VCDQuality Forums
Show all 71 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- I Robot *PROPER* - TELESYNC - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=44634)


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-17-2004 11:22 AM:

Certainly doesn't look like a VHS screener!

Audio is a bit quiet, video is a bit blurry and flickery. But best out i guess.

Personally i don't care. Movie looks like balls.

6/8


Posted by warhead1999 on 07-17-2004 11:25 AM:

Based on sample looks a nice copy, a little dark and the contrast is flickering a little, audio sounds very nice !

6/7/0


Posted by AddNtoX on 07-17-2004 11:28 AM:

audio is fine its normalised to 0db...some deaf cunts on here lol. GJ pot nice TS


Posted by vip3r on 07-17-2004 11:29 AM:

It's not all that bad .. i definately agree with the nfo POT .. Quality def. isn't like a vhs screener (as stated above), Audio is pretty damn good - but i'll wait for a better release. As for the movie, i saw it hours upon hours ago at the theater, and i really enjoyed it.

6/7.5/8


Posted by CANES1 on 07-17-2004 11:41 AM:

quote:
So unfortunately we we're forced to mark the DTS


I'm just curious. What would those marks look like?


Posted by Debo on 07-17-2004 12:10 PM:

looks alright
5/7
hope a better one will surface

__________________


Posted by deano21 on 07-17-2004 01:51 PM:

Hey ive been waiting to see this for ages what do u think get this release or wait to see if videoCD do a realease!! very good tho pot thanks will grab this


Posted by huggy on 07-17-2004 01:51 PM:

watchable judging by the sample but ill wait a few days till better comes along. good effort though

__________________
your never alone with Schizophrenia


Posted by lickmyzack on 07-17-2004 02:32 PM:

have only caught sample so far...
7/8/?

Not much better than the quality for King Arthur.....

LMZ


Posted by Movie_Insider on 07-17-2004 02:47 PM:

Thumbs up

GOOD JOB POT LOOKS PRETTY GOOD FOR A CAM AND VERY NICE SOUND YOU GUYS ARE STARTING TO TAKE OVER FIRST TO RLS A NEW MOVIE AND YOU SEEM TO BE THE ONLY GROUP LEFT TO BE DOING ALL THE RLS'S GREAT JOB 7/7/? HAVE NOT WATCH THE WHOLE THING YET WILL RE-POST AFTER I AM DONE.


Posted by vip3r on 07-17-2004 02:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by lickmyzack
WTF does it matter.. it's free!!!!!!!!!!



My god, he was ASKING not COMPLAINING

quote:
Originally posted by deano21
Hey ive been waiting to see this for ages what do u think get this release or wait to see if videoCD do a realease?


And to clarify this, .. by now you should all know that VideoCD lost their cammer, so no they won't be doing anymore TS - but you could hope for a better one, or not be cheap and see it at the theater.


Posted by Pickles on 07-17-2004 03:48 PM:

I liked this movie. Saw it in the theatres. Audio on this release is fine on my pc and dvd player not quiet at all. Videos is a tad blurry for my likings but it's watchable. I grabbed this one but I think I will wait on dvdr or a tc for the keeper.
*note* If one arrives.
Audio 7
Video 6.5 A bit blurry
Movie 8 Kicked ass


Posted by Miller on 07-17-2004 04:40 PM:

better then FRA's miss labled cam. audio is DTS so nothing to complain about. video is good to a little dark but thats about it
movie is wicked going to watch the other half tonight!!

7/9/8

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by bryehn on 07-17-2004 04:43 PM:

quote:

And to clarify this, .. by now you should all know that VideoCD lost their cammer, so no they won't be doing anymore TS




you're a tard. plain and simple. tard.

this release is aiigt by me...POT's pretty good at this TS shit, and i couldn't think of a better movie for saturday morn.

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?


Posted by vip3r on 07-17-2004 05:07 PM:

Enlighten me more


Posted by weedmonsta on 07-17-2004 05:42 PM:

I have downloaded this 2 times from 2 differnet places and CD1 go's out of sync by about a second 15 mins into the movie, it stays like this for a few mins.

If its just me il rate on what i have seen so far, 4/7/?

