VCDQuality Forums
Show all 90 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Austin Powers In Goldmember *SVCD* - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=5503)


Posted by bts on 07-26-2002 03:15 AM:

please, PLEASE stop releasing things


Posted by Ripklawe on 07-26-2002 03:26 AM:

If this is better than the other releases, I am gonna DIE laughing.


Rip


Posted by dyno on 07-26-2002 03:29 AM:

i will wait to see how good of quality it is. prolly just another shitty rls. but it is free. If it isnt better i will stick with the TEG one, it seems to be pretty good.


Posted by bts on 07-26-2002 03:29 AM:

one day they will realize that the 4th rip just wont matter anymore...


Posted by petrocs on 07-26-2002 03:31 AM:

y do people have to ruin the surprise in their nfo and in Vigilante's jpg thats just rude
I mean the surprise appearences thats is


Posted by Skippy_2002ca on 07-26-2002 03:34 AM:

dsffdsfsd

HALF U HAVE NOT EVEN SEEN THIS.... SHut up and when u seen the sample then you can go and make fun of them you guyz are passing past judgements of how there last realse was thats it so till u see it shut up.....

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol


Posted by Commy on 07-26-2002 03:40 AM:

in their nfo, they should explain why their release warrants an svcd. i hate when an nfo gives no information


Posted by Vyrrus on 07-26-2002 03:42 AM:

That's funny...all these posts..and they haven't even seen the jpg...much less anything else...amusing...


Posted by sincere116 on 07-26-2002 03:42 AM:

haters

u anti ftf flamers make me sick
do u rls $hit i dont think so
so until u rls $hit shut the fuc up


Posted by aTTicA on 07-26-2002 03:45 AM:

alright.. i here on a daily basis.. but usually the basics r covered so i dont bother posting.. i use this site more as a basis to decide what i want.. which copies r better.. sometimes groups suprise u.. ftf has put out some watchable releases in the past.. and some of the less watchable rls.. from ftf. are stil the only rips 2 date.. better something than nothin.. for all u ppl that flame ftf and any other group thats not ctp.. or now the Uti groupies.. (PS.. i thought Uti was great when u all were flaming them saying ill wait for the centropy.. ) give it up unless u can do better.. i guess my main point is.. i cant believe im seeing ppl getting bent about more than 1 rls of a movie.. variety is the spice of life right? and the rips have consistantly improved on this one.. form what i can tell.. having just watched the TEG 1.. there are some serious sound prollems.. especially on disk 2.. this movie isnt out yet.. it was a good copy.. but i will be looking for a better 1 in the future.. SO WHAT theres 8 RIPs of a movie... great.. maybe stop rushing to be the first to have something.. and wait 3 or 4 rls to fget a better quality 1.. but for gods sake dont bust on some one for trying to improve something 4 u


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-26-2002 03:45 AM:

Hmm I dunno FTF SVCD dun sound right think they are just trying to follow uti or what eva. Yall can go head and flame me but whateva.


Posted by TDubbin on 07-26-2002 03:46 AM:

Ok, for people who may not see this movie posted up till later, I just want to inform u that all the people above me have posted their comments without even a jpeg sample!U shouldn't even do it with a jpeg sample but nonetheless posting with a NFO that says download and jugde for yourself!?FTF u people trashed for their releases but this may happen to be the best release out, with full audio, it may not since they released no info about it, but at least they are tryin to improve the release even though they get trashed by many. I don't know why they'd even do so since they will have 6 pages mocking them, telling them how bad this release is before anyone fully downloads the movie. I just wanna know for the people who download it, how good is it and how is the sound. Yes, i do know that u can get the movies on topsites before its on vcdquality, but u guys didn't, so my point still stands.

Peace.


Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-26-2002 03:48 AM:

follow UTi? you think UTi started the retarded svcd telesync? no centershite did i cant wait till svcd TS dies for good

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by biggpest on 07-26-2002 03:50 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
Hmm I dunno FTF SVCD dun sound right think they are just trying to follow uti or what eva. Yall can go head and flame me but whateva.

now your bitchin about a svcd release?
first you wanted svcd releases and now you think you can bitch about it? damn you are lame obviously your just waitin for a jpg because your ax sux and you dont have the sample.this is better than the other 3 "cough"cough"1 release so far


Posted by greatsave9 on 07-26-2002 03:50 AM:

The NFO says Heather Graham .. Ms. Felicity Shagwell

But she aint in the movie is she?


