VCDQuality Forums - The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *PROPER* - TELESYNC

Show all 99 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *PROPER* - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12494)

Posted by Semantus on 12-19-2002 10:24 PM:

LOTR2 TXF

Yeah TCF ist out.
Hope this will be better!

cya
Semantus

Posted by revolution-x on 12-19-2002 10:24 PM:

oh god please no!

Posted by [dj-mike] on 12-19-2002 10:54 PM:

well this is better then the other two releases, gonna get this one i think

Posted by dopeuser8 on 12-19-2002 10:59 PM:

wow look at all the votes, only seconds after the jpegs go up, people have both tcf and ftf releases and are judging, retards, but anyways i got 2 comments...

shitty ts's like this might be fine for 'extreme ops' or 'country bears', and concidering a dvd screener will be out within the next 3 weeks, I really don't see why this is even out.

And a 'proper'? it doesnt look much better (if at all) than tcf's, even if it is any better, your gonna have to cut out about 15 minutes worth of scenes from tcf's and edit them into this one to get a full movie.

Posted by Mistar Muffin on 12-19-2002 11:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
And a 'proper'? it doesnt look much better (if at all) than tcf's, even if it is any better...

It's not a proper of TCF's, which is a CAM, this is a TS. This is a proper of NewFXP's ATROCIOUS TS that was released yesterday.
*SMACK*.

__________________
mmm...muffins

Posted by devilbeast on 12-19-2002 11:08 PM:

dope, true that the voting is gay but saying theres no point in this rls is stupid because some people may not want to fucking wait the time, speed is a big thing, stick around the scene long enough and you may understand that
props to any oen who rls's this even if its not that good cause ur riskin ur ass so some extent, but please try and make it the best that you can and dont just throw shit out there so we dont have to lsiten to ppl like dope say its stupid.

Posted by dizzyD on 12-19-2002 11:09 PM:

ftf should not be allowed to rls

another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

Posted by [dj-mike] on 12-19-2002 11:17 PM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

i dont agree, the ftf version is a lot better then the tcf

Posted by ewfbootlegga on 12-19-2002 11:19 PM:

hell no. Anybody saying the ftf release is better needs to open their friggin eyes. TCF release is clear and crisp audio. Can't say either of those for the ftf release. 6/5/10

Posted by cartoon master on 12-19-2002 11:20 PM:

@dizzyD your are full of crack, ok is release is not the best
but FTF is some of the best groups, thats the point.
FTF we love you so much, thx for nemesis.

i if you want a got release dubbed the spanish scr.
oder take the german that is coming out.

__________________
happy day

cartoon master
***************
sorry my English is bad ^-^

Posted by moo on 12-19-2002 11:21 PM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

You answered yourself totally there.

You don't like it, don't leech. I really don't think a group is going to care about what anyone thinks about their releases. If you're a siteop/boxowner, best you can do is ban them.

Apart from that, ranting on a forum like this is pretty much pointless.

Kinda like, if you don't like J-Lo (shudder), and you post to a forum about how much her music sucks and shouldn't be released, the same effect would be observed as saying this vcd release sucks, ie not much

People always seem so angry when they post to this forum, it's christmas time, be happier

Posted by Mystic Slippers on 12-19-2002 11:22 PM:

Just grabbed the sample. Ok pic, sound is a bit on the fuzzy side though. But overall, pretty ok.

6/4/9

Posted by Crazy_Jay on 12-19-2002 11:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ewfbootlegga
TFC 6/5/10

TCF

Posted by ewfbootlegga on 12-19-2002 11:26 PM:

uhmm you chopped up what I said?

Posted by jaoal on 12-19-2002 11:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Crazy_Jay

TCF

What, never heard of The Fosen Chew?

__________________
Make me immortal god damnit!

Posted by ewfbootlegga on 12-19-2002 11:26 PM:

heh

Posted by tearz on 12-19-2002 11:26 PM:

I don't know y you guys are debating which on is better quality, they are all 100% crap. I think that TCF should stick to what they do best, bringing us awesome quality dvd screeners, and FTF (Fucked the Film) should just leave the scene completely, like we've been asking since the initial release of Star Wars! YOU ARE WRECKING THE MOVIE SCENE! PLEASE STOP RELEASING!

i'll w8 for a dvd rip =)
i don't want to waste the "movie"xperience of a great movie like this on this the ignorance of shitty release groups.

what do i do for the scene u ask?
nothing much... just the main part of rooting you fucks the XDCC's and EDU's that host this crap...

:: well done, you're part of the problem. if u think xdcc is part of the "scene" then you're a total fucking retard. -pHo

Posted by sooka on 12-19-2002 11:36 PM:

i totally agree with devilbeast .

... and dizzy d, geez, there loads out there, im sure, who like ftf's stuff, so why the hell should they quit releasin it coz u think its shit :-/ bleh, wateva

...and on this newb hunts for tcf's and ftf's release...

Posted by aXs-SVCD on 12-19-2002 11:38 PM:

hey guys Just got the sample, To be honest both releases are good! Each one has its own reasons to be good. Lets just leave it at that!!!

i personaly would download both

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.