__________________
Ding Dong


Posted by EViL-EWoK on 07-17-2004 06:08 PM:

certainly the better copy out as of now.
movie looks pretty good. but its not the same to the book. but the again they gotta change some stufff

7/8/?

Good job POT, keep up the amazing work

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.


Posted by snozzler29 on 07-17-2004 06:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
My god, he was ASKING not COMPLAINING



And to clarify this, .. by now you should all know that VideoCD lost their cammer, so no they won't be doing anymore TS - but you could hope for a better one, or not be cheap and see it at the theater.




dont you just hate it when you put somthing down and cant remember where you put it

video 4

audo 6

movie 7

the video quality is like others have said " watchable" but a speedy release for those who arnt fussy about what they waste cds or dvdrs on

also noticed a bit of out of syncness but nothing real bad from what i could tell when skipping through the movie


Posted by neatz on 07-17-2004 06:41 PM:

dam if they didnt use the silvers for the pic

__________________
why bitch about the cost just switch to dvd-r "dam-it"


Posted by Korps on 07-17-2004 07:33 PM:

How Did The Tag The Audio?

Shoutouts? Please Enlighten Me.

I'll give ratings when a sample has been seen.

__________________
- Korps^


Posted by neatz on 07-17-2004 07:54 PM:

probly a fast beep or hiss or added efect :P

__________________
why bitch about the cost just switch to dvd-r "dam-it"


Posted by Air1 on 07-17-2004 08:10 PM:

judging from sample...


picture is way too blurry to compare to a VHS screener like in their nfo, but no i'm not bitchin. it's a little dark, too, though that's forgiving if they could have just made it alot sharper. anyhow not bad at all for saturday morning. i dislike will smith though am eager to see the movie but i'll wait for a better release.

video: 7
audio 8


Posted by ForumLamer on 07-17-2004 08:27 PM:

Yeah I saw this movie in theatre's to.... makes a huge difference actually going to watch them, instead of watching this releases.... but hey it saves alot of money and time to go see shit....

I've been watching them for a quite a while, and all the hi-fi retards don't understand how I can watch the shit... oh well... I am getting this one because I enjoyed the movie and want to view it again....


Posted by ShinBone on 07-17-2004 09:02 PM:

6/7

lacking sharpness, too much cut off on the side. pretty decent. thanks pot.


Posted by UltrA1 on 07-17-2004 09:05 PM:

Ok POT you did it in Dts audio the sound is good..Thx
the out of sync or blank spots are a drag, but only happends 2 times from my dl...for audio
as for video, it's a camera all TS and cams, are from cameras,
that way so stop bitchn....NUKERS..
Try getting the higest end camera there is.. find some rich kid to help. and rels a TS w/ dts, see if they want to steal the audio then? maybe too do a avi lol.....

seen movie in the Ultra screen looked blury on that too but over all the film was good
2 Soda's $7.00
1Lg Popcorn $6.00
2 tickets 16.00
total $29.00

sound 7.0 dts good enugh to dl FREE
video not like a screener in anyway....
video 6.5 good enugh to dl FREE
movie 8.0 way good enugh to take up a few hrs..
peace


Posted by razzy on 07-17-2004 09:54 PM:

Stupid Idiot Talking Shit

What an idiot


And to clarify this, .. by now you should all know that VideoCD lost their cammer, so no they won't be doing anymore TS - but you could hope for a better one, or not be cheap and see it at the theater. [/B][/QUOTE]


DUMB DUMB DUMB


Posted by Tork on 07-17-2004 10:05 PM:

6.5/7/Still watching.

Anyways very watchable, thanks POT !


Posted by brr8760 on 07-17-2004 10:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
And to clarify this, .. by now you should all know that VideoCD lost their cammer, so no they won't be doing anymore TS - but you could hope for a better one, or not be cheap and see it at the theater.
Do you KNOW this for a fact, or are you assuming that because they didn't put out an Anchorman or King Arthur (yawn), that they lost their "cammer"?


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-17-2004 10:13 PM:

not sure about the rest of you..but I thought even with the issues that the FRA release had a much better pic. This pic is pixelated to hell. I just got through watching the whole thing, and too much camera movement. And my God the people walking through the picture is out of hand. Constant shadows and its watchable but unenjoyable with all the distractions..

