VCDQuality Forums
Show all 77 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Halloween: Resurrection - SCREENER - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4775)


Posted by stuckx on 07-10-2002 03:45 PM:

woah

woah, a pre-release-screener..
l33t
congrats FTF

I Hope nobody will release a TS PROPER lol


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-10-2002 06:16 PM:

Judging solely on the sample mpeg, the colors and clearness could have been better for a scr, regardless, this is still better than a having a shitty pre ts

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by krazyfoo on 07-10-2002 06:16 PM:

quality.. sucks. but thats ok.. its a LAME movie.
reality tv + michael meyers.. wooo scary.

damn first time i ever noticed the irc add in their nfo. lame.


Posted by Swimj on 07-10-2002 06:20 PM:

Seriously SHut the Fuck up Flammers

If it wasnt for groups like ftf, where would get pre movies, yes the quality isnt great but i shapped it up, u can get it almost to vhs quality if u mess with it, good work ftf just a little fast, maybe next time, sound is a little scratchy to but can be fixed!


Posted by PenisXX on 07-10-2002 07:10 PM:

yeah, after reencoding this pile of blurry, blocky asf-like-mess it really looks like a dvdrip, amazing.


Posted by toohey on 07-10-2002 07:26 PM:

penis, wat app did u used to fix it??


Posted by neoparadox on 07-10-2002 07:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PenisXX
yeah, after reencoding this pile of blurry, blocky asf-like-mess it really looks like a dvdrip, amazing.

He was being sarcastic..


Posted by RayTraCeR on 07-10-2002 07:41 PM:

Well I got the release looks quite watchable to me!! Sound is decent .. However based on the fact its a screener I guess I will have to agree the quality is not up to that par. (screener)

BUT as far as watchable, oh yeah especially for someone like me who REALLY wants to see it .. i give it a 6.5 for video based on TS standards but I am sure once on the television screen should be good to go !

Props to FTF, thanks for the pre-release!


-RayTraCeR


Posted by Surtes on 07-10-2002 08:09 PM:

This is a mislabeled TS, NOT a fucking screener. Damn why do groups mislabel their rls ... groups should get scene banned for mislabeling their stuff. This rls got nuked on my sites


Posted by Ferret44 on 07-10-2002 08:21 PM:

How come the NFO & IMDB say the running time is 94 mins, yet when downloaded the film is only 76 mins...............

Otherwise nice release picture, quality is good but shame about the sound.


Posted by MovieGod on 07-10-2002 10:19 PM:

Props to FTF for this early release...well done.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





Posted by rappa on 07-10-2002 10:31 PM:

its a workprint..plain and simple, workprint quality and all and the time of the movie is shorter then it is in theatres so its more then def a workprint.


Posted by Skippy_2002ca on 07-10-2002 10:45 PM:

Thanks

Cut back On the Credits And There U go this IS a nice Realse Ftf I have always Been A fan OF the Halloween Series Except Part 3 U all Catch me There Thanks For this Wounderfull Realse Ftf

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol


Posted by Sig-Bro on 07-10-2002 11:18 PM:

Yep This Si Definetely a Workprint, due to the shitty quality for being a screener, perhaps also to do with the shortened time, which also can mean there are extra scenes in it that will be cut out of the theatrical release, but plus the sound track probably won't be the same either, and lastly, we always seem to get Workprints by movies made by Dimension Films(ie. Jay & silent bob, Impostor, Scary Movie, Etc), in which this one is distributed by, so therefore it must be a screener


Posted by biggpest on 07-10-2002 11:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by RaPpA
its a workprint..plain and simple, workprint quality and all and the time of the movie is shorter then it is in theatres so its more then def a workprint.


moron cut the credits and poof u got a shorter movie..
wait i understand now cause ftf put it out it sux but if it was ctp it would have been a great release right?
dumbasses....
GREAT release ftf


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 07-10-2002 11:30 PM:

Workprint or Not?

I wanna know if this is a workprint for sure. I don't wanna download this rls if it doesnt have most of the special effects. That's lame. Plz, if anybody knows about this being a proper SCR or workprint please post info. Thanx.


Posted by rappa on 07-11-2002 12:02 AM:

srry buddy credits isnt 18minutes long and mayb if u knew who i was ud shut ur mouth cuz i could ban u from here like *snap*.


Posted by biggpest on 07-11-2002 12:37 AM:

waaa


Posted by stm on 07-11-2002 01:05 AM:

agreed biggpest

great release ftf! people always have something to complain about, fucking amazing.