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-26-2002 03:54 AM:

Biggpest u dumb ass did I say anything about not wanting svcd no. You puttin bullshit in my mouth? Jsut keep making a dumb ass out of urself. Anyway would u ever think FTF would ever do an SVCD no and all FTF shitty releases would u trust them no my point is strong for all u flamers out there!


Posted by SSS on 07-26-2002 04:07 AM:

im watching this right now... im not sure which is the best copy... they look all the same after a while... well whats this number 9 or 10... i think this is the one ill stick with ... atleast it has no subs and it looks better than the normal ftf rlses


Posted by zangmann on 07-26-2002 04:11 AM:

angled screen, shitty sound.
typical FTF

dont bother


Posted by Fire_Sokar on 07-26-2002 04:17 AM:

To All

Props to Ftf decent release will be adding it to my dload section I DID see the sample it is nice. I prefer this over the others and no I am not a ftf nut hanger. You guys need to settle down 4 releases? Who gives a flying dick. You dont want em dont download them. I personally find it to the best it gives us more options to choose from.. Some of the filters are nice some arent I got a list of 10 more movies to go so i cant sit here and waste my time on the ethics of this shit... Simple quit bitching before all groups go internal because of the whiners.. plane and simple.. peace..

P.S. I demand smiley pies from the whiners


Posted by Superxero on 07-26-2002 04:17 AM:

its probably a re-re-re-encode

__________________


Posted by rusty2002 on 07-26-2002 04:18 AM:

some of u guys are so stupid just because u dont have the release doesnt mean no one else does there are things called topsites which have things before vcdquality posts it

amazing isnt it


Posted by biggpest on 07-26-2002 04:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
Biggpest u dumb ass did I say anything about not wanting svcd no. You puttin bullshit in my mouth? Jsut keep making a dumb ass out of urself. Anyway would u ever think FTF would ever do an SVCD no and all FTF shitty releases would u trust them no my point is strong for all u flamers out there!

lol .. you havent even seen this release and your bashin it.. i bet your mad theres no jpg on the site huh lol. how about you dont say shit about the release until you see it ok. then you can pass judgement


Posted by bmvtoys on 07-26-2002 04:25 AM:

Good release. Much props to ftf. Maybe there should be no jpeg for this release, so people can't hate on it as much. They would probably bitch 2 times as much anyhow.

b


Posted by TDubbin on 07-26-2002 04:30 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rusty2002
some of u guys are so stupid just because u dont have the release doesnt mean no one else does there are things called topsites which have things before vcdquality posts it

amazing isnt it



Aight, true, but tell me rusty how many people u think who post here about how bad the movie is, how FTF sucks, have gotten this movie from a topsite and watched it completely?


PEACE.


Posted by MrFreeze on 07-26-2002 04:33 AM:

Ok i can comment beacuse i just watched the sample.

the picture is wide screen but not very good.the audio is muffled not too good at all, the picture is typical ftf dark on the sides and not very clear. all in all the picture is much better on the teg version and if u have that version i would stick with it.


Posted by hippyhater on 07-26-2002 04:35 AM:

ya damn right


most ppl who are "leet" get there releases b4 vcdquality knows about them


svcd releases own vcd releases....


if this has perfect sound and no subs then its all good


Posted by MrFreeze on 07-26-2002 04:40 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by hippyhater
ya damn right


most ppl who are "leet" get there releases b4 vcdquality knows about them


svcd releases own vcd releases....


if this has perfect sound and no subs then its all good



well i just watched the sample so her egoes

its wide screen and is very dark all over the corners. the audio is a bit muffled and has a bit of a hiss. the picture on this rls is not close to being as clear as the teg version, if u have the teg already i would just keep it.