4/8/9

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by GloCK|40 on 07-17-2004 10:21 PM:

Thumbs up

6/8/8


Good Job POT!! Not too bad at all. The pic could prolly be better but the audio is excellent. I noticed a bit of sync probs but not bad. Thanks for this Awesome release POT! Keep It UP

__________________
LoCKeD aNd LoaDeD


Posted by Debo on 07-17-2004 10:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
not sure about the rest of you..but I thought even with the issues that the FRA release had a much better pic.4/8/9

ya the pic on the rfa release is much better

__________________


Posted by XxHyDrOxX on 07-17-2004 10:53 PM:

agreed fra release was better....get the repack. if already download pots version, that will do you fine til screener. 6/7/8 for POT. THANKS :-D


Posted by Sig-Bro on 07-17-2004 10:57 PM:

In Regards to the whole 'VideoCD Lost their cammer' comment, I am not certain if they did or did not, but someone else commented on people assuming this because they did not release Anchorman yet. Well, if my facts are correct, I believe VideoCD is based out of Quebec, and in Quebec some movies aren't released until the week after they are in the U.S. I know that Anchorman was not released until the 16th in Quebec. Past releases that have been postponed by VideoCd which seem to be because of different release dates include The Terminal and White Chicks. There is a possibility that they did lose their cammer, who knows? But I would have to say they didn't release anything in the past week because of different release dates for English / French.

Enough about that, This release is good for now, DTS sound is great. Video is definetely watchable.

Video: 6.5
Audio: 8
Movie: 8

__________________
With Me And Kitties It's Like That Book 'Cather In The Rye'. I'm Kinda Like The Guy Who Looks Out For All The Kitties In The Park. Otherwise There'd Be Nobody To Look After Them. This Cacksucker Right Here, I Found Him In A Storm Drain!
---Bubbles---


Posted by Pickles on 07-17-2004 11:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
I thought even with the issues that the FRA release had a much better pic. I just got through watching the whole thing, and too much camera movement. And my God the people walking through the picture is out of hand.


I always respect the people who deserve it. By NO means take this the wrong way, but I saw only One person get up during the whole movie and he did it twice. I have access to the FRA rls so maybe I will download it to see if it has a better picture. I don't really like to judge by samples. I also did not see the camera moving as you stated. Sorry NEO I just didn't see some of that stuff. Very decent and YES that guy does get up twice and it is annoying but remember folks it is a CAM.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-17-2004 11:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PhreaK
I always respect the people who deserve it. By NO means take this the wrong way, but I saw only One person get up during the whole movie and he did it twice. I have access to the FRA rls so maybe I will download it to see if it has a better picture. I don't really like to judge by samples. I also did not see the camera moving as you stated. Sorry NEO I just didn't see some of that stuff. Very decent and YES that guy does get up twice and it is annoying but remember folks it is a CAM.


Oh you forgot to mention the fact of the shadow covering the left side of the screen numerous times, and don't for on cd2 the lady head stick up bottom right corner..like she's sitting right in front of the camera too up about 25 percent of that side. There were more than just that guy. And I know your right. But alot of us have been knocking Fra on there releases in this case. The FRA is better and everyone just came and jumped on this forum just because it said PROPER and it has dts audio..but overall the pic has always been a big factor. No doubt its watchable. But even with out the audience interference the pic just isn't up to the FRA release quality. And the sound in the FRa wasn't bad in no way.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Jazzmo on 07-18-2004 12:36 AM:

First off the guy must have D,T's as its shaking all over
pixelated rather bad,, but the sound is good,(well i thought so)
aint watched the full movie yet...
think ill wait 4 another ..rls..(dont wanna spoil the film)as it looks good on the trailers

video 4
audio 7
movie ?


Posted by outside_ag on 07-18-2004 01:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jazzmo
the guy must have D,T's as its shaking all over

LOL. That is hillarious.

I've only watched the sample, and I got the same impression as everyone else. Audio is great, video is tolerable at best.


