speed. Nice overall

Ok, I thought everthing was said and done in Batman Returns.
Now this movie just makes it all look like a joke. Sure shes hot, but really another comic book movie? Ok sure we have all the special effects now to make tons of great movies that has plots which include non normal characters and epic battle scenes. But thats doesnt mean "Lets go out and remake everything!"
Lord of the Rings was awesome. King Arthur just looked like a copy. but none the less it was alright.
Spiderman was great I thought but now we have crap coming out like Hulk, league of extraordinary men. and now Catwomen?

People of Hollywood should just stop making movies just for special effects and stop jumping on the comic book bandwagon.

Even though im ranting on about crappy movies someone guy is making millions off this crap. and probaly laughing..
But then again if it was me I wouldnt complain lol
Fuck id make a prequel to the jesus movie. and pimp out jesus dvds to churches and make mad money.

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.

Posted by Ravenhawk on 07-24-2004 01:57 AM:

One of the best CAMS I've ever seen, sound was OK, As for the movie itself I thought it was great!

8/6/8

__________________
Live like James Bond die like James Dean

Posted by Redemption198 on 07-24-2004 02:29 AM:

quote:
Fuck id make a prequel to the jesus movie. and pimp out jesus dvds to churches and make mad money

LMFAO, cheers man, im quitting my Job now, think i'll give that a bash.

I agree with the Comic Book thing, too much trash recently, peronally dont think they're gonna get better than Spiderman 2.

Posted by fkngrvn on 07-24-2004 02:35 AM:

Video is pretty good, very watchable, audio is nice for a cam. Too bad this movie FUCKING BLOWS.

You can hear the audience laugh and cheer in a couple of spots, but what's to expect from a cam? And that fucker with the big head finally moves after about 5 minutes in the begining. Surprised I didn't see anyone get up and leave half way through.

vid/aud/movie
6/6(cam rating)/3

Nice cam.

Posted by deano21 on 07-24-2004 04:27 AM:

Good realease pic aint bad audio very good

Pic 7
Aud 8
Vid 7

Posted by shane4050 on 07-24-2004 09:58 AM:

great movie 7/5/8

Posted by qubit on 07-24-2004 10:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by EViL-EWoK
Lord of the Rings was awesome. King Arthur just looked like a copy.

Lord of the Rings was made by the same bafoon who did the likes of Bad Taste and Meet the Feebles. The LOTR films were not "awesome," in any sense other than special effects, and even that had a few serious flaws. The story of King Arthur has been around far far longer than LOTR, so how can it be a "copy." These type of movies has been around for years. I know this is not exactly the right forum for this discussion, but I didn't start it. I had to say something because I've had about enough of LOTR lemmings who can't see past the title and realize how Mr. Jackson ruined something which in the right hands could have TRULY been "awesome."

__________________

Posted by AddNtoX on 07-24-2004 10:58 AM:

ya bad taste he funded independantly made all the sfx for, yup he's a bafoon, real dumb being able to pull something like that off over 2 some yrs of weekends.

"AddNtoX casts level 12 slap of the almighty on u"

Posted by qubit on 07-24-2004 12:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by AddNtoX
ya bad taste he funded independantly made all the sfx for, yup he's a bafoon, real dumb being able to pull something like that off over 2 some yrs of weekends.

"AddNtoX casts level 12 slap of the almighty on u"

Pity he didn't spend a little more time trying to make more than a special effects extravaganza. Instead we get good actors not being allowed to act because of crappy direction. We see the Fellowship running across country, one stops briefly to say a stupid line, then runs some more. But what gets me the most is in the end of the third film where the camera pulls back and the hobbits look dwarfed by effects no better than the original King Kong. Clearly, someone was running out of time and imagination to allow that horrible scene. But, I'm done with this subject now. This ain't the place for it and I apoligize to the others who are here to talk about Cat Woman, a film for which at this time I have no opinion.

__________________

Posted by brut7 on 07-24-2004 12:59 PM:

I like Hale Barry, I like cats, I like silly superhero/action movies.
Video is excellent quality for a cam though cropped so much they could have added "edited for TV".
Audio is camish but has better bass than average and less hiss. Kind of a reverberating effect though. Crowd is annoyingly loud and talkative but I found it amusing to make fun of them.

Based on being a CAM 8/7/6 and very watchable if you don't want to wait. Good work NOX.

Posted by Oglethorpe on 07-24-2004 01:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by qubit
Pity he didn't spend a little more time trying to make more than a special effects extravaganza. Instead we get good actors not being allowed to act because of crappy direction. We see the Fellowship running across country, one stops briefly to say a stupid line, then runs some more. But what gets me the most is in the end of the third film where the camera pulls back and the hobbits look dwarfed by effects no better than the original King Kong. Clearly, someone was running out of time and imagination to allow that horrible scene. But, I'm done with this subject now. This ain't the place for it and I apoligize to the others who are here to talk about Cat Woman, a film for which at this time I have no opinion.

It's all to sell combo meals at fast food places. How many Orlando Bloom cans of Mountain Dew or whatever did you see after he did that fancy non-tolkienesque elephaunt slaying?
Elrond's sons... thats all I have to say.

Back on topic.
First few minutes have some dude's head in it. Not very good angle either. Dark and tinny.
But, it's a cam. I'll take it for free.

5.5/5/3

__________________
fuckinggoogleit.com
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
-George Bernard Shaw
I like proof!

