VCDQuality Forums
Show all 94 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- I Robot *INTERNAL* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=44676)


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2004 03:22 PM:

I Robot *INTERNAL* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - POT

Very nice rls POT!

Still a little blurry, but looks much better than the VCD rls.

Perfect DTS audio too. Anyone rating this less than a 10 has issues. How can it BE any less perfect? (Unless it was out of synch or something).

Think i'll settle for this rls and watch this and get the movie out of the way once and for all.

8/10


Posted by deano21 on 07-18-2004 03:33 PM:

WOW great job pot.your becoming great at releases not that u aint.The pic is nice a tad blurry but if u sit away its perfect.Great sound as well nothing wrong.

well done pot will get this

8/10/?


Posted by stezo2k on 07-18-2004 03:43 PM:

brilliant release, especially the sound, managed to get the sample

video 8 pretty good telesync, well watchable

sound 10 couldn't be any better

havent watched the movie yet

going to be a pain in the arse to find this release though, with the other release having a similar file name, oh well


Posted by SeeDee_MKII on 07-18-2004 03:49 PM:

/me takes the crack pipe of ms and co

have u actually checked the colours on this rls ?
not good enough quality to worthy svcd either

4\9\8

__________________
SeeDee MKII


Posted by deano21 on 07-18-2004 03:51 PM:

quote:
/me takes the crack pipe of ms and co

have u actually checked the colours on this rls ?
not good enough quality to worthy svcd either

4\9\8



OMG this is a good release the picture is good how can u give it a 4?????????


Posted by EJC413 on 07-18-2004 03:56 PM:

Crazy

You guys are rating this way too high. Yeah, its a lot better compared to their other releases, but this release is in no way an 8 for video. Blurry, heck yeah its blurry.

5/9/?


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2004 03:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SeeDee_MKII
/me takes the crack pipe of ms and co

have u actually checked the colours on this rls ?
not good enough quality to worthy svcd either

4\9\8



/me takes the crack pipe off SeeDee_MKII

And DTS source is only good enough to warrant a 9 from you?


Posted by huggy on 07-18-2004 04:26 PM:

a decent release of this long awaited movie. a little better than the last. this is the one to watch so grab it while you can

__________________
your never alone with Schizophrenia


Posted by luckyluke80 on 07-18-2004 04:29 PM:

the sample i saw did not look that good. Audio was Great but video from the sample looked ok. i get the 1st cd and see if its better. Saw the movie last night in theater... it was Great!
7/10/9 (from sample)

__________________
Elisha Cuthbert is sooooooooooooo hot!!!!


Posted by Miller on 07-18-2004 04:55 PM:

just watched the sample . pot cleaned this up alot. as the nfo said its brighter, sharper, and a little more color.its still a littel blurry. id settle for this rls. and of course audio is perfect.
7/10/8

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by bigd25x on 07-18-2004 05:02 PM:

this is a true ts, you cant get much better then this, DTS sound, good not so croped picture, decent quality, the only thing that could be better is if the video had better / more viberant colors, but im sure as hell not complaining good job guys good to see your takeing up group up more steps



VIDEO - 8

SOUND - 10

MOVIE - Going to theaters to see it, will smith is just tooo good lol


Posted by Air1 on 07-18-2004 05:36 PM:

just watched the sample....

wow this rls isn't as dark or fuzzy but it's way too bright and everything has a sea-green tint to it.

original TS by POT:

7/9

THIS rls by POT:

7.5/10


Posted by fixed on 07-18-2004 05:37 PM:

picture was a little better but i already watched the other release that was enough for me...shitty attempt at matrix effects or something,movie bites.

