VCDQuality Forums - Cradle 2 The Grave - SCREENER

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 37 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Cradle 2 The Grave - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=16511)

Posted by CyberZink on 03-14-2003 09:48 AM:

nIce

blatant first post. forum rules = instant ban -M$

Posted by PRiNT on 03-14-2003 09:48 AM:

Very impressive indeed...

Props.... MAD PROPS..

And damn nice quality too

7/7/10

Posted by magregus on 03-14-2003 09:51 AM:

average

6/7/7, rather big property of warner bros msg, also looks like 2nd gen VHS video, props tho for quick rls

Posted by Cable Boy on 03-14-2003 09:53 AM:

hmmm

7/7/?

its nice and all but the BIG LETTERS SAYIN PROPERT of WARNER BROS and the date gets annoying i wonder if it goes away? i doubt it....

Posted by CerealKid on 03-14-2003 09:57 AM:

Ya its aight.. Fast release. 7/7/7.5

__________________
Kill the FUCKIN RHINO.

Posted by B16A2 on 03-14-2003 10:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CerealKid
Ya its aight.. Fast release. 7/7/7.5

Holy shit, I'd advise users to stick with the CTP TS. There are 3 HUGE watermarks, faded colors, slightly pixelated and also the same motion blur problem as with most of VideoCD's encodes. Sound is ok, 6/7/5.

Posted by m-drew on 03-14-2003 10:06 AM:

Props for the quick screener, but Centropys SVCD was much better.

Who really wants to see white text tagged all over the picture. Bleh.

4/7/5

Posted by Evisu on 03-14-2003 10:30 AM:

nice qual. but , damn them is some big ass letters

Posted by dvdude on 03-14-2003 11:40 AM:

sound is very good! picture is fine if you watch in standalone and site a bit away from tv screen.. dont see why you guyz bash about watermarks.. dont like it.. wait till someone else rls the retail..

Posted by [dj-mike] on 03-14-2003 12:48 PM:

nice release, the watermarks are nothing, i'am gonna burn the full thing and watch it later.

Posted by ams30gts on 03-14-2003 12:54 PM:

stick to the release in question and save the flames for burger king -M$

Posted by PlanetSmasher on 03-14-2003 01:14 PM:

Nope, Actually seen the sample, and those letters are annoying. What a Waste really, it's a nice release, props to VideoCD for a quick screener release, but honestly who wants to watch a movie with all the tags on the screen taking up most the picture area.

CTP's version is just as clear, colorful, and complete, without all the biga$$ letters on the screen, I will be stickin with CTP's Release.

Posted by backoff on 03-14-2003 01:45 PM:

Well I think CTP's was clearer. It was bluer and darker though, but I would still take that over this... These watermarks are TERRIBLE! Stick with CTP, until a DVDSCR/DVDRip (yeah it is a LONG ass way away, but it will be better)
4/7/8

Posted by TommyGr on 03-14-2003 01:50 PM:

Looks good quality image....watermarks a problem..

8/7/?

Posted by aXs-SVCD on 03-14-2003 02:42 PM:

Just got the Sample, its not bad quality for VideoCD, sound is nice picture quality is good too! but i will stick with CTP rls for now

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.

Posted by Smurf Boy on 03-14-2003 04:36 PM:

Would be a great screener if it didn't have such huge watermarks, I'd take the CTP release over this one b/c of that. Other than that the sound and video are good... 6/7/4

Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 03-14-2003 04:54 PM:

the watermarks arent "terrible" they are so easily ignored...watch the sample and you would see that.
Pic is very slightly blurry and a little pixelated, audio is near perfect. Very nice job on the quick screener to.

8/9/?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Posted by dvdude on 03-14-2003 04:59 PM:

dont see why all ppl complaning about watermarks.. what can VideoCD do about em?.. nothing..

Posted by B16A2 on 03-14-2003 07:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dvdude
dont see why all ppl complaning about watermarks.. what can VideoCD do about em?.. nothing..

They could have tried to blur at least 1 or 2 watermarks and they could have internaled it so when another group does get a good copy it won't be nuked as dupe. That's what they could have done, the source is horrible and they should have known better.

Posted by LS_Gold on 03-14-2003 08:31 PM:

Just watched the sample, and like everyone else has said, the watermarks are hell. Other than that, good image quality, and great audio. (the sample has that Eminem song though.. bleh). Widescreen, too, so that's a bonus.

I already sat through the Centropy Telesync though, so I'm not going to waste my time again with this. Maybe if a clean screener comes out soon, but otherwise....

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49 AM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 37 posts from this thread on one page