Posted by ebeats on 07-26-2002 04:42 AM:

Please can moderators just run through and delete all the posts that don't even relate to this specific RELEASE (including my post) cause I just read 1 1/2 fuckin pages and I think I read one person actually post on the quality ??????? what the hell


Please I would like to know about this release. movie posted, download it if you want it, dont download if you dont want it. and the world moves on what the hell is wrong with everybody


i watched teg-vcd and the skipping fucks up some funny parts so anyone is this version worthy of a re-viewing

thank you and improve the vcdquality community we dont need so much trash

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net


Posted by philly b on 07-26-2002 04:43 AM:

quote:
Ok, for people who may not see this movie posted up till later, I just want to inform u that all the people above me have posted their comments without even a jpeg sample!U shouldn't even do it with a jpeg sample but nonetheless posting with a NFO that says download and jugde for yourself!?FTF u people trashed for their releases but this may happen to be the best release out, with full audio, it may not since they released no info about it, but at least they are tryin to improve the release even though they get trashed by many. I don't know why they'd even do so since they will have 6 pages mocking them, telling them how bad this release is before anyone fully downloads the movie. I just wanna know for the people who download it, how good is it and how is the sound.


without a jpg sample, lol. hey asshole vcdquality isnt the first to get these movies.


Posted by Big on 07-26-2002 04:45 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by greatsave9
The NFO says Heather Graham .. Ms. Felicity Shagwell

But she aint in the movie is she?



She is....briefly. Much like Liz Hurley's small role in part 2.


Posted by TDubbin on 07-26-2002 05:00 AM:

Philly B, lol, ur sooo funny and coool. My point was that there were people trashing this release before they saw it, that is what i meant, and i know that most people who post here don't get it from any topsites. I agree with the person who said delete the posts that have no point, inclding this one.



PEACE.


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-26-2002 05:02 AM:

greatsave9, no she isn't in the movie.
And im with ebeats, people please discuss the actuall release.
what does UTi and 'if this is better than the other im gonna laugh' have to do with it? your answer is nothing at all!

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by TDubbin on 07-26-2002 05:10 AM:

Aight, first, sorry to those peeps like me just tryin to find how good or bad the quality of the movie is,. This post has no point except that I still wanna know how good this FTF movie is and that I do know about topsites and how peeps get this before vcdquality posts it. I'm just sayin most peeps before posted on the fact that FTF released it.



Peace.


Posted by darkslide on 07-26-2002 05:14 AM:

if you're not spossed to use the jpegs as some judge of quality... then what's the point of having them.. if you don't use them as some sort of judge then why look at them.. it shows the quality.. you know the reason this site is called VCDQuality.. true the sample gives a full preview of quality.. but this is just a smaller basis to go on for quality...

ooh yeah...i'll wait for this movie... i watched the teg.. so i'll wait for afew days..

__________________
What do you get when you cross an owl, with a bungee cord? My Ass.


Posted by Cardcaddy on 07-26-2002 05:15 AM:

Thumbs down

Just look at the sample its lame. Looks exactly like their VCD releases, blurry waist of space.


Posted by cameronsdad on 07-26-2002 05:16 AM:

I just got thur watching the sample the pic is no queit as good as the other releases the sample is from cd2 the sound is good no glitchs in the sample hopfully all of cd 2 is good


Posted by MilesHigh on 07-26-2002 05:19 AM:

Junk!!!!


Posted by Vyrrus on 07-26-2002 05:29 AM:

is the quality junk? or WTF U talking about....I got tired of waiting for a quality review, so I said fuck it...I'm going ahead and dl it....guess I will report back mydamnself if this rls is shit or not...


Posted by Superxero on 07-26-2002 05:31 AM:

this is a peace of shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit shit*takes a deepbreath* shit shit shit and shiaaaaaaaaaaat! i saw the sample it sucks ! take the teg or vigl!

__________________


Posted by Natural on 07-26-2002 05:37 AM:

it's not that bad, just needs a recode. no that isn't a hint for some lamer group to do it, but it's what ftf should have did with this before releasing. coulda been half decent... coulda...


