VCDQuality Forums - Willard - WORKPRINT

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Willard - WORKPRINT - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=16170)

Posted by CATBOX on 03-07-2003 11:25 PM:

Yeah, my first post

Great job on the release of the workprint before theatre release. Effects look decent in this movie, storyline looks to be lacking. Kind of reminds me of the old Dead alive movie. Thats a classic.

CATBOX

::Next time=ban -FuzZ::

Posted by MovieGod on 03-08-2003 12:06 AM:

acutally for a workprint this is nice, but movie story line was lacking big time.

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..

Posted by CcZ on 03-08-2003 02:00 AM:

Nice color, widescreen, good sound. Movie looks like a waste though, and also, the various signs on the top left, and the left aligned center, take this away from being perfect. 5/8/?(i assume a 1 or a 2, no greater)

Posted by OzZyOz on 03-08-2003 02:19 AM:

:sigh: obliously u people didn't see the original of this movie cause it was fucking great and I'm so happy they released this. Nice pic like a 7 sound is quite nice with a 7.5 and the movie if its like the original should be quite good. I don't know if I'll get this though on account of the 9/18/02 in the middle of the screen and since 1 or two scenes might be cut out. But thanx videocd.

PS- It Ain't Nuttin But A G-Thang Baby!

Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 03-08-2003 03:56 AM:

The video is actually pretty good, audio is great, date and blur in the middle are annoying but very easily ignored, and the others on the top and property tag on the bottom are easily ignored to, i kinda wanna see this one so i will wait for screener.

And for an extra note, the sample almost made me cry, i really dont want that rat to die

8/9/?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Posted by MovieGod on 03-08-2003 05:10 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by LiQuIdMuNkY
The video is actually pretty good, audio is great, date and blur in the middle are annoying but very easily ignored, and the others on the top and property tag on the bottom are easily ignored to, i kinda wanna see this one so i will wait for screener.

And for an extra note, the sample almost made me cry, i really dont want that rat to die

8/9/?

hehehehehehe..it does it does..

__________________
Re-incarnated as evil overlord..

Posted by SharkE- on 03-08-2003 05:17 AM:

WORKPRiNT has very good video - 7 sound is very decent 6 and overall the movie sucks-Na I would vote but i get this msg,
Your voting privileges have been revoked for abuse...
click here to explain why you voted 1/1/1 or 10/10/10's..

Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 03-08-2003 05:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MovieGod

hehehehehehe..it does it does..

NOOOOOOOO! I hate you, and i hate everything, it was his "mother", it shouldnt die!!!!!

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Posted by pHizZ on 03-08-2003 06:10 AM:

I voted 5/8/?.

Sound is great, as it IS a workprint. Video is ehhh... very blurry. Better than a TS, though, and I give VCD respect for the pre. I haven't watched the whole thing yet, but does anyone know if this workprint is missing anything? I.E. Special effects, scenes, costumes, etc..

Posted by brr8760 on 03-08-2003 09:59 AM:

Great job nailing a workprint. Quality is what others have said: very nice audio, video is a little blurred, ill-defined, but very watchable. (6/7/2) Unfortunately, I can't say the same about the movie. What a disappointment! As someone who really dug the original, this one is garbage-- every choice they made (except casting Crispin Glover) is wrong, and they even made Glover's character too obviously creepy, which destroys any chance of a compelling story. It's amateur hour, folks, what a waste.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.

Posted by Mekapo on 03-08-2003 06:45 PM:

Crispin Glover is an acting GOD. You must all bow before him. Sample is good, a little annoying with the blurs but u get used to em. I'm gonna pay for this one

Posted by Mystic Slippe on 03-08-2003 07:07 PM:

NASTY release. Blocky and pixelated to shittyness. The encoder was probably having a nervous breakdown when they did this.

Audio was lovely though. One thing though, whoever was responsible for encoding this and/or doing the s-blur's isn't gonna be around for long. That s-blur in the top right is fucked and you can see the numbers. The central blur is fucked too and you can make most of it out in certain scenes.

As with all WP's, the markings are annoying as hell, but nothing we can do about that and it doesn't deter that much.

I got this coz i worship Crispin "George McFly" Glover. But the movie looks poo and well, this release is nasty. Mad love for the pre though. Next time blur stuff properly.

4/7/?

Posted by edf on 03-08-2003 07:25 PM:

i agree with solbee rip fucking good shit

Posted by Jugalator on 03-08-2003 10:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SharkE-
WORKPRiNT has very good video - 7 sound is very decent 6 and overall the movie sucks-Na I would vote but i get this msg,
Your voting privileges have been revoked for abuse...
click here to explain why you voted 1/1/1 or 10/10/10's..

Perhaps you (or another user of your account) have previously voted like MJ_ has done in this release and the previous four (!) movies? That is: 1/1/1.

It amazes how no zero tolerance policy against 10x3 or 1x3 votes have been enforced yet. A 1x3 movie would be a movie with sound and visuals you can't hear or see and a plot that's the worst you've seen. If the movie isn't like that (which not even that crappy LOTR:TTT cam was), the voter is simply after abusing the vote system and vcdquality.com itself.

Posted by buttheaduk on 03-08-2003 11:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jugalator

It amazes how no zero tolerance policy against 10x3 or 1x3 votes have been enforced yet. A 1x3 movie would be a movie with sound and visuals you can't hear or see and a plot that's the worst you've seen. If the movie isn't like that (which not even that crappy LOTR:TTT cam was), the voter is simply after abusing the vote system and vcdquality.com itself.

hehe, the votes normally get deleted eventually

Posted by phoR20 on 03-09-2003 12:41 AM:

this movie is really shitty....lacking storyline bigtime

great for a workprint though

6.5/6.5/3

Posted by aXs-SVCD on 03-09-2003 01:46 AM:

ok got the total movie, Quality is good, Sound is awsome. cuase its workprint it has some watermark but onces u get with movie u wont really see any of the watermarks .

Mmmm i guess everyone has there own way of understanding this movie. It has its own way of story lines and one liners! as usual horror flix has like ( Kill him, till he dies ) or ( What u can't see a little blood?? )

This movie is Wierd, it wont make much sence now but in few years its gona be a good flick!

VideoCD bring more horror movies

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.

Posted by KrackZaa on 03-09-2003 02:51 AM:

The counters in the top right and left do not take away from the movie if you dont let them, the picture isnt bad, probably a 7, sound again not bad, 6, will be watching the whole thing now so cant comment on movie

tsg.ant

Posted by Kathartic on 03-09-2003 04:21 AM:

6/6/7

Good movie, rush encode job! Lots of block noise. Plot wise it was choppy, definitely an early draft. Note it is dated september 2002 and they finished shooting pick ups in January. The end for sure is not the final because in the theatrical version Willard doesn't die at the end (according to a Crispen Glover interview).

But hey, congrats on snagging a Work-Print...

Posted by your name her on 03-09-2003 04:25 AM:

nice job finding a wp i actually wanna see this movie

pic is good cept for all the counters but other then that good rls

THANX VIDEOCD

7/7/?

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page