VCDQuality Forums
Show all 94 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets *CD1 REPACK* - CAM - UTi (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=10876)


Posted by ABlix0 on 11-11-2002 07:41 PM:

finally..

hypocrites with them damn silver remakrs


Posted by djkoolaide on 11-11-2002 07:46 PM:

thank you


Posted by moviebootlegger on 11-11-2002 07:49 PM:

:: BLAH BLAH I LOVE TO FLAME


Posted by ebeats on 11-11-2002 07:55 PM:

Quality over quantitiy my brotha, quality over quantity.
Once in a blue moon quality, is 10fold better than anbundance of shittty recordings.

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net


Posted by JRC on 11-11-2002 07:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ebeats
Quality over quantitiy my brotha, quality over quantity.
Once in a blue moon quality, is 10fold better than anbundance of shittty recordings.



word


Posted by Ferret44 on 11-11-2002 08:03 PM:

ok so u cut out the first 19 seconds of the movie so thats even more of it were missing now........but what about the fact that it is still out of sync on the rest of cd1.


Posted by traumatek on 11-11-2002 08:06 PM:

stop bitching and be grateful for what you receive.
Cheers UTi
Your hard work is appreciated by many


Posted by Diezel on 11-11-2002 08:24 PM:

lol about the vcd silver remarks, and thanks for the repack UTi


Posted by bertieg on 11-11-2002 08:29 PM:

Yep thanks for your efforts on this one guys.


Posted by desertboy on 11-11-2002 08:31 PM:

Didn't mean to stir the hornets nest with the silver remarks, I watched the whole thing a bit shit. Not going to bother with the repack as it is only cutting off 19 secs. Can handle that myself. I like UTI good cams normally a bit grainy though

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by [RaZoR] on 11-11-2002 08:41 PM:

now this release is good. but i hope they did not forget to solve the problem with the sound at the last , lets say about 10 , sec. of cd1. the sound is missing there . anyway , fixed the probs with their small guide , burned on RW and testet on TV
7/7/?

__________________
no idea


Posted by Azzkicker on 11-11-2002 09:08 PM:

road to perdition silver *cough*


Posted by ThoroBred on 11-11-2002 09:14 PM:

Showin Love To UTi

Thanx for tha hard work fellaz =)


Posted by brr8760 on 11-11-2002 09:16 PM:

quote:
i duno but the group whome most of u suck their balls just contradicted themselves in a lame fashion. first they bash silver groups and say silvers destroy scene. now they say if its good they'll put it out. pathetic!
Moviebootlegger, u stupid fuck-- what part of "groups that RELY on silvers" or "IF they're really good" didn't you understand? There's no contradiction here-- "lame" or otherwise.

UTi -- Thanks for your quick response, and thanks for the best release of the season. I was just trolling for a better 8 MILE and was stunned to find a high quality POTTER.

Some lame-ass dipshits might call this "sucking your balls." I call it showing a little gratitude.


Posted by scousethief on 11-11-2002 09:26 PM:

Nice job UTi good quality fast release thumbs up for you efforts
just a shame there are too many scally's who think because they download movies they have the right to criticise a group when they should be gettin of their fat arses and doing it themselves.


Posted by bmvtoys on 11-11-2002 09:36 PM:

whoever's complaining about 19 seconds being cut from disk 1, quit complaining..all that would be missing is the title screen..geez.


Glad to see the quick fix. Thanks UTi


Posted by psychome on 11-11-2002 09:37 PM:

damit i had to re register again

hehe

it looks like they read vcdquality forums


Posted by exorcist on 11-11-2002 09:39 PM:

a better fix than uti's solution is to multiplex it

TMPGEnc >File>MPG Settings>Simple Multiplex

don't lose those seconds, and it works fine


Posted by LD_VCD on 11-11-2002 09:44 PM:

Why dont you all STOP BITCHIN like a bunch of PUSSEY'S.

if u dont like the release DONT fuckin download it .

__________________
IN-A-BITT

LD-VCD


Posted by IsoFAST on 11-11-2002 09:46 PM:

repacks always save the day.

thank you UTI


And i agree with the quality over quantity remark.


Posted by pb3 on 11-11-2002 10:05 PM:

if you're going to bitch about the 19 seconds why dont you just cut it off and put it back on again. that will fix the shit jsut fine and if you cant figure that out you shouldnt be complaining.

these groups shouldnt have to cater to your every need. do something yourself.

