VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Hollywood Homicide *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=21748)

mucho better than logistic, audio especially

8/8/? watch it tomorrow

__________________
Saving the world from danger with a piece of shit on my head.

not to metion logistic was 3cds
8/8

__________________

maybe a little better than logistic, but not better enough for a proper. i don't care if you're ctp or some other shit, if you release something that was released before and was decent/good, you release a dupe

if ctp really wants to play by the rules, they should have labelled it "internal" - it would have been spreading anyway

3 cd's down to 2... I'd say that's grounds for a legit release... but then again, I don't know anything.

well, that might be a good reason for proper, but it is sort of arrogant to just release something without "proper" in the tag (let alone the fact that nfo doesn't say anything either) - yes, ctp has defined the standards of svcd TS, but that doesn't mean they can do whatever they want and expect everybody to be happy

very legitimate release....... improperly tagged IMO shouldve been a proper....... but who the fuck am I?
but definitely nice rls...... CTP still owns you whores

__________________
Did you REALLY think we where gonna pay $7 for THIS????


you so nasty produktionz 2k3

according to the IRC chan (vcdq one) , it's the script that the site uses.. since it is the same title as the logistic release, it gets *DUPE* tag. I don't have any way of verifying this myself though, so some mod would have to speak up on the subject before we know for sure.

dupe Eh?

Dupe wtf does that mean either way ill get this rls ill get the vcdcen rugrats though its much better

when you say VCDCen, do you mean NOX? I'm not seeing a VCDCentral rls of Rugrats.. or maybe I'm just slow (which is often the case)

Let them call it dupe as long as it's not a nuke, hadn't gotten either release yet so now i'll get this one.

You right its nox whatever still better dont now why i thought vcdcentral

From the Sample - Nice Picture and Colors , Sounds great too. Picking er up now

8/8/?

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Movie sucks

i have to give it a 7-7-4, the movie sucks ass, but centropy always rocks, even if its a *Dupe*

this is a better release and it will be the one im watchin since i believe the last release was kinda crappy quality
video just doesnt seem as crips as last releases
7.5/8/

I just grabbed the sample. Overall good release. Very nice video - audio is really suberb. I don't see an angle on video. 7/8/?

John

very nice rls


8/8/7

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

Great picture!

But a DUPE?!
Oh well.... Logistic's release wasnt that bad but this sure as hell beats it by a mile. Good job I guess...

8/8/X

*From Sample*

Once again nice picture and sound CTP.Thats another film taken care of until a screener is about.
8/8/?

__________________

ok,

i may be drunk

but its no script, its staff going dupe

ctp rlsd a rls with same dir name as another grp = DUPE!

fucking noobs learn shit,

it may be better, if it was they should proper. id be fine with that

but npoooooooooo they thinkg there big shit so they dont need scneene tags,

quote:

---

very legitimate release....... improperly tagged IMO shouldve been a proper....... but who the fuck am I?
but definitely nice rls...... CTP still owns you whores

---

quote:

---

according to the IRC chan (vcdq one) , it's the script that the site uses.. since it is the same title as the logistic release, it gets *DUPE* tag. I don't have any way of verifying this myself though, so some mod would have to speak up on the subject before we know for sure.

---

8/8

hahaha Centropy got a nuke! nice..

8/7/?

Centropy - time to learn how to play the game right

quote:

---

Originally posted by master-drew
hahaha Centropy got a nuke! nice..

8/7/?

Centropy - time to learn how to play the game right

---

Is this a good recommended movie to watch?

Def better the logistic. I mean commonnn. Ctp rules as always. Just my opinion

8/8/7

sound is very clear, pic is a little flickering but overall better rls than logistic's and 2cd's, about the proper stuff.. they just feel they don't need that kinda tags cause much places have svcd.ts from ctp allowed or not anyways, those places will take a dupe cause it's almost always much better

7/8/?

nice rls... the colour is a bit faded... but the sound deffinitely makes up for it bigtime... keeep em' coming CTP
8.5/9/?

you could have labeled it Hollywood.Homicide.TS.SVCD-Centropy *NUKE* *DUPE* but as long as ctp releases it you know its not because of the quality it gets this tag. Maybe ctp should put proper or internal but their releases (until very recently with nox and pv and logistic) they have had little competition and they have constantly provided top quality ts's so they had little reason too. i doubt people will not spread this even if it was nuked so go ahead and nuke or dupe it if you must.

