VCDQuality Forums - Star Trek Nemesis *INTERNAL* - SCREENER

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Trek Nemesis *INTERNAL* - SCREENER - ESOTERiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=15887)

Posted by Kid Hash on 03-01-2003 11:24 PM:

Looks very nice....if you could proper screeners, this would be one
Got a timer
Oh well, you can't have everything

Posted by kenshinx on 03-01-2003 11:36 PM:

:: stop commenting on jpgs and comment when you've seen the SAMPLE -M$

__________________

Posted by RAM on 03-02-2003 01:08 AM:

sample

looks sweet

timer not too bad

video/8
audio/8
film/7

best one to date

ok so im a trekkie

Posted by your name her on 03-02-2003 01:19 AM:

wow this is a awesome rls sound is a little weird for a screener but video is excellent

9/7/?

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by RAM on 03-02-2003 02:34 AM:

sounds ok to me

the sound is good ?

so is picture

maybe a little fuzzy round the edges

but a wicked release

nice one guys

Posted by MoNoXiDe on 03-02-2003 03:03 AM:

just droppin my opinion... picture was quit good actually... highly watchable... and the sound, though not crystal clear, still very good!!! 8/8/7... Straight Up!

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

Posted by Asterisk on 03-02-2003 04:21 AM:

The sound is excellent, in stereo too. The pic is nice, ticker don't bother me

8/8/6.

Posted by Jc100 on 03-02-2003 10:05 AM:

Question, the nfo says full screen and yet the sample is letter box. I know itll prob appear full screen on most tvs, but in acutality isnt this a widescreen release? Maybe im wrong, but idk. Someone add some light on this please.

Posted by Mr_Grinch on 03-02-2003 01:40 PM:

widescreen, I believe is classed as 1.85:1 or 2.35:1. This is definitely a FS release (4:3)... or closer to FS than WS anyway.

I think.
Maybe.

Posted by apache-vampir on 03-02-2003 08:10 PM:

well done!!!

really good rls- i may even watch this again
nice job!!

Posted by in-sites on 03-02-2003 10:09 PM:

Well I don't know what release ur watching, or ur not that fussy, but a screener is supposst to be alot better than this. The sound has bad crackling in it and the vhs sourse was so worn I can't read any creds. I've seen cams ten x better , cradle2 grave being a newer one. If I was esoteric I would hang my head in shame as to put my name on this release !!!

Sad Star Trek Fan still waiting for proper release.

Posted by Raven on 03-03-2003 01:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by in-sites
Well I don't know what release ur watching, or ur not that fussy, but a screener is supposst to be alot better than this. The sound has bad crackling in it and the vhs sourse was so worn I can't read any creds. I've seen cams ten x better , cradle2 grave being a newer one. If I was esoteric I would hang my head in shame as to put my name on this release !!!

Sad Star Trek Fan still waiting for proper release.

Damn,
dunno what rls YOU watched, but i have just seen the sample and yes its everything i could of hoped for.
On sample rating i give this:

Audio Good
Video Good
Movie Awesome

I think that people are becoming fussy since the awards screeners were rlsed.
People need to wake up and realise that sometimes DVD screeners are not always available.

Deffo one to watch again and again.

Posted by flashman on 03-03-2003 02:03 AM:

[flame edited out]

ALL I CAN SAY IS VIDEO IS AN 8 AUDIO 8 AND MOVIE 9

::your flames are not funny and not wanted. Please stick to the release. -K::

Posted by chocco on 03-03-2003 10:20 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by in-sites
Well I don't know what release ur watching, or ur not that fussy, but a screener is supposst to be alot better than this. The sound has bad crackling in it and the vhs sourse was so worn I can't read any creds. I've seen cams ten x better , cradle2 grave being a newer one. If I was esoteric I would hang my head in shame as to put my name on this release !!!

Sad Star Trek Fan still waiting for proper release.

One word for you ----> *INTERNAL*

basically that means the group thought the release was warranted for their own viewing, site ops, etc and not for critical whiners... This release was not intended as a proper hence the internal designation

If you don't want it don't download it.... A dvdrip will probably be out in another two months time..

Posted by scousethief on 03-03-2003 12:09 PM:

just watched it last night good vhs source very clear audio was perfect on my tv so i dunno what the complaints are about

i give it 8/8/5

story was below par full of holes especially about the android B4 didnt the writers watch the tv episodes if so why does everyone act like LOR never existed ?

Posted by phoR20 on 03-03-2003 11:25 PM:

kewl, a *real* screener

8/7/6

::Enough with the advertising... -FuzZ

Posted by B18C5 on 03-05-2003 01:11 AM:

Just finished watching this release and it's pretty good. Much better than the VERiTY version so I don't know why ESO didn't just proper. The only complaint I have is the white fuzzy thing at the top, the video encoding was great although a bit fuzzy, and I didn't notice any crackling audio. Overall 8/7/6

Posted by dtwizzy on 03-05-2003 04:02 AM:

nice

release was nice the other release was blury and had timer on it. however im a big trek fan and will wait on dvdrip then buy the dvd when it comes out. ( also other release was widescreen this is full screen ) oh well nice to see this geting out and ( INTERNAL witch shows class

7, 7, 9 ( in terms for scr -1 point for full screen =\ )

Posted by crapper on 03-05-2003 09:06 PM:

the best vcd i ve ever seen..
picture is amazing
and sound aswell..

very good work

love it..

internal?? well more kinda like proper..

jep black white on top..
in power dvd on dvd player non..
amazing rip
jus the start and cutting is a bit crude..

amazing
thats the word

ohh theres a counter
but not big and not annoying

i normally no longer post but this release was to good to be true ..

due to it being internal i'd posted a bit later..

but GET IT ALL
i love it..

Posted by jsl_lilbro on 03-06-2003 07:19 AM:

very nice quality. my .dat was unburnable and found 20 errors while fixing, don't know if its becasue of the place i got it from or what, so don't take my word for that. good quality on computer, and GREAT quality on my dvd. im telling ya, i was amazed. give this a 9 in quality, 9 for sound, and the movie wasn't so good, i had higher expecations.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 26 posts from this thread on one page