__________________
Gumby r0x0rs j00r b0x0rs


Posted by BLOODUK on 11-11-2002 10:07 PM:

hurrah for UTI! , gonna go grab and watch asap


Posted by ThEiLlEsT on 11-11-2002 10:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
Moviebootlegger, u stupid fuck-- what part of "groups that RELY on silvers" or "IF they're really good" didn't you understand? There's no contradiction here-- "lame" or otherwise.

UTi -- Thanks for your quick response, and thanks for the best release of the season. I was just trolling for a better 8 MILE and was stunned to find a high quality POTTER.

Some lame-ass dipshits might call this "sucking your balls." I call it showing a little gratitude.



word


Posted by moviebootlegger on 11-11-2002 10:45 PM:

u dont get it they said silvers ruinin the scene but then they say theyll use them. that makes no sense. u lame ass retards dont seem to understand that i wasnt hatin off UTi they are a great group but those comments didnt make much sense. also to brrrr u need to shut the fuck up.


Posted by ThEiLlEsT on 11-11-2002 10:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
u dont get it they said silvers ruinin the scene but then they say theyll use them. that makes no sense. u lame ass retards dont seem to understand that i wasnt hatin off UTi they are a great group but those comments didnt make much sense. also to brrrr u need to shut the fuck up.


I think they r talkin about the groups that just get ANY silver and release it and never release any other shit. Sure if a group does its own shit and then do 1 good silver cause of the quality is good then there aint no problem. but groups releasing JUST silvers r ruining the scene cause of so many dupes.

P'z


Posted by cyberkilluk on 11-11-2002 11:00 PM:

Does any one here no how to burn hpcd1 on to 700mb 80 minutes disks


Posted by Bud-man on 11-11-2002 11:15 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by cyberkilluk
Does any one here no how to burn hpcd1 on to 700mb 80 minutes disks

fits easily on a 80 min...well under 80 min..like 76?


Posted by shagman on 11-11-2002 11:30 PM:

the reason why not much is released from here is we are always last to get releases in the cinema in the uk so they aint much point in bringing something out thats already available elsewhere.
its only worth bringing out the english releases that other countrys do get.
why are so many of you so fuckin ungrateful if you can do better go fuckin cam em yourselves.
well done uti you put a smile on my daughters face.


Posted by rappa on 11-12-2002 12:09 AM:

OK OK, i watched the cd1 repack and CD2, PRETTY GOD DAMN GOOD MOVIE, well i liked it and santa clause 2 but other then thta, pic was above average for a ts, sound for a cam was like 9 but in ts rules like a 5, still better sound then most ts, in CD1 a guys head pops up and u hear a lil chattter, nuttn biggy, Sound was not a factor as it was no 8mile and u gotta hear the crazy ass freestyles, but anyway, id dl this release anyday considering tis a week pre and its very nice release. TS=7/5/8 CAM-9/9/8.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by djcycloid on 11-12-2002 12:11 AM:

quote:
well done uti you put a smile on my daughters face.


Likewise

Also, all those NOT in the UK, wtf would you do if ppl like UTi wernt so quick / skilled at releasing UK movies?

--
Deejay


Posted by oqwarrior on 11-12-2002 12:45 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by djcycloid


Likewise

Also, all those NOT in the UK, wtf would you do if ppl like UTi wernt so quick / skilled at releasing UK movies?

--
Deejay


So this is the UK version of the film? Hmm.... I wonder if the American version will differ in any way. I doubt it.

Anyways, great job with this repack UTi, although I will be fixing CD1 manually instead of wasting my bandwidth.


Posted by x|LeaF|x on 11-12-2002 12:59 AM:

I am placing my unbiased opinion on this flick based on the sample that I watched. I didn't decide to DL it all because of poor quality. The sample of movies are usually encoded a bit better or the same quality as the rest of the release. In my opinion, this release gets a:


5 or 6 /10 for video
...Because the video is just way to bright, pixelated and grainy for my liking.

6-7 / 10 for sound
...Because it is typical cammish sound. Very hollow, and hardly stereo quality.

?? /10 for the movie
...Because I haven't seen the entire flick. I will be waiting on a better release, or unfortunately support the MPAA on this one with my $5.50.

Final Decision: Not worth the bandwidth for this 1.4GB rls.