Posted by MovieGod on 07-26-2002 05:45 AM:

For FTF this is one of their better releases...props for the timing.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





Posted by TitoMcFlores on 07-26-2002 05:48 AM:

since everyone else is i guess ill throw some spam in this tread to.. i respect any group who takes time to give something to the "community" i dont care if what they rls is crap.. thats what this site is all about just checkin out the quality before you download it.. there is really no reason for such lame comments like "If this is better than the other releases, I am gonna DIE laughing." and the bullshit first reply to the thread by 'bts' .. how lame can you be.. the purpose of the forum is to "comment" on a specific rls (good audio, bad audio, good picture, bad picture) not to bash a group with negitive comments from past rls's .. i mean i dunno about anyone else but i come here to check out the quality and am sick of hearin' the same old shit over and over agian.. your replys are a fucking waste of bandwidth.. ah anyway im not startin anything here just bored and figured i would throw up a reply..

later,
Tito


Posted by Shadow on 07-26-2002 05:49 AM:

c4??o the board... registration wise anyways.. been following it for months now .. figured I'd finally join to add my own $0.02.


Viewed the sample for this release a little bit ago and have to say I'm not too impressed... it looks like another re-encode (like a few others have already said). Compared it to the TEG sample and they appear to have the same camera angle goin on.. so I would assume it's coming from the same source. FTF looks like they just cropped the subs like vigilante did and boosted the brightness.. ya can tell they boosted it cuz the black borders are no longer black.. I'm willing to bet if ya took a sample of the TEG from the same part of the movie FTF took their's from.. it would be very similar with the exception of the subs cropped and the brightness levels boosted.

Would definately wait for a release worthy of bein SVCD...

Let the flaming begin...


Posted by Bakkoda on 07-26-2002 06:07 AM:

im at a lss for words.... props for FTF puttin this out. i hope they meant it as a gag. Ya did right???


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-26-2002 06:12 AM:

HEY HO I Just saw the sample and to download this release I say hell no I will stick wit fucked up sound instead of crappy picture THANK U!


Posted by Salaga on 07-26-2002 06:29 AM:

Thought I'd add my comment for once:

While I havn't downed a sample yet, I'd figure I'd add a suggestion; if the video on the Teg is better, and the sound on this is better, why not take it into your own hands and mix the two? It's not that hard, vcdhelp gives you all the instructions you need, and since there a bunch of friends and family that want me to let them see it, I figure I'll give them the best quality possible.

I thought the video on the Teg was awesome (I got rid of the subtitles and fixed the contrast myself), but the audio became very annoying.

Just a suggestion.


Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-26-2002 06:49 AM:

what the hell.. its like isonews took a lamer shit on our boarrd

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by impossible on 07-26-2002 07:26 AM:

Ok, you stupid fucks....half of you haven't even looked at this release, so here is the real review. The video is mediocre, not up to par with TEG-VCD's release, but still watchable, as a matter of fact, very watchable. The audio is fine, there are NO noticble glitches in the audio, unlike the other release and its 2 re-encodes. This is the best release out there so far, and just because it is released by FTF doesn't mean it calls for a flame-fest. So, please quit your FTF bashing, they might have put out some shit releases before, but it does not mean that everyone of their releases are infact, shit.

-7/8/8-


Posted by raides on 07-26-2002 07:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Commy
in their nfo, they should explain why their release warrants an svcd. i hate when an nfo gives no information


strange, the ever so loved CTP never gave a reason for their SVCD dupes, yet they were praised for doing svcd. i am no ftf lover, and though half, if not all the posters here have not yet seen the quality of the release and have already unfairly judged the quality i will say, that it seems to be an ever so growing number of releases that are coming out with 4 or 5 versions for the consumer, each group claiming more quality then the next in an attempt to win the hearts of all those p2p file sharers, kinda pathetic, but whatever if it makes the releasing group happy....in my opinion it just fucks up the entire vcd genre and sets it to just a bunch of movies that people dont care if their copy is a dupe or not, just that it will be the best hands down and they will take that notion to the grave, oh well, those are my two cents...for anyone who wanted to make change


Posted by TDubbin on 07-26-2002 07:36 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by impossible
Ok, you stupid fucks....half of you haven't even looked at this release, so here is the real review. The video is mediocre, not up to par with TEG-VCD's release, but still watchable, as a matter of fact, very watchable. The audio is fine, there are NO noticble glitches in the audio, unlike the other release and its 2 re-encodes. This is the best release out there so far, and just because it is released by FTF doesn't mean it calls for a flame-fest. So, please quit your FTF bashing, they might have put out some shit releases before, but it does not mean that everyone of their releases are infact, shit.