Posted by dB| on 12-19-2002 11:42 PM:

wouldnt this be a proper of newfxp's release? and it is the worst ts i have ever seen. They wouldnt need PROPER to proper a internal cam

Posted by VCDz on 12-19-2002 11:43 PM:

Just saw the (mpg) sample...

Video: 6 (Blue Tint)
Audio: 8.2
Movie: ?.?

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i´m new...aand i´ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd´s"?

Posted by ZIGGYY on 12-19-2002 11:50 PM:

Well Well

i have looked at both rls and not just the sample they sent and i must say FTF rls wins the Sound for sure tcf sounds like someone had there mike in a tin can and the video is so close i would pick ftf rls to d/l

Posted by THING on 12-20-2002 12:03 AM:

this is just another bootleg tape from the streets

Posted by Crackedtooth on 12-20-2002 12:05 AM:

GO CINEMA

Best advice ... watch in cinema, or wait for dvd scr, really too great a movie to watch on low quality

Posted by Jugalator on 12-20-2002 12:10 AM:

Judging by the JPG's only, the TCF definitely look more crisp in picture quality to me. But perhaps that's just misleading shots...?

Guess I'll compare the samples and see.. :-/

Posted by Kalebson on 12-20-2002 12:21 AM:

not any better than TCF and this is missing scenes but I hear the TCF is also..which one folks?

Posted by dopeuser8 on 12-20-2002 12:32 AM:

bleh, I hate the whole argueing over the internet thing, but I'll try to clarify what I meant....
LOTR, starwars, spiderman, T2, etc, etc. are all good movies to start with, but the fantastic audio and visual effects are what really give it that kick in the ass that puts it in above and beyond your typical movie. For movies like this, anything less than a svcd taken from a screener tape, or preferably a dvd scr, just doesnt do the movie justice. It might be fine for 'The Hot Chick' or something like that. And considering a DVD screener will be out more than likely within 3 weeks (thats only 21 days), I think releases like this aren't needed.
Thats what I think, and if you don't agree and conform youre going to hell, because I'm really Jesus, and dopeuser8 is just my nick for online chatting.
And the "stick around the scene long enough and you may understand...." blah blah blah whatever was funny, just because my vcdquality post count isnt high doesnt mean I'm new to 'the scene'. Not to get into a who's l33ter debate but my c64 was equiped with a 1200 baud modem, 'back in the day'....

Posted by CoWs` on 12-20-2002 12:49 AM:

why u slamming ftf?

quote:
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

Bro, wats your problem, your suppose to give your personal opion on the release, not slam ftf..I mean ok, maybe TCF might be better but thats not need to say "lame attempt".. People put hours of time into trying to bring YOU these releases so you dont have to get off your ass and go to the theater..So if you wanna complaing about the groups take it somewhere else...
As for the releases, alright sound, alright pic, alittle blue, movie is great i hear...Gonna go to the theaters for this one!

Posted by bundyman on 12-20-2002 12:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
Not to get into a who's l33ter debate but my c64 was equiped with a 1200 baud modem, 'back in the day'....

hihi LOL

Posted by rObix on 12-20-2002 12:59 AM:

yawn. fuck any rls group that doesnt respect asptect ratio.

Posted by fateswarm on 12-20-2002 01:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
bleh, I hate the whole argueing over the internet thing, but I'll try to clarify what I meant....
LOTR, starwars, spiderman, T2, etc, etc. are all good movies to start with, but the fantastic audio and visual effects are what really give it that kick in the ass that puts it in above and beyond your typical movie. For movies like this, anything less than a svcd taken from a screener tape, or preferably a dvd scr, just doesnt do the movie justice. It might be fine for 'The Hot Chick' or something like that. And considering a DVD screener will be out more than likely within 3 weeks (thats only 21 days), I think releases like this aren't needed.
Thats what I think, and if you don't agree and conform youre going to hell, because I'm really Jesus, and dopeuser8 is just my nick for online chatting.
And the "stick around the scene long enough and you may understand...." blah blah blah whatever was funny, just because my vcdquality post count isnt high doesnt mean I'm new to 'the scene'. Not to get into a who's l33ter debate but my c64 was equiped with a 1200 baud modem, 'back in the day'....

I hear you. _Whatever_ I watch on a TS I think it sucks balls. Even if I say "ok, it's a TS/CAM, it won't be nothing special", it still bugs me.

Ok, I hear people say all the time "I don't have a problem with it, it doesn't matter, it's ok to me not to have dvd q." etc etc, but, do these people really anjoy the TS's? Or to be more precise, to they really enjoy movies or they just do it for the "0-day" glory?

Food for thought, but an obvious fact to me.

Posted by TroLL417 on 12-20-2002 01:09 AM:

how long until the dvd screener

Posted by your name here on 12-20-2002 01:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
wow look at all the votes, only seconds after the jpegs go up, people have both tcf and ftf releases and are judging, retards, but anyways i got 2 comments...

shitty ts's like this might be fine for 'extreme ops' or 'country bears', and concidering a dvd screener will be out within the next 3 weeks, I really don't see why this is even out.