However, despite my critisism, I would like to give UTi props for bringing us a HOMEMADE PRE-THEATRE CAM, and for not endorsing the Azn Silver scene. Every group on the scene, despite how crappy their releases are should be commended for risking their azzes for us leechers. UTi has amazed me with some of their releases, but this one just failed to do the trick.

__________________
[--Quality over Quantity always--]


Posted by Jimmni on 11-12-2002 01:19 AM:

Pre?

I don't mean to bash UTi in any way, they do some great releases, but why is everyone so hot on this being a pre? This film was showing in UK cinemas for a good five days before UTi's release. These showings were previews themselves, but anyone really wanting to see the movie wouldn't have had much trouble finding a cimena which showed it by Thursday, and I saw cinemas showing it as early as last Tuesday. Again, this isn't a criticism of UTi. It's great to see not only good cams, but UK releases... I just wish everyone wouldn't get so excited by how soon they released it... It may not be out in America (I have no idea when the first cinemas showed it), but it isn't really a pre. Unless of course the whole world revolves around America, in which case, I guess it is a pre.

And I know, I'm a stupid newbie and I should shut up.

- Jimmni


Posted by ThEiLlEsT on 11-12-2002 01:30 AM:

Re: Pre?

quote:
Originally posted by Jimmni
I don't mean to bash UTi in any way, they do some great releases, but why is everyone so hot on this being a pre? This film was showing in UK cinemas for a good five days before UTi's release. These showings were previews themselves, but anyone really wanting to see the movie wouldn't have had much trouble finding a cimena which showed it by Thursday, and I saw cinemas showing it as early as last Tuesday. Again, this isn't a criticism of UTi. It's great to see not only good cams, but UK releases... I just wish everyone wouldn't get so excited by how soon they released it... It may not be out in America (I have no idea when the first cinemas showed it), but it isn't really a pre. Unless of course the whole world revolves around America, in which case, I guess it is a pre.

And I know, I'm a stupid newbie and I should shut up.

- Jimmni



May be cause ppl like me that live in the US cant afford to go to the UK to see the movie and come back?


Posted by djcycloid on 11-12-2002 02:00 AM:

quote:
And I know, I'm a stupid newbie and I should shut up.


'nuff said!

--
Deejay


Posted by HATINonHATAS on 11-12-2002 02:02 AM:

Why are people bitchin at others for their opinion of the quality of this rls. The A/V are out of sync on this rls no matter if you multiplex or cut 19 secs out. As far as I'm concerned A/V sync is a big part of the quality. The video is a descent picture but still pixeled.

We all don't have to be on TCF's jock for this rls. Think about it this rls is a CAM you guys are all on this groups nuts for a CAM that is out of sync on disc 1.


Posted by Jimmni on 11-12-2002 02:29 AM:

"May be cause ppl like me that live in the US cant afford to go to the UK to see the movie and come back?"

And what has this got to do with what I said? How does that affect its being a pre or not? Just curious.

- Jimmni


Posted by bbrain on 11-12-2002 02:41 AM:

you mentioned it earlier.. the whole world does revolve around america.. so yea.. this is a pre


quote:
Originally posted by Jimmni
"May be cause ppl like me that live in the US cant afford to go to the UK to see the movie and come back?"

And what has this got to do with what I said? How does that affect its being a pre or not? Just curious.

- Jimmni


Posted by torxxx on 11-12-2002 04:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by x|LeaF|x
I am placing my unbiased opinion on this flick based on the sample that I watched. I didn't decide to DL it all because of poor quality. The sample of movies are usually encoded a bit better or the same quality as the rest of the release. In my opinion, this release gets a:


5 or 6 /10 for video
...Because the video is just way to bright, pixelated and grainy for my liking.

6-7 / 10 for sound
...Because it is typical cammish sound. Very hollow, and hardly stereo quality.

?? /10 for the movie
...Because I haven't seen the entire flick. I will be waiting on a better release, or unfortunately support the MPAA on this one with my $5.50.

Final Decision: Not worth the bandwidth for this 1.4GB rls.

However, despite my critisism, I would like to give UTi props for bringing us a HOMEMADE PRE-THEATRE CAM, and for not endorsing the Azn Silver scene. Every group on the scene, despite how crappy their releases are should be commended for risking their azzes for us leechers. UTi has amazed me with some of their releases, but this one just failed to do the trick.