-7/8/8-

P.S.


Why don't you hop off CTP's dick.



Aight, I agree with this, finally sumbody used the posts to inform of how good the movie quality is.


Posted by nookieaki on 07-26-2002 07:53 AM:

Re: haters

quote:
Originally posted by sincere116
u anti ftf flamers make me sick
do u rls $hit i dont think so
so until u rls $hit shut the fuc up



yeah what he said.

__________________
<Hitman47 > aight, im going to bed, but i leave you with this, remember, everytime you masturbate, your dead relatives are watching


Posted by ANTY3139 on 07-26-2002 08:38 AM:

Well pplz.. i think ftf thinks they got what it takes to take out svcd rls... in my own option i think teg's rls is better than this svcd rls... i think ftf should stick better to vcd until they get a better cam.. or encoding card.. hehe... i think my panasonic dv-dr2000u takes better quality than that.. and that's after encoding it with windows movie maker (wmv) converting it to avi and then mpeg-1... hehe


Posted by PSX23 on 07-26-2002 12:12 PM:

FTF, if they got a digital camera then they`d be producing some good stuff.

But why bother with an SVCD that doesnt surpass whats already been released on VCD?


Posted by brr8760 on 07-26-2002 12:19 PM:

Good to see a bunch of REAL members here calling the FTF-bashers (like "bts" and "MilesHigh") out for what they are: pre-judging lamers who are hurting the scene.

Nonetheless, cd2 has flaws of its own: a shake to the video that is as fatal as the audio gaps are on the other versions. Pick your poison, folks.

Props to FTF for their decision to use SVCD- and props to the members of this forum. One of these days, everything will come together.


Posted by misfits138 on 07-26-2002 12:48 PM:

could'nt you take the sound from the ftf version and sync it up with the video from the past releases?


Posted by ^Om3n on 07-26-2002 12:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by misfits138
could'nt you take the sound from the ftf version and sync it up with the video from the past releases?

You sure could

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by XzibitX on 07-26-2002 01:01 PM:

shittiest release ever, unless u can do a GOOD svcd all u r doing is making the bin files larger. This quality sucks. Who would want to waist cd's on this...it's just a TS, I'm not waisting cd's on this...CD-RW's are for ts's CD-R's for DVD SVCD's. Well you guys don't need an explanation, just to know that it super sucks.

pz, XzibitX


Posted by brr8760 on 07-26-2002 01:05 PM:

quote:
could'nt you take the sound from the ftf version and sync it up with the video from the past releases?
Theoretically you could, but one video burp on either release and you're out of sync. Only a madman would try it.


Posted by VonRashniek on 07-26-2002 01:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by raides


strange, the ever so loved CTP never gave a reason for their SVCD dupes, yet they were praised for doing svcd. i am no ftf lover, and though half, if not all the posters here have not yet seen the quality of the release and have already unfairly judged the quality i will say, that it seems to be an ever so growing number of releases that are coming out with 4 or 5 versions for the consumer, each group claiming more quality then the next in an attempt to win the hearts of all those p2p file sharers, kinda pathetic, but whatever if it makes the releasing group happy....in my opinion it just fucks up the entire vcd genre and sets it to just a bunch of movies that people dont care if their copy is a dupe or not, just that it will be the best hands down and they will take that notion to the grave, oh well, those are my two cents...for anyone who wanted to make change



well said.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.


Posted by cheezz on 07-26-2002 01:44 PM:

Thumbs down nuke dupe POS ftf

nuke dupe POS ftf


Posted by cheezz on 07-26-2002 01:47 PM:

Yes but ctp's svcd's were always better quality than the previous releases. this one is worse than the prvious.


