VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Fantastic Four *SVCD* - CAM - BaPH (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=64590)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

From the sample.

Video:7
Audio:7
Movie:?

Video is 7 for a cam!!! Blurry and a little pixelated but overall great for cam... also a little washed out


sound 6 for a cam very hollow but really alot of pic-up of the eq's


Movie 5


TWAT FACTOR is a 10+++++

idiot in the front left and his girl BOOOO!!!


it sucks

__________________
All my movies are burned using "PC Club" generic CD-R, and generic DVD-R disks. They are played on a AVAYON DXP1000 xvid/svcd/vcd/blah blah blah blah player...

good cam

video- 7
audio- 6(cam audio)
movie- will watch later

this is actually not bad! nice colour and fairly clear in the dark scenes.sound is tinny but clear, some audience noises though. I do think it needed to be svcd, or it would have suffered quite a bit.

7/7/?

__________________
just coz a guy got a library card dont make him yoda!!

Not to bad for a cam, color is ok but a tad blurry.

Few seconds at the begining where they look like they had to cover the cam.

Sound is good.

Waiting for the Italian xvid though.


5.5/7/?

__________________
---------------------------------------

watched a couple rars and movie seems fine. picture looks pretty decent and i havent noticed the Twat factor yet. Audio is hollow but the voices are easy to hear.

7/6.5/?

I decided to pass on this one.
This one is rated T for TWAT.
Definately interlaced. The lines are quite obvious, also pixelated and sounds hollow. The cammer coughs a few times and seems as if his clothes keeps rubing on the mic.
Will wait 4 better copy.


5/5/ Couldnt finish

__________________
I Still Think Michael Jackon is guilty



http://www.ircspider.com/content/081/thumb/3781.jpg

Excuse me I thought this was rather decent for first generation ... not out in UK till 22nd ... any foibles are quite excusable

video 6.50

audio 6.00

Film 7.00

Props to all

Washed out, blured, angled. Better wait for some thing else. 6.4/6.5/?? Here is the JPG sample.

http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/5377/f41it.jpg

Video: 6
Audio: 5
Movie: (Watching it right now..)

Props on the first release though

Typical cam

from sample

5/5/?

there are people walking through picture and a head in lower left of screen

Update:
watched whole thing and there are several places where you can't see anything due to someone standing right in front of cam these last 1-2 mins each

as stated by several others, is watchable if you can't wait on a ts or tc..not bad for a first rls

Pixelated, though was wondering how the quality of the theater release itself would be (haven't seen it yet)- heard the producers had a rush job.

Props for the fast release (!)

7/7/?

watched last night, gr8 for 1st release

6.5/6/8....awseom movie

typical cam pic (6-7)
Typical hollow sound (6)
The "You got served" of the year (2)

:Comment on release not speed of the post .P

Anywho, as it has been said not bad for a cam.

A bit blurred, some coughing, silhouettes of peeps standing up, but not bad for a cam.

7/7/9

I liked these kinds of movies so I'm a bit partial http://imageshark.ath.cx/0815/1382113489420bf3851d151.gif

good for a cam. The colors are a bit washed but other than that the picture is good. as expected the audio is hollow for a cam but not bad. haven't watched it all the way through so don't know about audience noises but I didn't hear any when I flipped through a few of the rars.


v-7
a-6
m-?

quote:

---

Originally posted by (_o_)
:Comment on release not speed of the post .P

Anywho, as it has been said not bad for a cam.

A bit blurred, some coughing, silhouettes of peeps standing up, but not bad for a cam.

7/7/9

I liked these kinds of movies so I'm a bit partial http://imageshark.ath.cx/0815/1382113489420bf3851d151.gif

---

Not bad at all for a cam..picture has good color...sound is ok...movie was decent..... 6.5/6/6.5

Quite Good

Take away a few trips to the bathroom and a cover the cam emergency moment very high Cam quality sound descent with minimal theater sound


v = cam 7
s = 6
m = 6 Introduction to the family Im surprised the sequel doesn't start next week.

For a cam:
V-7
A-6
M-6

The twat factor is very high in this. Seems like the camera had to be hidden for a while in the beginning, a few bathroom breaks, and the usher must have checked in because half the screen is covered for a few seconds about half way through. Actual video quality is pretty good for a cam. Audio is just ok, you can understand what is being said. Lot of coughing and mic-rubbing. Grab this if you can't wait, it gets the job done.

__________________
[ECHELON]

decent cam, picture a bit blurry and it does seem interlaced (but heh it's svcd it will probably look fine on my tv.) audio is typical. I've only watched the first disc but so far there hasn't really been any audience participation, although there is sound a couple times from the cammer moving around.

7/6/? - hopefully the second half is better then the first, but I'm not keeping my hopes up.