Go support the mmpa you then. This is a great rls considering its still 4 days before theater rls. What do you expect for a pre release? Cock smoker


Posted by ThEiLlEsT on 11-12-2002 05:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by HATINonHATAS
Why are people bitchin at others for their opinion of the quality of this rls. The A/V are out of sync on this rls no matter if you multiplex or cut 19 secs out. As far as I'm concerned A/V sync is a big part of the quality. The video is a descent picture but still pixeled.

We all don't have to be on TCF's jock for this rls. Think about it this rls is a CAM you guys are all on this groups nuts for a CAM that is out of sync on disc 1.



get the repack works fine for me ...


Posted by ThEiLlEsT on 11-12-2002 05:03 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jimmni
"May be cause ppl like me that live in the US cant afford to go to the UK to see the movie and come back?"

And what has this got to do with what I said? How does that affect its being a pre or not? Just curious.

- Jimmni



As long as the movie havent officially opened anywhere its a pre. just cause there were alot of previews in UK or wherever doesnt make it less pre . There is no way for me or most ppl in the US and around the world to see Harry Pothead except to download this release so it is a fuckin pre . every movie gets screened b4 it comes out and sometimes previews but that doesnt make it less pre just cause u or somone somewhere around the world saw it.

P'z


Posted by The Ironduke on 11-12-2002 12:06 PM:

missing the last 20 seconds on disc 1.

Abit gay if you ask me


Posted by keepinitreal on 11-12-2002 12:51 PM:

whys everyone bitching the copy i got is the uti one and it breaks for the first 10 seconds while the credits are on and then its fine all the way threw except for 30 seconds of sound missing at the end of disk one.Fuk its free what do you want already ?


Posted by rappa on 11-12-2002 12:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The Ironduke
missing the last 20 seconds on disc 1.

Abit gay if you ask me



ooo wow, who cares, no one dies and its not an important part. I could see if it was the climax but its not so dont complain...For all of you that are complaining, you are retarded and should stfu. This cam's sound is better then any cam sound ive ever seen other then direct and the pic is very darn good in my opinion. Its not bright at all, i watched the whole movie. This release is better then half the telesyncs released today so dont say shit.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by scousethief on 11-12-2002 12:57 PM:

Well here goes

The pic isnt great its good but not great 7/10

the sound could be a lot better 5/10

my kids loved the film so 8/10

whether you like it or not this isnt what id call a Pre i went to the cinema to watch this on thursday with my kids, anyone could buy a tickiet and it was showing all day, so i guess that dosent make it some sort of special show (they were on tuesday around here)

But UTi as always come through with something watchable instead of the BLUE fucked up audio other groups releases


Posted by shagman on 11-12-2002 02:19 PM:

is it me or is there a pattern developing here as it seems its mainly the americans who complain how bad stuff is.


Posted by Crazy_Jay on 11-12-2002 03:12 PM:

Anyone Got any bets of what group will try to proper this because of the missing sound....

::Cough:: ::Cough:: FTF


Posted by djcycloid on 11-12-2002 03:16 PM:

ok i have seen this rls (and the cd1 repack). Its ok, a bit bright in places but if they didnt do this then it would have been too dark in others (vicious circle). Audio is clear enuff, ocassional background noise. Filmed in a cinema so you do see ppl stand up and walk off a couple of times but this doesnt efect the overall viewing.

My daughter loved it so big up UTi

Visual - 6
Audio - 7
Movie - 9 (my daughters opinion)

--
Deejay


Posted by Asterisk on 11-12-2002 04:07 PM:

Just so you guys know, there's about 40 seconds of missing audio from the end of the cd1 repack, but that doesn't bother me, 40 seconds of missing audio is better than no movie at all. Thanks for bringing out the repack so early anyway.

No doubt there'll be another release coming out next week at some point, unless another UK based group will release it. Groups don't have to proper this, they just label their release as a TELESYNC without it getting nuked, and the chances are it's gonna be worse than this CAM, so groups, if you're gonna release this, make it decent. (or it's gonna be flaming time again)

Oh, and cyberkilluk, you asked how to put cd1 (77 mins) on an 80min cd, LMAO, weren't you the guy that said TCF were bringing out a 3cd screener of Harry Potter on thursday?