__________________
pha~Q


Posted by Phi on 07-18-2004 05:45 PM:

Very nicely done POT! Quick Quality & DTS oh my! You'd NEED to be smoking crack to think that these A/V sources didnt warrent SVCD... just look at the difference ;Þ

Movie wasnt as quality, good idea... poorly executed :T

8/10/6 (Whole Movie)


Posted by Debo on 07-18-2004 05:46 PM:

i dont know if we got the same sample
but this looks like shit
picture is fucking horrible
its green
audio isnt bad but it isnt the best i seen
4/8

__________________


Posted by Icedog on 07-18-2004 05:52 PM:

Video still looks like crap for me, the audio is the only thing that great.


Posted by Jazzmo on 07-18-2004 06:13 PM:

Thats Better No guy with a HAT!!.. needing the toilet every 5 mins

V:8 ..far better picture then the other rls (bit of a green tint 2 it though)

S:10.. The Sound is Fab

M:8 Enjoy'd it (not better then spiderguy2 though)lol


Posted by qbs on 07-18-2004 06:31 PM:

Very nice copy 7/10/8


Posted by lax01 on 07-18-2004 07:31 PM:

hey Mystic, where in the NFO does it say the source audio is from the DTS disc?

x/x/x

rating it soon

__________________


Posted by psyche on 07-18-2004 07:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by deano21
OMG this is a good release the picture is good how can u give it a 4?????????
cos he's in bed with the other guys *wink* SEEdee but this IS however a decent release, not the best but not the worse... 7/9/7


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2004 08:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by lax01
hey Mystic, where in the NFO does it say the source audio is from the DTS disc?

x/x/x

rating it soon



Don't you think it's kind of obvious?


Posted by ShinBone on 07-18-2004 08:12 PM:

Green tint traded for the blur.

Mystic Slippers: both releases are from the DTS so how do you rate one an 8 and this one a 10? I just listened to the same scene in the internal sample as in the first telesync. They sounded identical went I viewed the scenes back to back. Audio still seems too low.


Posted by zad on 07-18-2004 08:14 PM:

LOL i think the DTS bit is a little missleading casue there is no way none of these carry dts track

1) if it was in dts most people wouldnt be able to play it on there pc/stand alone as it wouldnt revert back to 2 channel stereo.

2)The amount of cds per film to carry 2 sound tracks would have to increase and i cant switch audio when its playing so i guess there is only one audio track on the disk

DTS as you all keep refering to is the fact its a direct plugin to the theater sound system not a proper DTS sound track as in 5.1/6.1 etc

The movie still looks blurry but like its been said the sound is good.


Posted by simon1987 on 07-18-2004 08:22 PM:

8/10/3

very nice release, crappy movie, nfo has the word shit in it.


Posted by Air1 on 07-18-2004 08:23 PM:

zad:

the DTS thing means they got the audio for their camera in the theater from a DTS *SOURCE* meaning they got DTS disc(s) from the movie that are sent along to a theater and used them though didn't encode them in DTS. rofl, a DTS track wouldn't even FIT on a single CD-R let alone with any video on it at all.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-18-2004 08:23 PM:

omg this shit is terrible....again pot wins with sound, still alittle low..but the video is f..king horrible. What the f..k is up with the green tint. The contrast is f..king high, and the picture is blurry and pixelates during movement. Man stick with FRA cam. Pot is still losing points for even trying to pass this re-encode off as a svcd telesync. Horrible release again.

4/7/9 movie was good. Too bad most of these releases aren't.

-Videocd is gone as far a telesync's
-Centropy is back but releases are to the shits.
-Will TCR or Fujitive make a guess appearance.
-or will TUN return with another fake Telecine....

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Bullet on 07-18-2004 08:28 PM:

ok;..shall i now give my opinion so at last u will read the comment of a dude that knows what he's talking about and is very objective:

video:. If you tune ure tv with a bit more color etc then it's watchable. It's not bad but definately not the quality that gives me a boner. It's watchable and nothing more.

audio: yes;..this is good. Dont think it's DTS but ok. It's still easy on the ears and therefor a job well done

movie: yes it is an american blockbuster so you can expect the same idiology as in other flics like this;.. A.I etc. But this movie has had so much bad critics and that is not right.