Posted by Pickles on 07-18-2004 01:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
Oh you forgot to mention the fact of the shadow covering the left side of the screen numerous times, and don't for on cd2 the lady head stick up bottom right corner..like she's sitting right in front of the camera too up about 25 percent of that side. There were more than just that guy. And I know your right. But alot of us have been knocking Fra on there releases in this case. The FRA is better and everyone just came and jumped on this forum just because it said PROPER and it has dts audio..but overall the pic has always been a big factor. No doubt its watchable. But even with out the audience interference the pic just isn't up to the FRA release quality. And the sound in the FRa wasn't bad in no way.


Ok m8 you win. But it isn't worth dl'ing another cam when I have seen it 3 times now just to compare. I did not jump on this forum b/c of it being labeled "proper" though.

Peace


Posted by Heph on 07-18-2004 01:30 AM:

7/7/9

Better late than never as long as it isn't your
mistress .. hehe

Ok cam again POT

__________________
Heph (Hephaestus)


Posted by AddNtoX on 07-18-2004 02:01 AM:

why do ppl keep saying its a CAm, a CAm = a can with cam audio...as ts = a cam with direct or DTS ripped audio.


Posted by Jazzmo on 07-18-2004 02:26 AM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by outside_ag
[B]LOL. That is hillarious.

lol m8 if u watch the first 5 mins its all over the place... and also through the movie (he must b trying 2 dodge the idiots that are poping up now and again)

watched the movie now.. pritty good
just wait 4 a better rls ....

i know it wont be long


Posted by Rezneck on 07-18-2004 03:07 AM:

Average rls imo.

6/6/7

btw you guys shouldn't talk about scene bs on here


Posted by Redemption198 on 07-18-2004 04:03 AM:

I agree its average, picture is pretty poor, watchable though, but its too shaky and grainy at times

Sound isn't as great as everyone is making either, (and i wish people wouldn't refer to it as DTS sound, its mp2 from DTS source)
Theres a buzzing at times and it doesn't do my DPL2 system any favours.

6/7/?


Posted by dc_man on 07-18-2004 04:11 AM:

Movie was decent...

7/7/7

__________________
My sig worked, It's back.


Posted by DIVX~KVCD~SVC on 07-18-2004 04:54 AM:

Talking

great job pot now you should take a bow.

8/8/8/

thanks keep it up


Posted by dwayne on 07-18-2004 06:39 AM:

well i say

What’s the deal with the shaking I just watched it and is it me or did the screen shake the whole time???.... and the pixilation made the movie on the boarder line of not watch able I would stick with the FRA release its much darker but its very clear for a cam and the hiss in the audio goes away if you mess with the treble level


Posted by fkngrvn on 07-18-2004 07:01 AM:

This is decent for a VCD release. The audio is quite, needed to crank the volume, but the quality is great. Audio does go out of sync for about 5 minutes or so, in the middle of CD1, then comes back in. Saw this on the big screen, it lacked a little detail there too.

Heads and people, in a theatre imagine that. There aren't many releases that don't have a person's head in it. But anything is better than Cold Creek Manor, where you can hear the camera dude munching on pop corn.

To my eyes, and on my TV, I perfered this release compared to the FRA release. They are both VCDs, and the quality fits accordingly, just the FRA has nasty audio.

6/8/8 Good movie.


Posted by ElusiveHacker on 07-18-2004 08:22 AM:

alright just watched this... great movie ... must kill the ROBOTS!

picture was so-so... but ok

7/8/9.5

One of the Top Movies i've saw this summer ... Going to see this in Threatres when i get back from a trip next week


Posted by Darkness on 07-18-2004 08:46 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by fkngrvn
To my eyes, and on my TV, I perfered this release compared to the FRA release.


Indeed.. Was VERY watchable.. Can see everything fine, isnt too dark like some people are saying..

And the walking in front on the camera only happenes twice through the whole movie for like a second or two each time..

And I didnt even notice the shaking.

7/8/8


Posted by slaz on 07-18-2004 09:06 AM:

just got done watching this....

video is grainey and zoomed in - but watchable by all means

audio is perfect

movie was really good!