Posted by desertboy on 11-12-2002 04:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Asterisk
Just so you guys know, there's about 40 seconds of missing audio from the end of the cd1 repack, but that doesn't bother me, 40 seconds of missing audio is better than no movie at all. Thanks for bringing out the repack so early anyway.

No doubt there'll be another release coming out next week at some point, unless another UK based group will release it. Groups don't have to proper this, they just label their release as a TELESYNC without it getting nuked, and the chances are it's gonna be worse than this CAM, so groups, if you're gonna release this, make it decent. (or it's gonna be flaming time again)

Oh, and cyberkilluk, you asked how to put cd1 (77 mins) on an 80min cd, LMAO, weren't you the guy that said TCF were bringing out a 3cd screener of Harry Potter on thursday?



I've been frequenting this board for the last 6-7 months downloading movies slightly longer and was just wondering what the fuck LOL & LMAO meant. Any help would be appreiciated as I'm far to idle to find out on my own.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by the movie wizz on 11-12-2002 05:18 PM:

i hav'nt seen this release yet . will have it later, but my m8 said it's very dark and the face's are kinda pink, said it looks something like fear dot com ist version


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-12-2002 05:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by bbrain
you mentioned it earlier.. the whole world does revolve around america.. so yea.. this is a pre





that's only true IN america.


Posted by dank! on 11-12-2002 06:13 PM:

LOL = Laugh Out Lout
LMAO = Laughing My Ass Off


Posted by rappa on 11-12-2002 06:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by scousethief
Well here goes

The pic isnt great its good but not great 7/10

the sound could be a lot better 5/10

my kids loved the film so 8/10

whether you like it or not this isnt what id call a Pre i went to the cinema to watch this on thursday with my kids, anyone could buy a tickiet and it was showing all day, so i guess that dosent make it some sort of special show (they were on tuesday around here)

But UTi as always come through with something watchable instead of the BLUE fucked up audio other groups releases



How could the send be better, its a cam, the sound was pefect on my surround system, the pic is above average, and it wasnt that bright at all, it was a dark movie but in the places when it was light out, it was perfectly fine. And yes it is a pre to american theatre but not to us, so its a pre, so dont complaing, people that complain are ignorant and should have no rights to be on this board. They release for you and since you guys complain, you may never see UTi again.

Edit: Or see any groups if they complain about all there releases, if you dont like em STFU no one cares if you dont like em, they were rlsed and you cant do much about it.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by Ph33rAfro on 11-12-2002 07:00 PM:

thanks guys. i dont know what everyones bitching about. if there complainging bout the sound and\or the picture. they should go out and cam it them selves a week early. then theyll have the right to critisize. untill they do so. stop ure bitching ne ways my only complaint is its hard ot get all the xdcc's are queued up but thats not the groups fault its the chans fualk.t keep up the good work and thanx for the pre cam of harry potter.


dont mind my spelling please i type fst and i hate re reading everything i say


Posted by scousethief on 11-12-2002 07:16 PM:

Rappa take a pill man i wasnt complaining about the release ( iwatched this on my wide screen tv with a dolby pro logic decoder on the cinema setting and the sound was still not too good the pic also wasnt great as ive said unless of course you think that that was the best pic youve seen on a cammed movie ?? but i suppose youd like me to give it a 10/10/10 ? the movie was good the quality wasnt (ALL my gear is Sony or Technics) but i was remarking on another groups releases that are inherently blue with crappy sound , if you dont agree with that statement thats tough cos it is very true.


By the way this forum is here so we can ALL give our views about the movies released, if youd bothered to read my post youd see i gave it a highish mark for pic seeing as its a cam i think its pretty good but as my mark suggests the audio IN MY OPINION let it down


Posted by Static on 11-12-2002 08:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by shagman
is it me or is there a pattern developing here as it seems its mainly the americans who complain how bad stuff is.


We only complain because it's so blatently obvious that the rest of the world just sucks.

I'm not some "Live Free or Die" white trash redneck either. Sure I have some greivences with the US too, but for the most part, when I travel abroad, I can't wait to get back home.

Here, when you have a problem with anything, competition is so fierce that product or service businesses do anything to make it up to you in order to keep you as a costumer. We grow up demanding only the highest standard of quality because there are so may other choices. That way of thinking just tends to boil over to everything else. Call it what you want, but the truth is, it fucking rocks.

That being said, I personally never compalin about anything free.
So mad props to anyone who will spend the time providing us with free , pre films. Even if the quality is that great.