And a 'proper'? it doesnt look much better (if at all) than tcf's, even if it is any better, your gonna have to cut out about 15 minutes worth of scenes from tcf's and edit them into this one to get a full movie.

dopeuser8 stfu plz u must be on dope to believe this is a proper of tcf's version thas why tcf labeled it *CAM* FTF'S RLS IS *TELESYNC* THE PROPER WAS PUT ON BCUZ OF THE SHITTY ASS RLS OF THE PREVIOUS TS *LORD OF THE RINGS THE TWO TOWERS NEWFXP* SO IF U ARE GONNA POST SOMETHING AT LEAST NO WHAT THE FUCK U ARE TALKING ABOUT

I GIVE THIS A 7/7/10 I LOVE TCF BUT I DO BELIEVE THIS IS BETTER SORRY GUYS BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by shagman on 12-20-2002 01:34 AM:

this is fuckin school yard stuff guys, why bother with a forum at all as all you do is the diss the fuckin groups if it wasnt for them in the first place we would all be fucked for movies as you guys who complain dont seem to contribute nothing but complaints.
get out there and cam your fuckin selves if you want better quality.

Posted by frontrow-4u on 12-20-2002 01:35 AM:

now now children put your handbags away!

It's a release some like it some don't.
But respect where it's due.
If you think you can do better you know what to do!

Posted by darkslide on 12-20-2002 01:46 AM:

hey.. your name... you need to read your posts and make sure they sound like you think they do, and lay off the caps...

i agree with dope, none of the releases do the movie justice...

glad i saw it in the theatre

__________________
What do you get when you cross an owl, with a bungee cord? My Ass.

Posted by a1catraz on 12-20-2002 02:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
wow look at all the votes, only seconds after the jpegs go up, people have both tcf and ftf releases and are judging, retards, but anyways i got 2 comments...

shitty ts's like this might be fine for 'extreme ops' or 'country bears', and concidering a dvd screener will be out within the next 3 weeks, I really don't see why this is even out.

And a 'proper'? it doesnt look much better (if at all) than tcf's, even if it is any better, your gonna have to cut out about 15 minutes worth of scenes from tcf's and edit them into this one to get a full movie.

ehh.. a Proper to the TS......... so. this propers the NEWFXP OR SOMETHING.......

doh.........................

a TS isn't fukin proper'd to a CAM..

a TS PROPERS ANOTHER TS.......
*sigh...........
n00bs..

Posted by dizzyD on 12-20-2002 02:03 AM:

Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
Originally posted by CoWs`

Bro, wats your problem, your suppose to give your personal opion on the release, not slam ftf..I mean ok, maybe TCF might be better but thats not need to say "lame attempt".. People put hours of time into trying to bring YOU these releases so you dont have to get off your ass and go to the theater..So if you wanna complaing about the groups take it somewhere else...
As for the releases, alright sound, alright pic, alittle blue, movie is great i hear...Gonna go to the theaters for this one!

firs off: i will see this movie at the theatre, so saying "they spend hours to bring it to me cuz i dont wanna go to the theatre" is pointless cuz i wouldnt download a ts of this movie. and second, take the complaining somewhere else? lol, i don't know if you know this..but umm...this is where people post their opinions about the releases, these forums are here for flames and complaints, along with other things..

and by the way tcf's release is also bad, i just said it's better than this cuz this really blows..and i don't care how many countless hours ftf encoders put into this or other releases but they aren't doing a good job. get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that

Posted by jaggy55uk on 12-20-2002 02:23 AM:

Why are the images taken from the first movie?

:: they're not, its the opening scenes from the new one.-pHo

Posted by Levangles on 12-20-2002 02:23 AM:

a solid point dizzy. and dopeuser, good call, but; u gotta remember that not every single person around is gonna love this film (though they most likely should)- and if a ts weren't released they'd bitch and bitch- and noone would hear the end of it until a scr is released. and i dont think anyone wants to see *x*number more posts about "when is TTT gonna be released?*. both incredibly weak releases. whatever.... scr soon hopefully!

Posted by Serpentor on 12-20-2002 03:03 AM:

Re: Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
[i]

and by the way tcf's release is also bad, i just said it's better than this cuz this really blows..and i don't care how many countless hours ftf encoders put into this or other releases but they aren't doing a good job. get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that [/B]

You want to put out something better yourself? Now shut the fuck up and stop complaining. Every thread these days is the same story, whiners contributing nothing but compaints about how shitty a free release is, until I see something better from you "DizzyD", go fuck yourself

Posted by Snowbording4138 on 12-20-2002 03:11 AM:

Re: Well Well

quote:
Originally posted by ZIGGYY
i have looked at both rls and not just the sample they sent and i must say FTF rls wins the Sound for sure tcf sounds like someone had there mike in a tin can and the video is so close i would pick ftf rls to d/l

the mic sounds like a tin can because its a cam genius i dunno how FTF can do a proper on a cam and call it a ts but whatever they blow hairy cock ne way

Posted by ExtremeMalice on 12-20-2002 03:20 AM:

I agree, this one is definately worth a theater visit. Unless your totally dying to know the entire movie plot etc. blah blah Why bother d/l a telesync or cam when u can get better (screener a couple weeks later) Movies like this one and new Matrix coming out in a while etc. etc. are bad ass for their special effects why ruin your first impression of the movie?

