VCDQuality Forums - King Arthur *PROPER* - DVDRIP

Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- SVCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- King Arthur *PROPER* - DVDRIP - FLiX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=50501)

Posted by bcool2k on 11-13-2004 11:29 AM:

a Nice PROPER, although to be fair unless u tested it most would NOT realize the higher bitrate or sound differences. Just a slightly enhanced version of the NBP release. However, after waiting all this time for a good release of this movie, unfortunately i felt it was kind of a letdown. Definitely an interesting take on the Legend of the great King Arthur. It just wasn't as good as what i have already seen surrounding the King Arthur story lines. On the plus side, being a dvdrip. All the subitles are in english and completely legibly. Give it a shot, u may find u like it

8/9/7

Posted by pvt_klaas on 11-13-2004 07:33 PM:

much better than the NBP, but it's ***** 3cd's, 1cd to much when u ask me, however when u look at the NBP one, u might consider to download all 3 cd's because it's certainly worthed,

still waiting for a good DVDrip Xvid...

9/9/8

Posted by vip3r on 11-13-2004 10:47 PM:

I'm personally a DVDR man .. nice quick proper tho

9/9/8

Posted by Redemption1980 on 11-13-2004 11:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pvt_klaas
much better than the NBP, but it's ***** 3cd's, 1cd to much when u ask me, however when u look at the NBP one, u might consider to download all 3 cd's because it's certainly worthed,

still waiting for a good DVDrip Xvid...

9/9/8

You couldn't put it on 2CD's it would look like shit, this film is 142mins long, it would have to be a VCD for 2CD's, even the XVID looks bad on 2CD's.

I had a gander at some of this and its an average SVCD, but thats no bad thing, as this is the only one in its section that is perfect, as the XVID and DVDR versions are flawed.

9/9/?

Posted by akasmiler on 11-14-2004 03:10 AM:

can i ask if this is widescreen?

Posted by AkWingnut on 11-14-2004 06:23 PM:

PROPER?????

Ok what is wrong with the NBP rlz? i have watched the movie and find i like it alot better than the Centropy FS rlz, so why would there need to be a proper from FLiX? can anyone explain this to me???

-AkWingnut

I wasnt comparing it to the rlz of their DVDR i was comparing it to their King.Arthur.FS.SVCD.DVDRiP-Centropy rlz which i think NBP was alot better quality, or am i wrong?

Posted by Redemption1980 on 11-14-2004 08:20 PM:

Re: PROPER?????

akasmiler, its WS.

quote:
Originally posted by AkWingnut
Ok what is wrong with the NBP rlz? i have watched the movie and find i like it alot better than the Centropy FS rlz, so why would there need to be a proper from FLiX? can anyone explain this to me???

-AkWingnut

The Video bitrate is too high, and the Audio bitrate too low, which is off standard for a SVCD, though I dont imagine anyone really having a problem with it, but rules are rules.

No sure were your going with comparing it to CTP's FS version, that is a DVDR, and although its FS, it should look alot better than this or the NBP release.

NBP release an off standard SVCD so FLIX release a proper that is a standard SVCD, Centropy's DVDR shouldn't be compared at all.

Posted by HcC on 11-21-2004 02:13 AM:

good movie, kinda followed the history of a group called the knights templar. Used to be a few cool medieval groups like knights templar, stonemasons, the assasins, except the assassins were crazy suicide fucks who were feared cuz tehy didn't care. Anyway I think they portrayed arthur as a knights templar who were hired to protect the pope and then revolted which actually happened.

__________________
--==HcC==--

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Show all 8 posts from this thread on one page