7/10/9


some guy with a cap on gets up and goes somewhere twice in this movie..... bit of a pain but that whats you get Just made the experience a little more authentic and like being in a cinema

__________________
[3:57am] <@mystic-s> every person in the usa is gay and loves men. they also like putting bicycles up their bottom <--- hehehehe


Posted by duomo on 07-18-2004 09:43 AM:

6/8/7

The video is definitely watchably, but certainly not terrific even for a TS.

The audio is excellent, I hope this kind of quality continues.

I just finished watching the movie. For a summer blockbuster popcorn flick it can't be beat. I wish it had stopped to be a little more contemplative at times, there were hints, but not enough to create real depth.

Anyway, it was an enjoyable experience all around.

p.s. Get down in front!

__________________


Posted by ou812 on 07-18-2004 11:12 AM:

2 Headshots (1 during the ending)
3 walk-bys, from the same guy with the ballcap and mustache

Other then that, its a decent watch. I liked the movie.


Posted by lickmyzack on 07-18-2004 11:13 AM:

Ummm... am I the only one that noticed this????

BOTH RELEASES ARE FROM THE SAME SOURCE!!

If you compare the fra and pot releases.. they are the same video source.... just that pot used something like tmpenc to either zoom in or stretch the top and bottom ... if you look at both.. in the scene where he tackles the robot about 7:55 into the movie you will notice someones head.. with curly hair on the right (your right) side of the screen.... it's there in both releases.. and I am 100% positive they are from the same silver source.. just pot got hold of the dts discs.. to resync the audio....... the picture on fra is 10 times better than pot... probably because they trashed the video quality by stretching it out.. either trying to cut out some of the heads.. or trying to make people think they had their own video source as well............

But aren't they the ones bitching in their nfo that some "elite" group was gonna strip their dts audio and use it for their own release???????? hmmm..........

After watching both releases.. i'm revising my rating........

POT=
6 video
9 Audio (sync issues stopped it from a 10)
10 movie.... it kicked ass..... one of my fav's for the year.

FRA =
8 video (much better than pot)
7 audio (released as a cam.. but the audio is direct so it
should be a telesync.. but to shut up the whiners
they only claimed it as a cam, yes it's direct.. you can hear the cammer fool with the audio jack a few times.. background hiss because it's not a great connection... but a few years ago this would have been top notch and received much higher ratings)
10 movie


Posted by firefighter on 07-18-2004 11:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by lickmyzack
Ummm... am I the only one that noticed this????

BOTH RELEASES ARE FROM THE SAME SOURCE!!

If you compare the fra and pot releases.. they are the same video source.... just that pot used something like tmpenc to either zoom in or stretch the top and bottom ... if you look at both.. in the scene where he tackles the robot about 7:55 into the movie you will notice someones head.. with curly hair on the right (your right) side of the screen.... it's there in both releases.. and I am 100% positive they are from the same silver source.. just pot got hold of the dts discs.. to resync the audio....... the picture on fra is 10 times better than pot... probably because they trashed the video quality by stretching it out.. either trying to cut out some of the heads.. or trying to make people think they had their own video source as well............

But aren't they the ones bitching in their nfo that some "elite" group was gonna strip their dts audio and use it for their own release???????? hmmm..........



Are you basically accusing POT of "stealing" FRA's video and screwing up the picture to make it look like their own source? If so POT released 1 hour after FRA and there is no possible way they could have downloaded FRA's copy > encode > merge DTS > pack > upload to all sites > pre within an hour period. Same silver source mabey. re-encode i highly doubt it. I watched a bit of FRA's CAM also and yes they labled right as a CAM , not only did you have the hiss to the audio but the echo of the theater POT's copy even though the sound was excellent still a bit blurry for my liking and yet to see the movie.

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by AddNtoX on 07-18-2004 11:38 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by lickmyzack
Ummm... am I the only one that noticed this????

BOTH RELEASES ARE FROM THE SAME SOURCE!!

If you compare the fra and pot releases.. they are the same video source.... just that pot used something like tmpenc to either zoom in or stretch the top and bottom ... if you look at both.. in the scene where he tackles the robot about 7:55 into the movie you will notice someones head.. with curly hair on the right (your right) side of the screen.... it's there in both releases.. and I am 100% positive they are from the same silver source.. just pot got hold of the dts discs.. to resync the audio....... the picture on fra is 10 times better than pot... probably because they trashed the video quality by stretching it out.. either trying to cut out some of the heads.. or trying to make people think they had their own video source as well............