Just MY opinion

Posted by rec0de on 12-20-2002 03:21 AM:

personally i downloaded the TCF version but either r ok i'm gonna watch it tonight when my wife has finished watching friends props to both grps for giving us a decent choice laters gonna get my swerve on b4 i watch it

Posted by ZIGGYY on 12-20-2002 03:23 AM:

lol

first off Snowbording4138 your a fucking idiot they propered the earlyer ts by NEWFXP

and number 2 for all the ppl that think the tcf rls is better better watch the whole move the cam was tilted while taping so bad it's unreal and on cd3 u miss half the picture in places

so all them ppl that voted 9/9/9 ect for the tcf rls are either sucking tcf balls or just don't have a clue 10/10/10 is dvd quality and if tcf 9/9/9 i just guess dvd quality must have just became worse than a 3rd gen vcr tape lol

for anyone that wants a real pick i would pick FTF rls and if read any other posting i have ever put up i don't kiss anyones ass and usaully don't like ftf rls but in this instance if u want to watch the flick for free get ftf it will be the best bang for your bandwidth

before ppl vote or post in here maybe just maybe they should watch the shit first

sry you only miss 1/4 of the pic not 1/2

Posted by |Ware|Man on 12-20-2002 03:31 AM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

LOL!!! u are one retarded kid.. go back to lickin ur moms ass

Posted by |Ware|Man on 12-20-2002 03:34 AM:

The.Lord.Of.The.Rings.The.Two.Towers.INTERNAL .CAM-TCF
Its INTERNAL... So i dunno why ftf propered it when tcf's was a internal... all of u idiots that r saying tcf's is better then ftf's ... good luck gettin the tcf hahaha

Posted by dopeuser8 on 12-20-2002 03:38 AM:

holy shit, big fuckin deal, I looked on here and saw TCF's LOTR, then 10 seconds later FTF's comes up with a *proper* tag, and considering ftf has been labeling cam's as ts since they were HBO, (and almost totally forgetting about newfxp's release, since it was such garbage it shouldn't even exsist,) I was quick to think the *proper* was so it don't get nuked for duping TCF's release, which is a cam, but also considering TCF's cams look more like TC's anyways, well also considering I smoked a huge bowl before I came on here, you can see in my haste how I made a slight error. Big fuckin deal.

Posted by mist_trie on 12-20-2002 03:39 AM:

just because somethings labled "internal" doesn't mean the public isn't going to get it...i already see it trickling down to DCC bots on irc

Posted by DougieZero on 12-20-2002 03:40 AM:

I'm glad that groups release movies for me to download... Cam's, Telesyncs and Screeners... I'm glad they release the small limited movies too... I'm glad I get to choose what I want... I would like to thanks all the groups for their effort...

Posted by likwid8 on 12-20-2002 03:56 AM:

quote:
I'm glad that groups release movies for me to download... Cam's, Telesyncs and Screeners... I'm glad they release the small limited movies too... I'm glad I get to choose what I want... I would like to thanks all the groups for their effort...

well put...

Posted by ZIGGYY on 12-20-2002 03:56 AM:

ok listen up ppl

This was a PROPER of NEWFXP RLS not TCF'S
and the only reason grp lable INTERAL is so it don't get nuked

and yes we should be glad for all the grps to rls anything im not bashing tcf they do good work
im just he telling you on the quality of the 3 rls FTF rls is the best so far

Next week or whenever tcf rls there SCR they have right now
it will be better but as of this sec FTF rls is the best out there

Posted by bbrain on 12-20-2002 03:58 AM:

anyways..

well .. i am in the center of the theatre where there is no chairs in front of me for this one.. as for my nephews or drunk frenz on a weekend.. either of these last two releases will do.. getting this one tho, it popped up on my screen first.

Posted by mib on 12-20-2002 04:01 AM:

omg ftf does a proper.. lol...

Posted by dizzyD on 12-20-2002 04:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man
The.Lord.Of.The.Rings.The.Two.Towers.INTERNAL .CAM-TCF
Its INTERNAL... So i dunno why ftf propered it when tcf's was a internal... all of u idiots that r saying tcf's is better then ftf's ... good luck gettin the tcf hahaha

quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man

LOL!!! u are one retarded kid.. go back to lickin ur moms ass

And you're calling me retarded? Go suck on your dads balls you fucking cunt. Proper was of newfxp not tcf you little nub fuck; go back to dalnet fservers.