8/8

great job ctp two releases in one day keep it up!

twanBiz

8 / 8 / x

Jesus, I just can't see why CTP wouldn't label this a PROPER, or maybe even INTERNAL. When they broke the rules for SVCD TS's, I was pretty pleased with their experimentation. But seemingly intentionally fucking up something as simple as proper labeling just seems like a lack of respect to the other groups, who I might add are approaching CTP quality. Same goes for a few other recent CTP releases.

7.5/8/4

Like most of the other centropy releases recently it is technically a dupe, so it should be nuked.

It's up to sites to nuke it, not anyone in particular, so if sites wanna nuke it they can, but most will allow it, just caus it's centropy and they know it's in demand.

Centropy will be allowed on sites regardless of what they label their releases, but I do agree they should start labelling properly, just to avoid confusion.

omfg, another dupe by CTP, go figure, if they cant get their shit out fast enough, face the facts, twis what iNTERNAL is for, bout time i seen em get nuked.

As far as Hollywood Homicide goes 8/8/? Not their best work but still up to their standards :-)

Personally, I think CTP are making a statement...
that they dont give a shit about nukers and scene rules

i seem to recall they rlsd something with great quality and labaled it INTERNAL for no apparent reason, just for fun

im also pretty sure they said in their nfo somewhere something like nukers, nuke away.. etc

they simply dont care
they know they're the best in what they do, so why should they

would irc channels stop serving them because they broke some rules, even though their rls are the best ?

i dont think so..

thats my opinon, anyways..

8/8

ctp should label correctly

DL NOW JUST WATCHED SAMPLE LOOKS GREAT 7/7/8

next time lads BEFORE you vote
watch the full film ...

cos cd1 is totaly fucked at 30min into the film it breaks up
till the end of cd1

wheres the repack CTP?????????


6/6/*

lovely jubbly - just checked the quality and its the usual ctp vibe. Nice colours, pic & audio. Props on another great svcd.
8/7/?

this release is the best one out though it should be nuked. if ctp cant get it out fast enough then they should label it at least proper if not internal. if this was any other group with the same quality release (some groups are nearly up to par with ctp now anyway) it would have been nuked for being a dupe but oh well.

8/9/8 standard ctp release though it did seem a little pixelated

8/8/?

Centropy is just becoming snobish. It's as if they are worried about loosing their position in the VCD scene. Lots of groups are experimenting with SVCD TS's and producing very good results, many just as good as Centropy's. For centropy to release an SVCD TS after another group has, with no reason(proper, internal, etc) shows they have no respect for other groups, or the rules of the VCD scene. As of late I have lost my respect for Centropy. They are no longer bringing the best quality releases, but rather releasing pointlessly after other groups have released the same thing.

as i was reading through these posts venom_il basicliy said what
i was going to say. Centropy rules and alwasys has!
Further more ctp has been on top for i dont know how long and no group can touch their acomplishments.
i dont think that they care about scene rules,and as far as their releases are concned neither do i or any of the sites i patronize.
this release was substandard to a normal ctp rls.

actually this is very very nice. logistics was good, but this is much much better.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..

quote:

---

next time lads BEFORE you vote
watch the full film ...

cos cd1 is totaly fucked at 30min into the film it breaks up
till the end of cd1

---

__________________

y should it be a proper? i was under the impression it gets propered if another version is out that is the same (with something wrong i.e mono sound whatever) since log`s was 3 cd`s and the other was vcd there is no reason to proper.

and to everyone who keeps bitching everytime ctp release something, wots ur problem?
before they were very impressive, svcd ts the only group to release them, awesome quality - whats wrong with that?
now we have a few other groups venturing into it, but at the moment theres normally a few problems that need sorting out.untill thats done, and nox/log start releasing ctp quality releases, well, i dont know what to say, is it cos u want divx reencodes of ctp releases, but they dont release them as early as other groups or what?
i mean really think about it, most people prefer quality (i know i do) so u`d get the best version u can befor a dvd release is out.which is ctp. just deal with it.

as for release. best so far. recomended

Yeah, CTP sure is the best at what they do...

...filming a goddamn angle.

I'll take the logistic any day.

Seriously, though. Color, sharpness, audio is DEAD ON. Why can't they just fix one little thing.