__________________
There is nothing to be afraid of.....except super aids

Just a follow-up: Movie was great! If i wasnt unemployed and broke with 2.00 left in my account, i would gladly go pay to see it.

from the sample...

picture: 7 ; kinda blury, but pretty good for a cam
audio: 6.5; coughing is kinda annoying, but decent

this had minimal theater sound and wasn't that bad...for cam audio it was real nice and clear..less hollow...

all the cam guys does is cough everyone once in a while and some f..king female keeps getting her dumb ass up a few times...overall its a great cam...

Video 7
audio 7 rated as cam its great audio..
Film 8 it was good and bad. Not enough action but enough story to build the characters up for the sequel.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...

grabbed sample (grabbing full movie) it took a while for a established viewer like blu-neo to post, i was d/ling b4 that but now i am assured its an OK rls at worst the sample (i no longer think thats ample enuff for sound) is good a great cam good color a slight bit saturated and blurry... but great none the less, the sound is good also, cam/ts is difficult nowadays, WOTW cam had better sound in some areas than the TS, i hope this is sorted out soon, if not i have a volume button

:ops cam rated as 7/8/??? to be edited soon enuff::

From full release:
Video - 6
I would've given it a 7 on just the picture aspect, but the fact that there's a few points where someone blocks some part of the picture made me go with 6 for video as an experience, as opposed to an aspect.

Audio - 4
Don't let the 4 mislead you, in the world of 'just cams', audio is very good, but I rate in an overall(or 'I want to convert this to DVD) aspect. Sound is a bit hollow, but not so bad that you must strain your ears. You can also hear some audience sounds in the parts I did listen to. It also seems to slip in/out of sync, but it could just be WMP, so when I see it converted, it may play just fine. I'll let you know if it IS an issue (unless someone else does first).

Movie - ???
Going to watch it in 2 more hours. If it's HALF as good as what everyone has hyped it up to be, it'll be the year's best.

outa curiosity what would u guys consider to be a 10 for a cam cuz I havent seen a seen a quality cam ever. Havent downloaded many of em, but i guess its all about the persons opinion. So what release in the past would u consider a 10 for a cam.

due to being a cam i would give this

6-v
6-a
?-m

can hear the guy clearing his throat in the sample, going to burn and watch on the tv tonight and see if it clears up the pixelation.

quote:

---

outa curiosity what would u guys consider to be a 10 for a cam cuz I havent seen a seen a quality cam ever. Havent downloaded many of em, but i guess its all about the persons opinion. So what release in the past would u consider a 10 for a cam

---

10 rated cams---- VideoCD after the re-encoding of DTS, only a few out there, napoleon dynamite is one... but me i dont care if TS and CAM... ppl say TS and cam video are the same... essentialy it is, but TS is mostly if not always above cam video... Video can reach 10, but sound... well this rls is dam good and for a cam.... but since the crackdown, ive noticed quite a few good cams, and the dts rendering being different, a quiet no laughing/coughing cam can sound better than the input jack for TS... sorry but alot of ts's recently just dont sound right

for the first release of this, nicely done. it is a cam and there are a few points when the screen is covered. all in all the audio isnt that bad. nice work.
video 6.0 for a cam
audio 5.0
movie 5.0 nice, but not up to the hype that is out there for this film.

5/5/5+

I give the movie a 5+ because jessica alba in a tight litle suit deserves a 5+.

bitrate is a mess for svcd 1hr 1st cd 37 mins second cd the ending is missing from it also, (the bit where u see d*****SPOILER REMOVED(muppet!)*****) shame really this silver was decent but wtf happened when these guys re-encoded it?

4/7/7

got this for my 4yr old son isn`t released here till the 22nd and he`s already collecting the toys from burger king (i love those double whoppers) i just didn`t enjoy the film i think i`m starting to get old, not bad for a cam , pity about the guy having to cover up the camera lens when ppl get up.

v/6
a/6
m/4

i give BaPH a 10 for stepping up and releasig this movie but i give this release a 6/6/5 would have been higher had it not been for the idiot and the girl constantly moving

Poor cam, don't know how on earth it's getting all these high ratings. Very washed out, not too sharp, audio is awful. It's watchable but I wouldn't call it enjoyable. On the plus side it doesn't seem overly cropped.

And will people please stop using the term "twat factor"... it's both annoying and idiotic.

This is the best CAM I've seen in a very long time. Blocking the camera under their bag for a few seconds a few times doesn't bother me at all, and the toilet visits isn't so disturbing either, overall very good cam.

Video: 7.5
Audio: 6
Movie: 8

Video = 5
Audio = 4
Movie = 6


Coughing and you can here the audience. There is a Spanish version with damn good video but the audio is Spanish.