Posted by walldude on 12-20-2002 04:04 AM:

I've been coming to this site for awhile, but never to the forums till now.. Wanted to know if any of these releases are worth my time and drive space... Well I still don't know, all I see here is a bunch of what I assume are 15yr olds pissing like little babys. I didn't come in here for a flame war I came in for information. The information I got is TCF sux FTF sux... Everything and everybody sux. Well, thanks for the help people... I swear to god I wish we could go back to the days(probably before most of you were born) of the BBS, when pirate shit like this was underground and you really did have to be l33t to get anything.. I'm getting way too old to be dealing with this kind of crap.. I hope this whole internet file trading thing goes down the crapper and I can get back to dealing with real l33ts again

Posted by your name here on 12-20-2002 04:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man
The.Lord.Of.The.Rings.The.Two.Towers.INTERNAL .CAM-TCF
Its INTERNAL... So i dunno why ftf propered it when tcf's was a internal... all of u idiots that r saying tcf's is better then ftf's ... good luck gettin the tcf hahaha

DUDE U ARE FUCKING STUPID FTF DID NOT PROPER THIS RLS FROM TCF,THEY PROPERD THE NEWFXP SHIT TS, U OBVIUOSLY ARE A FUCKING n00b

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by FLYNN on 12-20-2002 04:37 AM:

so how many proper propers til teh dvd scr comes out next month :x

i cant fuckin wait i try to goto theatre but 1 week old baby complicates my efforts

watched both teh samples think im going with the TCF but mostly off reputation over ftf and cuz of the infamous *tint*

it makes me sick not seeing it in theatre first but that could be a few weeks and i just cant refrain

Posted by JcM AkA ViPER on 12-20-2002 05:16 AM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

This is an excellent example of why groups get pissed off so much, every release is a good thing, who gives a shit if the quality is shit or if it is a dvd screener, ya gota give credit to any group who risk thier ass to rls this stuff, without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group. i reckon u shud cut these guys sum fucking slack here, they aint done nuttin wrong, infact they probably doing u a favour, cos you'll prob end up gettin this anyway, so say what ya like, they really dont give a shit, they'll just rls thier shit internal and hardly anyone will get hold of it, that aint to good for the peeps who like the ftf releases and give them credit for releasing.

Posted by Tweezer on 12-20-2002 05:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man
The.Lord.Of.The.Rings.The.Two.Towers.INTERNAL .CAM-TCF
Its INTERNAL... So i dunno why ftf propered it when tcf's was a internal... all of u idiots that r saying tcf's is better then ftf's ... good luck gettin the tcf hahaha

First off internal doesnt mean anything....i have yet to see a TCF internal release that hasnt been availible to me, good luck getting it? To whom....hell i guarantee this will be on XDCC's tomorrow, second of all FTF did not proper TCF's release, obviously if you knew what you were talking about (which obviously you dont juding by your internal statement) you would know you do not proper a cam with a telesync you proper a telesync with a telesync, and you proper a cam with a cam, thats like calling a screener a proper of a telesync

quote:
omg ftf does a proper.. lol...

is it cool to rip on FTF now? are you elite because you rip on ftf? I am not kissing FTF's ass or anything, but they have some of the fastest releases on the net, and they are most of the time watchable quality, and the oh my god they did a proper comment if just stupid, because FTF has done several propers that really deserved a proper(like this release) So no matter how cool you feel ripping on FTF, please have reasoning behind your statements not just a load of stupid bull shit

Posted by Evisu on 12-20-2002 05:51 AM:

Re: Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by JcM AkA ViPER

This is an excellent example of why groups get pissed off so much, every release is a good thing, who gives a shit if the quality is shit or if it is a dvd screener, ya gota give credit to any group who risk thier ass to rls this stuff, without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group. i reckon u shud cut these guys sum fucking slack here, they aint done nuttin wrong, infact they probably doing u a favour, cos you'll prob end up gettin this anyway, so say what ya like, they really dont give a shit, they'll just rls thier shit internal and hardly anyone will get hold of it, that aint to good for the peeps who like the ftf releases and give them credit for releasing.

allthou i aint a big fan of ftf release and think they put speed before quality, i agree with everything in above quote.
these guys and all other groups do take a BIG risk for the likes of YOU!!! the very people who flame them.
if u think u can do better then go do it.
if u dont like the quality, then dont dl it
but like he said u know ur gonna dl it n e way coz it's the only way u cheap arse fucks r gonna see it , so why even bother fucking bitching about it

go ahead tell me to stfu see what i care
if it makes u lame arse fools feel big flaming ppl down the other end of a wire then it just shows u should have been 1 of the little sperms ur father wanked away

give these groups some credit for what they do

all but NEWFXP that is

Posted by a1catraz on 12-20-2002 07:19 AM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

take out all the "shitty" unwatchable shit..

what would oyu have?

who produces good ts's anymore?

you wanna wait 2 months for a fukin screener?

thats what i thought

this is better then the tcf version.. just acuse hte sample is in a dark area, you gotta prejudge and shit..

if you don't like ftf's shit.. ITS EASY DONT FUKIN LEECH EM.

what does sites space have anything to do with you
u supplying the drives? u payin the money for hte drives?

the scene don't revolve around you.

i rather have choices rather then havin NO choices..

fuck... people like you..

gooooooooo awayyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by a1catraz on 12-20-2002 07:20 AM:

Re: Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD

firs off: i will see this movie at the theatre, so saying "they spend hours to bring it to me cuz i dont wanna go to the theatre" is pointless cuz i wouldnt download a ts of this movie. and second, take the complaining somewhere else? lol, i don't know if you know this..but umm...this is where people post their opinions about the releases, these forums are here for flames and complaints, along with other things..

and by the way tcf's release is also bad, i just said it's better than this cuz this really blows..and i don't care how many countless hours ftf encoders put into this or other releases but they aren't doing a good job. get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that

you make it sound so easy.