Overall rates:..well i personally find the video more important then the audio. So:

6/9/6.5


Posted by UltrA1 on 07-18-2004 08:45 PM:

No WAY...
wish I know how to fix the video like re encode for a better looking video personaly.....
everything is starting to look green.......... picture is to much, looks better the the rest.
wow !!!! svcd internal ok.. anyhow I hear a hiss in audio but it's clear driect dts cool.
a-7.8
v-6.2 my min requirments
due to no ctp or vcd grp rels maybe, I'll keep this copy..
movie 8.0

__________________
Anyone with any complaints, contact:
[email protected]

Movie From Maven Priceless!!

*Broadband internet not included...


Posted by DigitalMonkey on 07-18-2004 08:51 PM:

this isnt any better then the other one, its still shit, now there is a green tint to it , the sound is good, still a little low but i can deal with it,

5/9

pic


Posted by Koolice on 07-18-2004 08:53 PM:

ill take blurry over green tint


Posted by SeeDee_MKII on 07-18-2004 09:16 PM:

FAO Ms

The reason i only voted the sound 9 was although the sound was DTS source the level quality playback on my TV was too low.

Just because they say its DTS, dont make it an actual 10 does it now.

here endeth lesson

__________________
SeeDee MKII


Posted by UltrA1 on 07-18-2004 09:21 PM:

well best out there sofar..
so get it if you like will smith
or get it if you like to support POT...
get this if you can adjust your tv's green tint..

NEW NEWS'
jjo a radio station here has a 1st anual dodgeball contest want in??

weard.
looks like people are lowering there raitings for TS vcd or svcd's man wish there was a way to get direct video .....

__________________
Anyone with any complaints, contact:
[email protected]

Movie From Maven Priceless!!

*Broadband internet not included...


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2004 09:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SeeDee_MKII
FAO Ms

The reason i only voted the sound 9 was although the sound was DTS source the level quality playback on my TV was too low.

Just because they say its DTS, dont make it an actual 10 does it now.

here endeth lesson



Maybe your deaf? The audio is normalized.

Here endeth the lesson.


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2004 09:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ShinBone
Green tint traded for the blur.

Mystic Slippers: both releases are from the DTS so how do you rate one an 8 and this one a 10? I just listened to the same scene in the internal sample as in the first telesync. They sounded identical went I viewed the scenes back to back. Audio still seems too low.



Audio seemed low to me on the first VCD.

Maybe they used a different level for this one? Maybe i was drunk? Maybe Miami will win the world series?

Who cares.

It sounded different.

The end.


Posted by Bravo on 07-18-2004 09:31 PM:

Unless they have a new way to do DTS sound there is no way to put this on a svcd. The sound file would be too big. This is a direct source converted to mp2 sound. Please stop saying dts and just say direct sound. Put on a factory disc and you will hear the difference of what true DTS sounds is.


Posted by Heph on 07-18-2004 09:50 PM:

8/10/8

Superb Audio. Video not discernably different from the VCD
version. Oh well , not much new out atm anyway if you want
to DL it.

__________________
Heph (Hephaestus)


Posted by brr8760 on 07-18-2004 09:55 PM:

The only real complaint I had before was that the pic was a little dark. I never thought it was blurry. But if they brightened it up, ah reckon it's worth a peek.

POT-- your rep is growing.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by XboxFreak on 07-18-2004 10:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
Audio seemed low to me on the first VCD.

Maybe they used a different level for this one? Maybe i was drunk? Maybe Miami will win the world series?

Who cares.

It sounded different.

The end.



Miami doesn't have a baseball team, and if you mean Florida Marlins yes they already won the world series, twice!


Posted by SleepWalker on 07-18-2004 10:14 PM:

6/10/? from sample


the tint is really annoying. unless i can adjust it with wmp or something i'd rather settle for blurry. sound is nice though.