And in response to the literally millions of SVCD TSs released for each individual movie, there's an old saying: "Do it once; do it right." Hopefully groups like VCDCentral, who are already very close, will overcome the other competition, so we won't have to suffer the torture of these angles.

6/9/2

7/8/9

Good movie to watch w/ the gf. Although cd1 has some problems, a repack would be nice, but not expected at all, we can live

not bad guys...a little dark..but i think its just my computer screen cause ever one i download is mad dark. Great Audio and Video looks good...keep it up. Maybe we could get a bad byz like this...

8-9-6

angle? granted i'm only flipping through the sample, but, i see no angle. another fine centropy release for another summer to fill the gap inbetween fall dvd screeners =)

yeah i dont know about the repack there buddy it definitely didnt mess up on my player, although for like 3 seconds in the middle of cd1 it does go a little dark and the sound goes too, but other than that right up to par with ctp. (after watchin full version)

movie was pretty good, not great, but decent.

quote:

---

Originally posted by thejackal2000
y should it be a proper? i was under the impression it gets propered if another version is out that is the same (with something wrong i.e mono sound whatever) since log`s was 3 cd`s and the other was vcd there is no reason to proper.

---

quote:

---

well, i dont know what to say, is it cos u want divx reencodes of ctp releases, but they dont release them as early as other groups or what?

---

quote:

---

i mean really think about it, most people prefer quality (i know i do) so u`d get the best version u can befor a dvd release is out.which is ctp. just deal with it.

---

I agree, much better than loGisTics.

8/8

Thanks again CTP..

very good, just saw it. gj ctp, still, next time lable it right. OBEY!!

9/9/7

good 7/7/7

Are you guys kidding me? CTP's last 3 releases have stunk including this release. CD1 looks damn good but when you pop in CD2 it's horrific! Dark, Red, Grainy!!! Sound is always top notch though 5/8/8, Seriously ppl... stop being fanboys and rate properly. I saw the same voting method with CTP's How to lose a guy in 10 days vs. DiAMOND's PROPER. How can a 2-pass 3CD x 74 minute get an extremely higher score than a 5-pass 2CD x 80 minute, it's not only about the bitrate ya know, motion compensation is in the amount of passes.

damn fine release

8/8/6

good enough, 8/7/6. if this was christmastime video would be a 7 but it's summer and releases are shitty so it's an 8. sound coulda been better centropy, but whatever.

hasnt anybody said anything about the scene where the screen goes green? for about 3 seconds, other than that nice release

not quite up to par with recent, but good none the less...

should be labeled internal, imo...def. not proper...

logistics was fine aside from 3 discs...

6/8/7

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kalpz
hasnt anybody said anything about the scene where the screen goes green? for about 3 seconds, other than that nice release

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tweezer


yeah i just watched the whole movie last night, came on here to post about that....For about 5-6 seconds on the first disk the screen just completely morphs to green, cant see a thing....and if i remember correctly audio goes out

---

7/6/6

Saw no green, just an encode breakup that could be the fault of the player. No chunk missing on mine, the opposite - there is (properly) a 10 second overlap from disc 2 disc. Sound was normalized at 20 over normal, prolley in response to the echo whiners. The normalize added distortion, but not too bad.

Camming was above average, but barely. WAY bloom on colors, oversaturated in post/encode, or from cheap cam (I'd guess the cam, because of the moderate parallax from the lens on it = cheap lens).

On a side note, and on the off chance that someone actually reads this far: Dear scene, can we PLEASE get back to 790-810K KB bins? You that push to get that extra 2.3% of bitrate are shutting out a LOT of people that have very fine old SCSI burners that they NEED for other purposes. These folks don't need a NEW burner if we could just get back to 800K KB bins again. In my case, I'd appreciate being able to burn cams(TS, whatever, it's ALL parallax city) to a CD-RW. There is no possible way I'd watch one of these twice, and why waste the plastic/create the garbage for a lousy 2.3%. Didn't intend a rant or a whine but...

anyway, decent rls - go state...

7/8/1

picture and sound were fine. very nice job! movie itself was AWEFUL! Harrilson Ford should be embarrassed to star in this one. Horrible storyline, horrible action, everything was bad..even the jokes. stay far away!!

mehh...I was expecting more, after reading the posts, and seeing the rateings(quality wise) but it is a ctp release and everyone kisses thier butts, so you cant really make a decision untill u watch it yourself...movie was entertaining, not worthey of a visit to the theater, thats forsure. 5/6/4