VCDQuality Forums
Show all 14 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- INTERNAL (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=29)
-- Daredevil *FS* *iNTERNAL* *PDVD* - DVD SCR - ONS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=19081)


Posted by Krad on 05-11-2003 09:11 PM:

wow, shitty movie... this would hold me off till dvd release except i will never watch it... never ever make a movie about a blind man superhero pleease im begining these picture producers, dont do it !!!!

8/8/.5

edit: I wish you could vote 0 cuz this movie was a waste of my time on earth...


Posted by PhilD on 05-11-2003 09:16 PM:

Yup good quality video/sound, shame about FS but can't complain... not gonna get this as the movie sucked though... going by the sample running side to side with the screener released a couple of days ago by TEG-VCD this is better quality (not to surprising really ).

- oops forgot score

8/8/4


Posted by buttheaduk on 05-11-2003 09:59 PM:

Great picture/sound. Pity about it being FS though



9/9/6


Posted by krazyfoo on 05-11-2003 10:07 PM:

uh .. u mean FS?


and... i smell somethin fishy. i may be delusional but color and angle both seem a lil funny. its pretty clear tho. and i wont be grabbin it .. but just smelllls fishy

__________________
NFO Jones stole my bike


Posted by Leigh^ on 05-11-2003 10:08 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by buttheaduk
Great picture/sound. Pity about it being WS though



9/9/6



Just curious about the vote on the sound, because this is almost identical to PosTX's release, ie: from a pdvd source.
The sound is actually muffled, and the picture is slighty stretched I think.

6/5/4


Posted by Stabbe on 05-11-2003 10:26 PM:

lol @ u guys about the quality , it´s not even near DVDscreener , it´s a PDVD , smurf audio , stretched pic , badly converted pal to ntsc or vice versa . lol , just my say.

__________________
"i think i am getting hacked. my modem lights are flashing..."


Posted by NightCrawler on 05-12-2003 12:29 AM:

3rd disc is a waste, could have easily made it 2 discs.


Posted by buttheaduk on 05-12-2003 01:31 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by NightCrawler
3rd disc is a waste, could have easily made it 2 discs.


It could be but then again the quality would be downgraded!

The vcdq jpeg dose not do this release any justice. Comment off the sample


Posted by jmur on 05-12-2003 07:30 PM:


edit: the movie itself wasnt THAT bad...anyways, i thought the quality was excellent. this will do me good until the dvdrip.
8.5/8/6
-jmur


Posted by MoNoXiDe on 05-12-2003 08:56 PM:

Well... Its iNTERNAL So Most Wont Have Access To It... I Got The Sample... Well Done IMO... The Pic Was A Little Blue... A 8 On That... The Sound A Little Muffled... That Gets A 7... Movie I Gave A 5... Won't Be Getting This One, But Very Nicely Done ONS... The Situation Between You And OBUS Needs Maybe A Little Bit More Support... Only Because 2 Releases Of The Retail DVD Movie Were Released In DiVX/XViD Format... One By DMT (Didnt Spread Well) And Another By ViM (Which Was Internal)... Only A Day Or Two After The Obus... They Were RETAiL.. So Isnt it Possible That Obus Had A Real Source? Not Saying They Didnt Tag Your Release With Thier Name... But Isnt It At Least Possible That It Could Have Been Legit?

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..


Posted by buttheaduk on 05-12-2003 09:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by EnigmaV2.0
The Situation Between You And OBUS Needs Maybe A Little Bit More Support... Only Because 2 Releases Of The Retail DVD Movie Were Released In DiVX/XViD Format... One By DMT (Didnt Spread Well) And Another By ViM (Which Was Internal)... Only A Day Or Two After The Obus... They Were RETAiL.. So Isnt it Possible That Obus Had A Real Source? Not Saying They Didnt Tag Your Release With Thier Name... But Isnt It At Least Possible That It Could Have Been Legit?


Their release size was identical! The majority of divx/xvid releases are done by shit for brains re-encoding groups! --- Vim who released this are not shit for brains!


Posted by Butch on 05-13-2003 04:10 PM:

???????????????????????????????

OK seen the sample,looks almighty good.But how are you guys watching the film.I cant MPEG CD1 as VCDgear will not allow it.The PC and 2 DVD players will not play it when burned from bin/cue?.

__________________


Posted by jmur on 05-13-2003 05:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Butch


OK seen the sample,looks almighty good.But how are you guys watching the film.I cant MPEG CD1 as VCDgear will not allow it.The PC and 2 DVD players will not play it when burned from bin/cue?.



read the nfo.


Posted by Krad on 05-13-2003 06:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by buttheaduk


Their release size was identical! The divx/xvid releases were done by shit for brains re-encoding groups!




Hmmmm, Good point Butheaduk....
yah does look like OBUS jacked their release... heh too bad


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 AM.
Show all 14 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.