But aren't they the ones bitching in their nfo that some "elite" group was gonna strip their dts audio and use it for their own release???????? hmmm..........

After watching both releases.. i'm revising my rating........

POT=
6 video
9 Audio (sync issues stopped it from a 10)
10 movie.... it kicked ass..... one of my fav's for the year.

FRA =
8 video (much better than pot)
7 audio (released as a cam.. but the audio is direct so it
should be a telesync.. but to shut up the whiners
they only claimed it as a cam, yes it's direct.. you can hear the cammer fool with the audio jack a few times.. background hiss because it's not a great connection... but a few years ago this would have been top notch and received much higher ratings)
10 movie



alot of grps get the same silver.....what pot as refering to was a grp was blatantly gonna strip the sound, which is just fucked up. Anyone can buy this video scource in NYC for $10 so pls stfu and stop trying to talk like u know what ur talking about :s Pot rls was brighter than FRA....pots internal svcd telesync looks like a good improvment tho


Posted by -Jenix- on 07-18-2004 01:01 PM:

just checked this out definately not the blockbuster I'd thought it'd be but its good nonetheless.


Video-6.5
Theres a few dark scenes where you cannot see exactly what your seeing but you make it out.
Audio-7 volume's a little low, dont hear any hiss or anything so good
Movie-8.5 - few twists but still pretty solid sci-fi storyline.

my first review...of many hopefully.


Posted by vinnyv07 on 07-18-2004 01:50 PM:

Watched this one last night. Very watchable on my TV. Picture was a little grainy but I think this is a great release so early on. Video was grainy but very watchable....sound was excellent once you turned it up a bit. Good summer action movie also. 6/8/8 ...nice job POT keep up the good work. Thank you.


Posted by Enzomatrx on 07-18-2004 03:36 PM:

I just watched this via the XBox, streamed to TV and must say it was highly watchable. I did not miss a line due to the audio being really great, and while the picture was a little blurry (only slightly) and the part used for the sample shows the most camera movement of the whole movie (weird choice for the sample with that fact), I did not miss one detail, even in all of the action scenes (and the tunnel sequence with a bad copy could easily be enough of a scene to judge the release on).

Considering the roadshow for myself in Japan doesn't happen until Sept. 18 (http://www.foxjapan.com/movies/irobot/), this was a great way to spend a Sunday night.

Thanks POT for a great, highly watchable release that I can eventually ask a nice, cute Japanese person to in two months

For TS: 7.5/9/9 (I really enjoyed the movie... maybe because I love the genre of 'dammit I'm right and everyone else is a fucking idiot', and Will Smith did pull it off nicely)

Also, as a movie, the CG was perfectly melded. The robots could have been stand-ins, you wouldn't know. Nothing overdone (except maybe near the end final battle with the climbing... no spoilers there)... and I never read the book so I can't do that kind of argument.


Posted by lickmyzack on 07-18-2004 05:48 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by AddNtoX
so pls stfu and stop trying to talk like u know what ur talking about


Buddy.. i've been watching boots since you were in diapers... and I do know what i'm talking about.

I never said they stole anyones shit....... just altered the same video source (silver) ALOT (in a bad way mind you) so that peeps wouldn't think it was the same video source...... that's the only explanation I can think of as to why they took a good video source and fucked it up.. when it was much better in it's original form... you can brighten.. add color... ect ect without stretching out the video to look like shit.

And firefighter.. just because an audio track has a hiss to it doesn't in anyway mean it is not direct...... it is direct.. i've watched both releases... it's just not a great direct connection.

but irregardless there's another pot version out now...... supposedly a bit better.. so let's get to dl'ing and check it out :-)

LMZ


Posted by zak on 07-18-2004 08:52 PM:

Bitchin....

Great pic, decent audio, tho i found myself with the remote in hand, cranking it for conversations and turning it down for action.. Other than that... bitchin.