__________________

nice for a cam

6/6/7

This is one very nice cam very watchable

so i will rate it as a cam and give it

8/7/5

very average comic turned film

from sample:
this is sort of the same quality as pot's batman begins cam, only higher res (svcd).

it has slightly washed out colors, some pixelation around the edges, head in bottom left corner, cam coverage at the start...the sound is also the same: slightly tinny, hollow with little echo, some audience participation..

overall im gonna get the xvid which is the audio from this mixed with the video from the near-tc quality spanish telesync. ive already seen the sample for that and it is amazing:

JPEG SAMPLE:
http://img306.imageshack.us/img306/...tic4xvid7bx.jpg

see how it looks alot better than this one?

so for this release overall,

6/6/yet to see

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr_Grinch
And will people please stop using the term "twat factor"... it's both annoying and idiotic.

---

7/7/8 just like everyones been saying, not perfect but a good cam- btw the movie was kinda lame (predictable) and the guy coughs in the sample i got... hahaaha


thanks prevail

Video-6
Audio-5
Movie-7
Very watchable cam,not too dark converted my copy to vcd and it looked pretty good props on the fast release.

from sample:

video: excellent compared to regular cams, slightly pixellated but no complaints 7.5/10

sound: excellent for a cam, not very hollow

7/10

movie: have yet to watch

7.5/7/x

Well, average quality for a cam.

V: 5 - Colors are good, but pic is not so sharp, really pixelated at some moments, and interlaced. Head on the left and people standing up are too much for me.

A: 6 - Sound seemed not always in sync, but acceptable. Noticeable coughing and laughing.

M: ? - Watchable if you're in a hurry, but I'll wait for another one.

(Sits back on the couch with my piece pipe).... Will wait this one out

:: Learn how to spell

__________________
Carpe Diem !

quote:

---

Originally posted by mattmatt02

overall im gonna get the xvid which is the audio from this mixed with the video from the near-tc quality spanish telesync. ive already seen the sample for that and it is amazing:

---

__________________
happy day

cartoon master
***************
sorry my English is bad ^-^

The TWAT FACTOR isnt that bad, i think i counted 2 TWATS in total.
Colours are very good for a cam and audio is very good for a cam also

And No Sir we wont stop the "TWAT FACTOR"

twat!

EDIT: i see a new one of this out, Fantastic.4.2005.PRoPeR.CAM.SVCD-PreVail
Reasion for Propper they say the Bitrate is better now?
Ive checked the sample and they must of picked a bad cut
as theres Twats Mumbling over the audio and the picture is Very Blured compaired to BaPH.
Ive yet to sample the Xvid, but by all accounts the Xvid looks the best.

__________________
*Meet the rest of the VCDQ Crew, HERE *

whoever is talking about getting the spanish xvid ur gonna be dissapointed m8 its missing footage

not bad for a cam!!!

v- 6.5 a lil washed out
a- 5 camer seems to cough & or keep bumpin into somthing
m- 8

could someone post a screen cap of the movie quality now seeing that its not being done by the site.

Very good for a cam. Surprisingly good for catching the action without alot of blur and pixelation, sound is typically hollow but can be adjusted. Rated as a cam . . .

8/7/7

__________________


Sexy, Dangerous, Seductive ... 3 top Q's

Typical CAM as usual although quite watchable, usual audience participation and the sound was not great but at least it is out early compared to the UK release.

Sound: 6

Video: 6

Overall: 8

I have a copy of Batman, Herbie FL, and now this Fant 4, all four have heads on the bottom left screen and this damn guy coughing. gets the job done but c'mon this guy needs to buy some Robitussen. 6/6/6

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mr_Grinch
Poor cam, don't know how on earth it's getting all these high ratings. Very washed out, not too sharp, audio is awful. It's watchable but I wouldn't call it enjoyable. On the plus side it doesn't seem overly cropped.

And will people please stop using the term "twat factor"... it's both annoying and idiotic.

---

Not bad...average cam, pic is a little better than usual though...

It is missing the ending though...

6/6/9

Would be higher but the end is cut out...sad part is, the guy keeps rolling but doesn't get it...

__________________
"Girls kick ass...it says so on the T-Shirt."
-Max

"There are those who said this day would never come...what are they to say now?"

6/6/0

such a bad movie, the story sucked soooooooo much and the fight (not fights) was rubbish.

Re: Quite Good

quote:

---

Originally posted by bigbug41
Take away a few trips to the bathroom and a cover the cam emergency moment very high Cam quality sound descent with minimal theater sound


v = cam 7
s = 6
m = 6 Introduction to the family Im surprised the sequel doesn't start next week.

---

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY

Very good first released,still enjoyed it even though people kept walking across line of sight.sound a wee dull in places,but overall a good effort.

not a bad cam. decent until something better comes along.

6/5/7

I'm kind of a comic book purist so anytime studios muck around with the original storyline I consider it a mistake on their part. I found it pretty corny aside from a couple of "ok" video fx. Didn't seem like they chose the right actors for the parts with the exception of the "Thing" character. Jessica Alba's nice eye candy but not credible as a nerdy chick. Take your kids but leave the high expectations at home.

not too bad a version, 6.5/6.5/6.5