Posted by djcycloid on 11-12-2002 10:03 PM:

quote:
We only complain because it's so blatently obvious that the rest of the world just sucks.


Spoken as if you were Bill Clinton himself!

--
Deejay


Posted by conlia-98 on 11-12-2002 10:45 PM:

im soryy but someone said the sound is perfect NO WAY! . its a good release thats it . There is talking and coughing zooming in and out . a guy standing up . Gr8 release but Video worthy no more than a 6 and the audio 5 . The audio is tinny .

Way better than the FTF release last year tho . well worth the watch


Posted by 50-Cent on 11-13-2002 12:03 AM:

In nero it says the duration is 77 min but on bottom says like 88 mins and wont burn on 80 min cd for me, anyone help me out?


Posted by Faceman on 11-13-2002 12:58 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by conlia-98
im soryy but someone said the sound is perfect NO WAY! . its a good release thats it . There is talking and coughing zooming in and out . a guy standing up . Gr8 release but Video worthy no more than a 6 and the audio 5 . The audio is tinny .

Way better than the FTF release last year tho . well worth the watch



Isn't that the whole point of bootlegs? Been like that for years.

You should see the bootleg my friend has of E.T., yes E.T. back in whatever year it came out. Whatever released now is HDTV quality compared to that.

IMO the only things that should be mentioned or criticized is aspect ratio and colouring of the releases. Those can be fixed so easily. The groups releasing silvers probably do not want to re-encode their material and we all lose out. While groups who do CAMs have their opportunity to do so.


Posted by fluffykiwi on 11-13-2002 06:51 AM:

The whole point of this forum is to describe and give opinions on the quality of the releases.
If someone points out that the final 30 seconds or so of audio is missing then that's a valid point, if someone feels the video is a bit bright or too grainy with the odd person walking in front of the screen or missing 19 seconds of the titles then that's a fair point worth mentioning.
THAT IS NOT BITCHING!

I have no idea why someone would be replying to the thread on the repack to complain about the audio being out of sync, as wasnt that what the repack was for?
Reply to the other thread!

My own opinion is that the video is of great quality for a release labelled CAM there are only a few scenes where the brightness is distracting usually when the camera pans to a sunlit sky. There was regularly similar probs with Cen*r*py SVCDs EP2 for example.
It didnt stop people raving about the quality.
The only time I found the slight blockiness distracting was when it was showing the snow scene at the end. I'd give it a 7/10 for picture quality, I thought it was very watchable.
The sound, apart from the missing part at the end was, in my opinion very clear, I didnt notice any overiding hiss or much background noise, for a CAM I'd give a 6/10, I did adjust my TV to improve it on my set.
On the whole a great release.
Oh and I dont really care whether its a pre or not, it's definitely a pre in usa, I'm in UK and it's still pre general release here too.

I wont comment on the movie itself as this thread is about the CD1 REPACK so only half the movie.
I've watched it, it's fine and worth the download time.


Posted by Kbu11Dude on 11-13-2002 09:52 AM:

Nice job for a cam. Better than most so called "Telesyncs" that have been released as of late.

7/7/7


Posted by sonny on 11-13-2002 12:08 PM:

nice cam realease and early too


Posted by desertboy on 11-13-2002 01:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dank!
LOL = Laugh Out Lout
LMAO = Laughing My Ass Off



Thank you I think now I can LMAO whenever I read this forum & LOL for that matter.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by Jackal_Guardian on 11-13-2002 04:04 PM:

WOW UTi your my new GOD!

LOL I never thought I would see the day of a great CAM again!


Posted by Tunam on 11-13-2002 04:29 PM:

READ THIS

Hey People read this

http://msnbc.com/news/834107.asp?0si=-


Posted by djcycloid on 11-13-2002 08:10 PM:

hahahahahaaa! roflmao. so what its been pirated, big deal. Its not like the film industry is going to loose millions of dollars from the pirate rls.
Still that link makes a pretty funny read

--
Deejay


Posted by spdabbs on 11-13-2002 08:59 PM:

Thumbs up

Another excellent release from UTi. Excellent picture, sound much better than many TS's that have been coming out. A great movie. The glitches mentioned in the .NFO don't affect the overall quality at all.

Well done UTi. Recognised by MSNBC too!!!!