Posted by LiL pImPsTeR on 07-11-2002 01:55 AM:

rappa, calm down, no one cares who u r dog, unless your sum 1 really important, a release group, then i have a lot of respect for you, as it is now, i have respect for you, but whiy do u people have conversations with dummy and moron and calling people names, why cant u gusy have a serious arguement or covnersation without dissing each other...tis retarded....and rappa, that hole, if u knew who i was thing, i think tis kidna chilsih homie, bringing your rep into things, especilly over sumthing punny like this, if he was questioning your scene levelship(i guess i can call it that)then i can understand, but were aruging over the quality of a movie. As for the movie, i cant wait to see it, i dotn care wut kinda quality.


Posted by crapper on 07-11-2002 02:09 AM:

stop the bitching..
nice release..
sound nicec
picture nice

not an amazin release on quality .. but amazin since its gonna hit the cinema;s on the 19th..

i love these stupid horrors so i'd say way to go..

keep these prints/screeners/whatevers comin..

nice job..

i wish you did more of these..
and well maybe some good old fashion tc's


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-11-2002 02:12 AM:

If this is a workprint which it very much seems like then it is pretty nice quality. Props to ftf regardless of scr/wp source its still better than having a shitty pre ts which ever way you look at it. I agree the mislable is kinda stupid, its pretty hard to not know the difference between scr source and wp source, but Anybody complaining at FTF for releasing this simply shouldn't be downloading movies.
Biggest, credits dont last 20min, think before you flame somebodys opinion.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by MovieGod on 07-11-2002 02:26 AM:

Yes cheers to u m8....those who don't like FTF releases don't download it in the future... Please... we r tired to constantly hear yah bitch and complain.. waaaaahhh...

FTF has improved much in the last couple of months. Their releases even though not the best, are not the worst. Give them a break!

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





Posted by killfxp on 07-11-2002 02:31 AM:

You guys are all fucked up in the head... This is a pre release of a great movie and instead of thanking FTF for their hard work and hours waisted to bring you this release you guys flame them, thats fucken bullshit. If you guys dont like it don't download it and dont fucken flame it. Groups like FTF work their ass off for you guys and you guys dont apreatiate it, thats just fucked up. You guys should support these groups and give them credit for their hardwork. If you want FTF to get better STOP FLAIMING THEM flaiming just puts them down. If you guys stop flaiming them and thank them for their hard work i am 100% sure they will be the best group in the scene cuz i know groups love people's support and they will work harder once you guys support them.


Posted by toohey on 07-11-2002 03:03 AM:

ppl r bitching bc the quality on cd2 is frame by frame...which ruins the good work they did for cd1....if u can tolerate watching a movie frame by frame then u should live in a geriatric home..... i thought like every1 that this was good too til i reach cd2...wat a let down...every fucken time


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-11-2002 03:22 AM:

toohey, yes and thats what these forums are for. But there is a difference between the constructive critisism by some and the flat our flaming by others. IMHO i think there should be a 'guideline' not rule, but guideline, whereby by people posting opinions on the release, should have to back it up. Not just say 'bah FTF sucks, quality is shit' that does absoltely no good to people that read the thread to decide if they should get a release or not. They want/need to know WHAT is wrong with it if there is a problem, not just that 'quality is shit'
Not to mention the idiot above that suggested a 'scene ban' because of this apparent mislable. Who i might add didn't get it right either.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by barney on 07-11-2002 04:13 AM:

CLAP CLAP ........well said !!!!!!!

i am so sik of the peeps that just come here to blast the movie and 9 times out of 10 they havent even seen it !!!!!!!

If u r all so bored that u wanna waste your time flaming people who are trying to give you something that you HAVENT got then pissoff to a porno site and take a few minutes to wank over the teen pics maybe then u might relax and start to praise the groups and maybe just review the movie on quality alone and not on whos relesed it

fuk i get so pissed at them


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 07-11-2002 04:15 AM:

Final Decision on this Movie

Ok I downloaded this movie, and I have decided to wait for another release. I wanna see it in a bit better quality, and also I wanna see a real version, not some workprint. Props to FTF for getting us this *WORKPRINT* but next time, please label it properly. It would save us a lot of time.

Video- 6.9/10
Audio- 6.7/10
Movie- Waiting for a better release, but it looks good.


Posted by saqj on 07-11-2002 04:22 AM:

After watching the movie heres...

InAWord's Review

Movie: Ok
Video: Blocky
Audio: Low

Title on this was Halloween: The Homecoming, which was the working title from 2001?

Good job on the release.