8/6/7

__________________
-zak
Is that skeet on ur pants?


Posted by Oglethorpe on 07-18-2004 10:56 PM:

Sample was quiet. Colors a little washy.

I like how people say decent and rate it all 7's.

sample - 5.5/7/?

You can do better on the pic qual.

*update*
overall 6/9/9

watchable, set my watch and warrant on it.
love the sound, good flick too... and im a skeptic.

__________________
fuckinggoogleit.com
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
-George Bernard Shaw
I like proof!


Posted by corvex on 07-19-2004 01:24 AM:

watchable...not best rls...video is blotchy, audio sounds hissy a bit

7/7/?

__________________
eat, live , breathe : VCD


Posted by nitemare on 07-19-2004 04:57 AM:

7/8/9

Picture-- Perfectly watcheable...Not many colors, yes grainy...but does not effect the viewing at all.. Pleasantly suprised of how good it was.. Only 1person stood up (twice)..

Sound --Great..Surround sound kicking in..

Movie - Well above average..Great story, great acting, and ROBOTS!! What more can u want!! Go see this release!!

Thanks POT for a superb release!!


Posted by ZootedLooter on 07-19-2004 05:14 AM:

dick in a hat alert
4X across the screen

wish these guys woulda posted that in thier nfo

looter

__________________
zooted adj : 1. under influence of drugs: relaxed, excited, or euphoric from taking illegal drugs, especially marijuana ( slang ) 2. intoxicated: very intoxicated ( informal )
looter n. : someone who takes spoils or plunder (as in war) [syn: plunderer, pillager, spoiler, despoiler, raider, freebooter]



Posted by Pickles on 07-19-2004 06:40 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nitemare
.. Pleasantly suprised of how good it was.. Only 1person stood up (twice)..


Hmmm seems I said that and was flamed hard for it. Maybe not such the retard after all.


Posted by SNooF671 on 07-19-2004 08:21 AM:

i watched this whole release, picture is fine, audio is fine, movie was pretty good to

colour is a little grainy and blotchy, better than the svcd release, dam thats just crap

6/8/7


Posted by spazmeat on 07-19-2004 08:29 AM:

video: 7.5
audio: 8.5
movie: 10


right after i finished getting this rls the svcd was rlsed. i was mad, but did not feel like waiting to watch. i ended up very happy with this rls. it cleans up nice on a tv.

i did not think this movie would be that good, but ending up enjoying it (A LOT)

i suggest either of pots version as they both seem fine.

__________________
~morning glory dreams~


Posted by BiggD23 on 07-19-2004 01:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by lickmyzack
but irregardless there's another pot version out now......


lmao...irregardless.


Posted by ZootedLooter on 07-19-2004 09:29 PM:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nitemare
.. Pleasantly suprised of how good it was.. Only 1person stood up (twice)..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by PhreaK

Hmmm seems I said that and was flamed hard for it. Maybe not such the retard after all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


fuck em........there should be a post about that in every TS with an audience fuck up....thats the only thing i cant stand about TSs.....fuckin people......
and the way these guys rip shit to shreds about stupid shit like pixilation and grainyness....they should just keep thier mouths shut abaout other peoples pickiness....

my request to you guys left reading this thread is please post a crowd shot if you see one

and if this request pisses you off.......tough fuckin luck......people do want to know

looter

__________________
zooted adj : 1. under influence of drugs: relaxed, excited, or euphoric from taking illegal drugs, especially marijuana ( slang ) 2. intoxicated: very intoxicated ( informal )
looter n. : someone who takes spoils or plunder (as in war) [syn: plunderer, pillager, spoiler, despoiler, raider, freebooter]



Posted by Stuart49 on 07-21-2004 09:09 AM:

Audio was a bit quiet and apart from peoples heads on the screen at the start,end and during the film this release was not too bad....

Video 6
Audio 5
Movie ?


Posted by akasmiler on 07-21-2004 11:08 PM:

just watched this so thought i'd gie my reports

7/5/9

the picture was a bit off but not bad - not the best rls i'e seen all round but the best rls of this film

the sound was quality although had to turn my volume right up - it was far too low for y liking

as for the film - well what can i say, quality, loved it


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.
Show all 71 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.