Posted by Lrd_Mince on 11-13-2002 10:41 PM:

Great pic quality for a pre, sound pops alil at the beginning but soon disappears. Nice release

7.5/7/?


Posted by Jaded4Ten on 11-13-2002 11:18 PM:

Now imdb has the "story" too ...

http://us.imdb.com/StudioBrief/


Posted by mjnog3 on 11-14-2002 10:29 AM:

Good Stuff

Great Release, and y'alls Potter VCD got mentioned on CNN today, nice job


Posted by deesto on 11-14-2002 03:31 PM:

Question VCD playing on DVD players?

Anybody have trouble playing the burned repack on a standalone DVD player? I have a Pioneer DV-525 that plays most discs, but it wouldn't play this one... apparently it was released in PAL format? The NFO doesn't say... anyway, I re-ripped the DAT from the images, re-encoded them for NTSC, burned them, and those new discs played fine... but should I have to do this with new VCDs?
Not complaining (the quality is pretty damn good for a CAM), just wondering if any other users had a similar problem?

deesto


Posted by hawk_claw on 11-14-2002 10:46 PM:

huh?

i have a pansonic. and it wont play the movie. i got it by burning the image onto a cd. and btw the lst minute o fteh CD 1 doesnt haev audio how od i fix this?


Posted by DABhand on 11-15-2002 02:43 AM:

The best way to make sure your burning the correct format for your DVD is this.

Take the file AVSEQ.dat from the MPEGAV folder using daemon tools or Alcohol 120.

Rename to HP1.mpg (or hp2.mpg for cd2)

Start Nero (if your in US make sure the options are for burning to NTSC format) and burn as a VCD.

It should work.

Or you can use TMPEG and change to NTSC/PAL, either way works


Posted by IrcLeet on 11-15-2002 04:58 AM:

Ok, I am currently downloading this one, so I cant comment on the quality, but I would like to Thank UTI, for labeling their cam as a cam and not a TS. Thanks for the honesty, keep up the good work!


Posted by Esca on 11-15-2002 05:56 AM:

I feel pretty dam stupid but I can't get CD2 to play. Won't work in WMP and PowerDVD. Please help this nub :P


Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-15-2002 07:16 AM:

Just throwing in my two cents... I'll be expecting change

Keeping in mind that this is a CAM release, here's my vote.

6 (VERY good overall quality for a cam, but at a few parts people in the theater move in front of the shot... short but noticable)
4 (Audio was "ok" at best... at some points you can hear the camera moving around, and on the repack, at least, it cuts out near the end of CD 1 losing a few seconds from a minor scene)
5 (Movie was good on its own merits but a massacre of the original book... but then, aren't most adaptations to screen?)

With that said, I'll wait for the DVD rip, but thanks to UTi for letting us check it out a full week before US release!


Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-15-2002 07:20 AM:

Quick note to the noobs...

If you're having trouble with these VCDs, there's some really good tutorials posted at www.vcdhelp.com - you might want to check them out.

There are LOTS of sites devoted to help with this sort of thing... please let this post be the last of it. This forum is for rating and reviewing releases - not for the VCD creation process.


Posted by hawk_claw on 11-15-2002 07:19 PM:

i have no clue how to opne the AVSEQ01 on alcohol or daemon


Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-15-2002 08:00 PM:

This isn't the forum for help with vcds.

You really need to go somewhere else for this - the more people help out with vcd installs and ISO-related questions, the more negative attention we draw to havens like this.

Try going to www.vcdhelp.com - they have all you need.


Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-15-2002 08:07 PM:

P.S....

I'm not saying that to be a prick, either - Just try to appreciate what x69 et. al. are doing by hosting this forum. It's devoted to reviewing quality and content of group releases. There are several sites dedicated to teaching people how to make use of video files, burning CDs, and VCD issues.


Posted by deesto on 11-15-2002 11:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by hawk_claw
i have no clue how to opne the AVSEQ01 on alcohol or daemon

Put the VCD you created in the drive, and point Alcohol to the .DAT file above on the CD. Or, if you still have the CD image, use WinISO or ISOBuster to open the image (it opens it just like WinZip opens a ZIP file) and copy the .DAT file from the image to your hard drive.


Posted by coinsey on 11-15-2002 11:56 PM:

HARRY SNOTTER AND THE SNOTTY SECRETS

YOU JUST NEW i would put in my 2 cents here did'ent ya. lol

So like here's what i got to say. UTI very good job getting this out as quick as possible. BUT !