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 07-26-2002 02:08 PM:

FTF SVCD?

Heh. Svcd releases should be only for sources which have svcd quality. Whats the point in making the file bigger if the quality doesnt improve. I think that FTF should stick to vcds, because I doubt their sources will ever get good enough for SVCDs. I believe that groups that have good stuff like CTP, UTi and TEG can go to Svcd, but for ppl who just rip weak azn silvers(vcds) why upgrade to svcd?

__________________
[--Quality over Quantity always--]


Posted by calmpanic on 07-26-2002 03:05 PM:

quote:
The NFO says Heather Graham .. Ms. Felicity Shagwell

quote:
She is....briefly. Much like Liz Hurley's small role in part 2.


What part? i didn't see her at all, i thought they were going to explain why she wasn't going to be in this movie like they did in part 2 by making liz hurley a fembot. I dont think Heather Graham is in this movie though...unless i missed it.


Posted by Groovie Mann on 07-26-2002 03:36 PM:

Excuse another pointless post

You guys do realize that FTF releasing an SVCD-TS is the seventh sign of the apocalypse, right? Say goodbye to your loved ones.


Posted by Vyrrus on 07-26-2002 04:37 PM:

5 pages of posts.....lol...what a popular topic...FTF makes an SVCD...my take on the rls....it's watchable...I would agree with another member who said the video shaking sux a big one...at least u can hear it...i know this shit is all free...and i still dl shit like the next man...but..I mean really...if u in a group U know if u rlsing quality shit or not...if the shit is ass...its ass...period..not about group bashing or anything...easiest way to not get bashed is to rls good shit...of course if u cant get your hands on or produce a good copy..then all the beggers here are going to whine "I wish so-and-so would rls this...wah....wah...wah" seems like rls groups cant win for losing...


P.S. I seen some fucked up centropy rls's b4 too....


Posted by xdanny2002x on 07-26-2002 04:42 PM:

i think FTF did a good job and DONT Critize because its FTF its their first SVCD im sure they will do more. just cuz some of u dont like FTF dont critisize them and their release. this is by far the best release because the picture is good and the sound is awesome and clear. i dont think u guys should critisize them and their releases like u did to CENTROPY thats why they left and are now iNTERNAL. I think if u dont want FTF to go iNTERNAL then SHUT THE FUCK UP!

FTF is doing SVCDs better then what most other groups do.


Posted by hippyhater on 07-26-2002 05:41 PM:

xdanny no, this is a horrible SVCD, the MIB2 SVCD was about 40x better than this


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 07-26-2002 06:28 PM:

this release sucked. I downloaded the sample and didn't even bother touching the film. I wonder if the audio is fixed on this though cuz if it is I will download it to rip the audio and maybe apply it to one of the other releases.


Posted by mishtevan on 07-26-2002 06:40 PM:

this is NOT their 1st SVCD!!!

OK, all you ppl sayin that this is FTF's 1st svcd, ur wrong. If you had actually paid attention and knew something, then you would have known that they released:
06/26/2002 DVD SCR All About The Benjamins *SVCD*.
And that one was a lot better quality than this piece of shit. So stop using that as an excuse for the horrible quality of this rls.


Posted by hippyhater on 07-26-2002 09:02 PM:

thats a dvd scr... not a ts


so obviously the quality would be a lot better


Posted by M_J on 07-26-2002 09:10 PM:

the words ftf and svcd shouldnt belong in the same sentence........


Posted by mishtevan on 07-26-2002 09:24 PM:

I realize that it was a dvd scr

I know that the previous SVCD of FTF's was a DVD Scr, but ppl were using the fact that this TS was their first SVCD release. The fact that this is SVCD has absolutely nothing to do w/ the quality of it. FTF is able to encode shit in SVCD, which was proven when they rlsed All About the Benjamins, and even that had problems. My point is don't use the fact that this is their first SVCD release as an excuse for the bad quality, b/c its not their first, and it has nothing to do w/ that quality of the rls.


