VCDQuality Forums - Solaris - DVD SCR

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Solaris - DVD SCR - TcS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=14011)

Posted by wykidnk on 01-22-2003 05:33 AM:

C-0-0-L

WOw thanks for the great release. I read the imdb and i think ill grab this 1.

Posted by Jeomite on 01-22-2003 06:28 AM:

Was this movie any good? It looks quite stupid from the trailer, but the trailer doesn't always tell all...

Posted by bigcheder on 01-22-2003 06:47 AM:

just sampled the sample, quality is nice, but what else is expected from TcS...didnt see any messages or anything to hinder the film...looks good.

Thanks alot TcS

woot woot

bigc

9/9/?

Posted by TBA on 01-22-2003 07:33 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jeomite
Was this movie any good? It looks quite stupid from the trailer, but the trailer doesn't always tell all...

I thought it was great(watched the telesync). However I have a feeling most of the people who post/visit this forum will probably bash it. It's a little slow, but if you like philosophical films then take a chance.

I haven't seen this release, though(Re: Quality).

Posted by wisa on 01-22-2003 07:41 AM:

the quality is good

http://www.niuguo.com/niuguo_forum/attach/2002/10/27/74950-snap003-embed.jpg

http://www.niuguo.com/niuguo_forum/attach/2002/10/27/75240-snap004.jpg

NFO FILES:

http://www.niuguo.com/niuguo_forum/...reener.svcd.nfo

Posted by phate on 01-22-2003 07:45 AM:

Ah this has been up on vcdq for more than an hour and a half and nobody has voted on the quality...why you ask? cuz everybody here votes on the damn jpg until like 2 days after when like 2 or 3 people say they just watched the sample.

meh...gj TcS, im gonna grab this one.

9/9/?

Posted by PrOpANe on 01-22-2003 08:02 AM:

why do u need to get a quality rating anyways? its TcS and a dvd screener. We know what to expect of this.

__________________
-PrOpANe

Posted by fateswarm on 01-22-2003 08:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by phate
Ah this has been up on vcdq for more than an hour and a half and nobody has voted on the quality...why you ask? cuz everybody here votes on the damn jpg until like 2 days after when like 2 or 3 people say they just watched the sample.

meh...gj TcS, im gonna grab this one.

9/9/?

well, then don't pay attention to the markings, problem solved

Posted by FOS on 01-22-2003 08:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by phate
Ah this has been up on vcdq for more than an hour and a half and nobody has voted on the quality...why you ask? cuz everybody here votes on the damn jpg until like 2 days after when like 2 or 3 people say they just watched the sample.

meh...gj TcS, im gonna grab this one.

9/9/?

what quality? it's a dvd screener, dumbass.

Posted by FOS on 01-22-2003 08:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by TBA

I thought it was great(watched the telesync). However I have a feeling most of the people who post/visit this forum will probably bash it. It's a little slow, but if you like philosophical films then take a chance.

I haven't seen this release, though(Re: Quality).

i liked this movie a lot -- however, some people loved it, some hated it with a passion. i say download it, if you think its boring halfway through, delete it.

Posted by PrOpANe on 01-22-2003 09:34 AM:

i think the movie sucked ass =P

__________________
-PrOpANe

Posted by n0th1ng on 01-22-2003 09:39 AM:

damn good movie...thx for the rls

Posted by Bobby-Whiskey on 01-22-2003 10:04 AM:

The movie is too silent and uneventful for most people to like it. But i loved it, and i'm so glad a dvd screener is out.

Posted by Bobby-Whiskey on 01-22-2003 10:04 AM:

The movie is too silent and uneventful for most people to like it. But i loved it, and i'm so glad a dvd screener is out.

Posted by parasiticgann on 01-22-2003 10:30 AM:

woohoo

Don't know about the quality of the this release but its a damn good movie, one of the best of the year. Its not for people who like stupid action packed steven segal fake kung fu wannabe good but very lousy movies like XXX. its a deep movie, if your a complete dumb ass don't watch it cause you won't understand it. For those who aren't dumb asses watch it, you may like it.

Posted by mikeylikesit35 on 01-22-2003 01:56 PM:

I'm a dumbass...

Hey, I am offended...

I'm a dumbass and I liked this movie.

What gives?

Posted by shamelessbill on 01-22-2003 02:05 PM:

Yeah, people who think for themselves and dont like something you do are stupid.
This movie was a piece of crap, slow pointless Stanley Kubrick wannabee POS.
You want deep and thought provoking/intellectual? Watch adaptation and be blown away.

PS; fuck you parasite. Your handle is appropriate

Posted by mikeylikesit35 on 01-22-2003 02:18 PM:

Adaptation vs Solaris

Adapatation?

Man... that was a great movie BUT how much more pointless can you get.

It was intellectually entertaining, it just wasn't intellectually stimulating (like they intended).

The best part was watching Nic Cage play such a different type of role.

He really is a versatile actor.

Solaris?

great movie with dorky actors. I think they should have rewrote the screenplay to be 'Dusk til Dawn part 31214' with those actors.

Posted by parasiticgann on 01-22-2003 02:53 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by shamelessbill
Yeah, people who think for themselves and dont like something you do are stupid.
This movie was a piece of crap, slow pointless Stanley Kubrick wannabee POS.
You want deep and thought provoking/intellectual? Watch adaptation and be blown away.

PS; fuck you parasite. Your handle is appropriate

You seemed to have missed my point, I never said anyone had to like it, I think people should THINK. most people in general do not, thats why alot of movies like kangaroo jack, xxx, and many more movies where you don't have to use your brain come out. To be quite honest i saw adaptation that was a damn good movie, in my top 5 for the year. I have talked to quite a few people who have seen Solaris and didn't understand it. The question is why didn't they understand it? the movie is suppose to leave you with a wonder not a deffinate answer. Thats another reason some people don't like it.
The world would be a better place if people thought for them selves, instead we have movies like the fast and the furious comming out and kids try to be like the movie, another pointless but entertaining film. kids who try to act like the movies do not have thought for themselves. thats what todays youth is growing up on. if more thought provoking movies came out maybe people would start to think more. then again maybe not.
Oh thank you, i'm glad you feel the same way i do. "Your handle is appropriate."
No i'm off to get the movie. later all.

Posted by sandvic on 01-22-2003 03:27 PM:

Some people don't understand it because it's not a really good adaptation of the book, maybe they cut the explanation at the end of the book on purpose which I think it wasn't a good idea

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page