![]() |
Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Analyze That *PROPER* - TELESYNC - tNB (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11885)
Decent.
7/6/6
props on the proper, you guys own. bleh. ftf version was fine, this one isn't much better (if at all). might wanna get more street credit before openly dissing another group, even if it is 'ftf'.
5/5/1(shit movie, what a surprise)
yeah, no shit...... thanks alot guys....... for NOTHING
out of sync BULLSHIT
here come the nukers!!!
dank release i dot no y but it wasnt out of sync for me i rated it a pretty good ts worth the "proper" 9/8/8
tNB what-- somebody know you?
Nuked for being out-of-sync. You say "we have not labeled it proper," but your release title is "Analyze.That.Proper.Telesync-tNB-VCD." WTF??
I've seen your work before. I'm not a member of any group, just an objective contributor to this forum. That said, you guys aren't fit to smell FTF's (feature film) jockstrap. Watch "EXTREME OPS" from FTF and wonder if you can ever hit that level of quality.
Stick to what appears to be good work on "24". Better source material than this crap, anyway.
__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.
n00ked
"sync the pink" AC/DC
*nuked*
nuke...not enough improvment from FTF's version...
7\7\6
shame about the botch job
http://www.whoei.nl/garfield/garfield20.jpg
who the fuck rates a TS a 9??? even dvd screeners rarely rate 9 rofl.. get a grip...
A film should only be rated on what it is (if its a CAM it should be rated against other CAMS) - because as you rightly say, you can't rate the quality of a telesync to a DVD Screener.
analze that
I saw the movie, and i liked it.
but there was to much swearing in it.
Re: analze that
quote:
Originally posted by coinsey
I saw the movie, and i liked it.
but there was to much swearing in it.
Not like there's too much swearing in this forum ... 
Re: analze that
quote:
Originally posted by coinsey
I saw the movie, and i liked it.
but there was to much swearing in it.
THE MOVIE
How lame can one be? In this political world where everything has to pass the smell test - i guess we are breeding a bunch of politically correct bikini underwear pussies. How realistic would a movie about mobsters and old gangsters be without cussing. Grow up, if u cant create with your hands or fingers u r really nothing. Then, if that were not enough, there are all these other lamers that have the nerve to tell someone to jump off the cliff. Now, just consider this concept, if u worked late in the morning doing the best u could on encoding and tweaking the settings, for nothing, would you appreciate some loser moron that aint never had a real job in his life tell u that ur work was shit. There lies the the neat and deep inner meaning - STFU. I saw the first rls by ftf and its ok, their usual quality, barely watchable. I dont know if its the source or the encoding but those guys sure ought to learn how to bend the color curve with tmpgenc. I thought the movie was real good myself. De Niro was good in that role. Definately a very funny movie. But i must have a better quality rls. I didnt spend the amout of money on my system to watch crap quality on. Any improvement would be an improvement. Maybe its my system, it makes the crap look like shit and the good - unreal.
Is it the best?
Hey all,
Is this movie the best rls out?
Thans Ian
Its out of sync in some parts, but still worth downloading.
Very decent video, and the audio is clear and totally watchable.
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM. | Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.