VCDQuality Forums - Maid In Manhattan - TELECINE

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Maid In Manhattan - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=12706)

Posted by Bumpdatbootyq on 12-25-2002 02:50 AM:

great quality screener.

the last release of this from FTF was too green and the sound was very unclear.

Posted by Levangles on 12-25-2002 03:07 AM:

why do people vote on the quality of the jpeg??? i really dont undetrstand- usually the purpose of voting on the quality of the movie is so that someone will have a rough ballpark of the quality before getting it - rather than having to search/get the sample. i'm pretty sure that looking at the jpeg is a little bit better referance than looking at somone else's opinion of the jpeg?
could be wrong though?

Posted by DarkBeatz on 12-25-2002 03:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bumpdatbootyq
great quality screener.

the last release of this from FTF was too green and the sound was very unclear.

Indeed, SCREENER!!!! I still dont understand why the fuck VideoCD is labelling their releases as telecine? To justify that their releases aren't as good as tcf's? Off course it would be justified if some group released a properly labeled screener after these telecines but all good screener grps aren't that lame off course

Nice release, crap labelling

Posted by kronik on 12-25-2002 03:29 AM:

You're an idiot.
It's labeled telecine because it is a telecine. More often than not, groups that release claiming they are screeners are actually telecines. It has nothing to do with TCF. Get a grip and get off VCD's nuts. Gracias.

Posted by nvr on 12-25-2002 03:53 AM:

7/7/8 good quality and a nice movies if you liked Pretty Woman youll like this as well.

Posted by Wesb0b on 12-25-2002 04:11 AM:

im so fucking drunk so bare with me. I would like a xmas present. TTT dvd scr. i would err i dont rember what i was oing to say except that would be da shitttetert

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Posted by Wesb0b on 12-25-2002 04:38 AM:

rock on to the dude above. bring on TTT

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Posted by Mekapo on 12-25-2002 05:10 AM:

Everyone just STFU already about the damn TTT screener. Shits been in the theater for less than a damn week. It'll be here when it gets here... until then stop complaining and watch all the other damn fine releases out there...

Posted by lurker on 12-25-2002 05:21 AM:

I watched the sample. The pic is pretty good..better than the others. But the sound is a ZERO. It is extremely horrible. It is hollow and tinny. You can't understand jack.

Lurker

Posted by daizepam on 12-25-2002 05:27 AM:

u got a Jekyll and Hyde thingy goin on with ya wesbob?

__________________
My Lexicon

Posted by flipp0r on 12-25-2002 05:45 AM:

ooo jlo yer so fine
yer so fine you blow my mind
hey jlo (clap clap)

anway i doubt she reads this forum

^[VideoCD]^ - You are my santa claus

7/7/4

wicked lame movie. BUT JLO + her fine derriere = one happy man

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."

Posted by Wesb0b on 12-25-2002 06:31 AM:

honeslty pam i have no idea. sorry not much for talk. to dam drunk to deal with the pressures of life. i just told my parents i spam porn. eveyrone in my whole dam family was cool with it except for my step dad. he went fucking nazi about it. but hey if i make money and its the only way i can get to and from a job then so fucking bee it. Peace.

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Posted by Wesb0b on 12-25-2002 06:31 AM:

sorry for tellin my whole life story on vcdq. i love all you guys for lif3.

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Posted by huntdubie on 12-25-2002 07:44 AM:

calm down dude...

the pics look nice. i definately appreciate a sample with some cleavage (ie: top right frame)

Posted by BiggFatty on 12-25-2002 12:23 PM:

Judging from the sample: The picture ain't bad (sorta reminds me of the MIB2 Screener) but the sound isn't too good.

Posted by FOS on 12-26-2002 11:31 PM:

watched this last night, quality is fine for a movie of this caliber (if you will). a glitch or two in quality here and there, and the audio farts for a few seconds at one point, i forgot where, but its fine.

my main complaint, though, is that this is obviously NOT a telecine. either that, or its the shittiest telecine i've ever seen. telecine's usually have fine picture and very sharp, vibrant colors. the picture on this looked like a teleSYNC. also, it appeared to be a screener, with normal screener warnings along the way, while the picture turns black&white for 15 seconds or so..release is fine but come on guys dont mislabel.

Posted by your name her on 12-27-2002 12:22 AM:

sound kicks video is coo movie sux. watch this with your girl

*PUSSY POINTS*

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by ddmf on 12-28-2002 12:16 AM:

ahhh, this forum apparentley covers maid in manhattan (which i refuse to watch) and also wild thornberrys...

-D

Posted by shutthefuckup on 01-01-2003 07:43 AM:

shit

the quality and sound of this movie are horrible...seriously are you people blind? shit, this really sucks ass.

-ryan

Posted by Ragin on 01-02-2003 03:19 AM:

Looks like a great movie, but I think with the bad quality of this release, and all, we should just wait for the DVD screener to VCD to be released

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page