VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Rugrats Go Wild *TS* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=21746)


Posted by SneakySix on 06-17-2003 06:03 AM:

DUPE...

Come on ctp, your not immune to scene tags


NUKED..

BOO!


Posted by jmur on 06-17-2003 07:13 AM:

sound was horrible in NOX release. even tho it is only a cartoon, it still deserves decent quality. shoulda been labeled a proper IMO. nice release.
8.5/8/?
-jmur

::edit // after reviewing the sample again, i realized that the video rating i gave the sample was wayyyy too high. 7/8.5/?::


Posted by Cable Boy on 06-17-2003 07:30 AM:

i agree this should have been a proper better sound video is a bit on the bright side but oh well.
8/8/?


Posted by ikobo on 06-17-2003 07:44 AM:

no centropy didnt dube it ... vcdq just decided to tag it that way
its lame ..centropys quality blows all the other groups away
and to lable proper or internal ..makes the name huge i like just seeing it the plain way.. and im sure alot of other do also
but why lable it a dube couse 2 groups released some horrid versions and vcdq decides 2 lable it a dupe..just leave them alone i dont see one site nuke them its spread everywhere just by the name.. u see the name.. u know its good.. leave it at that
the dube thing is lame.especialy 2 a group that is all about quality only... and is this site not about quality?


Posted by your name here on 06-17-2003 07:50 AM:

too bright pic isnt that good...
sounds is better on this then the nox version


6/8/6

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by Debo on 06-17-2003 07:57 AM:

pretty good
7/7

__________________


Posted by Dirty on 06-17-2003 08:10 AM:

C'mon Centropy...
You guys could have done better.
The picture is bright as hell though, and the sound sure beats NOX's release of this. This also appears to be at an angle, you can see the 'curtain' on the top left of the video. CAM's really suck huh..

well anyway, you guys could have done better in my opinion.
6/6/X


Posted by Mercenary13 on 06-17-2003 08:39 AM:

now we got one with good video *nox* and one with good sound *ctp* put em together and good telesync or don't bother just a kids movie and how many lil kids pick at quality that you know?


Posted by Kim on 06-17-2003 08:48 AM:

have any of you even seen this? it's cropped to hell to try and remove terrible fisheye (still visible) , sound far better than other release but i for one find it reasonably important to be able to see the characters heads, this version you don't get that as someone chopped them off.


Posted by OdarO on 06-17-2003 09:35 AM:

I am pretty sure my kids would notice if the characters heads where missing


Posted by brr8760 on 06-17-2003 12:22 PM:

Watching this as I write-- it's pretty simple, really. 1st version had wretched sound, this version has great sound. DUPE? I don't see how, maybe they used some magic to get rid of the people walking around in front of the screen...

Either way, I label this a FAST, high-quality release and I label myself VERY grateful to CTP, as does my little boy.


Posted by Mouth_Full21 on 06-17-2003 03:03 PM:

all in all... it ain't a bad rls... and as ikobo said..it's CTP... who gives a shi-ite... It is gonna be everywhere anways... as for the rls
8/9/?


Posted by NightKid49 on 06-17-2003 04:47 PM:

is this really ctp? WTF?!

pic looks like it was encoded at 16bits, looks too bright, and theres a bit of an angle. sound is a huge improvement, tho.

and what the hell happened to the nfo? old one was much better.

5/8/8


Posted by ophir on 06-17-2003 05:53 PM:

8 / 8 / 5 a bit too bright, but i rather go with this one than nox's which is a bit dark, plus the sound is way better.


Posted by Tweezer on 06-18-2003 02:50 AM:

blah

6/8/?


Posted by kenshinx on 06-18-2003 03:49 AM:

7/8/?

its a bit bright boys =] but hell...havent u ever heard of menu on ur tv =] u can tone the brightness down..i did...makes it look better =]

__________________


Posted by KrackZaa on 06-20-2003 05:19 AM:

have the whole release and i think that its not quite up to par with centropy's standards on video, but still very exceptable. sound as always is what sets them apart, very good clear and crisp, definitely beats nox out.

7.5/8.5/might watch it lata

twanBiz


Posted by CrazY4MoVyZ on 06-20-2003 07:39 AM:

Smile

just watched, much better than the other release, video and sound.

8/9/8


Posted by L-B-A on 06-21-2003 12:14 AM:

Thumbs up

great rls......pic sorta bright sound is ok....

7/8/x

__________________
what is it with you massively oversized sigs?

JUKED


Posted by djjase on 06-21-2003 12:18 AM:

The movie was cool for the kiddies. The quality was video was very good and auido was even better. I rate it the way you should...

8/9/7 on the TV!!!

6.5/9/7 on the PC!!! (Here is where the brightness was noticed it looked fine on the TV)

Thank you CTP for releasing a good copy of a kids flick!

__________________
<font size=2 font color="Black" face="Impact">3.0 mbit connection $1.25 a day
CD-R's $0.30 a piece
Popcorn $1.00 per bag
Soda $0.42 a can
Watching a movie for free on the comfort of my own couch not matter who released it - PRICELESS!!!

Stop fucking bitching and go to theatre then you fucking dumbasses...</font><br>


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.