"get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that "

i don't see your sorry ass doin it.

Posted by nicci on 12-20-2002 07:55 AM:

8/8/4

FTF ur the kings....

now plz do ur masterpiece with a real movie...we expect Gangs of New York from u....only from u !

thx

Posted by dizzyD on 12-20-2002 08:42 AM:

Re: Re: Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
Originally posted by a1catraz

you make it sound so easy.

"get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that "

i don't see your sorry ass doin it.

how the fuck do you know what i do or not? exactly, now stfu.

quote:
Originally posted by JcM AkA ViPER

This is an excellent example of why groups get pissed off so much, every release is a good thing, who gives a shit if the quality is shit or if it is a dvd screener, ya gota give credit to any group who risk thier ass to rls this stuff, without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group. i reckon u shud cut these guys sum fucking slack here, they aint done nuttin wrong, infact they probably doing u a favour, cos you'll prob end up gettin this anyway, so say what ya like, they really dont give a shit, they'll just rls thier shit internal and hardly anyone will get hold of it, that aint to good for the peeps who like the ftf releases and give them credit for releasing.

"without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... " lol..i wouldn't give 2 shits, cuz i wouldn't get this.

"all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group." LOL....GOOD!!!!!! i hope they dont BOTHER anymore..jesus this is my initial point...let em rls internal, who gives a fuck...anwyay this is getting already way too off topic..my point was simple, rls something that is at least DECENT..not even GREAT just fucking decent...if not, then don't bother at all..it ain't worth the "RISK" as u put it..

Posted by Phantasmical on 12-20-2002 10:32 AM:

What makes me chuckle on these boards, is the massive assumption that a DVD screener of TT will be relased in the next few weeks as Felllowship was.

As much as I want a DVD screener, it would also be funny if only these two releases were released until the proper screener is released.

Posted by FatalException on 12-20-2002 01:32 PM:

All i know half of these jerkoffs who voted from the jpeg just voted on LOTR:FOTR TS-FTF ahahahah Fucking N00bs

Posted by TroLL417 on 12-20-2002 02:15 PM:

think im goin to wait for a dvdscreener

Posted by jelydonut on 12-20-2002 02:40 PM:

HOLY FUCK..

I can't believe i just read all these posts by you stupid fucks bitching about propers so i could find out if all the movie was there.. I don't give a fuck what you people have to say about a ftf release.. It's a fucking given.. It will be slightly burry and scrachy audio.. we all know that! Is the whole fucking movie there or not?

Jelydonut

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 03:17 PM:

If you don't atleast have one of the 3 cds of each rls, then you shouldn't say a freakin word about which is better! I for one have cd1 of the TCF rls, and am in queue for cd2 and 3. I'm also in queue for the FTF rls, both cd1 and 2, plus the full rar, so I will not know myself until I have compared them both! Then I will post my vote and my humble opinion.

So far, I give TCF, based off the first cd, a 6/6/9. Well see about the FTF rls.

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 03:34 PM:

Has anyone seen the UTi rls yet? Seen it up on irc, trying to dld cd1 of it now.

I'm pretty sure its not as good as TCF or FTF, but then again, it is a cam and in avi format rather than tar or rar, which means it could conceivable take up more than 3 cds.

Just wondering if anyone has it yet.

__________________

Posted by FatalException on 12-20-2002 03:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
If you don't atleast have one of the 3 cds of each rls, then you shouldn't say a freakin word about which is better! I for one have cd1 of the TCF rls, and am in queue for cd2 and 3. I'm also in queue for the FTF rls, both cd1 and 2, plus the full rar, so I will not know myself until I have compared them both! Then I will post my vote and my humble opinion.

So far, I give TCF, based off the first cd, a 6/6/9. Well see about the FTF rls.

haha there will be a dvdscr of it by the time you get the shitty cam of it hahahah N00bs you got to love them

Posted by motabus on 12-20-2002 04:19 PM:

CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE QUALITY OF MOVIES???? I feel like i am back in highschool with all you children.... i loved it when pc's were expensive and all you little pricks could not get on one

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:36 PM:

@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

*REMOVED*

Yeah, it might take a little while, but I've got cd 1 of the TCF rls, and I'm in queue for cd3, so . . . eat it bitch!

