VCDQuality Forums
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Bulletproof Monk *INTERNAL* *CAM* *SVCD* - CAM - Cheetah-DV (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=19376)


Posted by jmur on 05-16-2003 06:23 PM:

not really a need to SVCD a cam, but nonetheless, a nice first release. pic is good, audio is a little bit shallow, but overall the release is definately watchable. still waiting for a svcd matrix....come on ctp!
6.5/6/4
-jmur


Posted by Butch on 05-16-2003 06:34 PM:

Eh?

There's an SVCD PDVD by solution out there if you look for it,why bother with this?.
BulletProof.Monk.PDVD.SVCD-Solution

Sorry Just read NFO

__________________


Posted by mgrd on 05-16-2003 06:36 PM:

READ THE DAMN INFO BEFORE YOU START BITCHIN ABOUT THEIR RLS THEY HAVE AN EXPLANATION FOR IT

__________________

quote:
Pho:
i'll shout for the umpteenth time to have a patch applied to stop non 10+ posters from pming..... maybe it'll get installed this time :/

VCDz:
So thats why I havent been getting any PM's lately lol. I used to get tons of Req. PM's from users w/ no posts. TY pHo!

kalvaitis007:
I'm pretty sure you need to stop smoking weed. pHo hasn't been able to get that taken care of yet. Unless MY reading comprehension skills are screwed up.

-K



Posted by faYth on 05-16-2003 09:13 PM:

why not release. i think we needed this rls. im sorry but i like to watch ENGLISH movies in ENGLISH. i dont like to have to read my movies


Posted by Debo on 05-16-2003 09:53 PM:

i been waiting for a good release of this movie but i guess ill continue waiting
7/7

about the dvd i dont think anyone whants to watch this in mandarian audio

__________________


Posted by pezley on 05-16-2003 10:01 PM:

BulletProof.Monk.PDVD.SVCD-Solution is a dvd rip with english subs... was released today

anyway back to the release

pretty darn nice pic ..

sound is average for a cam


keep it up .. get a direct audio and it would be awsome


Posted by Wesb0b on 05-16-2003 10:35 PM:

yay now i dont have to watch what they say while i try to watch all the jackie chan like flying around shit. Good quality. Pic is dam nice. Shame about the crop thow

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel


Posted by [RaZoR] on 05-16-2003 11:47 PM:

i read the nfo but still a not-needed-rls imo.
why dont take the mandarin rip and put english audio over it?
foreign groups do that often.

__________________
no idea


Posted by tumtum on 05-17-2003 12:13 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by [RaZoR]
i read the nfo but still a not-needed-rls imo.
why dont take the mandarin rip and put english audio over it?
foreign groups do that often.


I think the point of this release is to get comments on the quality, as they state in the nfo. If they would have taken the mandarin rip, then they would be a) stealing and b) not getting comments on the cam quality.


Posted by Debo on 05-17-2003 12:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dune
why bother release this when you can download this Bulletproof.Monk.DVDRip.DiVX.SCREENER-NovaVCD


my bad i didnt know aparently theres a english dvd rip of this movie by NovaVCD

:: yes even though its been nuked for being wank... didn't the dirname give you a hint? - cC.

__________________


Posted by vcdvet on 05-17-2003 01:11 AM:

Not Too Bad

hmmm,

I would have to say the quality aint bad at all for a cam, but still... a scr will come soon so i wont bother getting this flick.

7/7/? From Sample


Posted by Krad on 05-17-2003 02:01 AM:

lmfao

Is this some kinda joke?

- This release isn't in Bin/Cue format due to the fact we're
incompetent and the fact most people prefer mpegs.
We'll be watching the usual places (VCDQuality mainly) for feedback

Why be in the scene in general... anyways, the divx is much better scenes are all the same as american version so just use a diff sound source and you got pie encode to vcd and burn that dont waste your time on shit like this....
just my opinion and feed back
5.5/5/6


Posted by DiSRUPToR on 05-17-2003 03:52 AM:

wow... the nfo explains nothing..... why DID cheetah rls this gruesome cam at such a late stage? they could have at least tried a newer movie...

:: actually the nfo says its to get feedback before they do any other movies. and it sounds like you're judging from the jpg anyway.

anyhow, don't bother with this, there's better rls's floating around.. damn even kazaa users could do better than this

:: again, the nfo says there's already been a few releases of this movie so just ignore this release as its internal for a good reason.

3/3/5

__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.


Posted by timmoy on 05-17-2003 05:25 PM:

No VCDquality isnt the place where groups look for feedback

They mean inside the group u fool , If its Internal its not even meant to be released to the general public (this shud be the Internal section anyway , shudnt it?)


Thankgod the mods have some patience on here , Cause u are idiots

Its a real gud cam for a first attempt . I havent got the release in full cause i dont one it . But respect Cheetah , Hope we see more from u guys . To the guys who said do a later release , Err lets gointo a packed theatre for a first atempt , I think not

This film sucks anyways


Posted by tumtum on 05-17-2003 06:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by timmoy
No VCDquality isnt the place where groups look for feedback

They mean inside the group u fool , If its Internal its not even meant to be released to the general public (this shud be the Internal section anyway , shudnt it?)


Thankgod the mods have some patience on here , Cause u are idiots

Its a real gud cam for a first attempt . I havent got the release in full cause i dont one it . But respect Cheetah , Hope we see more from u guys . To the guys who said do a later release , Err lets gointo a packed theatre for a first atempt , I think not

This film sucks anyways


Actually their release contains a sample from xmen 2 which was even better quality then bulletproof monk (better sound), so they did go into a packed cinema.


Posted by rich200 on 05-18-2003 12:37 AM:

i thought it was a good svcd

not mint but then we got to have a bit of room between svcd and divix dvdr ect


Posted by strawhair on 05-18-2003 02:09 AM:

4/4/7
although something i cant understand-svcd never bothers me-why does it bother some of you guys-whether it be svcd or vcd it is still 2 cd's used?.


Posted by Leigh^ on 05-18-2003 11:31 AM:

People generally tend to moan about SVCD with lower quality films, because it fills up a cd completly, ie: 80Mins = 800Mb, whereas if it was VCD it would only peak at something like 600 odd Mb, again this doesn't really bother me, it just comes down to peoples opinions on it.

Good pic, shame about the cropping, good sound.

7/6/5


Posted by 50Cent on 05-19-2003 04:10 AM:

Give them a break, I know SVCD cam isnt the best thing, but it isnt that bad. If there was no DVDRip, you wouldnt be bitching (Oh wait you would... it is vcdq LOL). Nice try Cheetah, but dont do SVCD for cams .
6/5/3


Posted by tumtum on 05-19-2003 09:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by 50Cent
Give them a break, I know SVCD cam isnt the best thing, but it isnt that bad. If there was no DVDRip, you wouldnt be bitching (Oh wait you would... it is vcdq LOL). Nice try Cheetah, but dont do SVCD for cams .
6/5/3


What's the big difference between a cam and a telesync and why should a telesync be allowed in svcd format? It's the sound that differs cams from telesyncs and not the video, so why is it so terrible to release a cam in svcd format? If the group had mislabeled the thing and called it telesync, then noone would bitch.

There is a lot off possibilities that should be explored now that technology is advancing. centropy's telesyncs are a good example, and deity released a few divx telesyncs. Why isnt the scene open for new possibilities that might possibly give better quality?


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 AM.
Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.