VCDQuality Forums
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Frida *LiMiTED* *PROPER* - DVD SCR - FiRM (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13055)


Posted by G-X on 01-02-2003 11:09 PM:

TDi's release seemed fine to me. not sure if these are really valid reasons to proper it except for the 2cd , 3cd bit. o well.


Posted by LMB on 01-02-2003 11:27 PM:

I heard that TDi's bitrate was too high. I can't really confirm this since I don't actually have the TDi release. Anyone know for sure?


Posted by grinch2k on 01-02-2003 11:27 PM:

Thumbs up

NICE release... great picture and sound... firm?? i guess u guys are new... from the .nfo i saw u did minority report too... i gotta find it... if its anything like this... u guys will be big contenders soon!!


Posted by Jackfrost on 01-02-2003 11:37 PM:

TDI's version seemed fine to me when I watched it. And as far as 3 CDs goes I don't see where releasing it in 2 CDs as a proper isn't a good enough reason. Yes 2 CDs would probably have been better but ohwell tough luck, no reason to proper.


Posted by foster2k3 on 01-02-2003 11:44 PM:

lol sample quite clearly shows a DIVX 2 SVCD reencode.... haha lewsers


Posted by Krakn3Dfx on 01-03-2003 12:46 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by LMB
I heard that TDi's bitrate was too high. I can't really confirm this since I don't actually have the TDi release. Anyone know for sure?


Here's a better question: Who cares?

BRING ON THE TWO TOWERS DVD RIP, W00T, W00T, W00T!




Sorry, a little too much "I'm a happy bitch that this is Thursday and I don't have to work again til Monday" - ititis.

w00t...


Posted by parasiticgann on 01-03-2003 12:52 AM:

its all good

Woah, not bad, great release, good movie,

Just wondering if any group is gonna bring out the movie Chicago?????????? Catherine Zeta Jones is the hottest hottie alive, its not out where i live, but i know its out, I am waiting for it. dying to see it. well everyone take care. Self bless everyone.


Posted by your name her on 01-03-2003 01:34 AM:

nice rls but why they rlsd it i have no idea the one b4 was good

all we need now is 8mile dvd screener or LOTR TTT

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by Octane on 01-03-2003 01:44 AM:

Welcome to the scene. Hope you stick around.


Posted by sweetsour on 01-03-2003 03:05 AM:

XViD reencodes rock, let's all praise them!


Posted by CHAOSMAN on 01-03-2003 06:22 AM:

horrible reason for proper. and cd size is not about the length its about the bitrate. bitrate below 1700 will result in a crap encode even if you use 100 passes. Id rather have it in 3 cds looking much better, but this firm grp doesnt know shit prolly a bunch of guide whores


Posted by Jackacid on 01-03-2003 08:56 AM:

If I was to judge quality by the jpegs as was done in an earlier post, I would have to say the scenes posted look like a lot of motion is involved. You can see a hand blurred from motion, but no blockiness.

In the other one, you see them obviously rushing her in a hospital somewhere, but the quality still looks like it's holding on.

Apparantly the nfo was right, they could rip this to 2 discs and maintain good picture.

p.s. This does NOT look like an avi re-encode, or that hand you see blurred there would be surrounded by blocks. Duh.


Posted by sickdick on 01-03-2003 11:42 AM:

lol
look at the sample
the pics are all blocky
even in jpeg, her face in bottom left has all blocks like its made out of lego
infact, all 4 pics, the first one, u can see blockyness in mans hand/elbow, second one, the curtain, and her leg is not even straigh, its legoleg!, third one, the doctor looks like he has rabbit teeth so much blockyness....
lol

if this isn't a reencode of the divx, then they sure as well did the worst job ever encoding this... proper my ass

EDIT: just checked the 3 releases, and haha busted may i say
the divx starts about 2 sec after the start of the TDi SVCD (looks like ViTE chopped like 2 sec in the start)
and guess what.... this proper starts also 2 sec late.... hahahaha busted big time
what asswhips! i don't blame them, who would have guessed but loooooollllllllllllllll


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 01-04-2003 03:57 AM:

I'll stick with the TDi release i think.

p.s: This is a fine movie. Watch it.


Posted by vcd fogie on 01-08-2003 03:58 AM:

i got a blow job thanks to this rip... so mad props to FiRM for helpin me spray my web =] beautiful rls to a half-decent movie. thanks guys! i sure as shiz didnt wanna pay to see this sleeping pill!!!

__________________
retired from the scene, but still leechin!


Posted by Pra3t0 on 01-12-2003 06:51 PM:

Heard that this FiRM release is a 2CD reencode of TDi's 3CD release. The NFO calls TDi's release "subpar". How can they say this? Their reencode from 3CDs down to 2 of already reencoded video is obviously going to look worse.


Posted by Pra3t0 on 01-16-2003 06:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by LMB
I heard that TDi's bitrate was too high.

The bitrate can NEVER be TOO high.


Posted by Pra3t0 on 01-16-2003 10:30 PM:

Okay, just checked it out for myself. Audio is fine. As for the video... they've managed to take a DVDSCR and reduce it to horrible VCD quality. Way to go FiRM.

Stick with TDi's 3CD version if you want DVD quality.

Rating: 6/9/7


Posted by Pra3t0 on 01-16-2003 10:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vcd fogie
beautiful rls to a half-decent movie. thanks guys!

Why did you rate the video a 10? It's the worst looking release I've seen in the past 2 months.


Posted by WiZZLa on 01-16-2003 11:36 PM:

^ couldn't you have put all the responses in one post?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 PM.
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.