The reason my dld are slower, is I'm also dlding harry.potter.2.divx.cd2-dominion.avi, 11.22.02.Triple.X.DVDrip.SVCD-TDC-CD1.rar and Halloween.Resurrection.DVDRip.DivX-iNiQUiTY.avi which are also pulling some of my bandwidth.

Enough said, be quiet, I win, you lose.

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:37 PM:

Got another queue for FTF and Uti bitch!

__________________

Posted by Enzomatrx on 12-20-2002 04:52 PM:

To a mod:

can we please clean up the TTT threads? It's really hard to figure anything out with what is going on in them. I personally really am curious about these two releases and all I am reading is the typical "do more for me" comments on both threads.
I have no way of knowing who in these forums does what relating to these releases, so I will not critique individuals...
but can we please clean these threads up and stick to ones that rate the quality?

I appreciate FTF's constant releases and the speed of them, but I think people are kidding themselves if they say that FTF's releases are always great quality. They typically tend to be tinted, and the sound could always use a run through some filters. Like I said, I appreciate their speed, and the releases are at least watchable in most cases.

How about with each movie that is releases we have two threads that start? One can be Quality Comments Only and the other can be General Flaming of Eachother Over and Over Because of the Release.

Just a suggestion.

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:57 PM:

Well, you can see that fatalexception has nothing better to do on this thread than flame. I didn't say a word to him, but calling me a n00b gets me started. So had to prove him wrong with my second and third post. Sorry if I made it tougher on the rest, but I'm going to defend myself, though it seems a waste for an ass like fatalexception.

'The Candyman decides that fatalexception is "persona non gratia" '

__________________

Posted by flipp0r on 12-20-2002 05:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

<snip>
xdcc? gross!
xdcc really is ruining the scene. there is no skill in copy + paste
im suprised that post wasn't edited. a trained monkey could come and find u w/ that screenshot.

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."

Posted by dank! on 12-20-2002 07:35 PM:

w0w, those are some l337 screen captures!

Posted by melon on 12-20-2002 07:50 PM:

Shit quality once again from FTF...
I thought FTF was getting a little better, I guess I thought wrong.

Why even release this? Just because it's an early release doesn't mean you can just do it and give crappy quality, I'd rather get a released later and get best quality...

2/3/9

Posted by Diezel on 12-20-2002 08:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by motabus
CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE QUALITY OF MOVIES???? I feel like i am back in highschool with all you children.... i loved it when pc's were expensive and all you little pricks could not get on one

LMAO

I think that this released is overall better than the other 2 rlses, if you are desperate to see the movie, see this, if not go to the theaters

5/5/?

Posted by your name here on 12-20-2002 11:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

http://www.igamesandmore.com/eatitbitch!.html

Yeah, it might take a little while, but I've got cd 1 of the TCF rls, and I'm in queue for cd3, so . . . eat it bitch!

The reason my dld are slower, is I'm also dlding harry.potter.2.divx.cd2-dominion.avi, 11.22.02.Triple.X.DVDrip.SVCD-TDC-CD1.rar and Halloween.Resurrection.DVDRip.DivX-iNiQUiTY.avi which are also pulling some of my bandwidth.

Enough said, be quiet, I win, you lose.

roflmfao wow those are incredible screen shots, i love your amazing bandwith im sure u can rape me wit that bandwith and btw why the fuck u downlading avi's, is it just me or does this guy not belong here

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by nineismine on 12-21-2002 12:00 AM:

LMAO!

quote:Originally posted by |Ware|Man
The.Lord.Of.The.Rings.The.Two.Towers.INTERNAL .CAM-TCF
Its INTERNAL... So i dunno why ftf propered it when tcf's was a internal... all of u idiots that r saying tcf's is better then ftf's ... good luck gettin the tcf hahaha

Good luck getting this?!?!?!?! LMFAO!!!!! In one Irc Channel alone they are serving it on 10 XDCC bots 20 sends per bot... anybosy who can copy and paste can get it...lol!

Posted by jaoal on 12-21-2002 01:06 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

http://www.igamesandmore.com/eatitbitch!.html

Yeah, it might take a little while, but I've got cd 1 of the TCF rls, and I'm in queue for cd3, so . . . eat it bitch!

The reason my dld are slower, is I'm also dlding harry.potter.2.divx.cd2-dominion.avi, 11.22.02.Triple.X.DVDrip.SVCD-TDC-CD1.rar and Halloween.Resurrection.DVDRip.DivX-iNiQUiTY.avi which are also pulling some of my bandwidth.

Enough said, be quiet, I win, you lose.

Yeah you sure told us, i bow to your 130 kb/s XDCC downloadz.
You, sir, are really the cream of the crop.

__________________
Make me immortal god damnit!

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-21-2002 01:53 AM:

Dank, thanx
Now I just need the dvd screener!!!

*The Candyman waits patiently and says his nightly prayers to the dvd screener gods*

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-21-2002 01:59 AM:

*The Candyman has finished his bedtime prayers and hopes to hear from the dvd screener gods real soon!*

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-21-2002 02:04 AM:

your name here and jaoal,

I was not posting those to imply high bandwidth, hell my store got 3 times more with my business connection. I was just responding to *persona non gratia* comment about being a n00b.

