VCDQuality Forums
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- About Schmidt *XViD* - DVD SCR - DigitalVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13975)


Posted by sneakysam on 01-21-2003 04:34 AM:

Nuked?

umm.. it's nuked on Nforce, anybody know why?


Posted by sp00ky on 01-21-2003 07:15 PM:

undersized
cd1: 45 x 14,3 mib = 643 mib
cd2: 41 x 14,3 mib = 586 mib, whereas the last rar is usually not 14,3 mib

with this video size they could have included 5.1 ac3 sound.

also, their nfo states 2 ch ac3 at 160 kbit vbr, but 2 ch ac3 must be 192 cbr (their nfo must be mistaking here)

props for speed and all, for the svcd and dvd, but videocd should have stayed out of the xvid biz

//spoo


Posted by spectra on 01-22-2003 01:01 AM:

yeah theay should have given it to a proven xvid group


Posted by niall0s on 01-23-2003 09:17 PM:

Talking

SAPHIRE to the rescue
From NFO

About Schmidt (2002) *DVD SCREENER* *PROPER* - SAPHIRE

ViDEO BiTRATE...: XviD 1103kbp/s avg
AUDiO BiTRATE...: 448kb/s 5ch AC3
ASPECT RATiO....: 1.85:1
RESOLUTiON......: 640 x 336
NO. DiSKS.......: 2


Posted by Vtec on 01-23-2003 10:14 PM:

The saphire release looks like ass and I wouldn't be surprised since that's a division of DiAMOND which also can't encode for crap. I saw an iND release on a dumpsite with much better quality, About.Schmidt.PROPER.DVDScr.XviD-ProperVX. I usually don't trust iND releases but I downloaded both samples and the SAPHiRE one had this affect where the color would drag onto the next scene. I'll try to find that iND release again and post the .nfo, I know it's on one of my sites...


Posted by Vtec on 01-24-2003 10:10 AM:

Sorry just got back from work, but here's the version I'm talkin about :

!@#$%^&*()_+ ProperVX PrEsEnTs: +_)(*&^%$#@!=
! !
! About.Schmidt.PROPER.DVDScr.XviD-ProperVX !
! !
!@#$%^&*()_+-={}|:"<>?[\]?><":|}{+_)(*&^%$#@!

22-01-2003 ReLeAsE dAtE
DvD ScReEnEr SoUrCe
1.85:1 AsPeCt RaTiO
1141kbps XvId
438kbps 5.1Ch Ac3
592x240 ReSoLuTiOn
2Cd (50x15,000,000ByTeS pvx-ass.cd?.r??)
125 MiNuTeS RuNTiMe

MoViE NfO: http://us.imdb.com/Title?0257360

ThIs Is OuR FiRsT aNd LaSt ReLeAsE!
DigitalVX RiP wAs UnDeRsIzEd, BaD QuALiTy
, AnD 160kbps VbR mP3! CaUsE ThEy SuCk At
RiPPiN' XvId!!!

SAPHiRE ReLeAsE aLsO bAd QuALiTy, AnD wHy
640x336?

DoNt Be ScArEd CaUsE wE'rE nEw, OuRs Is
ThE bEsT RiP!!!

!@#$%^&*()_+-={}|:"<>?[\]?><":|}{+_)(*&^%$#@!
! !
! GrEeTs: FiXrUs, bRiTnEy SpEaRs & yOu!!!!! !
! !
!@#$%^&*()_+-={}|:"<>?[\]?><":|}{+_)(*&^%$#@!

They sound like a bunch of lamers but the quality was good.


Posted by niall0s on 01-24-2003 02:11 PM:

Thanks for the NFO Vtec

Thanks for the release ProperVX

Thanks for the internet Tim


Posted by sp00ky on 01-24-2003 05:24 PM:

wRiTiNg lIkE tHiS iS sO 1337!

haven't found their release tho... does the SAPHIRE really sUcK so much?

//spoo


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.
Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.