Posted by aznstyle on 07-26-2002 09:40 PM:

this is confusing the shit out of me. Which rls is the BEST out of the 3 so far lol. I have 2 of the 3 and was wondering which one i should watch. Vigilante's was nuked for being just a cropped version of teg so i guess teg's is the best or is this svcd better? anyone have all 3 samples and can tell me the answer?


Posted by ChiTown on 07-26-2002 10:39 PM:

Why is this damn message board so fucked up?

I know the little leechers that dont know shit, will be wet once they get their hands on the sample of this, so stop all the damn whinning and either grade the movie for the quality or the dont post anything at all, no one fucken cares!


Posted by Metalslug on 07-26-2002 11:20 PM:

this release sucks, what's the point of a svcd ?...to see the flaws better?...dont bother wasting bw on this,the teg or vigilante releases are much better.I dont hate ftf,any group that relases,in my opinion is helping the scene,but this release just sucks.
4/4/7


Posted by Bud-man on 07-27-2002 12:36 AM:

Why bother making the same crappy release a svcd? to me the only releases worth making a svcd are dvd rips/screeners....why bother ? alot more hard drive wasted for nothing.
So far vigilanty's release was good..i saw the nfo they made for tadpole....couldnt of said it better!


Posted by PsYCoTiC on 07-27-2002 01:40 AM:

Angry

Not to knock the groups that release these films, but can we please dispense with the poor quality pre-releases? The movie comes out in a matter of days. Instead of releasing/re-releasing the same sad sources, wait a few days and maybe,just maybe a group will be kind enough to bring us a damn fine release.


Posted by djkoolaide on 07-27-2002 02:15 AM:

ummmmmmm


ok so before you guys start bitchin, lets think first...


i may be wrong but if theres anyone else here that risks getting fined and/or arrested by making TS's and stuff like that then plz say so. this is the best rls so far. no subs, no watermarking, no cropping, hell if you have seen the sample you would know that even though it is not the clearest picture, it is a good rls.


just my 2 cents


-=DJKOOLAidE=-


Posted by Hipnotik on 07-27-2002 02:49 AM:

FTF burn in hell.
all these shitty svcd releases make me want to puke.
trash.


Posted by Johnrx86 on 07-27-2002 03:55 AM:

Unhappy

boooo
watched the sample
looks like a different source than the other 3 releases... quality is rather lousy (center of screen brighter than the rest, and the overall picture quality is low.)

Making it a svcd seems like a bad choice, maybe we'll see a vcd re-encode of this one.

i agree that u shouldn't bash a release just cause its from ftf, but they've created their own reputation, however look @ the movie review votes, peeps weren't that biased (similar to the other releases)

the release overall seems like it was rushed to get it out on friday.


Posted by aznstyle on 07-27-2002 05:32 AM:

stop all your whining you all "sound" like a bunch of lamers. shit is free. vcd quality was established for a reason so that you people wouldnt have to whine because you wasted your credits or oh crap bandwith!! lol give me a break not like your paying for metered bandwith. Koolaide said it best


Posted by Khameleon808 on 07-27-2002 05:54 AM:

Cool Why are We Bitching??

Look , I dont see what all the bitching is about.
You get free movies.
You get them rather fast , alot faster than the lil peeps with 56k on a P2P are gettin them.
And Flaming a movie ( a free movie ) should be for people that are ready to go buy a camera and do a better job themselves.
These People risk getting arrested so information can be free to us.
So sit back and enjoy , Judging the movie is cool , but dont steady talk shit on a group cause their rls isnt better than good.

Remember how it used to be? Really shitty!!!
All i am saying is appreciate the movies we do get and bitch about the ones we dont have yet :-)

propz to all those on the scene. Keep up the evil work.
lets try and get the audio fixed :-)


Posted by 8tImER on 07-27-2002 06:08 AM:

Quit bashing.

Rate the rls if you've seen it (or at least the sample).

D/L if you want, don't if you don't.
Simple as that.