Posted by dc_man on 07-18-2004 10:27 PM:

Alls I can say is if you want to see this movie don't watch the sample. Ruins the whole flick. GJ, POT

__________________
My sig worked, It's back.


Posted by britinwinnipe on 07-18-2004 10:28 PM:

good job guys thank you

my score 8/9/10
thats 8 for the picture
9 sound
10 good movie


would have been 10 for the picture but it is blurred and that guy gets in the way three times but all in all great job
thank you


Posted by pHo on 07-18-2004 10:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
Unless they have a new way to do DTS sound there is no way to put this on a svcd. The sound file would be too big. This is a direct source converted to mp2 sound. Please stop saying dts and just say direct sound. Put on a factory disc and you will hear the difference of what true DTS sounds is.


sigh, please read before typing. i think everyone here except you and zad, knows the difference between a DTS track on a dvd and a DTS source from a theater. direct sound could mean a jack in a seat used, and that's hardly the same as using a DTS disc and muxing is it?

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by EJC413 on 07-18-2004 10:46 PM:

What sample have I been watching?

What sample have I been watching? I dunno, but the sample is kinda green and blurry. What's up with everyone giving the video an 8??? Should some of the better VideoCd and Centropy releases get a freaking 15 then? On a scale of 10, no way this is an 8. You guys must have real low expectations


Posted by Bravo on 07-18-2004 10:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
sigh, please read before typing. i think everyone here except you and zad, knows the difference between a DTS track on a dvd and a DTS source from a theater. direct sound could mean a jack in a seat used, and that's hardly the same as using a DTS disc and muxing is it?


True, now it makes sense. If i take a plain audio tape and copy a 5.1 digital disc audio track i will have 5.1 digital on the tape. It will play back as 5.1 too on my stereo system. Makes perfect sense to me now, thanks.


Posted by ZootedLooter on 07-18-2004 11:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jazzmo
Thats Better No guy with a HAT!!.. needing the toilet every 5 mins

which release is that.......not the original pot proper i hope?......looks to me like the video color is better in that one

looter

__________________
zooted adj : 1. under influence of drugs: relaxed, excited, or euphoric from taking illegal drugs, especially marijuana ( slang ) 2. intoxicated: very intoxicated ( informal )
looter n. : someone who takes spoils or plunder (as in war) [syn: plunderer, pillager, spoiler, despoiler, raider, freebooter]



Posted by maccydad on 07-18-2004 11:24 PM:

way too green to me and why is there 2 mpg in disc2 with different lba

audio 8
video 5
film 6

__________________


Posted by hahe on 07-18-2004 11:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by XboxFreak
Miami doesn't have a baseball, and if you mean Florida Marlins yes they already won the world series, twice!


Maybe he ment Tampa Bay?


Posted by 007-Bond on 07-18-2004 11:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by maccydad
and why is there 2 mpg in disc2 with different lba

audio 8
video 5
film 6



Quote from Sleepover.SVCD.TELESYNC-POT.nfo

" NOTE - each CD has 1 bin & 1 cue file but if you extract the mpeg from the bins you will notice 2 mpeg files per CD (remember the old TCR movies?, just like theirs) We didnt want to do it this way but due to a bad frame and fix, we had to split the mpeg into 2 to keep the movie in sync. There is no movie loss as CD1 ends on frame 72259 and CD2 starts on frame 72260."

Could be the same issue or maybe it is because they had to mark the audio..


Posted by dwayne on 07-18-2004 11:47 PM:

fras rls is still superior;]


Posted by ShinBone on 07-18-2004 11:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dc_man
Alls I can say is if you want to see this movie don't watch the sample. Ruins the whole flick. GJ, POT


Yeah, I like how they sampled the scene that resolves all the questions in the move.

The nasty tint really ruins this one... Thanks for the effort POT, but I do hope someone "steals" your audio and syncs it over a nicer cam like you suggested they might in the first release's nfo.


Posted by Redemption198 on 07-19-2004 12:38 AM:

Damn stupid sample, did they mean that.

