VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Swimfan *PROPER* - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=10676)


Posted by TeAr-Dr0p on 11-07-2002 03:58 AM:

dunoo what the nukers will do. . .


but the tcf version was good enuff to hold me til the dvdrip


Posted by Bear on 11-07-2002 04:44 AM:

wow, i haven't seen either movie, jus the jpegs, but from earlier releases and whatnot, i'm VERY suprised someone has the balls to proper tcf. No offense to either group, just stating an opinion. Props videocd and tcf, keep the new hotness comin.

~Bear


Posted by djkoolaide on 11-07-2002 04:54 AM:

but why would there be 2 versions of a screener?? hmm...something seems weird about that tcf version...


Posted by tOny_bOgs on 11-07-2002 05:08 AM:

omg

why cant u guys actually respect VideoCD.. they beat TCF.. oh no.. the group u all know and love have been beaten.. boo hoo.. but looks like none of u will admit it...be happy with that ur given and well done to VideoCD.. getting your name a better reputation again


Posted by Squirell on 11-07-2002 05:08 AM:

Isn't there already too many releases of this movie out?! It's not even a decent flick and it's been released 6 different times!!! Sheesh!!!!


Posted by mew on 11-07-2002 05:30 AM:

Yepp this one looks better, if you already leeched TCFs I guess its ok enough, but otherwise this is the one to grab!


Posted by HATINonHATAS on 11-07-2002 05:41 AM:

Good job! I never got around to dl TCF's version, but glad I waited. As long as a proper is rlsd within a week after the first rls its ok with me, I just think it's gay for a proper a month later. Like if a group propered Ballistic a month from now even though the rls could have better sound it would be gay cuz VideoCD had it a whole month earlier. VideoCD just barely got this rls in at a week.

Keep it up VideoCD your starting to claim your piece of the pie!


Posted by Commy on 11-07-2002 06:10 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Squirell
Isn't there already too many releases of this movie out?! It's not even a decent flick and it's been released 6 different times!!! Sheesh!!!!


there is nothing wrong from a decent release getting a real proper. thats how the scene should be. propers shouldnt be released just because the group lost the race. so as for this release, nice job

__________________
I like big butts and I cannot lie.


Posted by nokia on 11-07-2002 08:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
but why would there be 2 versions of a screener?? hmm...something seems weird about that tcf version...
There are dozen's of versions... they range from studio screeners, hotel screeners (lodgenet), retail screeners, 3rd party screeners, so on and so forth...


Posted by t33d0ugh on 11-07-2002 10:04 AM:

Cant wait to `see this flick
from the sample I give it an 8/8.5


Posted by aTTicA on 11-07-2002 10:48 AM:

why o why these groups have to flame each other.. tcf has consistantly brought great quality screeners.. now video cd has joined them as another great screener group.. maybe this rls is a lil better.. im not gonna flame them 4 rls it.. but i am gonna flame them for trying to make tcf look bad.. thx for the rls anyways


Posted by MovieDude735 on 11-07-2002 12:34 PM:

Thanks VideoCD for an awesome screener. Keep them coming.


Posted by |V|USTANG_FAN on 11-07-2002 01:31 PM:

TCF and VideoCD are tearing up the screener scene, keep up the good work guys!

__________________


Posted by mew on 11-07-2002 01:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by aTTicA
why o why these groups have to flame each other.. tcf has consistantly brought great quality screeners.. now video cd has joined them as another great screener group.. maybe this rls is a lil better.. im not gonna flame them 4 rls it.. but i am gonna flame them for trying to make tcf look bad.. thx for the rls anyways


In what way are they trying to make TCF look bad? Did you read the nfo? They thanked TCF for the earlier release and pointed out the problems in a civil matter. TCF's last nfo for Pluto Nash SVCD didnt flame VideoCD either, which I think is good, because group flaming is just lame.


Posted by DarkEsperX on 11-07-2002 01:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by aTTicA
why o why these groups have to flame each other.. tcf has consistantly brought great quality screeners.. now video cd has joined them as another great screener group.. maybe this rls is a lil better.. im not gonna flame them 4 rls it.. but i am gonna flame them for trying to make tcf look bad.. thx for the rls anyways


The way i see it, they both release good quality rips. Everyone needs to take a deep breath, and remember that they do this for free. they dont ask anything from us in return. If a group thinks it can release a better quality version I say let them. no one is forceing you to get it. Some of us like good quality only, others dont really care. Me? I like quality but I dont care eather way. When somethings free, I dont complain. [edit] unless i'm feeling perticularly mean. heh [/edit]


Posted by blacks on 11-07-2002 05:45 PM:

I hate to be the one to say this, but a PROPER should only be released when there is something wrong with the previous version. Unless you guys want to go back to the "telesync-propering-war" where groups release propers and propers based on the the claim that their version is slightly better than the previous.

VideoCD's reason for the proper was the blurred serial and timer on TCF's release. Which is retarded imo.

Keep in mind that a PROPER, by definition means thats something had to be wrong in the previous version, to warrant a proper, which I honestly cant find.

VideoCD would have done better imo if they had internalled this.


Posted by mew on 11-07-2002 06:33 PM:

Well the nfo said that TCF looked like tc, and I agree, if you compare TCF's screener with a TC from VideoCD they look to come from same source. And the real screener does look alot better imo so its a good proper.


Posted by rappa on 11-07-2002 09:50 PM:

Re: omg

quote:
Originally posted by tOny_bOgs
why cant u guys actually respect VideoCD.. they beat TCF.. oh no.. the group u all know and love have been beaten.. boo hoo.. but looks like none of u will admit it...be happy with that ur given and well done to VideoCD.. getting your name a better reputation again


TCF beat VideoCD, maybe if you would check your sites you would see and read nfo, other then that, Id dl this release over tcf's because TCF's has a coutner and blurred serials but overrall there both good quality, 8/8/x

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by svenbob on 11-07-2002 10:38 PM:

I really respect VideoCD. I dont think they're releases are the best, but still pretty good, and are fair. They started out as pure shit and have really come along well

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he�s buying another cat and I says to �em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don�t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by DarkEsperX on 11-07-2002 11:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by svenbob
I really respect VideoCD. I dont think they're releases are the best, but still pretty good, and are fair. They started out as pure shit and have really come along well


I agree completly


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.