VCDQuality Forums - Half Past Dead *Proper* - TELESYNC

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Half Past Dead *Proper* - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11031)

Posted by aXs-SVCD on 11-15-2002 01:37 PM:

Just got the Sample for this movie, it looks dark but its not bad movie, couldn't wait for a Better Quality. Oh ya it is a little bit better then FTF

Keep up the good work and bring out more Good Pre Movies

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.

Posted by Swimj on 11-15-2002 01:51 PM:

Please dont ever proper again Esoteric, other release was fine........

Posted by Neversoft on 11-15-2002 01:55 PM:

RE: My post in the FTF thread...

Esoteric... You need a kicking!

There's nothing wrong with the FTF release, it's more than adequate until a screener comes out.

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.

Posted by jaoal on 11-15-2002 02:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Swimj
Please dont ever proper again Esoteric, other release was fine........

yeah, but u gotta admit this release is a little better then FTF?, so "propering" wasn't totally taken out of the blue imho..

6 / 5 / ?

Posted by Trenton_1 on 11-15-2002 02:42 PM:

I only have the samples of both FTF's and Esoteric's and they had every right to Proper the release. Good job on FTF for the faster release but the Picture and sound are better on the Esoteric release.

Thanks to all you guys for giving us the movies, and all your hard work!

Posted by THE_DREAM on 11-15-2002 03:38 PM:

u guys go and do this after i voted u guys number 2 when it comes to quality. the video is much to dark, the ftf rls was fine. if u going to proper make it better than the previous one.

Posted by crapper on 11-15-2002 04:16 PM:

same source same rip..
only darker..

eso this is lame and u know it.. call it an internal.. that would be nice..

but proper.. MY ASS!
u cant proper from the same source.. unless the previouse ripper sucks ass.. (which in the case of ftf could have been true but wasnt)

Posted by KaMa on 11-15-2002 04:18 PM:

ESO....... I guess i mean its darker witch is KInda Gay i dont see any difference except for its darker . heh

Posted by nicci on 11-15-2002 04:38 PM:

lol, the lamest group around make a proper.......
go away, ftf is allways best, look at ur latest releases, when u have nothing to do make propers of ur own crappy shit...

Posted by BridgeLife on 11-15-2002 05:04 PM:

no need for a proper

Posted by jammi® on 11-15-2002 05:46 PM:

i have to say FTF version looks better and the ESO should have labled theres Half.Past.Dead.CRAPPPER.TS-ESOTERiC realy no need for a proper

Posted by BladeX on 11-15-2002 07:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jammi®
i have to say FTF version looks better and the ESO should have labled theres Half.Past.Dead.CRAPPPER.TS-ESOTERiC realy no need for a proper

you're a fucking moron. everyone else who posted that ftf's looked better is a moron.

I downloaded this soon as it was released this morning, and picture and the sound are better. I'm not going to say way better, but eso's picture is not grainy, and the sound is not sizzly. what i have found out is, the shit is out of sync. i don't know how the fuck you could release a proper and it be out of sync. but, as far as the picture/sound go, it is better, and definitely propered. i played both, you can see a difference. almost all you idiots that posted had to have posted based on a fucking jpeg. fuck all of you idiots.

Posted by Outrage_Display on 11-15-2002 07:54 PM:

Lame

Good old lame ESOTERiC rlsing this under the asumed *PROPER* when there is ocviously no need for a proper on FTFs rip. The only reason thay rlsed it as *PROPER* is cuz they were late on distro and didnt feel thye would be 'leet' if they were to rls it as *iNTERNAL* like they should have.

U dont like this post or me, I dont give a fuck!

Posted by SneakySix on 11-15-2002 09:10 PM:

Omg.. There was no need for a proper, the FTF was fine, stupid eso just wanted a rls

should be nuked

Posted by Levangles on 11-15-2002 09:17 PM:

i haven't seen eiter of these rls's yet... but are they better than uti's cam?

Posted by scousethief on 11-15-2002 09:20 PM:

hmmm all the ass suckers from ftf are around again i see

If you think Ftf's version of this is better then you really are blind deaf and extremely dumb please ,, stop sucking groups dicks and give opinions that are at least 50 % right instead of giving the crap FTF turn out anything over a 5 . Ill give them 10/10 for their speady output of these movies but in 99 put of a 100 cases the audio is shite and the pic is shagged if they could up there quality by 50% i too would worship at the alter of the outcast

Posted by DaveMode on 11-15-2002 09:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by scousethief
hmmm all the ass suckers from ftf are around again i see

If you think Ftf's version of this is better then you really are blind deaf and extremely dumb please ,, stop sucking groups dicks and give opinions that are at least 50 % right instead of giving the crap FTF turn out anything over a 5 . Ill give them 10/10 for their speady output of these movies but in 99 put of a 100 cases the audio is shite and the pic is shagged if they could up there quality by 50% i too would worship at the alter of the outcast

I don't think that people siding with particular groups is the number one problem.. the problem is that a large number of people post here without downloading or watching the movie.. or even the sample at all.. it's pretty obvious sometimes.

Posted by lowrida0000 on 11-15-2002 10:17 PM:

Em, im really wondering about the fact, that all of u claim to have the proper already.... but NO ONE mentions the fact, that this version is async and therefore a NUKE...

Bad luck Esoteric....

Posted by nokia on 11-15-2002 10:40 PM:

Yea, most are jpeg judges. If they saw the actual sample it looks MUCH better than FTF's (picture is sharper and less pixelated, colors are more vibrant... if eso chose a brighter scene as a sample you'd see the difference easier) and also sounds MUCH better (less hiss and clicks) but too bad it is out of sync by a second or something. nice try eso...

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-15-2002 11:17 PM:

STFU

ALL OF YOU STFU.

Ok 1, this is worth a proper, 2 this is not the same source.
3, ftf was more faded. they have little ticks in each copy. This seems to be the best. Looks like a DV TS. SO STFU props to eso. FTF You are improving but get your suckers off the boards please.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page