I think this is OK, the pic is blurry and strange looking, but watchable enough, not really an improvement from the VCD version though.

Sound is overrated, if this is from a DTS disc then, then they've messed up the encode to mp2 as this isn't as good as the sound on VideoCD's Spiderman2, which is the best TS audio yet.

6/7/8


Posted by vip3r on 07-19-2004 12:52 AM:

Good release .. not much more to say that hasn't been said already.

7/9/8


Posted by crapper on 07-19-2004 01:09 AM:

k
i guesse by now everyone that wants the know bout it knows

but this isnt an amazing release
its fast.
its watchable
but its not amazing

its not a dv cam job

the sound is good

the picture is cropped and well washed out. and grainy. so not that good

if i'd give ctp an 8 i'd give this one an 5.5
cuase its watchable .. but i dont wanna see this movie this way.

so right now goto the cinema's
and see it there

sound great
vision not so great


Posted by Debo on 07-19-2004 02:43 AM:

its interesting that in the full release the audio seems much better then the sample
but the pic is much shittier

__________________


Posted by snozzler29 on 07-19-2004 04:15 AM:

....

video 5
audio 7
movie - waiting for a watchable release

yes i know its fre etc etc

:: Just shut up with the comedy and rate the friggin release. -K::


Posted by unknown00 on 07-19-2004 04:24 AM:

quality sux a lot dont kno what yall r thinkin =\ 4/5/8


Posted by RUiNU on 07-19-2004 06:03 AM:

I'm not stevie wonder but I can rate this above a 5. I would think stevie would rate it a 0 for being to dark. <<<---Joke!! Pic was fine but too green (washed out). I didnt notice it being blurry,just grainy. Sound was good, sounded like it was direct. Movie was cool, not great but entertaining.

7/9/7.5

BTW All the peeps that gave the video below a 5 are just peeps that like to stur up crap. Please rate this, dont bash it.


Posted by Pickles on 07-19-2004 06:46 AM:

Man this shit is worse than the proper. Green tint all the way through. And what is with everyone saying the sound is better. It isn't that much better. Played on stand alone dvd player (yes I wasted 2 cd's). Stick with the proper or FRA if you have it. This is not that much better. However, it is still watchable if you must have.

Peace


Posted by jasonl33 on 07-19-2004 08:05 AM:

Video: Green vs Blurr u decide = 6
Audio: Great for a TS = 10
Movie: Not bad for Will Smith = 7.5


Posted by SNooF671 on 07-19-2004 08:19 AM:

shitty picture, green tint? blurry?

no way its any higher than a 5, audio is great, i watched the other pot release, was fine enough to watch

5/9/7


Posted by akasmiler on 07-19-2004 08:41 AM:

why did i waste my time with this rls???

i'm sorry but the sound wasn't altogether there, the pic...well let me not go any further on that and i cant comment on the movie cos the picture was so bad i couldn't watch it

2/4/???


Posted by garvey100 on 07-19-2004 10:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
True, now it makes sense. If i take a plain audio tape and copy a 5.1 digital disc audio track i will have 5.1 digital on the tape. It will play back as 5.1 too on my stereo system. Makes perfect sense to me now, thanks.


A fairly retarded comment. Clearly you can't understand that the audio source is from a DTS DISC, and therefore should be labelled as such, whether it's 5.1, 6.1 or simply encoded to 2 channel sound. It is from a different source to the jack in the seat, for example. Also despite your attempt at irony/sarcasm, you clearly also have difficulty understanding the difference between analogue and digital.


Posted by killabit on 07-19-2004 01:03 PM:

6/8/7

Video is not too bad for a TS release, audio is good but not great. The movie, egh, well its a sci-fi independence day..












-------------------------------------------
I don't give a fuck what you think.


Posted by Neversoft on 07-19-2004 02:03 PM:

Watched this last night. I expected it to be shit but was pleasantly suprised. Not an awesome movie, but good enough to keep you interested. This release is let down by fairly crappy video, it's washed out, blurry and (as mentioned earlier) there's the bloke with the baseball cap and some slut with an afro gettin' in the way.