Hmm, as some1 in this thread already said, it smells like iSONEWS here

__________________
Blah?


Posted by [LdFg] on 07-27-2002 09:15 AM:

Shame on FTF!!
People are gonna bitch saying its better than nothing,but fuk..id rather wait for the movie to be in theatres and tape it myself!!!
I did this for Reign Of Fire and the quality is close to the Uti release...So dont tell me FTF is trying to improve the scene!
FTF is shit,they just buy the fukin dv tapes and encode them using crappy software like FlaskMpeg!
FU FTF!U can suk my dick caus I can make better releases than U guys by just having a standard DV cam(Sony DCR-PC 101) and Adove Premiere!
The only advantage youguys have is a really fast connexion.
So Instead of uploading crappy quality movies, just download the other releases instead of saying ''After all thats been said about the other previous releases,just download this and decide for yourself''.

Fuk FTF and hail to the groups that tape their releases.........
Whos knows, mabe one day youll hear of [RaW].....A badass quality release group that doesnt have the bandwith and the speed FTF has!

Quality over quantity!

[LdFg]


Posted by PlaiBoi on 07-27-2002 10:35 AM:

Ok then [LdFg], I suggest you go out and get that DV camera and start recording and releasing your own shit then, and well see how it is, then we can tell u to suck a dick a too cuz ur trying to help others by releasing movies.


Posted by evilone on 07-27-2002 10:59 AM:

will someone delete all these posts and maybe put a blocker on the forum ie only 20 posts per topic and weed out the bad an leave the good.

isnt this supposed to be a forum to discuss quality hmmm havent seen it yet.

i hate to come here to read this shit and am looking hard for a better release site hell its even making me think of making one myself thats mod´d.

on another note i have watched the vigilante version and found the picture to be good ( enough to watch )

the sound well poppy an breaks up but so does the teg version.

id have to say get the subbed teg version as atleast all the subs are there for when there talking stupidly. if you hate subs then get vigilantes.

i cant say if ftf´s is any good as i havent seen it but from others comments picture is not so hot and sound is much better though so you decide.

VCDQUALITY MODS = please sort yourselfs out and stop these whining people from even having the privalege to post


Posted by dystopian on 07-27-2002 01:41 PM:



NUKED 1x by **** - This CAM makes **** look like Oprah. Decent but fat

quote:
Originally posted by [LdFg]
The only advantage youguys have is a really fast connexion.
[LdFg]

the "only advantage" ftf has is that they get the movies before you have a chance to see them - for just about every movie that comes out - take the time & effort to film it (risking getting caught perhaps) encode it, upload it, have a distribution network that allows it to get spread around, etc, and all of this often before any other groups has been able to do so, and so even tho the quality usually isn't very good a lot of ppl d/l it anyway.

that's the difference between them and you that makes them a release group, and you a whining poser.

quote:
Originally posted by Salaga
Thought I'd add my comment for once:

While I havn't downed a sample yet, I'd figure I'd add a suggestion; if the video on the Teg is better, and the sound on this is better, why not take it into your own hands and mix the two? It's not that hard, vcdhelp gives you all the instructions you need, and since there a bunch of friends and family that want me to let them see it, I figure I'll give them the best quality possible.



heh i'd give up on that idea... it's hard enough to get a vid synched properly when the audio & video are from the same source... from two different ones, forget it, you're never going to be able to mux that sucker so that it stays in synch for any length of time, in my opinion.


Posted by [LdFg] on 07-27-2002 04:46 PM:

For your info dystopian....Why do you think lots of groups have the same source when encoding a movie????
Its because they dont tape the movie...they just buy the tape!!


Posted by your name here on 07-28-2002 12:55 AM:

ftf please stop releasing movies cuz u guys suck the last decent release i seen was juwanna mann u guys r just waisting time and money please ftf STOP

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by dystopian on 07-29-2002 08:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by [LdFg]
For your info dystopian....Why do you think lots of groups have the same source when encoding a movie????
Its because they dont tape the movie...they just buy the tape!!

in which case, they spent money out of their pocket for the release... something that you are obviously too cheap to do. either way, they're putting something into it, not just sitting back saying "i could do so much better (if i just weren't so lame)"


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 AM.
Show all 90 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.