Posted by tim087 on 07-11-2002 04:59 AM:

Good release...but please, leave this movie alone already


Posted by JoshNya on 07-11-2002 05:40 AM:

to bad the last 10 minutes of the movie are choppy as hell


Posted by b0nk3r on 07-11-2002 05:48 AM:

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!! FTF WTF .. you going back to bad quality? I thought you guys was doing better.. but you just had to ruin this movie. i watch 1 movie every 2 weeks, and this was a pick. and it was all fucked up in the end!!!!!

bah.. 3/5/9

__________________
..


Posted by brr8760 on 07-11-2002 06:12 AM:

"Death by CD2"

CD1 -- a real sweet pre-release. AWESOME WORK FTF!!!

CD2 -- speeds up about halfway through. There's your running time difference, people. And it RUINED a great release. Just ruined it. I hope for a fix.

ARRRRGGGHHHHHHH


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-11-2002 06:47 AM:

Can You Say *NUKE* first of all this is not a screener second of all cd2 is screwed up! Like some all of a sudden gave them the chipmunks voice and hit fast foward, It's called there damn well be a better release if not that atleast proper it up!


Posted by DEEZNUTZZ2 on 07-11-2002 07:48 AM:

Talking BOOGIE MAN SCREENER

A SO SO RELEASE, JUST FINISHED WATCHING IT, A LITTLE HAZY PICTURED, TOO CORNY! BUSTA NEEDS TO STICK TO MOUNTAIN DEW COMMERCIALS AS HIS ACTING OUTLET! THANKS FOR THE EARLY LAUGH, I MEAN RELEASE.


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-11-2002 07:57 AM:

Hmm, wonder if they will repack it

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by renegade on 07-11-2002 08:26 AM:

This could've been a nice pre release. Cd1 is done well except towards the end it had some glitches. Cd2 on the other hand is not good. cd2 is frame by frame and the words are broken up so i was hearing bits and pieces. I will have to watch again to get it all. Ftf thanks for the release. Good job when taking into account the nature of this release.


Posted by horrorfan on 07-11-2002 08:26 AM:

yep

this is definitly a workprint. I know this because on cd 1, it uses "Halloween The Homecoming" as the title. Which means it was back before they came up with resurrection or just didnt want to use it. And I havent seen cd2, wat exactly does it do? is it still watchable anyways?


Posted by SxPxIxDxExR on 07-11-2002 11:06 AM:

The last part of the movie isn't very watchable, the frame rate is all messed up and is hard to see who's doing what to who.


Posted by on 07-11-2002 11:48 AM:

anyone besides me notice the name is wrong

on all the previews and trailers the name of the movie is Halloween The Resurection Yet When this one starts its Halloween the Homecoming? is it possible we have a early trailer before more scenes were added , could this explain the missing minutes?


Posted by b0nd on 07-11-2002 01:21 PM:

What a hilarious release!

A Workprint from before they did the reshoot.

Some might call this a whole other movie.

But they might be stupid.


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-11-2002 03:38 PM:

Hmmz, so what exactly is this release, if what bigshoe said is true and with what others have told me, it seems to be a WP. Can anybody actually confirm what this is?

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by 2B@D on 07-11-2002 06:01 PM:

Dont know if it was just me, But this Film started off Ok, towards the end of cd1 started getting really Blocky, Same with cd2. But apart from that it was well watchable. Wouldent Go as far as saying its a screener though!!

But End Of Subject!! Nice Pre. Props FTF! Keep em Coming!!!


Posted by bmvtoys on 07-11-2002 06:55 PM:

it is the original cut

It deffinately is a workprint. I'm wondering if you convert the last 20 minutes or so back to avi and re-encode to ntsc, you may be able to fix it correctly. Maybe, but not sure yet.

bv


Posted by Grimfull on 07-11-2002 06:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Sig-Bro
Yep This Si Definetely a Workprint, due to the shitty quality for being a screener, perhaps also to do with the shortened time, which also can mean there are extra scenes in it that will be cut out of the theatrical release, but plus the sound track probably won't be the same either, and lastly, we always seem to get Workprints by movies made by Dimension Films(ie. Jay & silent bob, Impostor, Scary Movie, Etc), in which this one is distributed by, so therefore it must be a screener


LMAO!!!!! You start out by saying "This is Definetely a Workprint..." and at the end you say "so therefore it must be a screener" lol. I just thought that was a funny typo


Posted by PhAnToMs on 07-11-2002 07:09 PM:

cd1 was fine perfect everything fine
cd2 sped up at the end and made it sound and look retarted to keep up

cd1 and cd2 each will fit on 1 cd if u extract to the .dat files

video-8 (cd1) 4(cd2)
sound-6(cd1) 4(cd2)

good release much better than watching a ts from videocd or somthing great
movie sucked 2

thanks ftf


Get off CTPS BALLS

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by darkslide on 07-11-2002 07:35 PM:

good release if you don't count the ending.. you know... even though the ending to a horror movie is the most important part!

if this is a workprint then i'm watching a TS because Busta said they shot multiple endings.. so maybe... just maybe this was the shitty ending that was slapped on it...