The audio also loses sync for 10mins on CD1, but otherwise the sound is perfect, although quiet.

Overall: 5/9/8

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.


Posted by CARLlTOS on 07-19-2004 03:30 PM:

pretty good release by pot

excellent sound, this is probably the best that pot has released.

I give it a 7/9/?


Posted by Bravo on 07-19-2004 03:48 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by garvey100
A fairly retarded comment. Clearly you can't understand that the audio source is from a DTS DISC, and therefore should be labelled as such, whether it's 5.1, 6.1 or simply encoded to 2 channel sound. It is from a different source to the jack in the seat, for example. Also despite your attempt at irony/sarcasm, you clearly also have difficulty understanding the difference between analogue and digital.


Thank you for clearing that up for me as it was obvious i didn't understand. Thanks again, you are noble. So tell me, is the sound still DTS or is it MP2 stereo once it's converted?


Posted by Movie_Insider on 07-19-2004 05:46 PM:

Thumbs up

was a very nice rls 6/7/7 I would have given you guys a better score if the jerk in front of you didn't get up 4 times while your cam man was filming it!


Posted by your name her on 07-19-2004 06:45 PM:

eh missing ending of the movie

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by firefighter on 07-19-2004 07:15 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by your name here
eh missing ending of the movie


man people are just itchin to find a way to nuke POT, if you cant find a reason make one up! (like some people we're dumb and nuked Sleepover for no bin/cue when it did have it), anyway rumor going around that POT's internal is missing the ending. Like i said on 100000 other threads its next to impossible to sync dts on an incomplete movie. (i have encoded along time and have in past to make a better copy of two movies). POT's copy here is same as their VCD TS ... its not only complete but archives all the way to the credits. So whoever nukes it slap them around a bit and tell them wait untill next POT pre to try and nuke them

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-19-2004 07:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by your name here
eh missing ending of the movie


No it's bloody well not. I just watched the entire thing this afternoon.

1. The movie surprised me in that it's actually rather good!

2. The video quality is great. Bit dark, but not so dark you can't see anything.

3. The whole movie is there. The rls cut's off after the first name of the credits is displayed.

So there. Quit crying.


Posted by SeeDee_MKII on 07-19-2004 08:10 PM:

seriously m$, how are you rating the video so high ?? its cropeed quite a bit, green to fuck and generally pretty shit for a silver, SVCD, TS.

I personally still think that the FRA repack was far superior in quality, and if like me you rip the audio from the pot rls and mux with the FRA video, you have a half decent rls.

I`d also like to say Hi to my mum, and suck my balls to the 99% of the twats on here.

__________________
SeeDee MKII


Posted by xFusioNx on 07-19-2004 08:55 PM:

Mystic, why is it that all the nay-sayers are newbies? Anyone who rates this rls lower than a 7/10/x is a fucking groupie. Go suck on your favorite groups nuts some more, POT did an excellent job with this one.

Anyway, this rls is great. The sound is perfect, colors are just fine, only thing that keeps it from being perfect is the very very slight flicker in brightness, but it's hardly noticable, blurry, but what do you expect? A Screener or DVD-rip?

All in all 9/10/8.5

Movie wasnt bad at all, but had a few shortcomings. Great flick though.


Posted by zad on 07-19-2004 10:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
Thank you for clearing that up for me as it was obvious i didn't understand. Thanks again, you are noble. So tell me, is the sound still DTS or is it MP2 stereo once it's converted?



LOL like your wit

think its DTS but only stereo on my amp weird


Posted by 555Prodigy on 07-19-2004 10:18 PM:

DAMN fine job on the rls

7/9/9


Posted by I am X on 07-19-2004 11:25 PM:

Grainy with green tint and slight blur. This release was BAD.