I don't know everything, nor do I pretent to, heck I know that I learn something new everyday. The day you stop learning is the day they put you six feet under. But I would not imply I'm a newb.

Second, your name here, please explain to me what is wrong with avi??? Smaller download, and with my faster system, I use tmpgenc and vdub (if need) to encode and burn to svcd which I watch on my dvd player. Is this wrong? If so, I guess I'll be wrong considering the XVID codec has allowed me to dld 5 movies in less than one day (I let them dld while I'm gone and at work or with my wife and son like tonight while I was xmas shopping).

If I'm doing something you feel is wrong or in poor taste, than by all means, correct me of my ignorance. But if your post was just a flame, well, I guess we can let others decide who is the better person and who really belongs here. I for one flame only when deserved, and *persona non gratia* deserved it.

__________________

Posted by masta_spl on 12-21-2002 02:17 AM:

its missing the ending

Posted by |Ware|Man on 12-21-2002 04:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD

And you're calling me retarded? Go suck on your dads balls you fucking cunt. Proper was of newfxp not tcf you little nub fuck; go back to dalnet fservers.

You are one lucky motha fucker cuz i cant see ur ip =] if i could have seen ur ip.. i would have banned ur ass =]

Posted by |Ware|Man on 12-21-2002 04:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by your name here

DUDE U ARE FUCKING STUPID FTF DID NOT PROPER THIS RLS FROM TCF,THEY PROPERD THE NEWFXP SHIT TS, U OBVIUOSLY ARE A FUCKING n00b

Hmm n00b? me?
|Ware|Man
VCDQuality Updater
And uhm i was writting that when i was drunk dumbass

Posted by evdubs on 12-21-2002 05:53 AM:

Posted by FatalException on 12-21-2002 04:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
Im a Lame n00b so What

*The Candyman waits patiently as he reencodes and says his nightly prayers to the XDCC gods*

I know lol

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-22-2002 04:37 AM:

Hey fatal, I gave you a chance to prove you don't just flame. Thanks for proving me right ass.

__________________

Posted by Tweezer on 12-23-2002 08:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan

Second, your name here, please explain to me what is wrong with avi??? Smaller download, and with my faster system, I use tmpgenc and vdub (if need) to encode and burn to svcd which I watch on my dvd player. Is this wrong? If so, I guess I'll be wrong considering the XVID codec has allowed me to dld 5 movies in less than one day (I let them dld while I'm gone and at work or with my wife and son like tonight while I was xmas shopping).

AVI is a much smaller file, with smaller files come decreased sound and video, dont let these people fool you majority, at once in there life either heavily downloaded avi's, or has a few times. Another thing if you convert AVI's to SVCD its pointless your wasting your time, cds, etc...the avi files come from VCD's someone takes the VCD downsamples it and encodes it to AVI, so basically you are taking something of a certain quality, tunring it into lesser quality and then turning it into greater quality than what you started with. Most people on this board prefer to download the original VCDs which will run up your hard drive space about a gig, gig an a half a movie, but the quality blows most avi files out of the water

Posted by Phantasmical on 12-23-2002 10:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tweezer

AVI is a much smaller file, with smaller files come decreased sound and video, dont let these people fool you majority, at once in there life either heavily downloaded avi's, or has a few times. Another thing if you convert AVI's to SVCD its pointless your wasting your time, cds, etc...the avi files come from VCD's someone takes the VCD downsamples it and encodes it to AVI, so basically you are taking something of a certain quality, tunring it into lesser quality and then turning it into greater quality than what you started with. Most people on this board prefer to download the original VCDs which will run up your hard drive space about a gig, gig an a half a movie, but the quality blows most avi files out of the water

Thats not neccesarially true, Ive dwnloaded avi's (anime), that although the file sizes were quite large (400mb +) for a half hour episode were exceptional quality.

Posted by MovieDownloader on 12-23-2002 06:37 PM:

Can anyone specify if this release is missing scenes or the end?
I have downloaded the TCF release but the audio is out of sync and wanna know if this is complete cause I will get this if it is.

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-24-2002 09:09 AM:

Tweezer,

I convert the avis to svcd to watch on my dvd player with my big screen tv and 18 speaker, 3 sub surround sound system!

Much more enjoyable with the wife than watching them on a 19" monitor!

As for quality, when watching on my television, the quality is excellent, almost DVD. One Hour Photo and White Oleander (wife's pick!) looked great!

__________________

Posted by Beedle on 12-29-2002 10:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MovieDownloader
Can anyone specify if this release is missing scenes or the end?
I have downloaded the TCF release but the audio is out of sync and wanna know if this is complete cause I will get this if it is.

is it just me? or does nobody seem to have an answer for this question on any of these rls'

__________________
It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others

Posted by madmike on 12-30-2002 09:23 AM:

HORRIBLE!!! This version is absolutely horrible.. Do not waste your time with it.

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Show all 99 posts from this thread on one page