__________________
What do you get when you cross an owl, with a bungee cord? My Ass.


Posted by gemvis on 07-11-2002 08:07 PM:

hmmmm its called homecoming and thats the original name before it got edited and changed to resurrection and i did read they were reshooting the ending which is why the release got delayed so it will be interesting to grab a t/s when one appears to see the differences.


Posted by cyber649 on 07-11-2002 09:34 PM:

Great movie. but half way through to the end was so choppy you couldnt tell what was going on. The audio jerked and everything.

Overall still a great movie, just hope a better release comes out that fixes all these problems.


Posted by SumBastard on 07-11-2002 10:12 PM:

RELEASE SUX AZZ

this is a fuked up screener. the second CD is fukin jerkin and the sound glitches along with a loud hiss. a repack or proper very needed.


Posted by skunkyhydro on 07-11-2002 10:21 PM:

shut the fuck up, who cares what it is, honestly, who gives a fuck if its a wp or a screener? if you really lose sleep over it then meet me at quail and 2nd in ny at 10 pm tonight and i will shoot you 3 or 4 times because you dont deserve to live. enough of that, but good job to ftf


Posted by Sig-Bro on 07-11-2002 10:36 PM:

My bad Grimfull, at the end I meant to say Workprint, not SCR, but hey at least I'm not sitting here trying to say that it must be a CAM Or TS status. Those homosexes are the humor to this shat-catastrophe.


Posted by darkslide on 07-12-2002 12:06 AM:

i don't care if it was a wp or a scr.. i just want something with an ending that doesn't fuck up

__________________
What do you get when you cross an owl, with a bungee cord? My Ass.


Posted by bmvtoys on 07-12-2002 12:12 AM:

Does it really matter if it is a screener or workprint, or even a cam? It is a pre-release, it should not matter, it's all free.

bv


Posted by philmore13 on 07-12-2002 01:14 AM:

All fussing who cares so its a workprint its a great pre-release even though the last 10 minutes of video are screwed. great movie!


Posted by tearz on 07-12-2002 02:46 AM:

Talking Crap Crap Mega Crap

Hey guyz

Downloaded the full movie and was very dissapointed

I do realize that this is a screener but it is terrible quality
the picture is watchable but has too many visable pixel.

Audio is garbage. Take the sndtrk and just throw it away
sounds like a bee was caught in the mic.

I do realize that this is a pre-release and give them credit
for that... but who wants to see a crappy rip of the movie
and wreck it be4 a good copy comes out?

W34k
l8s

||TearZ||


Posted by tearz on 07-12-2002 02:48 AM:

BTW

BTW biggpest, rappa is right...

and if it were a ctp release instead of ftf it would be better...

CTP DOESN'T RELEASE CRAP LIKE THIS
SORRY IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW....

=) done bitching


Posted by Wesb0b on 07-12-2002 03:24 AM:

Look over all it was a great movie and ive been a huge fan of halloween sence the begging. not a bad release. keep em commin ftf


Posted by Hyperize on 07-12-2002 04:12 AM:

...

Um I heard that the movie is choppy on CD2... like it is all messed up.


Posted by Static on 07-12-2002 04:58 AM:

CD1 is nice. CD 2 is has a horrible frame rate.

Wait for a proper that will hopefully have a different ending. I can see why they chose to re shoot it. It's pretty bad.




quote:
Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do


Posted by NOAHT1980 on 07-12-2002 06:09 AM:

Well i think i will wait cause this movie gets released tomorrow FRIDAY 12TH so im sure there will be more groups releasing this tomorrow or saturday


Halloween: Resurrection (2002)


This film has not yet opened in your area. It is scheduled to open in national release on July 12, 2002.