Video 3.5
Audio 7
Movie 8.5

__________________
It is purpose that created us

Purpose that connects us

Purpose that pulls us

that guides us,

that DRIVES us,

It is purpose that defines

PURPOSE........that BINDS us

"Agent Smith" (and cloned virii cohorts)

"The Matrix Reloaded"


Posted by alexnasty on 07-19-2004 11:30 PM:

this looks much better than the proper ts but still has ways to go before being as good as videocd. I mean I really miss those guys. SO far their garfield, the terminal, dodgeball and white chicks have been their best ts's and right now pot does not stand a chance but they are getting better. Keep improving, hopefully you can then be the solution to videocd

__________________
hello


Posted by bee_nutz on 07-20-2004 02:00 AM:

hey bravo,
did you know (s)\vcd's can totally be authored with DTS audio? you blithering idiot. obviousely it is encoded to mp2. nevertheless, it will be infinitely better than another means of direct audio, i.e. the aforementioned headphone jack.

and on another note, pot rules because they are NTSC god damnit!! and i dont have to re-enc to author DVDR.

8/9/9

awesome release


Posted by PsychoPostalW on 07-20-2004 02:18 AM:

Video - green,grainy,god-awful
Rate it a 4(and I'm being generous)

Audio - superb
Rate it a 10(don't see how the sound can get any better)

Movie - a joke....hasn't "The Matrix" been re-hashed enough already.Hollywood needs some new script writers....BADLY.
Rate it a 2(please get some ideas for films)


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-20-2004 02:43 AM:

Considering I, Robot was written about 900 zillion years BEFORE The Matrix, someone needs to get their bold statements right.


Posted by Bravo on 07-20-2004 02:59 AM:

Originally posted by bee_nutz
hey bravo,
did you know (s)\vcd's can totally be authored with DTS audio?you blithering idiot.


Bravo-OK i'm an idiot, SO! And can you post a link to back up your statement?

bee_nutz-obviousely it is encoded to mp2.

Bravo-And what was the argument again?
CASE CLOSED!!!!


Posted by Inise on 07-20-2004 06:02 AM:

video is total sh!t....worst than the first release as said many times alrdy. also, it would be nice to see a release by this grp without heads poppin up in front of the camera....repositioning the camera might eliminate this...but what do i know


4/9/x

still waiting for a better release..even if i have to wait for the dvdrip


Posted by bee_nutz on 07-20-2004 07:46 AM:

bravo,
read pot nfo for king arthur & the proper ts of i robot


Posted by garvey100 on 07-20-2004 10:30 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
Originally posted by bee_nutz
hey bravo,
did you know (s)\vcd's can totally be authored with DTS audio?you blithering idiot.


Bravo-OK i'm an idiot, SO! And can you post a link to back up your statement?

bee_nutz-obviousely it is encoded to mp2.

Bravo-And what was the argument again?
CASE CLOSED!!!!



Obviously you don't feel the need to know where the audio is sourced from. I personally think that knowing where audio is from gives us a better opportunity to discuss the release. Still you can't get it through your thick skull that it has to mentioned that its from DTS, as this is different to other forms of direct sound. MP2 encodes from different sources are obviously gonna sound different. We ALL know that it is MP2 sound, the group don't insult our ignorance by stating the blatantly obvious, and mention therefore where it is sourced from. You are sounding more ignorant in every post bravo, so now's the time to stop.


Posted by Bravo on 07-20-2004 05:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by garvey100
Obviously you don't feel the need to know where the audio is sourced from. I personally think that knowing where audio is from gives us a better opportunity to discuss the release. Still you can't get it through your thick skull that it has to mentioned that its from DTS, as this is different to other forms of direct sound. MP2 encodes from different sources are obviously gonna sound different. We ALL know that it is MP2 sound, the group don't insult our ignorance by stating the blatantly obvious, and mention therefore where it is sourced from. You are sounding more ignorant in every post bravo, so now's the time to stop.


