VCDQuality Forums
Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- SVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- One Hour Photo *WS* - DVDRIP - Centropy (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=12069)


Posted by sickdick on 12-09-2002 05:15 PM:

useless dupe
the colors were perfectly fine on tcf's rls
as much as i love ctp (as in previous posts where i praise them for valid rls'es)
this one is not called for and useless


Posted by reelnewbie on 12-09-2002 07:14 PM:

agreed. lame release.


Posted by DJ_Laher on 12-09-2002 07:53 PM:

if u read the nfo it states tcf release was a DVD SCREENER,
And it also clearly states "we enjoy retails"
indeed we do )


Posted by opso on 12-09-2002 08:30 PM:

hrm it has that weird color scheme when convertin divx to svcd dunno


Posted by PhAnToMs on 12-09-2002 09:07 PM:

tcf's was way better than ctp's shitty encoded movie

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by opso on 12-09-2002 09:09 PM:

I'd say sombody TcS? should provide a real retail dvdrip instead of a divx -> svcd rip.. Proper it!


Posted by Vtec on 12-09-2002 09:59 PM:

TcS won't be releasing it, their DVDR and XVID division stated so in their nfo "There will be no SVCD format of this movie by our friends at TcS. as TCF's SCREENER version was great quality". Centr0py usually never gets more than 2 weeks pre on their DVD's (from DEiTY) so I'm 99% certain they downloaded DZN's DVDR and converted it to SVCD (DEiTY is known to do so for divx also and has admitted it). I had high respects for Centr0py but I think they are getting a little too desperate for releases since they lost their TS supplier (even jackass was well below their original quality). As for comments on the release itself, ok quality but it looks like the video is a little shaky from sample and TCF's looks a little smoother. Maybe they used a lower bitrate and only 2 passes? the rar count is 1 smaller and their is a little more noise so who knows. If you already downloaded TCF's then stick with that one, if not this is fine also.


Posted by reelnewbie on 12-10-2002 12:54 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Laher
if u read the nfo it states tcf release was a DVD SCREENER,
And it also clearly states "we enjoy retails"
indeed we do )



if you read the nfo for TCF release you would know their rls had no watermarks/messages/etc, making it appear like a perfect retail. read my signature plz.


Posted by desertboy on 12-10-2002 02:38 AM:

We enjoy retails,
We pay to see our movies
We re-encode divx to svcd to get credits because we no longer can supply the quality TS that made use famous

CT-P died with scooby doo, Jackass only proved they didn't go underground out of choice they just lost their supplier.

before flaming read my sig

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by Skippy_2002ca on 12-10-2002 06:16 AM:

sss d

OK this is the same quality as the fucking TCF how does this have a smaller ratting Wanna know why cause fucks like Sickdick are not apericating a good realse since the group they like never realsed it welll this is the same fucking thing as the tcf IT deserves the same fucking ratting as TCF

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol


Posted by WiZZLa on 12-10-2002 08:08 AM:

heh no praises for ctp & there's some accusations making the group seem lame (divx to svcd re-encodes.) oh, the fall of an empire.


Posted by flipp0r on 12-11-2002 02:33 AM:

not bad quality, really..
good flick too

TCF's rls is also good. either or is worth the dl
prolly go to XDCC for the people
who see CTP
and cream themselves

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."


Posted by Natural on 12-11-2002 01:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by flipp0r
not bad quality, really..
good flick too

TCF's rls is also good. either or is worth the dl
prolly go to XDCC for the people
who see CTP
and cream themselves



xdccs, and the people who use them, need to die


Posted by Figaro on 12-11-2002 05:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Natural


xdccs, and the people who use them, need to die



Much like you dipshits who frequent this TEG ran shithouse who don't even have a clue wtf you are rambling about.


Posted by |sw1tch| on 12-12-2002 05:02 PM:

stop whining. ctp's doesnt look as good as TCF's. simple as that.


Posted by alundrety on 01-03-2003 11:45 AM:

damnit this is only dvd realese of one hour photo i could get my hands on.

it is watchable

but the thing gives me a headache for some reason, very odd refresh rate or something, it could be me, but its very odd

i see why people where talking about the color

its more the contrast

i wish i had the tcf

__________________
ehhhhh


Posted by MovieGod on 01-05-2003 07:35 AM:

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Version of this film was alright, but the version we had was solid..

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..





All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58 AM.
Show all 17 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.