VCDQuality Forums Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Show all 91 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- X-Men 2 *SUBBED* *MISLABELED CAM* - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=18522)


Posted by star on 05-01-2003 02:10 PM:

grabbed sample as soon as pred. stable tripod cam, very hollow sound, couldn't tell whether it was mislabled cam from sample. Vid was pretty dark in some places but maybe better if there was less light in my room. subs in chinese not too annoying.

6/5/?

- also wondering why it is 97mins when cinema release where i live is 130mins.

looking at the size of the cds it would seem that the nfo is wrong in time, as 1200mb + in vcd is 2hrs+


Posted by [dj-mike] on 05-01-2003 02:16 PM:

just watched sample, ok video and audio 6/7/?


Posted by jmur on 05-01-2003 02:20 PM:

pretty good for a first title release (except those damn subs, but oh well). 6/6/?. heres an interesting note. i work at a movie theatre, and in our computer we have x2 as being 2 1/2 hours long...in the nfo it has x2 just over 1 1/2 hours...so im not quite sure what the story is there.
-jmur


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 05-01-2003 02:21 PM:

Blah. Mislabeled CAM. Dark pic (although pretty clear with no blurring, mozaicing or artifacts), subs are annoying embedded on the bottom 1/4 of the pic.

Audio is hollow as hell. I'll dl it now to watch tonight, but will hold off burning it incase something else comes along.

5/4/7

EDIT: Watched it all now. DEFINITE CAM, audience laughter can be heard a few times. Good stuff though and a good movie if a little long.


Posted by [psycho] on 05-01-2003 02:26 PM:

video is ok, sound is very sucky

6/4/?


Posted by Uman on 05-01-2003 02:30 PM:

Mislabeled CAM

as for the eso release... pic is very dark and the sound sucks
5/3/10


Posted by zcar on 05-01-2003 02:30 PM:

mislabelled cam

the pic is ok bit dark but yes the subs look annoying
this was capped last night so im guessing
uti? today?


Posted by InSaNeOnE on 05-01-2003 03:02 PM:

Vid's ok = 6
Sound very muffled but hearable = 5
Movie = ?

Gonnawatch it later.


Posted by brr8760 on 05-01-2003 03:23 PM:

Congrats ESO for nailing the first watchable release of this biggie. Subs mean NOTHING to me-- counters and scrolling warnings are far more intrusive than Chinese (?) subtitles. THANKS!!!!

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by snowy1998 on 05-01-2003 03:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jmur
pretty good for a first title release (except those damn subs, but oh well). 6/6/?. heres an interesting note. i work at a movie theatre, and in our computer we have x2 as being 2 1/2 hours long...in the nfo it has x2 just over 1 1/2 hours...so im not quite sure what the story is there.
-jmur



I am pretty sure it is just a typo in the .nfo, the release weighs in at 84 x 15mb rars which gives 1260 MB. As a rough rule of thumb a vcd is around 9mb per min which gives a running time of around 140mins which allowing for variations in the compression of the rar files is close enough to the actual running time of 133m34s to make me think it is the full film.


Posted by Faldo777 on 05-01-2003 03:37 PM:

Some very fussy people out there .. judging from the sample I think this is a good realease and I'm looking forward to watching it .. who cares about subs!! I've seen a lot worse without them getting good scores


Posted by insyder19 on 05-01-2003 03:38 PM:

looks pretty fine for a first release.


Posted by Smurf Boy on 05-01-2003 03:50 PM:

Nice early release ESO. Though I won't be grabbing this release since the pic is a little too dark and the audio is much too cammy for a movie such as this. 5/4/?


Posted by nicci on 05-01-2003 03:56 PM:

6/6/8

lol, funny movie, nice ending, wait of part 3


Posted by Rezneck on 05-01-2003 04:06 PM:

Watched sample, watchable but sound is below average. Saw this at the movies couple of days ago, it rocks. Ill hold out for a better rls of this tho.......Bring on RELOADED!!!!!!


Posted by bakageta on 05-01-2003 04:10 PM:

Tolerable video quality, though a bit dark. Horrible Audio, definately a Cam, and not a direct audio source. Subs are a minor annoyance, but at least the subs don't block out a quarter of the screen with a black background, they're just overlayed on the picture. Props on a quick release, lots of people will be all over this, but I think I'll hold out for something with better audio. 6/3/?.


Posted by Movieguy on 05-01-2003 05:38 PM:

k

Well this is pretty bad overall quality

5/4/?

I wont be downloading any rls of this movie i will be paying to watch in theatres this is the kind of movie that any rls other then a dvd would be worthless watching its a must see theatre movie


Posted by petrocs on 05-01-2003 05:49 PM:

To the first post Star..its probably missing scenes..a few eso's releases have been missing chunks of movie

quality is shite..its a cam not a TS.

sound is very hollow as stated before

video is dark also stated before by many others

4/3/?

If you dont go see this in the theater then you're sad

and to Hadu..
#1 WAIT until you reply posts..stop hitting submit more than once
#2 how u voting 9 on the movie if you havent seen it in the theaters yet?

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005


Posted by Evisu on 05-01-2003 06:14 PM:

6/4/?

pic seems pretty decent from what i can tell
yes a little on the dark side but watchable imho

sound aint to clever cammy n echoey

but hey

X MEN 2 BABBBYYYYYYYYYY


Posted by Bullet on 05-01-2003 06:28 PM:

I just watched the whole movie. And no..i dont wanna goi to the theater;..bought this pc with my cinemamoney

I think it's a veryy good qual for a first release. Ofcourse it's not all excelent but what u guys think;..first rls would be dvdrip?
I remember the first rls of latest 007 and that was reall garbage. This is viewable and for those who cant wait;..watch it.

6/5,5/9


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM. Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Show all 91 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.