Gotta love the insults, always leads to a more honest and constructive conversation . True i don't care where the source is from. As long as it is clean. And i can see where knowing what the source is may mean alot to some of you. But calling the audio on the svcd DTS is still wrong. If you call it audio from a DTS source that is different and correct. There are alot of noobs who won't understand your lingo and think they have DTS on a disc.
And don't say it won't happen cause i have seen people who think mono in two speakers is stereo. Let's just call it what it is and nothing more. It is great sound. Probably one of the best released on svcd, but it is not DTS. It's mp2 audio from a dts source.


Posted by brooklyn on 07-20-2004 07:09 PM:

This is the worst release i have ever gotten. I see ppls heads leaving to go to the bathroom n then i see them come back. Colors are horrible, screen is blury, it freezes after cd1 n cd2 and i cant even watch the ending.

I give it a 3 or video and a 7 on audio


Posted by ams30gts on 07-20-2004 11:02 PM:

did i grab the wrong rel? audio is awesome. video is all green toned. it was labled the internal svcd rel

?/9/6


Posted by garvey100 on 07-21-2004 03:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
Gotta love the insults, always leads to a more honest and constructive conversation . True i don't care where the source is from. As long as it is clean. And i can see where knowing what the source is may mean alot to some of you. But calling the audio on the svcd DTS is still wrong. If you call it audio from a DTS source that is different and correct. There are alot of noobs who won't understand your lingo and think they have DTS on a disc.
And don't say it won't happen cause i have seen people who think mono in two speakers is stereo. Let's just call it what it is and nothing more. It is great sound. Probably one of the best released on svcd, but it is not DTS. It's mp2 audio from a dts source.



Yeah and I can agree with that. Sorry we had problems........like a fairytale ending eh mate
Maybe they should relable SOURCE in fact.


Posted by dalton4life on 07-21-2004 04:58 AM:

It's weird to see 2 releases that needed each other so bad. The FRA cam had a pretty nice pic and bad audio. And this is exactly the opposite. I don't see how anyone can say this video is good. It's green, blurry and washed out. The audio is pretty nice except too quiet. So you take this audio and turn it up and take FRA cam you have a nice release. That's what I did. I've only watched half so far but the movie seems ok to me.

4/8/?

__________________
"with great power comes great responsibility."


Posted by lorddusty on 07-21-2004 06:36 AM:

Wow you guys didnt remind me to bring the underwater diving googles so everything else in the room would look as green as the video... Video also a little bit grainy, but not cropped too bad.
And unless I am losing my mind the sync is off a little bit in the first cd (round 15 mins in).

6/8/6


Posted by CANES1 on 07-22-2004 06:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
Considering I, Robot was written about 900 zillion years BEFORE The Matrix, someone needs to get their bold statements right.


How was he supposed to know that? And how do you know that? Is your real name Will Smith? I don't think its common knowledge 'cause I didn't know that.

EDIT: Wait a sec Is this movie based on book? Maybe thats how you know?


Posted by TeK-Delorean on 07-22-2004 09:25 AM:

6/8/4

Decent release, Not worth a blank CD imo. Not because of the quality, but because I thought the movie was trash.

__________________


Posted by Thelgar on 07-23-2004 02:09 AM:

After watching the full vcd, i have to say nuke this one. it is not a ts, people are walking though the screen as it plays, and the picture is shaky/blurred. I do have to agree the audio is excellent


Posted by Diggler on 07-23-2004 08:28 AM:

This one should be nuked for the fact that there's a chunk of film missing in between cd1 and cd2.

:: I have watched this release. There is NOTHING missing. Whatever problems you are having are yours and yours alone. - 404notfound


Posted by quality on 08-18-2004 02:30 PM:

[IMG]http://storeage.s5.com/store/q.gif[/IMG]

Film was worth a watch
Quality was average, Shame about the couple of heads when people were going to the restroom.
Sound was a bit low, but the quality was not 2 bad once the volume was cranked up.

http://storeage.s5.com/store/qbanner.gif


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:28 PM.
Show all 94 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.