Get showtimes for opening day:


Thats according to amazon .com

i guess they changed it cause i heard the 19th then when i saw this so who knows


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-12-2002 07:37 AM:

Overall for a pre release it doesn't matter what it is as its better then having nothing. But, the reason defining exactly what it is is importent is becasue the source it came from can provide allot of information about a release, there is a HUGE difference in a WP and a SCR. The biggest being that a SCR is a final print of the movie, so its exactly as would be in theatre. A WP on the other hand is messy, contains scenes that may not be in final, has missing scenes, possible alternate ending, and often a different title in the opening sequence, even different audio in allot of places and so on. regardless of quality, some people will deside entirely on wether its a SCR or a WP. Some dont want to see messy unfinished cut of a movie, they are just interested in the finished product. Others, such as possible Halloween fans, might very much like to see the 'working' copy of the movie with all the differences and things they probably wont see in the final cut. It's like having unreleased deleted scenes of your favorite movie.
Please do not flame others for caring what the source is, just because you don't. It makes you look narrowminded

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by svenbob on 07-12-2002 07:55 AM:

preech it omen, hell of a good release, sucks buot the end though... oh well im goin to see it tomarrow :-D

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by bbrain on 07-12-2002 12:06 PM:

LISTEN UP

saw it, got it, watched it, then read these reviews.. i guess i was drunk and bored. anyways.. reading ALL these comments.. took longer than downloading, burning, and watching this rls. props to FTF. i know i can not do better. and neither can yall


Posted by glassdragon on 07-12-2002 10:33 PM:

i do recall that sometime last year there was a leak of like a 70 minute or so cut of this movie online.. this might be that one


Posted by PepperKorn on 07-13-2002 12:01 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by RaPpA
srry buddy credits isnt 18minutes long and mayb if u knew who i was ud shut ur mouth cuz i could ban u from here like *snap*.


Errr I don't think so, you wanna give it a try?


Posted by 2B@D on 07-13-2002 12:47 AM:

Come on, This Is Reviews Not a Bloody Flaming War!!

cut the ,my dads better than your dad bizzness and start reviewing the film!!!!!!


Posted by MovieGod on 07-13-2002 01:22 AM:

Re: BTW

BTW biggpest, rappa is right...

and if it were a ctp release instead of ftf it would be better...

CTP DOESN'T RELEASE CRAP LIKE THIS
SORRY IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW....

=) done bitching
[/QUOTE]

CTP right now is dead and buried....They r not releasing new releases..so enjoy whats available even if it is crap..

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





Posted by VonRashniek on 07-13-2002 03:06 AM:

the worst

this was the biggest piece of shit release i have ever seen.
please ftf---- QUIT.
Ive had stomach virus' that didnt make me as sick as this movie did. And i'm a jackass for even d/ling a ftf release, i guess i got what i asked for. There were more frames dropped at the end of this movie, then frames captured.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.


Posted by svenbob on 07-13-2002 08:16 AM:

One thing wesbob and I noticed when watching this release was the HUGE ammount subliminal messages throught it. Atleast 10, watch it again, on your DVD player, and make sure you have slo-mo. Very cool shit.

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 07-13-2002 09:44 PM:

this is indeed a workprint with a fake ending. The ending is not the same as the theather release as I saw it last night. Other then that and the cd2 problem its a great release. If they fix cd2 I will be redownloading this movie as everything except the ending is the same as the movie.


Posted by bmvtoys on 07-14-2002 03:32 AM:

it appears as if cd2 has some strange encode problem. Anyone know of a way to fix it? b


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-14-2002 05:50 AM:

ewfbootlegga, having a different encoding does not make it fake. Alternate endoings are more common than you would think.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 07-14-2002 06:43 AM:

your right I meant to say alternate ending. I kinda liked seeing both endings to tell you the truth and if they were able to reencode that 2nd half this would be a great release.


Posted by jedialphaknight on 07-16-2002 04:13 AM:

what a horrible fucking release do not spend anytime downloading this, the second cd is so unbarible it literally goes down to 5 frames per sec do these people watch the movie or test it out before they release it?


Posted by AngelDeath on 07-16-2002 08:31 AM:

Good I thought it was me with the rls, the second CD I put together on one CD cause it was short (thought it was odd), and the second CD was the worst, I couldnt stand it, but I bared with it cause I wanted to see it, and even if the ending was different then the one in the movies, I dont care, its not even worth my time to DL it again, being a big fan of Holloween, they should have left well enough alone. Seems Holloween and Friday the 13th are both trying to do the same thing, break the guiness book of world records, which is a shame. Thank god Nightmare on Elm Street decided against pursuing it. And least they kept there dignity!

Video: CD1: 5 CD2: 2
Audio: CD1: 6 CD2: 3
Movie: 4

__________________
AngelDeath is Here
Stupidity is Universal, Wisdon is from Within.


Posted by nitemare on 07-22-2002 06:54 PM:

agreed. the movie was not scary...i enjoyed the signs alot more!!.. cd2 is messed up, but u can atleast kinda make out whats going on. at that point, i didnt even care cuze the movie sucked anyway... bad release, bad movie.. oh well..


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.
Show all 77 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.