Posted by Jazzmo on 07-24-2004 04:06 PM:

started 2 watch it ....... got rather fedup within 10 min's
as for the Large Head thats at the bottom of the screen. does go just as the movie starts .. but i just cant deal with the chatting and giggling though it..

6 good for a cam/
4
? guess i wait 4 another rls ..wont b long../

Posted by pHo on 07-24-2004 04:28 PM:

if this film was worth more than 2/10 i wouldn't take it more offtopic...

but peter jackson directed, wrote and coproduced "Heavenly Creatures", which imo is his best work, and probably one of the best films i've seen. that says it all.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by joey_75051 on 07-24-2004 06:44 PM:

POST WAS ERASED

Posted by joey_75051 on 07-24-2004 06:48 PM:

POST WAS ERASED

Posted by rickhype on 07-24-2004 07:12 PM:

good first release very watchable
nice color bad cropping and as already stated
the audience is loud
movie could have been better

8/5/5

Posted by KrackZaa on 07-24-2004 08:28 PM:

this movie was the biggest piece of shit ive seen in a long time. the movie was just plain awful, effects look so shitty, and halles not even playin herself half the time when shes flyin around haha, its some dude man that sucks bigtime. as for this release, theres some idiot in the way for a lil bit in the beginning, then theres the laughter and such, i heard some coughing too. video was pretty damn good, especially for the pre. too bad the movie ranks up there as one of the worst.

as a cam: 7.5/7

movie: 1

__________________
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
It's been so hard
but I can't let it die
Turn my head up,
looking at the stars
So many years,
I still wonder where you are?
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
Every day I ask myself why?
So much pain pouring
from inside
Above me I feel the spirit fly

Posted by AddNtoX on 07-24-2004 10:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by qubit
Pity he didn't spend a little more time trying to make more than a special effects extravaganza. Instead we get good actors not being allowed to act because of crappy direction. We see the Fellowship running across country, one stops briefly to say a stupid line, then runs some more. But what gets me the most is in the end of the third film where the camera pulls back and the hobbits look dwarfed by effects no better than the original King Kong. Clearly, someone was running out of time and imagination to allow that horrible scene. But, I'm done with this subject now. This ain't the place for it and I apoligize to the others who are here to talk about Cat Woman, a film for which at this time I have no opinion.

most of the world, the academy awards and numerous other ppl disagree with you, fellowship i do agree was a little stop start run, cut to panoramic ad nauseum, but to say the sfx are awful boggles my mind. Firstly it was a little NZ effects company that did this, not some ILM "we do this shit for breakfast" crew. Secondly the fight with the cave troll in FOTR is in my mind one of the single most impressive peices of action/CGI intergrated cinema i have ever seen. I dont think the effects were overdone or underdone, as for lacking imagination...imagine this..you have a budget ur making three movies back to back, studio takes risk and gambles on something that could ultimatly mean lights out. Well sorry if everything cant be PREFECT, do u have any idea how much sfx shots cost?? and the time it takes to produce them. it takes longer to do effects shots that it does to complete principal photography, 3 yrs in post production roughly for that movie.

now ur either one of those freaky tolkien purists, in which case there's no reasoning with you, ur bible is sacred and ur considerd hard line extremists.

Or u r just really over opinionated.

but so am i i guess, but calling someone a bofoon, err ok

A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again. - alexander pope

oh and to get on topic...this movie really really sucked major ass i watched 10 mins with the wife and thought fuck that and went n played far cry

Posted by qubit on 07-25-2004 03:13 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by joey_75051this looks good yadayadayada

anyway i dont know where to ask but
has VideoCD been busted?

I don't know if they got busted. I read in one of their last nfo files that they were going away for awhile, no reason given, but said they'd be back someday. Then I read in these forums that they lost their cammer, which, I guess, could mean somebody got busted, like say...oh...the cammer? I don't know, but I wish they'd come back soon.

__________________

Posted by deano21 on 07-25-2004 03:18 AM:

and wat nfo was this?

Posted by qubit on 07-25-2004 04:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by deano21
and wat nfo was this?

I don't remember, and maybe I'm mental and confusing them with another group's nfo that I read. Sorry to be misleading on that point - more I think about it, the more I'm thinking I was wrong about that one. Thanks for calling me on it. But, I do know that somewhere in these forums someone said they lost their cammer.

__________________

Posted by ElusiveHacker on 07-25-2004 07:48 AM:

decent video, sound is not to good
7/4/5

Posted by Stuart49 on 07-25-2004 06:39 PM:

Not bad picture but very squint and cropped with big heads popping up all over the place..Audio is pretty hollow but ok watchable if you want to see the film badly which I personally don't

Video 5
Audio 5
Movie ?

Posted by oppman29 on 07-25-2004 06:57 PM:

the movie is too dark, sounds is really bad, you can hear the people laughing on the background there is some heads at the beggining of the movie like first 10 minutes. The cam has the worse of angles. The movie doesnt suck as much as people say, i mean come on its a Woman super hero cut her some slack. My vote 3-3-6

Posted by [RaZoR] on 07-26-2004 02:17 PM:

cropped a lot but quite sharp and colorful picture
audio..well its a cam

6/6/ -

__________________
no idea

Posted by dummie on 07-27-2004 03:04 PM:

Hmm not so sure about this one, colours are good,movies mildly entertaining but the sound to me had way to much audience partisipation,got to piont where i coudnt tell if it was the crowd or the movie.
Still for a first it will do.

__________________
I,ll protect you from the hooded claw,and keep the vampires from your door.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Show all 60 posts from this thread on one page