VCDQuality Forums - Deadly Little Secrets *LiMiTED* - DVD SCR

Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Deadly Little Secrets *LiMiTED* - DVD SCR - ECO (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13165)

Posted by Jaded4Ten on 01-04-2003 11:15 PM:

At least it's got Dina Meyer ... still looks like a pretty bad flick though, and judging from the jpg not a good rip.

Posted by MoNoXiDe on 01-04-2003 11:35 PM:

How many times will fuckin people have to say... Dont judge JPG's... WTF... Look at the sample... The jpgs can make a release better or worse than it actually is... Dont judge JPG!!!!

7.6/8/???

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

Posted by Jaded4Ten on 01-04-2003 11:53 PM:

Based on my perceived quality of the film itself I couldn't care less how good the quality is I'm staying away from this one. I'm not even going to watch it if there is nothing on tv a year from now and it's playing on HBO, I'd rather watch the frickin tv guide channel.

Posted by MoNoXiDe on 01-05-2003 12:19 AM:

still quality is not about the movie... dont judge a rip from a picture of a movie thats in motion... yes the jpg helps alot but dont give your opinion till youve at least seen the sample.

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

Posted by Aff on 01-05-2003 03:18 AM:

so not a dvd scr

the res is too low maybe bad ar?

Posted by Od|n on 01-06-2003 04:02 AM:

How in the hell you rate a DVD screener 1 for video? at least give it a 5 if your going to bash it

Posted by SiKzNuGz on 01-06-2003 04:05 AM:

Video qual of this rls is pretty bad for a DVDscr (could use more time on the encode) and sounds just OK. Has anyone watched the whole movie I just saw the samp? I was wondering if it's worth the BW b/c it's debatable IMO.

Good point Enigma!

Posted by ARSoNiC on 01-06-2003 05:51 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Od|n
How in the hell you rate a DVD screener 1 for video? at least give it a 5 if your going to bash it

thats because lamers can vote too

Posted by jdp on 01-07-2003 01:16 AM:

At least he clearly said he is judging by the jpg. I fear many people here say they judge from the sample or from actually watching it when they have only seen the jpg. That is much worse. Besides, whats the harm in judging by the jpg and posting what you think of it any way? Submitting a rating by only seeing the jpg is not acceptable, I agree, but let him talk about what the jpg looks like. Isn't that why the jpg is posted? So people can get a quick grasp of the quality? Sheesh.

Oh yeah, the movie sucks.

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Show all 9 posts from this thread on one page