The picture was alright im not complaning and the sound was alright, BUT and i do say But the timming was off when the person spoke the sound was off. poor timing,, my only complant, i did enjoy the movie, and i do apreacate it, but like i said just a bit of a timming problem on the sound .


Posted by ErrorS on 11-16-2002 02:59 AM:

nice release.. sound was awesome for a cam.. video was pretty good.. had to mess with brightness, but after i did it lookd awesome.. just a little dark and not as sharp as it could've been.. good movie too, better then the first

edited score

8/9/7

was really one of the most beutiful cams ive ever seen


Posted by deesto on 11-16-2002 05:47 AM:

Re: P.S....

quote:
Originally posted by Packet_Kiddie
I'm not saying that to be a prick, either - Just try to appreciate what x69 et. al. are doing by hosting this forum. It's devoted to reviewing quality and content of group releases. There are several sites dedicated to teaching people how to make use of video files, burning CDs, and VCD issues.


I do realize all you've said, but my question was with direct regard to this particular release, and the method by which the VCDs were produced. THose questions still remain unanswered, by the way... are these PAL format? Why did I need to rip the DAT files in order to watch them?
Enough for now.


Posted by Jc100 on 11-20-2002 11:35 PM:

Hey im wondering, and please dont construe this as a movie request... Did anyone dl the bad copy of cd 1???? did they use that fixed posted in vcdquality and was audio fixed or was there still a prob. ?? if anyone has had cd 1 fixed using the vcdquality method ??


Posted by shadyrapper2 on 11-21-2002 03:42 AM:

just saw the sample of harry potter 2 cam -repack

i really think that this was definetly one of UTis best cam copys. When the snitch hit the ground it made a loud explosion u definetly heard that loud and clear. i think that no other group no matter how hard they try they cant top UTi's cams. FTF tried to beat them by doing a cheap telesync and that didnt work. i dont even think CTPz can beat this unless they got a preddvd screener.which is doubtless.

i rate the picture and 8 because its the best cam pic ive seen

i rate the sound a 8 because it is clear and loud and not fuzzy.

i rate the movie as a no rating because i havent seen it yet.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-21-2002 03:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by shadyrapper2
just saw the sample of harry potter 2 cam -repack

i really think that this was definetly one of UTis best cam copys. When the snitch hit the ground it made a loud explosion u definetly heard that loud and clear. i think that no other group no matter how hard they try they cant top UTi's cams. FTF tried to beat them by doing a cheap telesync and that didnt work. i dont even think CTPz can beat this unless they got a preddvd screener.which is doubtless.

i rate the picture and 8 because its the best cam pic ive seen

i rate the sound a 8 because it is clear and loud and not fuzzy.

i rate the movie as a no rating because i havent seen it yet.



you just got this fixed according to your other posts and you are rating it allready lol NO this is not better than c*p or ftf. The sound is terrible hollow as hell and the pic is too dark-2 cents from a newbie


Posted by Jc100 on 11-21-2002 10:54 PM:

Did Centr0py even release a copy of this? People are mentioning them so was their an internal or peopel just suckin the dick and hoping somehting comes out as so many seem to do around here.


Posted by memoman on 11-22-2002 12:48 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by oqwarrior

So this is the UK version of the film? Hmm.... I wonder if the American version will differ in any way. I doubt it.

Anyways, great job with this repack UTi, although I will be fixing CD1 manually instead of wasting my bandwidth.



in the first harry potter the only difference was the title and any reference to it in the film . i expect they did not think the americans would understand it .can't remember any other differences so i don't think this time it will change much in that respect


Posted by deesto on 11-22-2002 01:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by memoman


in the first harry potter the only difference was the title and any reference to it in the film . i expect they did not think the americans would understand it .can't remember any other differences so i don't think this time it will change much in that respect


What was the UK title?


Posted by MatrixKid on 11-28-2002 10:26 PM:

Hi there.

I was wondering with the repack...

do i copy the 26 rar files into the original cd 1 directory and overwrite the files? .....im kinda lost in what to do. Ive got Cd2 burned, and have cd1 and c1 repack. Not sure what i should do.

Could someone help me?

thanks


Posted by Resnullius on 12-08-2002 09:20 PM:

Thumbs up

just wanted to say thx uti.
the missing sound is unfortunate tho.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 PM.
Show all 94 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.